[HN Gopher] An Incan nobleman contested Spanish history
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       An Incan nobleman contested Spanish history
        
       Author : Thevet
       Score  : 36 points
       Date   : 2021-12-08 17:34 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (daily.jstor.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (daily.jstor.org)
        
       | pvaldes wrote:
       | Cherry-picking is useful to promote agendas, but I would prefer
       | to ask the opinion of a true historian about that.
       | 
       | > one of the most important and idiosyncratic texts of Indigenous
       | American literature remained forgotten
       | 
       | Hem, nope. I don't buy this BS.
       | 
       | In the roman empire tradition, Spanish crown registered
       | absolutely anything of interest. They funded the first global,
       | -global-, scientific studies about American Flora and Fauna. The
       | whole stuff. Just one book in the series would gave us a much
       | better picture of the history than this text.
       | 
       | And they spent a lot of money in that huge task, just to publish
       | and share it with the rest of Europe. We have 'English' tomatoes
       | and 'Dutch' potatoes and 'Italian' peppers or avocados because
       | they shared the discoveries. Think about it. Try to culture some
       | Asian spices in Europe instead.
       | 
       | There are probably hundreds, (if not thousands) of more relevant
       | texts about the early history of the New World. And unlike the
       | old tale of "boy finds big thing gathering dust in a library"
       | they are available to anybody interested.
       | 
       | Spaniards or Portuguese crowns did a lot of things wrong but also
       | a lot of things right. The last week somebody was talking on TV
       | about if is time to repatriate the remains of Hernan Cortes to
       | Spain to protect them from haters, The man was dead for
       | centuries, for Pete's sake!.
       | 
       | Lets put it clear, this "miraculous discovering" is just another
       | cancel latinoamerican culture stunt.
        
         | djsbs wrote:
         | The only Latin Americans _from Latin America_ Ive ever known
         | who are resentful of Spain are white, unemployed socialists who
         | studied Marxism. And I like to think I've met enough of them.
         | 
         | Spain is fascinating. The "pop" image of her is seriously wrong
         | (and this is widely known to historians).
        
         | kuhewa wrote:
         | I take indigenous American literature to mean authored by an
         | indigenous American. Can you suggest more idiosyncratic and
         | important examples?
         | 
         | > this "miraculous discovering" is just another cancel
         | latinoamerican culture stunt.
         | 
         | in 1908?
        
         | dang wrote:
         | Please do not take HN threads into nationalistic or ideological
         | flamewar. It's not what this site is for, and it destroys what
         | it is for.
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
        
       | datameta wrote:
       | If this is what we did to other Homo sapiens, I have no doubts
       | about the majority steakholder in the destruction of our related
       | hominin populations.
        
         | hihihihi1234 wrote:
         | Was he the one with all the beef?
        
       | cwp wrote:
       | It's such a shame that the coding system used by quipus was lost
       | for so long. I bet a _lot_ of quipus were just thrown away
       | because nobody could read them anymore.
        
         | 29athrowaway wrote:
         | The quipu conventions used by the quipucamayocs, the Incan IRS,
         | are still lost.
         | 
         | The Qhapaq Simi language used by the Inca nobility is lost
         | forever too.
        
           | ska wrote:
           | Wasn't this intentional (i.e. systematic destruction of
           | records, and suppression of use) ?
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | vondur wrote:
       | The poor natives in Peru were doomed once the Spanish discovered
       | all of the silver present. I believe they basically enslaved the
       | local indigenous population.
        
         | WalterBright wrote:
         | Ironically, all the gold and silver the Spanish extracted and
         | transferred to Spain did the Spanish little good, as it simply
         | resulted in inflation.
         | 
         | Like what we do today with fiat money.
        
         | chestertn wrote:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_colonial_Spanish_Am...
        
       | djsbs wrote:
       | Law of Burgos 1512
       | 
       | Sublimis Deus 1537
       | 
       | Pastorale Officium 1537
       | 
       | New Laws 1542
       | 
       | Laws of Spain, or of Roman Christendom, declaring that America
       | belongs to Americans (ie natives) and that they are free.
       | 
       | Bill of rights not seen by any European colonized peoples
       | elsewhere.
       | 
       | Ever wonder why all the brown people seem to live _south_ of Rio
       | Grande, as soon as the language changes to Spanish? Because the
       | Spaniards were, by far, the most benign European imperialists.
       | 
       | There were crimes, Potosi cries out to this day, but the fact
       | that an Incan nobleman knew how to write in Spanish and could
       | petition the court of Charles V (?) is a testament to Spain.
       | 
       | !Viva Espana!
        
         | kuhewa wrote:
         | > Because the Spaniards were, by far, the most benign European
         | imperialists.
         | 
         |  _Laughs in Pizzaro_
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | dang wrote:
           | Please do not take HN threads further into flamewar.
           | 
           | " _Don 't feed egregious comments by replying; flag them
           | instead._"
           | 
           | a.k.a. please don't feed the trolls
           | 
           | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
        
         | bsedlm wrote:
         | > the most benign European imperialists.
         | 
         | "most benign" does not equal "least worse".
         | 
         | sure, they didn't violiently decimate the native populations,
         | salmonella took care of that on its own.
         | 
         | And instead of violently killing the remaining natives they
         | raped and enslaved them (as compared to just murdered them).
         | That is not benign in any way, shape, or form.
        
         | bsedlm wrote:
         | sometimes I think that the main difference is that the Spanish
         | didn't have a clear idea of where they'd arrived; they had
         | sailed looking for new trade routes. But then they "struck
         | gold" and they improvised.
         | 
         | But the rest of the europeans sailed to conquer, with a very
         | clear picture of what they were doing even before taking to the
         | sea: taking over the "new world".
        
         | Darmody wrote:
         | And don't forget that in 1593 Felipe II established a 8 hours
         | work days. Centuries before socialism. [0]
         | 
         | Interracial marriage centuries before it was legal in the US.
         | 
         | Tens of universities.
         | 
         | And even a vaccine. Not a vaccine as we know them today but a
         | vaccine nevertheless. [1]
         | 
         | [0] https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Eight-hour_day
         | 
         | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balmis_Expedition
        
           | djsbs wrote:
           | Or forget that liberalism has its roots in Spain centuries
           | before similar ideas are found elsewhere.
        
             | Burnafter290 wrote:
             | There's an interesting position in "The Dawn of Everything"
             | by Graeber and Wengrow wherein they argue that the
             | isolation that the Americas were allowed gives us a palette
             | of alternative social constructions. The influence of the
             | Greeks, the Alexandrian, the Roman and the cultural
             | modalities of the Mediterranean an no doubt the various
             | other groups of considerable power and most importantly the
             | emergent interplay. Moreover the eventual concretion of
             | hierarchical structure in the most elementary facets of
             | life, lead to the assent of man to such hierarchy, thus
             | pushing forward the ideological model of European states.
             | This, perhaps, leveraged the equalization of man in the
             | eyes of god to be convincing.
             | 
             | To put it concisely, Europeans were deluded into the belief
             | that hierarchy was ever-present - something which is
             | heavily discredited historically. Further rationalizations
             | that it _must be_ so for a  "developed, complex" society is
             | evidently made spurious as well.
             | 
             | The various peoples of the Americas on the other hand,
             | lacking in these diverse influences, and instead developing
             | their own systems often altogether eschewed hierarchy and
             | formalized coercive powers. Men and women in some cultures
             | were very explicitly equal, and chiefs held little in the
             | way of formal power. They were public speakers, and they
             | had to present rational and convincing arguments - the
             | rational tradition. This is a _stark_ contrast to the
             | feudal system and the heavy influence of the Roman Catholic
             | church at the time. DoE suggests that certain figures had
             | considerable influence on later though, providing citations
             | from philosophers such as Montesquieu.
             | 
             | Their key argument comes from a highly-referenced
             | individual named Kandiaronk, who is quite probably the
             | basis for Adario in Baron Lahontan's books (evidently very
             | popular), of particular interest:
             | 
             | "Finally, Supplement aux Voyages ou Dialogues avec le
             | sauvage Adario lambasts institutional Christianity by means
             | of a dialogue between de Lahontan and a Huron Chief named
             | Adario (The Rat). The author attempts to contrast the
             | injustice of Christianity with the _freedom and justice of
             | native people._ His idealized view of  "natural humanity"
             | as a vehicle for criticizing European civilization was a
             | forceful early expression of the "noble savage" trope
             | associated with the Enlightenment."[1]
             | 
             | Evidently, Lahontan's writings were very popular:
             | 
             | "All these would be rather trivial concerns had Lahontan's
             | books not been so successful; but they were to have an
             | enormous impact on European sensibilities. Kandiaronk's
             | opinions were translated into German, English, Dutch and
             | Italian, and continued in print, in multiple editions, for
             | over a century. Any self-respecting intellectual of the
             | eighteenth century would have been almost certain to have
             | read them." [2]
             | 
             | Coming from that point of reference, it wouldn't be
             | surprising that Spain, having decades worth of exclusive
             | exposure, would come out leading "liberal" thought. But is
             | it fair to assert that it was Europeans that initiated it
             | if it is so that they were inspired by the natives of the
             | New World?
             | 
             | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis-
             | Armand_de_Lom_d%27Arce_d... [2] Dawn of Everything
        
         | notahacker wrote:
         | This is some kind of reverse "what did the Romans do for us"
         | satire, right?
         | 
         | "But apart from killing 80% of the native population, who
         | definitely weren't slaves because in return for their forced
         | labour they were forcibly converted to Catholicism, what
         | exactly did the Spanish do wrong?" The bills of rights were
         | inspired by the extent of the conquistadors' brutality, were
         | generally ignored and the New Laws lasted three whole years and
         | one dead viceroy before the Spanish settlers forced the King to
         | back down. I'm not sure missionaries teaching one nobleman
         | Spanish so that he could write a petition to be ignored really
         | offsets that.
        
           | Darmody wrote:
           | They didn't kill the native population. Horrible crimes were
           | committed but not genocide. The crimes committed there were
           | not different than the ones committed in Europe between
           | Europeans.
           | 
           | The conquistadores were able to overthrow an Empire because
           | they made allies with everybody else who was bullied by them.
           | 
           | Sadly diseases killed a lot of people. More than 90% of the
           | deaths were caused by said diseases, I think it was close to
           | 94%.
           | 
           | If Spaniards were marrying into the native nobility is
           | because it mattered to the locals as they were the majority.
        
             | djsbs wrote:
             | One minor quip
             | 
             | " The crimes committed there were not different than the
             | ones committed in Europe between Europeans."
             | 
             | Just over 100 years ago Belgians were "harvesting" the
             | right arms of Congolese for who knows what reason. The
             | Spaniards were always much more benign than their Northern
             | cousins.
        
               | Darmody wrote:
               | Well, I wasn't comparing it to what other countries did
               | with their colonies. I was comparing it to what Europeans
               | did to themselves.
               | 
               | Oh, by the way. Spain never had colonies. They had
               | provinces and everyone in those provinces was just as
               | citizen of the empire as someone from current Spain.
        
               | bigwavedave wrote:
               | > Oh, by the way, Spain never had colonies. They had
               | provinces and everyone in those provinces was just as
               | citizen of the empire as someone from current Spain.
               | 
               | Um. Okay. A colony is:
               | 
               | 1. "an area over which a foreign nation or state extends
               | or maintains control"
               | 
               | and
               | 
               | 2. "a group of people who establish residence in that
               | area and who retain ties with the parent state."[1]
               | 
               | So, to say that Spain had no colonies is patently false-
               | it most certainly had pockets of emigrants from the
               | homeland who were still culturally tied to it and under
               | its rule (the Philippines, Louisiana, any number of
               | Caribbean islands, colonial Mexico, and the list goes on
               | and on during Siglo de Oro and beyond).
               | 
               | I don't have a horse in this race, but if you wanna act
               | like a pedant, you're gonna be treated like one.
               | Ridiculous.
               | 
               | [1] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/colony
        
               | pvaldes wrote:
               | If you want to accuse other to be pedant, please, note
               | first the 'foreign' word in your description.
               | 
               | Living in a province of the -same- nation that has
               | granted you a fully citizenship is a different situation
               | than living in a colony ruled by a -foreign- nation. As
               | everybody knows, the later typically comes with none or a
               | restricted set of rights. Ask a Puerto rican friend for
               | more details.
        
           | djsbs wrote:
           | They weren't killed, they died of diseases. As we see today
           | with the pandemic, the respiratory illnesses were
           | unstoppable, so you cant ascribe guilt through some assumed
           | knowledge of proto-germ theory.
           | 
           | The first law is from 1512, 20 years after the discover of
           | the Americas. Given transportation at the time it is clear
           | that he vast majority of the troops overthrowing the Inca
           | were recruited by the subjugated native peoples. Kinda what
           | progressives [1] tried to do in Afghanistan. Pray, what noble
           | accomplishment do we have to show in Afghanistan after 20
           | years?
           | 
           | The enslavement of natives was against the law of King.
           | Ignored by criminals, sure, but the law was clear and its
           | violators criminals.
           | 
           | Forced conversion to Catholicism from a blood thirst cult
           | that stained their monuments with the blood of innocents. Ya,
           | they were real bad for that. Btw, if you insist on cultural
           | relativism, what were progressives doing in Afghanistan but
           | proselytizing feminism?
           | 
           | [1] I used the word progressive, as opposed to Americans, on
           | purpose as the war was a multi nation effort cheered on by
           | people, "right" or "left" who believe we have to impose
           | democracy and liberalism on others. I remember before 9/11
           | when leftist wanted to liberate Afghani women. I remember in
           | August, when leftists were aghast we left the women behind
        
             | notahacker wrote:
             | The Law of 1512 formalised the econmienda system, which was
             | slavery in all but name. The best thing to be said for it
             | is that it was intended to be less brutal than what had
             | already happened and what continued to happen. Diseases
             | decimated the population north and south of the Rio Grande,
             | but it was south of it that the much greater populations
             | also died from overwork (not that the British and French
             | were any better; they just imported their slaves from
             | elsewhere).
             | 
             | You will forgive me for not engaging further if you are the
             | sort of person that regards the econmienda system as a
             | magnificent accomplishment, especially compared with the
             | horrors of female education "leftists" inflicted in
             | Afghanistan. It is the same reason I don't speak to the
             | sort of person that argues the holocaust was basically self
             | defence and signs his posts off Deutschland Uber Alles.
        
               | jcranmer wrote:
               | > (not that the British and French were any better; they
               | just imported their slaves from elsewhere).
               | 
               | I should point out that the Spanish _also_ imported
               | slaves from Africa in prodigious quantities. However,
               | instead of doing it themselves, the Spanish crown let out
               | a single contract for who would be the sole importer of
               | slaves into the American colonies (the asiento)--and all
               | of the major maritime powers of Europe were vying to win
               | that contract at various points in time.
        
               | hihihihi1234 wrote:
               | If you find the term "Deutschland Uber Alles" problematic
               | then you'd be horrified if you ever watch Germany at the
               | football world cup, because "Deutschland Uber Alles" is
               | not a Nazi or fascistic slogan but is a lyric from the
               | current German national anthem.
        
             | Gabriel_Martin wrote:
             | "Forced conversion to Catholicism from a blood thirst cult
             | that stained their monuments with the blood of innocents"
             | 
             | Not sure you want to bring into focus Catholicism's history
             | as it relates to the blood of innocents..
        
               | djsbs wrote:
               | @Gabriel Martin.
               | 
               | " Not sure you want to bring into focus Catholicism's
               | history on the blood of innocents.."
               | 
               | Go for it. I'll defend the sins of Rome against the
               | depravities of any other civilization, including and
               | especially our own.
        
               | [deleted]
        
               | christkv wrote:
               | I don't know compared to what major faith. Name of one
               | that has not perpetrated mass murder in name of some
               | deity or idea.
        
               | shrimp_emoji wrote:
               | A safe bet is this one, which is also one of the most
               | ancient ones that still exists today:
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jainism
        
               | shrimp_emoji wrote:
               | It's funny to reflect on the context, too.
               | 
               | The Inca were probably the most astonishingly advanced
               | Native Americans, and they surely had great thinkers
               | (definitely great engineers). And here come the
               | conquistadors, rock-headed barbarians from the most
               | desperate segments of Spanish society (little else drove
               | people to risk their life for riches in the New World),
               | absolutely slaughtering them, burning their cultural
               | artifacts or melting them down into ingots when
               | applicable.
               | 
               | It's like if (a much more desperate and destitute version
               | of) the January 6th protesters were sent to conquer new
               | worlds.
               | 
               | As an aside, a colorful example[0]: they lured the
               | Emperor in a plaza (he came to show he was unafraid, and
               | his army were disarmed of all but ceremonial weapons),
               | and, in the slaughter that ensued, they tried capturing
               | him. He was up on a palanquin, carried by servants.
               | Unable to reach him, the Spanish began cutting off the
               | limbs of the servants, who it's said, without thinking,
               | bore the load on their shoulders instead (it was
               | unthinkable to do otherwise, as they considered the
               | Emperor a god). Eventually, they captured him. In
               | captivity, they taught him to play Chess, and I think
               | it's said he was good at it. Later, panicked that an army
               | was going to come and re-capture him, they killed him.
               | Before his death, he was offered conversion to
               | Catholicism, which he accepted, which awarded him the
               | clemency of being strangled instead of burned alive.
               | 
               | 0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Cajamarca
        
               | chestertn wrote:
               | This is a very colorful view of history. You can also see
               | that the first university in America was built by the
               | spaniards. The first university in Asia? Also, built by
               | the spaniards.
               | 
               | The earlier ships were a mixture of those "barbarians" as
               | you mentioned, and very learned people.
               | 
               | The concept of international law and human rights started
               | with the discussions in Spain after the discovery of
               | America:
               | 
               | https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/school-
               | salamanca/#IusGent...
        
               | dang wrote:
               | Please do not take HN threads further into nationalistic
               | or (god help us) religious flamewar. It's not what this
               | site is for, and it destroys what it is for.
               | 
               | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
        
               | Gabriel_Martin wrote:
               | Sorry, I took the bait. My bad.
        
         | dang wrote:
         | Please do not take HN threads into nationalistic or ideological
         | flamewar. You started a doozy with this one and then poured
         | fuel on the inevitable flames. We ban accounts that do that, so
         | please don't do it again.
         | 
         | If you wouldn't mind reviewing
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the
         | intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.
        
         | sulam wrote:
         | I regret that I only have but one downvote to give to this re-
         | framing.
        
           | dang wrote:
           | " _Don 't feed egregious comments by replying; flag them
           | instead._"
           | 
           | a.k.a. please don't feed the trolls
           | 
           | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
        
           | djsbs wrote:
           | Let me give you another opportunity.
           | 
           | While you're at it, care to expound a little more than
           | "reframing"?
           | 
           | Did those laws not exist?
           | 
           | Did they not grant rights unheard of in the 16th century?
           | 
           | Are there not vastly larger populations of natives south of
           | Rio Grande?
           | 
           | Did I not acknowledge that crimes were committed (but were
           | leas in intensity and duration than of other colonizers)?
           | 
           | I mean, my comment surely hurts the pride of Anglos (and
           | Dutch) - for all their moaning of conquistadors Northern
           | Europeans were far more brutal than Spain. Theres no contest.
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | dang wrote:
             | Perpetuating flamewars like this is particularly against
             | the site guidelines. Would you please review them and stick
             | to the rules when posting here?
             | 
             | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
        
         | [deleted]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-12-08 23:02 UTC)