[HN Gopher] Predict 3D position of flying bugs and pest to shoot...
___________________________________________________________________
Predict 3D position of flying bugs and pest to shoot down them with
a laser
Author : giuliomagnifico
Score : 38 points
Date : 2021-12-31 20:51 UTC (2 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.naro.go.jp)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.naro.go.jp)
| jjcm wrote:
| It says the prediction is accurate to 1.4cm, but it doesn't say
| at what range. 1.4cm at 1km is great, but 1.4cm at 1m likely
| isn't usable.
|
| I'm also curious what the failsafes are like for this - how will
| they prevent laser spillover or misfires from hitting eyes? Even
| if this is a 1 in a million chance, it likely isn't worth it
| except in highly remote areas.
| carbocation wrote:
| In a flat area, you could imagine designing a system so that it
| couldn't aim below horizon, and then mount it 10-15 feet up to
| mitigate the risk of blinding.
| skykooler wrote:
| That sounds like a big risk to aircraft.
| TheDudeMan wrote:
| How long of a pulse is required to disable an insect? How
| long to be a danger to airplane pilots?
| yakshaving_jgt wrote:
| This sounds very similar to that old idea for protecting African
| families from female _Aedes Aegypti_ mosquitoes[0].
|
| I think the idea never took off, and I'm still not sure why.
|
| [0]: https://youtu.be/hqKafI7Amd8
| the_only_law wrote:
| Everytime this idea comes up, I can't imagine a laser powerful
| enough to kill even small insects not running the risk of
| collateral damage, burning things around it.
| niccl wrote:
| IIRC (can't find a reference), the idea was noty to be able
| to kill teh mosquitoes outright, but to damage their wings so
| they couldn't fly. _Much_ less power needed.
|
| Still an issue, though, but not so bad
| DJBunnies wrote:
| Like my retinas.
| solidsnack9000 wrote:
| Maybe if several low power lasers were fired together, to
| converge at the predicted position, it would moderate the
| risk of collateral damage. Even a few millimeters away from
| the target position, the radiative flux (W/m2) would be much
| lower, likely at safe levels.
| jacquesm wrote:
| Firestarter for sure.
| mattbee wrote:
| The illustration is hilarious - appears to be a gigawatt laser
| scoring a hit on Mothra.
| consp wrote:
| Ah yes, the "star wars laser defense mosquito system". It' as
| impractical then (early 00's origin) as it is now
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGkPMZxWPpA&t=2s (it's Dutch but
| you get it).
|
| Unless you can get mm accuracy and perfect non-foe detection it's
| useless with the multi-watt lasers generally required.
| jacquesm wrote:
| That video is absolutely hilarious, a total spoof on all those
| tell-sell nonsense videos they would play at night on idle
| channels of the local cable TV systems.
| kurthr wrote:
| One key thing is that flying bugs might be hiding under leaves,
| which doesn't even require any tracking, but matching their
| favorite plants... and hopefully scaring them with an optical
| flash so they can be tracked.
| toomuchtodo wrote:
| Beacon lights to draw them out?
| bee_rider wrote:
| We can only take that sort of thinking so far before we
| reinvent the bug zapper.
| toomuchtodo wrote:
| Bug zapper _at a distance_.
|
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0C5vkbtpdN4
|
| https://patents.google.com/patent/US20100186284A1/en
| bee_rider wrote:
| Oh neat, you can even see their horrible little mosquito
| ghosts go shooting out of their cursed bodies. (it is OK
| to be completely spiteful toward mosquitos, right? They
| are like the #1 all-time human killer)
| snek_case wrote:
| Should be possible to modulate the intensity of the laser
| pretty easily with a modern diode-based laser (so that you
| can avoid damaging the plant).
| giuliomagnifico wrote:
| I think this system (laser) will work from the ground (where
| there're the crops) to the sky, before the bugs will touch the
| leaves, not froun ground to ground level. So there will be no
| trouble in shoot down the bugs when they're flying some meters
| above the ground.
| fareesh wrote:
| if a spray is used the radius would be wide enough to catch i
| suspect - as opposed to a laser
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-12-31 23:00 UTC)