[HN Gopher] Better.com CEO Vishal Garg steps back as employees d...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Better.com CEO Vishal Garg steps back as employees detail how he
       'led by fear'
        
       Author : myth_drannon
       Score  : 113 points
       Date   : 2021-12-10 20:25 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (techcrunch.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (techcrunch.com)
        
       | gigglesupstairs wrote:
       | > Garg "leads by fear," she said, preferring not to be named.
       | "Nothing is ever good enough. He would threaten employees to work
       | harder, faster and not be lazy, but there was never clarity on
       | what the consequences might be."
       | 
       | Standard toxic leadership.
        
       | mfrye0 wrote:
       | I bought a place with Better.com last year. While really cheap, I
       | don't think I would use them again.
       | 
       | It seems like the model is to have a slick UI and hire
       | contractors from India with second rate English skills handle the
       | grunt work. There were multiple instances where there was
       | miscommunication, no reply, or we couldn't get ahold of someone
       | to get the current status. Overall it was really frustrating.
        
         | suresk wrote:
         | I refinanced with them last year and it was a "meh" experience.
         | Their rates/fees were good, and the UI made it pretty easy to
         | work with, but they were incredibly slow. I would have
         | understood - it was a really busy time for refis - but the work
         | flow would go something like this:
         | 
         | They'd ask for a document that they hadn't asked for previously
         | and make a big deal that I needed to provide it to them in the
         | next few hours or else we'd lose our rate, then when I did
         | provide it I wouldn't hear from them for 2 weeks. Overall, even
         | with an appraisal waiver, it took like 3 months for it to go
         | through and I never waited more than a day to respond to
         | requests for info/documents.
        
           | mfrye0 wrote:
           | My experience exactly, though they also asked for the same
           | document multiple times.
        
             | suresk wrote:
             | Yes! That too!
             | 
             | A lot of this started after the rate lock was set to expire
             | and they had to keep extending it (costing them a bit of
             | money each time), so part of me thought the whole "You have
             | until tomorrow morning to send us this document you've
             | already sent us 3 times, or else your lock will expire" was
             | a way for them to get out of it, but more likely it was
             | just incompetence/overwork.
        
         | tebuevd wrote:
         | what if i told you that this is the business model for a lot of
         | SV startups ;)
        
         | cwkoss wrote:
         | We used them ~three years ago, and seemed like our account
         | manager was US-based.
         | 
         | I wonder if their recent 'success' with outsourcing is the
         | primary impetus for the layoffs.
        
         | david38 wrote:
         | Same. Very frustrating, but the money savings was substantial.
        
       | andrew_ wrote:
       | Every story that's come out since this mess started vidates the
       | bad vibes I got from their recruiter on the first call, and my
       | decision to walk away.
        
       | didip wrote:
       | This guy is fascinating (in a bad way). In what universe can you
       | call your employees: DUMB DOLPHINS (with all caps)?
        
       | pkaye wrote:
       | Looks like he didn't maximize shareholder value!
        
       | vanusa wrote:
       | _He already had a reputation for using abusive language in emails
       | to employees, but the treatment toward his investors was yet
       | another shock._
       | 
       | Abusing employees is more or less expected, out in techland.
       | 
       | Ruffle investors' feathers, however, and there may be
       | consequences.
        
         | sharken wrote:
         | Maybe expected but certainly not accepted. In tech the only way
         | to gain respect is to know what you are doing, shouting and
         | using abusive language makes you lose that respect.
         | 
         | Keep it up, and you have to start looking for a new employee.
        
           | vanusa wrote:
           | _In tech the only way to gain respect is to know what you are
           | doing, shouting and using abusive language makes you lose
           | that respect._
           | 
           | That's the platonic ideal, at least. The reality on the
           | ground is often far different.
        
           | weare138 wrote:
           | If your career is in tech sure but Garg's of the world are
           | seldom one of us. In business world the end justifies the
           | means. This type of behavior is not only tolerated but often
           | encouraged. This is only becoming an issue now because the
           | story went viral and is generating bad press which is bad for
           | profits.
        
         | polote wrote:
         | > Ruffle investors' feathers, however, and there may be
         | consequences.
         | 
         | Because that's their main power
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29320078 Your Board of
         | Directors is Probably Going to Fire You 718 points
        
         | eikenberry wrote:
         | > Abusing employees is more or less expected, out in techland.
         | 
         | Which techland do you live in? In my techland there are tons of
         | jobs at places without abusive leadership where you can get a
         | job in a few weeks. No one I know in my land expects this sort
         | of treatment as everyone knows it won't stand.
        
           | bsuvc wrote:
           | I guess it depends on what they meant by "techland".
           | 
           | I think companies who are tech companies or where tech is
           | central to the product tend to attract good tech leaders who
           | treat their teams well.
           | 
           | But at companies where tech is seen as a secondary to the
           | product tech employees are sometimes treated poorly, with
           | things like overwork/abuse of agile processes to extract more
           | work out of developers, unsustainable on-call rotations,
           | unreasonable support response expectations, understaffed
           | teams, restricted budgets, inadequate equipment like super
           | cheap budget laptops, etc.
           | 
           | Sure they might add a foosball table and buy a pizza once in
           | a while, but by and large many companies don't treated tech
           | especially well. I'm not sure if it is a lack of respect
           | (some companies see developers as a pluggable commodity) or
           | resentment for having to pay them more than they think they
           | should have to.
           | 
           | I guess it depends on where you live, but some cities just
           | don't have a lot of pure tech companies, so you are stuck
           | with places like these.
        
             | eikenberry wrote:
             | I agree that there are places like that, I worked at one
             | briefly.. the key there being the word 'briefly'. As soon
             | as it got annoying I started looking and had a new job
             | pretty quick.
             | 
             | Lack of mobility used to be an issue as well, but with all
             | the current remote work possibilities this is no longer the
             | case. The bad employers will end up with the bottom of the
             | barrel, just like in cities with lots of good options, as
             | all their talent will be able to find work elsewhere.
        
       | schnevets wrote:
       | I did a search here just to figure out what Better.com did
       | without visiting their web page, and the results are quite a
       | saga:
       | 
       | > Simple, Online Mortgage - Better Mortgage (3 years ago)
       | 
       | > Better.com CEO Vishal Garg Threatened to Burn His Business
       | Partner Alive (2 months ago)
       | 
       | > Better.com CEO Vishal Garg lays off 15% of employees [video] (7
       | days ago)
       | 
       | > Better.com CEO blasts laid-off employees, accusing them of
       | 'stealing' (4 days ago)
       | 
       | > The Better.com CEO says he's 'deeply sorry' for firing workers
       | over Zoom (2 days ago)
       | 
       | > Better.com's's CEO is 'taking time off effective immediately'
       | (2 hours ago)
        
         | z2 wrote:
         | > Mortgages, Fraud Claims And 'Dumb Dolphins': A Tangled Past
         | Haunts Better.com CEO Vishal Garg (1 year ago)
        
         | mfrye0 wrote:
         | I was tempted to do the same to my business partner. After he
         | bailed on me the day before we were going to close a funding
         | round, among other things.
         | 
         | I think about that quote from Elon sometimes, that starting a
         | company is like eating glass and staring into the abyss.
        
           | Kina wrote:
           | I think your situation is different.
           | 
           | > His former business partner and college friend, Raza Khan,
           | claims that Garg improperly moved $3 million from a software
           | company the two men started to his personal bank accounts,
           | and then used stolen technology to help build Better. Garg
           | denies those claims and is countersuing, in a dispute so
           | bitter that during a deposition Garg threatened to burn his
           | former friend alive.
           | 
           | https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidjeans/2020/11/20/mortgages.
           | ..
        
             | mfrye0 wrote:
             | Yeah, I was exaggerating. While my situation sucked, it
             | definitely wasn't as bad is this.
        
         | chirau wrote:
         | Don't forget the wild email he sent to one of Better.com's
         | largest investors. You can't make this stuff up.
         | 
         | Link: https://www.vice.com/en/article/pkpgkm/bettercom-ceo-
         | called-...
        
           | schleck8 wrote:
           | Wow...
        
         | antisthenes wrote:
         | Sounds like his mental health issues finally caught up with him
         | and resulted in involuntary burnout.
        
       | josh_carterPDX wrote:
       | I find it interesting that the only reason the investors took any
       | action was because of the attention this is getting in the press.
       | As many have already read, Garg had a reputation for bad behavior
       | yet SoftBank and his other investors let it play out leading up
       | to their SPAC.
       | 
       | I feel like we watched this movie before.
       | 
       | **cough**WeWork**cough**
        
       | jedberg wrote:
       | I refinanced with the at the beginning of this year. If they had
       | a toxic internal culture they did a great job hiding it from
       | their customers, because I had an amazing experience with
       | incredible customer service.
       | 
       | I'm not saying the culture isn't toxic, I'm saying it's
       | surprising how well they hid it.
        
         | tomnipotent wrote:
         | I've had amazing experiences at any number of restaurants that
         | I later discovered treat staff horribly (Urasawa, Mario Batoli
         | come to mind).
         | 
         | Abusers work very hard to make sure other people don't realize
         | what's going on behind the scenes (whether that's the office,
         | or at home).
        
         | deckar01 wrote:
         | I financed my first mortgage and refi through Better. They did
         | ping me about once a week even when there was nothing for
         | either of us to do while waiting for an appraisal. I got the
         | feeling they were hitting arbitrary engagement quotas.
         | 
         | Compared to my experience with Rocket it was great. I sat on a
         | phone with Rocket for hours having them put me on hold and go
         | to a manager to negotiate rates only for them to have shuffled
         | the numbers around so that the interest rate looked lower, but
         | the total cost of the loan broke even due to extra points and
         | fees rolled into the loan. The salesperson was manic and
         | desperate. They pretended to have a nice async process on the
         | front end, but they end up dumping me into a phone call at the
         | end where I had to tell them everything I just typed in.
         | Several other online companies had similar tactics. The worst
         | was one that just harvested my info and sold it to every shady
         | lender who proceeded to call me non-stop for weeks.
        
       | downWidOutaFite wrote:
       | Hated that company when I was shopping for a refinance. They had
       | the slickest website (which is probably why they call themeselves
       | fintech) but were extremely opaque about their quotes even after
       | they forced me to answer 100s of detailed personal finance
       | questions. And very spammy
        
         | bombcar wrote:
         | And their rates/pricing wasn't even any better than other
         | places, just obfuscated so it was harder to compare.
        
           | treis wrote:
           | Both of these are the opposite of my experience with them.
           | You could fiddle with down payment, price, and points to your
           | heart's content and it'd spit out a quote for you. Also a few
           | thousand cheaper than other places.
        
           | kn0where wrote:
           | But they have Better in their name, so it must be better
           | right?
        
             | kreeben wrote:
             | I Can't Believe They're Not Better!
        
       | keewee7 wrote:
       | Two takeaways from this is:
       | 
       | 1. Be a nice boss.
       | 
       | 2. Fire people as discretely as legally possible. Don't do it
       | over a Zoom call that will leak and make you the face of the
       | #EvilCEO archetype the Internet hates so much.
        
       | kingcharles wrote:
       | I still have a tab open in my browser from week's ago.
       | 
       | LinkedIn: 50 Top Startups in the U.S.
       | 
       | #1 Better [Financial Services]
        
         | rossdavidh wrote:
         | Payola?
        
       | baby wrote:
       | This story is only getting better and better.com
        
       | rmason wrote:
       | I remember talking with an investor about a founder CEO and said
       | I was friends with a lot of his employees who say he's a bully.
       | The investor shrugged and then said with a smile but he's a bully
       | who gets results.
        
         | vanusa wrote:
         | Until the day arrived when they were shocked to find themselves
         | on ... the receiving end of that very same treatment.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-12-10 23:00 UTC)