[HN Gopher] DeepCreamPy- Decensoring Hentai with Deep Neural Net...
___________________________________________________________________
DeepCreamPy- Decensoring Hentai with Deep Neural Networks (2018)
Author : acqbu
Score : 242 points
Date : 2021-12-30 13:46 UTC (9 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (github.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (github.com)
| ramesh31 wrote:
| spurtrenolds wrote:
| What a ridiculous comment
|
| So much of our technologies have been built or adapted to
| enhance and/or fulfil our desires, including sexual desires, it
| is puzzling to me why you think women are somehow excluded from
| this. Your post smacks of a modern puritanism.
| ramesh31 wrote:
| > So much of our technologies have been built or adapted to
| enhance and/or fulfil our desires, including sexual desires,
| it is puzzling to me why you think women are somehow excluded
| from this. Your post smacks of a modern puritanism.
|
| It's a question of venue. There's nothing wrong with the tech
| itself. Don't bring this up on HN. We have enough trouble
| fighting the stereotype of the misogynistic porn watching
| computer nerd as it is. Women are overwhelmingly offended by
| pornography (particularly hentai, which is very commonly
| focused on incest and pedophilia), and especially in a
| setting that is supposedly professional. Of course there are
| always exceptions to any rule. It just really bothers me to
| see the casual locker room conversation here that is so toxic
| to having an inclusive community.
| throwaway425260 wrote:
| >Don't bring this up on HN.
|
| What? Why? This is interesting. As a woman the _only_ thing
| that offends me in "tech" is people who don't treat me as
| a person, but rather as a "woman in tech." I am _person._ I
| am just as good as you. I don 't need some strong man to
| protect me from the big, scary world of the impolite
| hentai-masturbating nerds. Throwaway since I want to tell
| you to go fuck yourself. Yes, even women know those words,
| thank you very much.
| ramesh31 wrote:
| It's not just a question of male/female, but of
| inclusiveness. As a minority, I see the same thing. The
| problem with tech is the white/asian male dominated frat
| house culture that pervades it from the point of college
| all the way to large companies. And anything that
| perpetuates that is unwelcome in a professional
| environment in my opinion.
| smegsicle wrote:
| > Women are overwhelmingly offended by pornography
|
| This can be changed- it's merely cultural, right?
|
| Bigots of either sex need to get over pornophobia for
| culture to progress.
| quincy_holden wrote:
| How was it possible that you typed all this out, read it
| over, and still didn't see the irony in what you were
| saying?
|
| We are absolutely incredibly offended by porn. So thank you
| for speaking out to protect us women! I see that another
| woman has already told you to fuck off, so I'll spare you
| that.
| yoyohello13 wrote:
| Plenty of women enjoy Hentai.
| [deleted]
| mdni007 wrote:
| What a strange thing to say. Do you even know any women? Women
| watch porn and hentai too.
| wiseowise wrote:
| Oh yeah, because only men watch porn and hentai.
| ramesh31 wrote:
| >Oh yeah, because only men watch porn and hentai.
|
| Nope. But what is the breakdown, 70/30 at best? There's
| nothing wrong with watching porn. It's just that having a
| casual "frat house" culture like this where people feel fine
| sharing these things in a supposedly professional environment
| inevitably leads to women being ostracized or alienated. The
| majority who disagree get labelled as boring or buzzkills and
| are excluded from the group, while the minority who go along
| are held up as examples to make them feel bad (we're not
| misogynistic! look!) like you pointed out.
| 0x0nyandesu wrote:
| You know what actually drove my fiance out of tech? Sitting
| in front of a computer all day till her health, looks, and
| worth as a women became threatened because instead of being
| fit, taking care of her body, and practicing self care she
| would instead have to do what most men do and just sit all
| day.
|
| She has made commits to the Linux kernel that have been
| merged and she loves hentai and porn but is no longer in
| tech because she literally makes more money being a cam
| girl and it's way more fun.
|
| Tldr: stop trying to white knight. It's neither warranted
| nor welcome.
| ramesh31 wrote:
| >She has made commits to the Linux kernel that have been
| merged and she loves hentai and porn but is no longer in
| tech because she literally makes more money being a cam
| girl and it's way more fun.
|
| I'd argue this proves my point though. Your fiance is
| someone who conformed to the existing male dominated
| culture and succeeded despite the structural roadblocks
| in place. But the other 50% of women who may have
| otherwise made a career in this industry were driven out.
| 0x0nyandesu wrote:
| > But the other 50% of women who may have otherwise made
| a career in this industry were driven out.
|
| [Citation Needed]
| ramesh31 wrote:
| My point being that there's no reason engineering teams
| shouldn't be 50/50 male/female, but the reality is more
| like 90/10. Why does the other 40% never show up despite
| our best efforts? It's cultural.
| wiseowise wrote:
| Maybe because they don't apply?
| 0x0nyandesu wrote:
| It's wild seeing nerds on HN bend over backwards to
| justify themselves when the truth is that fewer women
| want to do the job. Not because they aren't capable but
| because they just don't want to.
| jptech wrote:
| Not the latest on censorship. Couple of months ago someone was
| arrested for decensoring porn and putting it on their website.[1]
| With Deepfake and all the latest GANs, anyone can probably do it
| with an acceptable quality. It's just that the sale and
| distribution of such material will remain illegal in Japan for
| the forseeable future.
|
| [1] https://www.vice.com/en/article/xgdq87/deepfakes-japan-
| arres...
| [deleted]
| swayvil wrote:
| Doesn't work with nipples or anuses.
|
| Is it just a matter of what the NN is trained for?
| cs702 wrote:
| A new front in the long-running battle between censors and those
| who oppose censorship.
|
| The use of deep neural networks for this purpose seems
| inevitable, in hindsight.
|
| We live in interesting times.
| marderfarker2 wrote:
| How do you recover information that is not there? Best you can
| do is guess what's supposed to be there.
|
| That's why I hate watching 4K AI "enhanced" historical films,
| it is akin to rewriting history.
| mayapugai wrote:
| Long story short, these algorithms aren't recovering
| information that was lost. They reconstruct the images by
| guessing what should've been there. So, you're not violating
| any information theoretic concept.
|
| But this means the guesses can be incorrect, although the
| likelihood of that happening can be greatly reduced with good
| training data.
| feanaro wrote:
| I never heard of this before. What kind of enhancing does the
| AI do?
| [deleted]
| Jhsto wrote:
| It tries to predict patterns from blurry shots. It might
| introduce artifacts that were never there: some drawings I
| upscaled turned distant woods into houses. You can see why
| this might be bad when viewing something for historical
| accuracy.
|
| See e.g., https://www.topazlabs.com and
| https://github.com/nagadomi/waifu2x
| gaze wrote:
| Imagine putting this on your resume.
| delusional wrote:
| I think the tone of the interview is going to depend heavily on
| the first impression. A well rounded person with good personal
| hygiene would make this seem like a fun and weird project. If
| the person is a total misfit neckbeard, it's going to be less
| fun and quirky, and more worrying.
| vmception wrote:
| Then you immediately pass the culture fit test
| DaftDank wrote:
| Plot twist: He's applying at Pornhub next, and this gets him
| instantly hired.
| luckman212 wrote:
| Out of curiosity, how many Pornhub'ers are also here on HN?
| (I mean employees, not users haha)
| amitport wrote:
| The company is mindgeek and AFAIKT they outsource (/ use
| subcontracts / off the shelves tools) in most of their
| operations.
| smoe wrote:
| They do have a lot of open positions in SRE and
| development, from the job descriptions it doesn't sound
| like just outsourcing.
|
| https://www.mindgeek.com/careers/
|
| They do a pretty good job at never mentioning anything
| related to porn. So I guess in most cases it won't be a
| problem on someone's cv
| Debug_Overload wrote:
| I remember the AMA one of their devs did on Reddit a few
| years ago, it was interesting.
| marnett wrote:
| I believe the company is referred to as MindGeek.
| politelemon wrote:
| > The user colors cencored regions green in an image editing
| program like GIMP or Photoshop. A neural network fills in the
| censored regions.
|
| This will have limited use as it would require highly motivated
| individuals with enough time to go through their collections.
|
| Speculation, also probably won't work with alien/creature hentai
| of the green skin variety.
| fork-bomber wrote:
| 'Vagina' is not anatomically correct in the context of the
| description within the github text. 'Vulva' would be more
| appropriate. Vagina is the internal passage onwards from the
| vulva and terminating at the cervix. The vagina wouldn't be
| visible under normal circumstances, the vulva would.
| unbanned wrote:
| You significantly underestimate the sexual depravity of your
| average deep learning enthusiast. Vagina may full well be
| visible.
| fork-bomber wrote:
| Possibly. But not in the average case surely
| vmception wrote:
| Only works with color images, so that's basically limited to
| fanart and explicit covers, and not the actually manga pages
| where the censoring appears
|
| Very limited utility
|
| Love the pun in the title
| Mumps wrote:
| > very limited utility
|
| Easily one of the funniest things I've read on HN; as if
| decensoring _any_ hentai isn't already a hilariously limited
| use case.
| rg111 wrote:
| A man was very recently arrested for decesoring pixeleted
| Japanese porn with Deep Learning ("AI").
|
| Man Arrested for Uncensoring Japanese Porn With AI in First
| Deepfake Case - Vice
| (https://www.vice.com/en/article/xgdq87/deepfakes-japan-arres...)
|
| Note: This is not hentai, but real-life porn.
|
| Whenever I see news like this- I feel like there are a lot of
| work that can be done in Porn with AI. There are several low-
| hanging fruits that can be very easily solved. I don't know why
| no one is working on them.
|
| I guess it would be difficult for people to say that they do AI
| at PornHub, and it will be hard for people to find work
| afterwards. Not to mention the ethical implications even when the
| humans involved fully agree to everything.
| bayindirh wrote:
| > I feel like there are a lot of work that can be done in Porn
| with AI.
|
| Well, one of the de-facto test images for image processing
| belongs to a Playboy model [0], so it looks like a natural
| evolution in the field.
|
| Actually it's amazing how image processing revolves around
| sexual imagery.
|
| [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenna
| taylorius wrote:
| Lenna is a great image, they shouldn't retire it. it's only
| her head and shoulders after all, and she looks great. They
| should get a good looking male photo too, to balance things
| up - use them both for testing.
| netcan wrote:
| >> a lot of work that can be done in Porn with AI.
|
| I think that "can be" is probably and "is being."
|
| Porn generally, has a historical tendency to be a pioneering
| adopter of media technology. A substantial chunk of early
| commercial photography was pornographic. Early films. Early
| ecommerce. Streaming video. Porn is currently the most
| developed/active niche in VR filmmaking. I would even consider
| renaissance portraiture a part of the pattern.
|
| In any case, most of "deepfake" that exists currently besides
| demonstration is pornographic.
| Barrin92 wrote:
| ads and payment as well. One of the first uses of real-time
| online credit card transactions was payment for the Pamela
| Anderson / Tommy Lee sex tape.
| rg111 wrote:
| I also think the same.
|
| Many things are possible with the AI technology that we have
| _today, right at this very moment_ that can be used to do
| things are the most wild things. Some of it would be illegal,
| some of it would be unethical. Good things are possible, too.
|
| There was a repo on GitHub that contained the JDK environment
| variables (IIRC) to identify and box Uighurs from CC camera
| footage. The news made the headlines.
|
| The getting out part was not really intended, I guess. So,
| imagine- what other wild things are out there in non-public
| repos.
|
| "AI" is a very bad name, and often seen as synonymous to AGI.
| And people are either afraid or excited about it. Because
| much of the public facing content is focused on beyond-human
| AI. I guess this is because it is easy to get fundings, and
| there are private propaganda Machines running?
|
| But there are so much that can be done today. Right now. Good
| things, too. If there are people willing to do it, and people
| willing to fund it, things are getting done.
|
| AI weaponry is among this. I believe many things are being
| done that are far away from the public information.
|
| Let me give you an example.
|
| If there is a drone, I guess, it is not hard for mechanical
| engineers to rig a machine gun to it. Or with $$$ of defence
| funding, maybe a drone _designed_ to host a machine gun. Then
| all you need is basically a cheap webcam and a Raspberry Pi
| to detect any motion, store the coordinates and aim and
| trigger the gun. When you have an enemy line, you deploy it
| behind that, and get done with it.
|
| I am sure multiple countries have this _today_. And this
| example is among the lowest-hanging fruits of AI weaponry.
| warning26 wrote:
| I believe the issue was not that he was de-censoring per se, it
| was that he was reselling copyrighted works. That is, he could
| have been arrested for the same crime even if he was reselling
| them with no changes.
| hwers wrote:
| Despite the headline, inside the actual article they admit that
| it wasn't really for uncensoring that he got arrested, but for
| copyright violation (as well as basically displaying porn in a
| country where porn is illegal).
| [deleted]
| rg111 wrote:
| Copyright laws are a favorite instrument of preventing stuff
| that you do not want to happen.
|
| In one country, making reaction videos or analysing news with
| clips from proprietary news channel is very common.
|
| Then came a guy, who used news clips to create Before/After
| clips of politicians of a certain party. In these clips, the
| same person would be saying completely opposite things- on
| camera, and publicly- some years apart. These videos went
| viral. The party was in power. They forced the news channels
| to claim copyright to YouTube, and as they were legitimate,
| YT did take down those videos.
|
| So, yes, when they say that he was arrested for copyright
| claims- I don't trust that.
| zionic wrote:
| >Porn and AI
|
| This comment reminds me of a disturbing one I read a few months
| back on an anonymous underwater basket weaving forum.
|
| The poster was discussing those expensive "real doll" (?) sex
| robots that creep me out, anyways he went on to mention that he
| discovered the app "face app" could take these things from
| "uncanny valley" to essentially photorealistic. Makes sense
| given what the app is supposed to do, but the real mind fuck
| was he said it also works on under aged dolls... which again I
| was surprised to learn are apparently legal most places.
|
| So AI/ML can take an inanimate object and then create highly
| illegal fool-most-humans level fake image from said inanimate
| object. Seems pretty scary to me, and we might not be far from
| an ML model that can essentially produce endless amounts of
| illegal content.
|
| What are the implications of that? How do you even begin to
| police/filter that? Then I guess there's the question of if we
| even should, since none of it's real anyways.
|
| Porn and AI is gonna get real messy.
| tomerv wrote:
| Not sure if I want to get into this discussion... but is
| underage porn still illegal when it's not technically
| depicting a real person? And is it moral? I could see it
| going either way (no child got hurt in the process / but it
| may push someone with pedophile tendencies towards acting on
| them / but it could also provide a safe outlet for someone
| with those tendencies).
| GistNoesis wrote:
| It reminds me of the children's right campaign sweetie
|
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sweetie_(internet_avatar)
|
| https://vimeo.com/86895084
|
| where an org lured predators by posing as an animated 10
| years old.
| roomey wrote:
| It's illegal in some places, like Ireland for example.
| solarmist wrote:
| I think it is illegal in the USA. But explicitly is is not
| illegal in Japan.
|
| Japan has a pretty bad reputation for making their child
| porn laws pretty narrowly defined in the international
| community.
|
| For these reasons Japan has a very high level of child
| pornography activity, but I know very little beyond that or
| of details.
| ta8902 wrote:
| netcan wrote:
| It's complicated, in that this depends on jurisdiction. In
| some places, the age of the character matters, not just the
| actor's age. Regardless of legality, I think this is very
| prominent in self censorship. A lot of filmmakers wouldn't
| depict a nude 15 year old sexually, regardless of the
| actor's actual age.
| zionic wrote:
| I haven't researched it heavily, but AFAIK the gov can't
| really criminalize art/drawings etc.
|
| If it doesn't depict a real person, then what's the crime
| exactly? It's still disgusting, but that's another topic.
| dymk wrote:
| Well sure they can, although it depends what government
| you're talking about. Porn laws in Japan are weird, and
| the government does require that distributed pornography
| (including drawings) be censored.
| rg111 wrote:
| > but is underage porn still illegal when it's not
| technically depicting a real person?
|
| If we look at existing laws, it should be. Depicting an
| underage person _even when the actor is an adult_ is
| illegal, I think, in every country. So adult actress
| _portraying_ a minor is illegal. So why not pixels
| depicting young girls should be illegal?
|
| The pixels are just the conduit, just as the the adult
| actress depicting a minor in a sexual act.
|
| So it should be.
|
| But whether it is moral- I don't know. I don't know enough
| psychology, public policy, etc. to express an informed
| opinion.
|
| But my personal choice? Yes. It should be illegal.
| Hypothetically, if it ever comes to a vote, I would vote
| against child porn even when there is no real human
| involved.
|
| That's why child porn in animations is banned as well.
| bitwize wrote:
| > If we look at existing laws, it should be. Depicting an
| underage person even when the actor is an adult is
| illegal, I think, in every country. So adult actress
| portraying a minor is illegal. So why not pixels
| depicting young girls should be illegal?
|
| Due to that pesky First Amendment, this is not illegal in
| the USA. The USA bans child pornography under the rubric
| that producing or even viewing it implicates the
| perpetrator in the abuse of a child. If no actual child
| abuse is taking place, they can't ban it.
|
| Cartoon images and the like may be banned if they depict
| an actual minor.
| oriki wrote:
| In the US in particular, it doesn't matter if the underaged
| subject exists or not, but I think you'll find the law much
| more loosely enforced in cases where the subject of the
| pictures doesn't exist.
| zionic wrote:
| > it doesn't matter if the underaged subject exists or
| not
|
| Are you sure this is true? As weird as it is it seems
| pretty ridiculous to suggest that someone drawing a
| sketch could be guilty of the same thing as someone
| abusing a real child.
| sterlind wrote:
| They're both illegal under the Child Pornography
| Prevention Act of 1996:
|
| > _The Child Pornography Prevention Act added two
| categories of speech to the definition of child
| pornography. The first prohibited "any visual depiction,
| including any photograph, film, video, picture, or
| computer or computer-generated image or picture" that
| "is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually
| explicit conduct." In Ashcroft case, the Court observed
| that this provision "captures a range of depictions,
| sometimes called 'virtual child pornography,' which
| include computer-generated images, as well as images
| produced by more traditional means."_
|
| > _The second prohibited "any sexually explicit image
| that was advertised, promoted, presented, described, or
| distributed in such a manner that conveys the impression
| it depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit
| conduct."_
|
| (From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_Pornography_Pre
| vention_A... )
|
| "Computer-generated" images was a remarkably prescient
| thing to include in 1996, since it criminalizes deepfakes
| and GAN images.
|
| I think the standard argument is that even though actual
| minors aren't harmed by the creation of such images, the
| images trigger pedophiles to become more depraved or
| something. There's probably an element of the old
| obscenity laws to it - real or not, child porn is
| obscene, and obscenity isn't covered by the first
| amendment without some artistic merit.
|
| I'm not sure of case law around enforcement of this.
| zionic wrote:
| Interesting, that seems to strictly criminalize cartoons
| then. I wonder if that's ever been enforced or
| challenged.
|
| Not that anyone would ever put their name behind
| attacking this.
| CheezeIt wrote:
| As the Wikipedia page states, it was struck down by the
| Supreme Court in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition in
| 2002.
| ta8902 wrote:
| lr4444lr wrote:
| It probably depends on whether they can prove the
| individual was soliciting for the real stuff. Same legal
| reason for why you're still committing a crime when you
| fall for a sting operation with an actual adult.
| rg111 wrote:
| > we might not be far from an ML model that can essentially
| produce endless amounts of illegal content
|
| Like this [0] one?
|
| And give me enough money, I can get you one that's a lot
| better. But I don't want to work for a porn company because
| of not the perceived immorality of porn, but for the horrible
| things that come _with_ Porn. And I am well past my teenage
| years to do this with my own time and money.
|
| [0]: https://thisvaginadoesnotexist.com/about.html
| MomoXenosaga wrote:
| Feminists are against it because they are afraid it could
| replace real women. I have to admit that considering the
| general shittyness of man it is not beyond the realm of
| possibility that one day we might prefer the companionship of
| robots. I read Asimov when I was a teen.
| na85 wrote:
| >Feminists are against it because they are afraid it could
| replace real women.
|
| Do you _really_ think that 's why feminists are against it?
| cbozeman wrote:
| > Then I guess there's the question of if we even should,
| since none of it's real anyways.
|
| The idea of "policing" something that isn't even real should
| be seen as just patently ridiculous to any thinking person.
|
| What comes after that? People love to shit all over the
| "slippery slope" and call it a "fallacy" even though there's
| a _clear_ historical record of how the smallest of openings
| for those in power eventually become handholds, then
| footholds, until finally, you 're living under a tyrannical
| system.
| dijonman2 wrote:
| > those in power eventually become handholds, then
| footholds, until finally, you're living under a tyrannical
| system.
|
| I immediately thought about the current US political
| landscape. I believe this is exactly what we're seeing with
| respect to radicalization.
| alex_anglin wrote:
| I would argue that it's a reasonable limit on whichever
| freedom may be cited not to allow the creation and
| distribution of child pornography, even when it is
| fictitious.
| somebodythere wrote:
| That limit is probably where real harm was caused to a
| real child.
| aeturnum wrote:
| > _Porn and AI is gonna get real messy._
|
| From a practical standpoint I think it is going to be an
| unmitigated nightmare: people creating AI revenge porn, fake
| porn of famous people, etc.
|
| From a legal standpoint, I don't think AI changes that much.
| People still own their image and while I would support
| stronger penalties for creating fake media of people, the law
| protects third parties using your image without your
| permission. Revenge porn already carries specific penalties
| in many jurisdictions[1].
|
| > _I guess there's the question of if we even should, since
| none of it's real anyways._
|
| I absolutely think you should have say over the release and
| distribution of porn that uses your image. Not because it's
| wrong to make porn, but because you are impacted by its
| existence.
|
| [1] I am generally skeptical of the ability of the prison
| system to deal with these kinds of things, but if we are
| going to have one I am glad it's included in the list of
| crimes.
| setr wrote:
| > From a practical standpoint I think it is going to be an
| unmitigated nightmare: people creating AI revenge porn,
| fake porn of famous people, etc.
|
| I honestly don't see these becoming larger problems -- once
| it's ubiquitous, then it'll quickly become meaningless; by
| default, everyone will assume it's generated, the
| equivalent of cutting out and pasting their face onto a
| nude image today, and it'll have relatively little impact.
|
| It'd probably still be rude and stupid, but I'm fairly
| positive it'll be much less damaging than it is today.
|
| Effectively: if everyone stars in a porno, no one does.
| [deleted]
| can16358p wrote:
| I think the name of the library deserves an award on its own.
| hwers wrote:
| Hardly subtle
| schleck8 wrote:
| There is also DeepThroat, the speech synthesis architecture
| name of 15.ai (was added later on after someone recommended it
| on twitter)
| rg111 wrote:
| Nah, that award goes to this project (Hent-AI)-
| https://github.com/natethegreate/hent-AI
| oneepic wrote:
| Not to start a war, but Hent-AI is pretty basic by comparison
| IMO.
| dilap wrote:
| Here are all of the double-meanings / associations I can
| find in the DeepCreamPy name:
|
| DeepCream sounds like deep dream, the AI technique
|
| To cream is slang for to ejaculatw
|
| Thus, "deep cream" would be to ejaculate "deeply". In
| general, "deep" is a richly evocative word in the context
| of sex.
|
| "CreamPy" sounds like "cream pie," a type of pies, the
| pastry. Pies themselves also have a sexual connotation, due
| to the widely popular and influential sex comedy "American
| Pie" (it gave us the word MILF, for example).
| flobosg wrote:
| This one is missing (NSFW):
| https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creampie_(sexual_act)
| dilap wrote:
| Haha, how did I miss that?! Thanks!
| toomanydoubts wrote:
| Yeah, and honestly, at least for me, the most heavy
| sexual connotation. I like the py/pie joke.
| ComputerGuru wrote:
| Can you still tag that with a huge NSFW? The link itself
| is truncated on mobile so it's a big surprise.
| amelius wrote:
| I think Wikipedia should add NSFW in their links.
| [deleted]
| BTCOG wrote:
| How did you go this Sheldon and still miss that it's
| referring directly to a creampie? LOL
| fsckboy wrote:
| I can't believe I'm participating in this conversation,
| but misapprehensions beg for clarification.
|
| pie had the sexual connotation decades before American
| Pie, see notably "hair pie" at least from the 1960s; also
| earlier cherry pie with its jailbait associations; I
| would imagine also dating back to the early part of the
| last century in Black vernacular, see for comparison
| jelly roll.
|
| cream pie only recently took on its modern meaning; prior
| to the last decade or so it referred to the same thing it
| does now, but only in the context of eating it. search
| usenet archives (see asstr.org) if you feel an
| uncontrollable need to learn more about this.
|
| creaming, your jeans for example, equally applies to
| women.
| [deleted]
| hiyer wrote:
| Incidentally this depends on DeepCreamPy. From the github
| readme:
|
| > You will need to download and install DeepCreamPy, which is
| linked in the intro.
| throwaway_bdcp wrote:
| bgeeek wrote:
| But that name. Ugh.
| [deleted]
| nomdep wrote:
| It does NOT work with: - Censorship of nipples
| ...
|
| What? Useless!
| wiradikusuma wrote:
| I heard hentai pictures don't censor nipples, only penises and
| vaginas. Haven't seen it myself, of course.
| micromacrofoot wrote:
| you don't need to even go as deep as hentai, you see it in
| anime (Ghost in the Shell is one prominent example)... it's
| fairly common to see nipples and a complete lack of genitalia
| toyg wrote:
| They used to censor nipples too, and then at some point they
| just didn't. I guess the Japanese government relaxed their
| guidelines a bit - after all, they've now recognized that
| manga and anime are effectively their Hollywood, and are very
| busy promoting them around the globe. I expect at some point
| they will quietly drop prosecutions of uncensored drawings
| altogether.
| hooande wrote:
| this name is too much. there's a difference between cute and
| vulgar. no star
| marginalia_nu wrote:
| To be fair, it's a pretty vulgar application.
| computerfriend wrote:
| It's not my thing, but I personally find censorship much more
| vulgar.
| goldcd wrote:
| _shrugs_ Not to my taste, but you 've got to admire somebody
| so pissed off with pixelation, they've created a project..
|
| I was disappointed at the issues - I'd anticipated there
| being amusing complaints.
| monkeybutton wrote:
| How popular are the censorship laws in Japan? Is it like cannabis
| where the majority is in favor of legalization but politicians
| are beholden to a vocal minority? The whole thing seems so dated
| in the age of the internet. Anyone in Japan can easily access
| uncensored porn from anywhere else in the world on their phone
| now. What's the point?
| [deleted]
| makeitdouble wrote:
| Am not super versed in the question, but would wager it's a
| matter of who's willing to go fight the status quo to change
| the law. Contrary to cannabis, there's no strong science behind
| decensoring, nor obvious medical use. The field is already
| under heavy attacks in a lot of fronts, there would be better
| battles to fight than this one.
| monkeybutton wrote:
| I would argue that using science to prove cannabis/uncensored
| nips has benefits as an argument in favor of legalization is
| wrong. One should not start from the position of a thing
| being illegal and demanding others to argue for its
| legalization. The correct approach is to start from the
| position of a thing being legal, and arguing for it being
| illegal using science. So, has anyone proven using science
| that censorship has benefits? Reduces porn addiction? Reduces
| abuse?
| teawrecks wrote:
| iirc Japan's more conservative laws, including the ones
| related to porn, originated after WW2 in an attempt to
| appease the US's Christian sensibilities.
| kodah wrote:
| Much of our free speech (and porn laws) are thanks to Larry
| Flynt. His case rather than being argued through "science"
| or statistics was argued via innate rights. Whether it's
| "good" or "bad" is none of society's business, and his case
| was about establishing the bar where society is allowed to
| care from a legal perspective.
|
| Also worth mentioning that he lost his ability to walk over
| that case.
| solarmist wrote:
| I didn't know that. Was he attacked by someone due to it?
| singlow wrote:
| From Wikipedia:
|
| > On March 6, 1978, during a legal battle related to
| obscenity in Gwinnett County, Georgia, Flynt and his
| lawyer were shot on the sidewalk in Lawrenceville by
| Joseph Paul Franklin. The shooting left Flynt partially
| paralyzed with permanent spinal cord damage, and in need
| of a wheelchair.
|
| >Franklin, a militant white supremacist and serial
| killer, also shot Vernon Jordan; he targeted other black
| and Jewish people in a killing spree from 1977-1980.
| Violently opposed to 'miscegenation,' he confessed to the
| shootings many years later, claiming he was outraged by
| an interracial photo shoot in Hustler.[12] About Flynt
| and a Hustler pictorial, he stated, "I saw that
| interracial couple ... having sex ... It just made me
| sick ... I threw the magazine down and thought, I'm gonna
| kill that guy."[13] Flynt himself suspected the attack
| was part of a larger conspiracy involving ultra-right
| elements surrounding U.S. Representative Larry McDonald
| also behind the Karen Silkwood case with ties to the
| Intelligence Community and that Franklin may have been
| subject to MKULTRA-style Mind Control.[14]
| kodah wrote:
| It's worth noting that after a lot of psychological
| evaluation that he was deemed a paranoid shizophrenic
| from years of abuse and starvation at the hands of his
| mother as a kid. That's detailed on Franklin's Wikipedia
| page as well.
| MomoXenosaga wrote:
| Free speech is one those things everyone pretends to
| support until someone uses that free speech to do
| something they disagree with. The mental gymnastics and
| hypocrisy tends to go off the charts quickly.
| syshum wrote:
| I dont think that is limited to free speech, that pretty
| much applies to all freedoms.
|
| The number of people that can separate how they would
| choose to act, or live their life, and how the law should
| be applied to people is very slim.
|
| Most people want the law to support their choices in
| life, thus if they don't believe blue cars should exists
| there should be a law that prohibits blue cars.
|
| Over my couple decades of advocacy for more liberty, I
| have found that in general people do not want liberty,
| they want validation of their life choices
| criley2 wrote:
| This project was deleted by the original author 9 months ago
| after they were doxxed/compromised potentially in relation to
| this project. This repo is a copy. The paypal donate link in the
| readme still goes to the original authors paypal lol.
| toxik wrote:
| This is three years old, why is this being reposted now?
| high_byte wrote:
| the world needs to know
| danuker wrote:
| Urgently!
| scubbo wrote:
| Ah, I remember the terrible coworker who shared this in work-chat
| within a week or so of being hired. Somehow he stuck around for a
| couple of years despite continued terribleness (of both the "HR-
| related" and the "actually-doing-his-job-badly" flavours), then
| went to Facebook. Good riddance.
| 0x0nyandesu wrote:
| The funny part is everyone I've ever known to be into sex,
| porn, kink, etc has been not the one doing the sexual
| harassment in an organization but rather the ones calling out
| bad behavior.
| Subsentient wrote:
| Just like the heretics are usually the most deeply
| principled.
| thewarrior wrote:
| Because they understand consent a lot better.
| mmiliauskas wrote:
| Now we know what HN faps to..
| tmp65535 wrote:
| Here is the first (?) application of deep learning to improve the
| pornography experience, an Android app called Melondream
| published in early 2017:
|
| http://driftwheeler.com
|
| Surprisingly, almost 5 years after being published, this app
| still serves thousands of user sessions per day. That rate
| continues to slowly grow.
|
| Except for its user interface, the whole app (client and server)
| was written in Go
| (https://pkg.go.dev/golang.org/x/mobile/cmd/gomobile).
|
| It uses densenet feature vectors
| (https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.06993) to allow "touch-to-search"
| (ha!) with a fractional norm distance metric (https://citeseerx.i
| st.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.23...).
|
| Citation: Discriminative Unsupervised Feature Learning with
| Exemplar Convolutional Neural Networks
| (https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.6909).
| vmception wrote:
| How does it improve the pornography experience? The description
| and examples on that website don't make it obvious. The
| Register article linked seems to help but I really didn't get
| that from the landing page or example video.
|
| edit: now I understand, it is a continuous slideshow of
| erotica, and you can tap any part of the image to be taken down
| a path of similar images. that's kind of cool.
|
| I thought it would have had something to do with decensoring,
| but nevermind.
|
| Does BlueStacks work on an Apple Silicon machine? I don't have
| an android device.
| [deleted]
| jameswhite1994 wrote:
| Invictus0 wrote:
| (2018)
| [deleted]
| textcortex wrote:
| Finally something that deeplearning is useful for..
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-12-30 23:01 UTC)