[HN Gopher] World of Text is an infinite grid of text editable b...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       World of Text is an infinite grid of text editable by any visitor
        
       Author : throwaway47292
       Score  : 128 points
       Date   : 2021-12-16 09:01 UTC (14 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.yourworldoftext.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.yourworldoftext.com)
        
       | literallyaduck wrote:
       | Hope you don't mind me using it as a database with base64 storage
       | blobs.
        
       | Lapsa wrote:
       | Loading...
        
       | xhrpost wrote:
       | Neat coding challenge. You get the benefit of something rather
       | simple and straight forward while getting to spend more focus on
       | how to scale such a system.
        
       | PikachuEXE wrote:
       | Is there more "shared message board" type of websites you know?
       | 
       | Or "multiple notes" version of this website.
       | 
       | Edit:
       | 
       | Also reminds me of an unmanaged creative Minecraft word on a
       | server. Near centre = lots of crazy stuff, further away = fewer
       | but sometimes bigger stuff.
        
         | depaya wrote:
         | 2b2t is the famous one.
        
         | omnibrain wrote:
         | Check out https://manyland.com
         | 
         | It's a public 2d game with an editable world.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | alphabet9000 wrote:
         | https://burrow.jollo.org (view source to see controls)
        
         | com2kid wrote:
         | About 20 years ago there was a game called Incarnations. It was
         | a 2d style "build your own house" game but with amazing high
         | quality artwork. Players made some incredibly lovely scenes.
         | 
         | I haven't seen anything like it since. An prototype MMO
         | designed solely around making things look lovely.
        
       | bdr wrote:
       | Creator here. Your World of Text was launched via HN 12 years
       | ago! Seems today's traffic took the server down, but we're back
       | now.
       | 
       | There's a great, recent podcast episode covering the history of
       | the site, including "the line" mentioned in another top-level
       | comment:
       | https://www.cultorjustweird.com/episodes/episode/1d3933d1/s2...
        
       | RhetoricX wrote:
       | This reminds me of the old wide-open, raw HTML experimental wiki
       | Metababy:
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metababy
       | 
       | As you might expect, as it became better known, it got filled
       | with increasingly extreme and offensive material.
        
       | earthbee wrote:
       | I was literally trying to find this yesterday but couldn't
       | remember the name. Thank you!
       | 
       | It's nice seeing some of the stuff I wrote on less trafficked
       | pages or far from the centre on popular pages is still there
       | after ten years!
        
       | qsort wrote:
       | Everything world-editable is eventually filled with depictions of
       | genitals and N-words. Must be a theorem.
        
         | kabdib wrote:
         | Quick story.
         | 
         | As I understand it, the UI folks at Nintendo who were working
         | on the Wii controller did user testing, of course. In one test,
         | they would hand a new user a controller wand with instructions
         | to "Just draw stuff on the screen" using a simple drawing
         | program.
         | 
         | The metric Nintendo came up with was called TTP, or the how
         | long in minutes and seconds -- sometimes, only seconds --
         | before the user drew the inevitable male genitals. "Time To
         | P-n-s". Averaged something like two or three minutes.
         | 
         | Every new vista humankind opens will be so decorated. And so,
         | World of Text: QED. :-)
        
           | Cthulhu_ wrote:
           | It's ok to write out penis, we're all adults here.
        
             | schnebbau wrote:
             | Unless he meant PUNKS, and people have been drawing dudes
             | rocking out with spikes and mohawks?
        
             | djrockstar1 wrote:
             | It should also be okay to write words in a censored form if
             | the writer wishes.
        
               | scrollaway wrote:
               | Not if it prevents the point from being made. Which in
               | this case it has. And then detracts from the post
               | altogether. Which it also has.
        
               | cto_of_antifa wrote:
               | In what ways?
        
               | boomlinde wrote:
               | Is it really censorship, though? You insist on conveying
               | the meaning of the word, which is what is offensive if
               | anything. By omitting a couple of letters you've only
               | saved us from its exact spelling.
               | 
               | For example, "fuck you" is offensive because it's rude,
               | vulgar and expresses contempt, not because of how exactly
               | "fuck" is spelled. "F-ck you" is still rude and vulgar
               | because it conveys the exact same meaning. The only
               | difference to the recipient of such a request is that
               | it's slightly more annoying to read, an annoyance that is
               | surely dwarfed by the offense taken to the rude and
               | vulgar meaning, and its intent as an expression of
               | contempt.
               | 
               | It's better described as the exact opposite, a sort of a
               | censorship _circumvention_ ; you can omit or replace a
               | few letters to get past dumb word filters or comply with
               | poorly worded courtesy policies and still convey the
               | meaning to humans. Where no such filters and policies are
               | in place, it's pointless.
               | 
               | A scary thought is that we may be so conditioned by
               | machines and machine-like policies that our means to
               | circumvent them now occur to us naturally even in
               | contexts where they don't make a difference.
        
               | I_complete_me wrote:
               | I would like to upvote this comment for it's clarity of
               | thinking.
        
               | sumtechguy wrote:
               | This sort of censorship has been going on for a long
               | time. For example 'oh fiddlesticks'. They are still
               | swearing. But some sort of odd self censorship happened.
               | 
               | It is an interesting exercise for me. Try not to swear.
               | No substitutes allowed. It is oddly difficult for me.
        
               | DharmaPolice wrote:
               | I think we should be discouraging that kind of self-
               | censorship for all but the worst words. Not only do
               | people start to use it for ridiculous political posturing
               | (e.g. "w _men " or "g_mers") but it just makes what
               | you're write ever so slightly harder to understand. And
               | for what benefit?
        
               | DeusExMachina wrote:
               | How is the original comment harder to understand?
               | 
               | If there is one freedom people have is to control their
               | language, wether to avoid certain words or to utter words
               | that other find silly.
        
               | Kranar wrote:
               | They are welcome to avoid certain words, and I am welcome
               | to criticize it.
        
               | philovivero wrote:
               | In a previous sentence they mentioned TTP, then they
               | mentioned P-n-s. I thought this was another acronym of
               | sorts. Like "Posts not sexy" or whatever. I spent a
               | couple seconds to figure out what it meant, failed, and
               | just moved on.
               | 
               | Figured out what it was supposed to mean from the
               | replies.
        
               | bobmichael wrote:
               | GP didn't imply it wasn't!
        
               | scubbo wrote:
               | Only by a strictly-literal, context-free reading.
        
               | Symbiote wrote:
               | It seems odd to write "genitals" but not write "penis".
               | 
               | H-w f-- -an we t-k- wr--i-g -ord- in a -ens--r-d f-rm?
        
             | checkyoursudo wrote:
             | If my children are remotely average (sometimes I wonder)
             | then kids know about penises as well.
        
               | jrochkind1 wrote:
               | heck, around half of them even have one!
        
             | samsolomon wrote:
             | I took the comment that 'Time to PNS' was a kind of code
             | name for the metric at Nintendo. Honestly, I think that's
             | hilarious.
             | 
             | Edit: TTP is the metric name. Sorry, it's early.
        
               | kgwgk wrote:
               | Could also have been TTPP
        
           | globular-toast wrote:
           | Did they only test it on men, or do women draw penises too?
        
           | mysterydip wrote:
           | I'm honestly surprised the first astronauts on the moon
           | didn't draw one with their finger in the dust.
        
             | nerdponx wrote:
             | Maybes there's a patch of the moon dust that they all
             | agreed to never photograph, where they drew all the boobs
             | and dicks.
             | 
             | Imagine: aliens get the Arecibo message but don't quite
             | know what to make of it, until they see the boobs and dicks
             | drawn on the moon and they correlate it with their own
             | crass fascination with reproductive organs, and only then
             | do they recognize humanity as a self-aware species.
             | 
             | That, or they just smudged it out after doing it.
        
             | tmalsburg2 wrote:
             | How do you know they didn't?
        
         | Laremere wrote:
         | Reddit's /r/place is perhaps an interesting counter example. It
         | started that way, but as space on the image grew tight and
         | contested, all of that kind of stuff went away. Towards the
         | middle and end, the only significant images were those which
         | could get enough people on board to maintain, and people tend
         | to care more about other stuff, it seems.
         | 
         | I'd say it comes down to the balance of (# of people who make a
         | positive impact * difficulty of positive impact) vs the same
         | for negative impact.
         | 
         | Wikipedia is another example. Sure plenty of people make stupid
         | edits, but enough effort is put into detecting and immediately
         | reverting the vandalism that the effort required to properly
         | vandalize it quickly goes beyond the effort most people will go
         | for a stupid joke.
        
           | SavantIdiot wrote:
           | /r/place was weeeeeiiird. It figured there'd be some trolls,
           | but not massive troll brigades intent on spreading every form
           | of hate the world has seen from the last century. The number
           | of people that were involved was in the 100,000's battling to
           | control the content.
           | 
           | If I let myself wax poetic, I saw /r/place as a proxy for the
           | coming internet faction wars: WW3 won't be fought by
           | countries, it will be fought by internet factions.
        
           | Retric wrote:
           | For good or ill, I don't think Wikipedia qualifies as
           | globally editable anymore.
        
             | culi wrote:
             | the majority of wikipedia is still editable without even
             | having an account
        
             | chalst wrote:
             | Not all pages are, and quite a few IP ranges are blocked,
             | but there is plenty of content being added by non-logged-in
             | editors.
        
               | Retric wrote:
               | Yes, editable != globally editable.
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Protection_policy
               | 
               | On top of this, bots such as ClueBot will most dong
               | postings on even less trafficked locations.
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ClueBot_NG
        
               | earthboundkid wrote:
               | My vandalism from 2011 is still up though, thanks to
               | being protected by a bogus citation. :-)
        
               | tptacek wrote:
               | A weird thing to be proud of.
        
               | SavantIdiot wrote:
               | The last two apartments I lived in had Comcast and the
               | IPs were banned from editing. Very weird.
        
           | kple wrote:
           | like the swedish flag
        
           | Jenk wrote:
           | and programmability. Most publically manipulable stuff only
           | gets hijacked by a few people with a bit of time and a few
           | scripts. PitBull/Bieber "Where to perform next?" online
           | polls, that ML Twitter bot MS recalled (was it Tammy or
           | something?) etc were all attacked by spam bot style flooding
           | of votes and messages to poison the data, and it's a lot
           | easier to just spam incoherent unpleasantries than it is to
           | spam coherent substantial messages.
           | 
           | AFAIK Reddit's /r/space didn't have any obvious vectors of
           | attack so after the 1,000th manual entry of the n-word the
           | trolls just got bored.
        
             | teddyh wrote:
             | > _that ML Twitter bot MS recalled (was it Tammy or
             | something?)_
             | 
             | Tay: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tay_(bot)
        
             | Laremere wrote:
             | Plenty of people used bots on /r/place, but there were two
             | mitigating factors: 1. You could only make a single pixel
             | change once every (iirc) 5 minutes. 2. Only user accounts
             | created before the (entirely unannounced) event could
             | participate, preventing people bypassing the time limit
             | with more accounts.
        
               | Jenk wrote:
               | Spam mitigation by rate limiting and preventing account
               | cycling :)
        
         | pelagicAustral wrote:
         | Oddly enough, the first thing I saw was a giant ASCII penis
         | saying "good morning citizen, do you want to be my friend?"
        
         | Karawebnetwork wrote:
         | This page seems to says that users can claim parts of the grid
         | and make them members only. This would prevent some trolling.
         | https://www.yourworldoftext.com/~Help/3
        
         | smitty1e wrote:
         | This is a Rule 34 corollary.
         | 
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_34
        
         | majkinetor wrote:
         | And everything that has avatar and chat will be used for
         | mingling eventually.
        
         | rpastuszak wrote:
         | Ah the famous MTTP (mean time to penis) metric!
        
         | jhgb wrote:
         | > Everything world-editable is eventually filled with
         | depictions of genitals and N-words. Must be a theorem.
         | 
         | Boltzmann's Black Dick?
        
       | dusted wrote:
       | It's just saying "Loading..." Both in Firefox and chrome
        
       | DrinkWater wrote:
       | Blank page and loads of errors in the console: Firefox can't
       | establish a connection to the server at
       | wss://www.yourworldoftext.com/ws/.
        
       | djrockstar1 wrote:
       | 37 minutes and already hugged to death :(
        
         | kiwijamo wrote:
         | Working for me, although it did take a while to load.
        
         | tarkin2 wrote:
         | Can't connect to the websocket, for me
         | 
         | Websocket based websites seem to suffer for this massively. I
         | wonder if there's a better way or a better way of doing
         | websockets. How many websocket connections can a single host
         | reasonable handle?
        
           | tiborsaas wrote:
           | Depends on the implementation:
           | 
           | https://matttomasetti.medium.com/websocket-performance-
           | compa...
           | 
           | https://hashrocket.com/blog/posts/websocket-shootout
        
             | tyingq wrote:
             | Those links are odd because they label the websocket
             | implementations with the language they were written in,
             | rather than the name of the (often 3rd party) library.
             | Where there's more than one choice of library for the
             | language.
        
       | kple wrote:
       | You crashed it: can't establish a connection to the server at
       | wss://www.yourworldoftext.com/ws/
        
       | sizediterable wrote:
       | There's a Scrabble version of this that's free to play
       | 
       | https://spellingquest.online
       | 
       | If you prefer playing as an app over in a browser
       | 
       | https://store.steampowered.com/app/1086630/Spelling_Quest_On...
        
       | usrbinbash wrote:
       | A cool idea in theory.
       | 
       | However, loads waaaay to long at least for me. I guess some
       | better caching may be required.
        
       | majkinetor wrote:
       | This one from 2005 used pixels, and sold them for $1/pixel:
       | 
       | http://www.milliondollarhomepage.com/
        
         | _hao wrote:
         | It's a bit sad that most of those links are now dead.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | furyg3 wrote:
         | I don't know if the "rent pixel ads" guy is insane or
         | brilliant.
        
           | justusthane wrote:
           | Probably not insane...the guy who created it, Alex Tew, also
           | founded Calm.
        
           | Cthulhu_ wrote:
           | Clever idea at the right time, and it got a lot of media
           | attention. There were a lot of copycats that sprung up left
           | and right, but they weren't as successful.
           | 
           | It's an interesting concept as well because the guy could
           | just hand-edit the image and link map, no need to write
           | software to manage it.
        
           | xanaxagoras wrote:
           | Brilliant.
        
       | hairofadog wrote:
       | At some point during the early days of this site someone started
       | drawing a very long ascii line which you could scroll for many
       | many hours and not reach the end of. It became a satirical - or
       | who knows these days, maybe literal - cult. Here's the best
       | summary I can find with a few minutes of lazy searching:
       | 
       | https://yourworldoftext.fandom.com/wiki/The_True_Diagonal
       | 
       | I seem to remember someone posting a screenshot of a short
       | inspirational essay you would find if you reached the end, but
       | looking around it seems like folks are posting various different
       | screenshots of what's at the end, so I suppose that adds to the
       | mythology a little bit.
       | 
       | --
       | 
       | Edit: I found the screenshot of the essay in my filesystem so
       | there's no context, but for whatever it's worth here it is:
       | 
       | https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aboxwithrocksinit/test-buc...
        
         | marcellus23 wrote:
         | This reminds me of an old minecraft server I played on which
         | had a Great Northern Road that someone started building, and
         | was continued by various people. You could just walk on it for
         | hours, through caves, over seas, through mountains... with inns
         | along the way, and scenic overlooks. There was something really
         | special about that, and about extending it when I reached the
         | end. I didn't even play on that server for more than a few
         | days, but that memory is still stuck in my mind.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | TedDoesntTalk wrote:
         | > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aboxwithrocksinit/test-
         | buc...
         | 
         | Beautiful. thank you for sharing that.
        
       | diimdeep wrote:
       | Previously submitted:
       | 
       | - Your World of Text, my current side project. Requires FF3+ or
       | Safari 4, I think. (August 5, 2009 -- 136 points, 71 comments)
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=742268
        
       | pcmaffey wrote:
       | I made an infinitely expanding tile-art game with the same
       | general MMO principles. Kindof an evolution of r/place... except
       | the canvas expands logarithmically every day. While the number of
       | tiles you get each day grows linearly.
       | 
       | It's just sitting there growing without anyone using it, lol
       | (probably because it requires signup).
       | 
       | https://www.oroboria.com
        
         | dmonitor wrote:
         | You should scale the size of the canvas based on the number of
         | unique signups.
        
       | tony-allan wrote:
       | A fun website!
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-12-16 23:01 UTC)