[HN Gopher] Sensor Network Technology in Vinge's a Deepness in t...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Sensor Network Technology in Vinge's a Deepness in the Sky
        
       Author : strlen
       Score  : 58 points
       Date   : 2021-12-24 16:34 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (blog.regehr.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (blog.regehr.org)
        
       | beamatronic wrote:
       | As the article refers to, the technology demo 20 years ago got as
       | far as deploying the sensors from a radio-controlled airplane,
       | and then driving a tank nearby, and receiving and processing the
       | sensor data received. I can only imagine how far this technology
       | has developed in the meantime.
       | 
       | I'm vaguely disappointed I can't go down to Costco and buy a
       | 100-pack of localizers to sprinkle around my own property.
        
         | pavel_lishin wrote:
         | > _I 'm vaguely disappointed I can't go down to Costco and buy
         | a 100-pack of localizers to sprinkle around my own property._
         | 
         | I choose to be very glad that my neighbors can't wait for an
         | opportune gust of wind to spread a 100-pack of localizers to my
         | property.
        
       | zwkrt wrote:
       | Funny I should see this here, having just reread the book two
       | days ago. Apart from the Sci Fi elements, of which Vinge is
       | rightfully lauded, I love how much depth there is in the book w/
       | regard to individuals' scheming and how layered the conversation
       | is. At one point two factions of humans are listening to a live-
       | translation of an alien radio show debate between rivaling
       | aliens. The scene simultaneously moves forward the plot for each
       | of the human factions, each of the alien factions, and the
       | translators themselves, all of whom extract important info
       | unnoticed by the others. Later it's revealed the situation was
       | /even more complicated/ than anyone thought as misinterpretations
       | occurred across the board.
       | 
       | Does anyone else have recommendations for sci fi or otherwise
       | with such complex intrigue?
        
       | nynx wrote:
       | There are some technologies that should not be created.
        
       | awinter-py wrote:
       | at long last we have created the torment nexus
        
       | TheMagicHorsey wrote:
       | Ubiquitous sensors would be a great thing for owners of large
       | parcels of property ... such as farmers and ranchers.
       | 
       | But maybe not such a good thing for civil liberties.
       | 
       | I love how Vinge explores these issues in his books. He's really
       | underrated. When The Expanse was announced, I was excited ... but
       | a bit disappointed that that series made it to the screen as the
       | first hard sci-fi book across the line, before Vinge's work.
        
         | walrus01 wrote:
         | It probably would be possible to turn A Deepness In the Sky
         | into a TV series, but it would need about the same high budget
         | and first season run time as the Foundation series (10 hours?)
         | to really go into sufficient depth on the 3 different cultures
         | involved, and the order of events in that one book alone.
        
           | Sharlin wrote:
           | It would be an interesting challenge to depict the Spiders in
           | a manner faithful to the book, given the plot twist at the
           | end that <rot13>rirelguvat gur uhznaf (naq gur ernqre) unq
           | yrnearq nobhg gurz unq orra guebhtu na haeryvnoyr aneengbe -
           | gur uhzna genafyngbef jub unq "ybpnyvmrq" (uru!) rirelguvat
           | jevggra sebz gur Fcvqref' crefcrpgvir.</rot13>
        
       | akkartik wrote:
       | _" The QHL is not depicted as being able to move itself; it is
       | moved passively around its environment by riding on humans, air
       | currents, etc. However, at least a bit of mobility is implied by
       | the presence of a magnetic actuator and by the QHL's ability to
       | create a gritty surface on a switch."_
       | 
       | The way I imagined this while reading the book was that the
       | sensors are ubiquitous, so it's not about making them move so
       | much as selecting the sensors in a specific area to view imagery
       | from or enable grit attraction on.
        
       | akkartik wrote:
       | _" The main thing we know about the QHL's software is that it is
       | large and complex enough to defeat a years-long "software
       | archeology" effort directed at determining whether the nodes can
       | be trusted (in the end, they cannot)."_
       | 
       |  _" cheap, effective sensor nodes lead to a government with the
       | capacity for ubiquitous surveillance, which leads to a police
       | state, which leads to societal collapse or worse."_
       | 
       | It feels helpful to reframe "can it be trusted?" as "who knows
       | more about its emergent runtime behavior?" This makes it more
       | obvious that there are answers that can't be found by staring at
       | the source code. Vinge was likely aware of the unanticipated
       | behavior of the Morris worm
       | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morris_worm) when he wrote
       | Deepness. In the years since this book, we've seen more examples
       | (stuxnet[1], ethereum[2]) of software with behavior unanticipated
       | by -- and even weaponized against -- its creators.
       | 
       | (I'm very interested in this subject, and research ways to
       | prevent unanticipated runtime behavior. My approach can be
       | summarized as, "keep software small and simple to stay out of
       | dark forests[3].")
       | 
       | [1] "accidentally spreading beyond its intended target"
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuxnet#History
       | 
       | [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethereum#The_DAO_event
       | 
       | [3] https://www.paradigm.xyz/2020/08/ethereum-is-a-dark-forest
        
       | sbisson wrote:
       | Vernor is a proponent of ubiquitous sensors as an alternative or
       | as an adjunct to AI; the example he likes to use is what he calls
       | the "localizer", a simple sensor that can detect its position
       | relative to other nearby sensors of the saem type.
       | 
       | So instead of complex vision systems to find, say, a part in a
       | bin in a warehouse, a locator attached to the item would inform
       | the network that it was "Two items down and three across in bin
       | #243. Oh, and I am upside down", allowing a robot to quickly
       | retrieve the item. It's an interesting approach to what Robert
       | Forward called "artificial stupidity".
        
         | SCHiM wrote:
         | I've got this idea that, given some R&D and technological
         | advancements, an advanced military could drop 'dust sensors'
         | over a future battlefield, or entire country.
         | 
         | Each particle of dust is a tiny computer with simple sensors,
         | near field laser beam directed stealth communication node, FOF
         | identification sensor, and maybe more. Soldiers could plug into
         | this network (all properly encrypted, yadayada) en see and
         | listen to the enemy. Dust covered vehicles could be tracked as
         | long as they stay in a well-dusted area.
         | 
         | The idea is not that the enemy cannot see that you've 'dusted'
         | their country/battlefield, but that you've dropped so much of
         | this self-organizing sensor dust that they cannot block it all.
         | 
         | I'm assuming that the dust could be radiation hardened against
         | EMP or other area of effect 'cleanup' measures, and that they
         | are powerful enough to run proper cryptographic code, to ensure
         | proper functioning of FOF and the communications.
        
       | porkbrain wrote:
       | One of my favorite sci-fi books. I had a lot of fun thinking
       | about how I would implement the localizers. I don't have the
       | relevant background so I later found out that my ideas, some of
       | which I put into a blog post[0], were rather naive.
       | 
       | Anyway, great timing to see this posted over the Christmas break.
       | I wanted to reread The Witcher, but this has revived my desire to
       | read more of Vernor Vinge. Recommendations welcome.
       | 
       | [0]: https://manyagents.ai/posts/001_swarm
        
       | skywal_l wrote:
       | I believe the sensors are used more prominently and are actually
       | an essential element of the plot in "A fire upon the deep".
       | 
       | In that book, giant ships are being powered by computer systems
       | that are so complex, nobody fully master them and you need
       | computer archeologists who spend their entire life studying how
       | those system works to maintain and improve them. The hero of the
       | book is actually one of those archeologists. If I remember
       | correctly, he's the only one to know the meaning of the "unix
       | epoch".
       | 
       | Edit: got my wires crossed. Indeed the book I am refering is
       | actually the one mentionned in the article.
        
         | akkartik wrote:
         | You're thinking of "A deepness in the sky" :) One of my
         | favorite passages: http://akkartik.name/post/deepness
        
           | linspace wrote:
           | "The word for all this is 'mature programming environment.'
           | Basically, when hardware performance has been pushed to its
           | final limit, and programmers have had several centuries to
           | code, you reach a point where there is far more signicant
           | code than can be rationalized..."
           | 
           | The heat death of programming
        
           | pavel_lishin wrote:
           | My favorite part of that was the historical mix-up - the Qeng
           | Ho, and presumably the rest of humanity, assumed that the
           | Unix epoch marked the moon landing, which was only six
           | months' off!
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-12-24 23:00 UTC)