[HN Gopher] Charles Babbage - Passages from the Life of a Philos...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Charles Babbage - Passages from the Life of a Philosopher
        
       Author : robin_reala
       Score  : 63 points
       Date   : 2021-12-18 12:14 UTC (10 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (standardebooks.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (standardebooks.org)
        
       | andai wrote:
       | _On two occasions I have been asked [by members of Parliament],
       | 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures,
       | will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to
       | apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such
       | a question._
        
         | wrp wrote:
         | This quote comes up whenever Babbage is mentioned among geeks,
         | but the common interpretation of its significance may be wrong.
         | The quote is assumed to illustrate the hardship of a genius
         | communicating with a society of dunces, but I think the problem
         | may have been the reverse. The fact is that Babbage was a
         | terrible explainer and the questions put to him may have been
         | sensible extrapolation on what he said. I came to this opinion
         | largely from seeing how much effort Ada Lovelace had to put
         | into getting Babbage to clarify his ideas. It seems that he
         | truly could not "apprehend the kind of confusion" that his
         | explanations caused in others.
        
           | wzdd wrote:
           | I think that this passage and various other parts of the book
           | are a particularly English form of understated humour, where
           | Babbage is playing up his public perception as a frustrated
           | genius in order to add a little levity to what might
           | otherwise be fairly dry writing.
           | 
           | Plenty of other sections of the book hint at this. As an
           | example, search for the word "philosopher" throughout the
           | book. We get section headings musing about whether a
           | Philosopher would deny being descended from Cain, quotes
           | attributed to a recently-scalloped oyster who was also a
           | philosopher writing in its shell, a sequence of passages
           | titled "The Philosopher writes a Ballet --Its rehearsal --Its
           | high moral tone --Its rejection on the ground of the probable
           | combustion of the Opera-house", and so on and so on. Does
           | Babbage consider himself a philosopher? Maybe (probably, even
           | -- he clearly had a good opinion of himself in any case), but
           | he is also well aware of how the public perceives such
           | people.
           | 
           | In other words, Babbage is doing a "bit" and playing with the
           | public perception of him and of scientists of the time (and
           | even now) -- i.e. as being so removed from the real world
           | that they not only can't explain something, but can't even
           | understand why they can't explain it. Which is an
           | understandable thing to do, particularly if you're a
           | mathematician and engineer writing an autobiography for a lay
           | audience.
           | 
           | This doesn't mean that he was actually good at explaining
           | anything, of course, or that he wasn't in fact a frustrated
           | genius. It just means that he was aware of how he was
           | perceived and was capable of a little humour at his own
           | expense.
        
             | hungryforcodes wrote:
             | The member of parilment was probably playing him as well...
        
             | jhbadger wrote:
             | The term "scientist" was just starting to become a thing in
             | Babbage's time. "Philosopher" was used in a much broader
             | sense than it is today.
        
               | lou1306 wrote:
               | Indeed, science was simply known as "natural philosophy",
               | as in Newton's "Mathematical Principles of Natural
               | Philosophy", i.e, the Principia.
        
           | sjtindell wrote:
           | Feels to me like the start of a tale as old as time - tech
           | support explaining to users what they think should be
           | obvious.
        
         | yesenadam wrote:
         | Using an error-correcting code he could say "Well, sometimes,
         | yes!"
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Error_correction_code
        
           | messe wrote:
           | You could argue that an error correction code just expands
           | the set of correct inputs.
        
             | dbtc wrote:
             | I would argue that it corrects errors :)
        
         | mrkramer wrote:
         | >if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right
         | answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind
         | of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question.
         | 
         | Volkswagen emissions software scandal comes to mind.
        
         | samwillis wrote:
         | Good to see his estimation of the British parliament still
         | stands today...
        
           | moffkalast wrote:
           | Haha yeah this reminds me of that recent Google congressional
           | hearing where the only thing they accomplished was showing
           | how little the questioners understand anything at all about
           | tech.
        
       | jurassic wrote:
       | For any Charles Babbage fangirls/boys out there, the Royal Mint
       | recently honored him with a commemorative 50p coin as part of
       | their Innovation in Science series:
       | https://www.royalmint.com/our-coins/events/charles-babbage/c...
        
         | new_guy wrote:
         | Sadly once we all go cashless commemorative coins will be a
         | thing of the past.
        
           | jurassic wrote:
           | I kinda doubt that. The US Mint manufactures a ton of
           | commemorative coins in denominations and materials (e.g.
           | silver dollars, gold $5, etc) that have no relationship to
           | the circulating coinage. As long as there's an audience for
           | it, I expect they will keep launching products.
        
           | TedDoesntTalk wrote:
           | There will still be NFTs :)
        
         | ffhhj wrote:
         | Expected to see his face on the other side of the coin.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | matt_f wrote:
       | I looked into the source of the above link and it's a
       | collaborative git-managed team effort.
       | 
       | https://standardebooks.org/about
       | 
       | What an awesome project.
        
         | adhesive_wombat wrote:
         | Wikisource also has On the Economy of Machinery and
         | Manufactures[1] in their current Monthly "sprint"[2]
         | 
         | [1]
         | https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Index:On_the_economy_of_machi...
         | 
         | [2]
         | https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Community_collabor...
        
           | jackfoxy wrote:
           | This is a good read documenting technology history in the
           | first half of the 19th century. Babbage drew on his
           | experiences trying to source manufactured parts for his
           | Analytical Engine. At the time manufacturers just could not
           | meet the specifications (tolerances) for the many mass-
           | produced parts the project required.
           | 
           | I think by the end of Babbage's life the parts could have
           | been manufactured, but by then both Babbage and his
           | financiers had moved on.
        
       | kwhitefoot wrote:
       | See also Sydney Padua's 2D Goggles: https://2dgoggles.com/
        
       | Ftuuky wrote:
       | It eludes me how nobody has yet made a movie about Babbage and
       | Lovelace. Such colorful characters and way ahead of their times.
        
       | samwillis wrote:
       | See also "Plan 28" a project that plans to build a replica of
       | Charles Babbages Analytical engine. (Started by HNs and
       | CloudFlares jgrahamc)
       | 
       | https://plan28.org/
        
         | jgrahamc wrote:
         | Happy to AMA about that.
        
         | retrac wrote:
         | I'm a bit conflicted. On one hand, it is a sin that it still
         | hasn't been built! And it must be powered by a literal steam
         | engine!
         | 
         | On the other hand, Babbage never really finished the Analytical
         | Engine. It was always in pre-alpha. In a sense, there is no
         | Analytical Engine. Only a lifetime of sketches for various
         | parts and extensive commentary on how the various parts might
         | fit together. An actual implementation requires making a lot of
         | hard decisions, and basically inventing a fair bit as well.
         | 
         | It's clear the Plan 28 folks appreciate all this, of course.
         | They've appropriately started with a complete review of the
         | literature:
         | 
         | > With the first-pass inspection of the manuscript archive
         | complete, attention has turned to analysis and interpretation,
         | and organising the findings to aid navigation. Babbage shed
         | versions of the design as it developed in the form of 'Plans' -
         | large 'systems drawings' which serve as developmental staging
         | posts - the main ones of which number Plan 1 through to Plan
         | 28.
         | 
         | This might hint at why Babbage ultimately failed, really. He
         | was a tinkerer and he didn't commit to a design. It was always
         | provisional. When he ran into a minor hitch, or had another
         | good idea, he would go back to the drawing board and start
         | over. If he had just committed and scaled up the original, much
         | simpler and fully-designed difference engine he had been
         | contracted for, he might just have got the funding to continue
         | more theoretical and larger-scale work with thinking machines.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-12-18 23:01 UTC)