[HN Gopher] Sarco suicide capsule 'passes legal review' in Switz...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Sarco suicide capsule 'passes legal review' in Switzerland
        
       Author : gigglesupstairs
       Score  : 155 points
       Date   : 2021-12-05 17:16 UTC (5 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.swissinfo.ch)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.swissinfo.ch)
        
       | jasonpeacock wrote:
       | Tangentially, this is my frustration with the death penalty -
       | it's way too complicated & error-prone when much simpler,
       | reliable, and humane methods are available like this.
       | 
       | Humans are easy to kill, and it's not hard to do so humanely.
       | 
       | (Yes, there are many other problems with the death penalty
       | besides the technical execution of it, but you'd think we could
       | at least do that part right.)
        
         | 71a54xd wrote:
         | Not to be grim, this is a very "adult" subject that most adults
         | have a hard time discussing.
         | 
         | After seeing friends and family struggle with severe injury /
         | deformities and Alzheimer's / mental decline (cancer with
         | grueling treatment as well) - I can as a currently happy and
         | healthy person say that I would likely use some form of firearm
         | to end my life. It's quick, hard to mess up and above all my
         | right as a human being.
         | 
         | I generally dislike political spats regarding labor /
         | "obligations" to society in general - but I think the most
         | sacred right is the right to decide whether you contribute by
         | living. Both capitalism and socialism demonize the idea of
         | suicide because each needs some form of a worker and the
         | pursuit of a certain constructed life to work properly.
         | Something that I'll never understand and that I believe is more
         | morally wrong is family deciding that someone should "get over"
         | their own choice to no longer live. In my opinion nothing is
         | more selfish and less respectful of what life should mean to an
         | individual.
        
           | rootusrootus wrote:
           | > hard to mess up
           | 
           | I think it depends a bit on technique and choice of firearm.
           | Some people foolishly put a gun in their mouth and assume it
           | will definitely kill. But it's entirely possible to miss the
           | brainstem and just blow off the side of your face instead.
           | Now you are alive but mangled.
           | 
           | Something like a shotgun is probably a bit harder to screw
           | up.
           | 
           | But personally I'm far too chickenshit to use a firearm. I'd
           | probably try to find someone who'd sell me fentanyl, were I
           | interested in terminating my own existence. At the moment,
           | however, I'm far more likely to suffer an existential crisis
           | and so I've zero desire to answer life's greatest question
           | any sooner than strictly necessary.
        
             | BrandoElFollito wrote:
             | And here I am in France, where the closest thing to a gun I
             | can get legally is a nail gun.
        
           | rrdharan wrote:
           | > hard to mess up
           | 
           | I was under the impression it was in fact not that hard at
           | all to mess up.
           | 
           | Though in fact, seems like other methods are indeed likely
           | "worse" in terms of achieving the intended outcome:
           | 
           | https://www.medpagetoday.com/psychiatry/generalpsychiatry/83.
           | ..
        
         | meepmorp wrote:
         | Yeah, with all the problems the US has had acquiring an
         | appropriate cocktail of drugs for lethal injections over the
         | last few years, you'd think someone would look into this kind
         | of thing. Nitrogen is super easy to get.
        
           | sschueller wrote:
           | Or just carbon monoxide. The thing people are so paranoid
           | over in their homes because it is a silent killer.
        
           | jasonhansel wrote:
           | Needless to say, bringing back gas chambers is a hard sell.
        
             | formerly_proven wrote:
             | Isn't Arizona planning to start executions in gas chambers
             | again using Zyklon B?
        
               | meepmorp wrote:
               | They've always used hydrogen cyanide (HCN) gas, typically
               | produced from potassium cyanide pellets dropped into
               | hydrochloric acid. Zyklon B is just HCN.
               | 
               | Edit: not HCl, H2SO4.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | jack_riminton wrote:
           | Some states are experimenting with Nitrogen
           | 
           | Article from NYTimes from 2018: https://web.archive.org/web/2
           | 0210704140110/https://www.nytim...
        
           | skocznymroczny wrote:
           | I am not up to date with US lethal injection, but weren't the
           | changes in lethal injections in the US "yeah, it's still a
           | painful death, but we added muscle relaxants so it looks
           | peaceful on the outside and acceptable to the public?"
        
             | meepmorp wrote:
             | I think there's always been a paralytic involved. The idea
             | was to knock the person out with a barbiturate, then stop
             | the breathing with the muscle relaxant, and finally stop
             | the heart with a bolus of potassium chloride.
             | 
             | It's not so much to pretend it's peaceful, as it's a error
             | in how the drugs are administered and availability of
             | appropriate drugs.
        
               | jasonpeacock wrote:
               | This is exactly my point - why do something so
               | complicated when many people die quietly in their homes
               | from CO poisoning? Let's just setup a CO poisoning
               | chamber to do the same thing.
               | 
               | Or nitrogen as the article describes. Or a fatal overdose
               | of a pleasant drug like morphine?
               | 
               | Even the guillotine is quite humane, though gory.
        
               | gambiting wrote:
               | I never understood it either - there must be some crazy
               | reason though.
        
               | kergonath wrote:
               | Sadism, mostly. The electric chair was painful enough but
               | too picturesque, which makes it easy to rally against.
               | The injections solve that problem whilst still inflicting
               | immense pain. Which is supposed to be good, because these
               | damn criminals had it coming. Or something.
        
               | [deleted]
        
               | alice-i-cecile wrote:
               | Many argue that the deliberate cruelty is the point. Also
               | stigma around gas chambers.
        
             | hprotagonist wrote:
             | The changes are of the form that nearly every legit
             | manufacturer of the cocktail refuses to produce it for the
             | purposes of capital punishment.
             | 
             | https://www.npr.org/2015/03/11/392375383/states-scramble-
             | to-...
        
         | Jiro wrote:
         | Any time someone tries a new method of execution, activists
         | pounce on it and take it to court, making any new method
         | expensive because of court costs and tied up in years of cases.
         | The only methods of execution that can't be filibustered in
         | this way are methods where courts have specifically ruled in
         | the past that the method is okay. That's why execution is
         | limited to specific methods, and why we're not going to use
         | carbon monoxide or nitrogen.
         | 
         | Personally, I'd prefer that if the extra suffering caused by a
         | method of execution is less than the suffering caused by, for
         | instance, a week in jail, we should ignore the suffering and
         | permit use of the method.
        
           | deegles wrote:
           | Depending on the jail you use as a baseline, that might be a
           | scary way to die.
        
       | aaron695 wrote:
       | This is 100% because of Futurama.
       | 
       | But we'll ignore that?
       | 
       | Sure it's a funny meme, and I'm happy for memes to become real
       | even at the cost of human lives, 200 million dollar movies also
       | cost a lot of lives.
       | 
       | But I'm not going to pretend I'm stupid just so we as a species
       | can meme off a cartoon show without mentioning it. Own it. It ok
       | it's off Futurama and a lot of people love Futurama and it was
       | originally dystopian. We also love dystopian, probably more for
       | other people though.
       | 
       | FYI Nitschke's The Deliverance Machine has been used legally
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthanasia_device you could see it
       | at art galleries. Wiki says the British Science Museum has the
       | one that was used on people.
        
       | errcorrectcode wrote:
       | For a second, I thought "capsule" meant "pill." "Pod" would've
       | been a better word.
       | 
       | Obligatory:
       | 
       | Does it have "quick and painless", "slow and horrible", and
       | "clumsy bludgeoning" settings?
       | 
       | What do they do with the bodies?
        
         | jfrunyon wrote:
         | Or "booth" (shoutout to Futurama) ;)
        
         | mcguire wrote:
         | Given that conceivably you could print the pod yourself, unless
         | the AI automatically notifies someone no one would know so you
         | would sit in a pod full of nitrogen until someone found you.
        
           | errcorrectcode wrote:
           | It seems a little impractical to print yourself given the
           | size of the parts.
           | 
           | This idea has too many moving components, I don't think it's
           | a good idea.
           | 
           | There are already companies who sell dual-use nitrogen
           | equipment for home brewing and "home brewing."
        
           | LorenPechtel wrote:
           | What actually matters is the nitrogen, not the pod.
        
           | errcorrectcode wrote:
           | It would be better to already have arrangements pre-paid
           | (Edit: in the US, it's called "pre-need" and can save 80-90%
           | of the costs by buying decades before), and the coroner and
           | the mortician notified. Having someone "find" you isn't a
           | very classy way to go out.
        
       | deadalus wrote:
       | Hoping this pill makes it to the Darknet Markets, I want to die
       | but I don't want to experience pain. I just want a painless exit
       | from this world from where I find no meaning or joy.
        
         | bogwog wrote:
         | If you click the link you'll see a picture of it. It's not a
         | pill, it's a giant capsule you step into.
         | 
         | Also, I don't know you, but I'm confident that dying is the
         | wrong solution to whatever problems you're having.
        
           | gregoryl wrote:
           | Consider: When you share a profoundly personal feeling, and a
           | stranger openly states "I know nothing about you or your
           | situation, but you're wrong".
        
         | meepmorp wrote:
         | You should take a minute to skim the article.
        
         | timwaagh wrote:
         | I'm sure there's plenty on there that can kill you already. But
         | before you go maybe try a vacation in Thailand or something.
        
         | schroeding wrote:
         | It's not a pill, but a "capsule" in the "Japanese Capsule
         | Hotel" sense.
         | 
         | I feel you. I'm the same, honestly.
         | 
         | That's probably the biggest danger of these "safe", "easy"
         | suicide methods - some people just don't commit suicide because
         | they are too scared of a cruel death, not because they are
         | attached to life. Stuff like this will lower the probability of
         | such a cruel death, making suicide less scary, raising the
         | probability of pulling though with it. Not an easy topic.
         | 
         | But I really hope you can find something in life before you do
         | it, so you don't have to do it ^^'
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | smeej wrote:
         | From someone who's felt that way before, I strongly recommend
         | going searching for meaning or joy instead, or inventing your
         | own meaning or joy if you can't find anybody else's idea that
         | does it for you.
         | 
         | Not saying it'll be easy, or even promising it'll work.
         | 
         | I'm just saying I'm glad I gave it a shot. 10/10 would
         | recommend. YMMV.
        
       | hliyan wrote:
       | For a moment, the catchy trade name and the mention of 3D
       | printing made me worry that this was a startup. Thankfully, Exit
       | International is a non-profit [1]. Imagine if this had been a
       | commercial endeavor: what would one have to resort to, to
       | increase revenue?
       | 
       | https://www.exitinternational.net/about-exit/history/
        
         | sokoloff wrote:
         | > what would one have to resort to, to increase revenue?
         | 
         | Well, subscriptions are out...
        
         | garaetjjte wrote:
         | Uh...
         | 
         | >Our aim is to develop an artificial intelligence screening
         | system to establish the person's mental capacity. Naturally
         | there is a lot of scepticism, especially on the part of
         | psychiatrists. But our original conceptual idea is that the
         | person would do an online test and receive a code to access the
         | Sarco.
        
         | 1f60c wrote:
         | "Before we continue with this assisted suicide, I'd like to
         | thank our sponsor NordVPN"
        
       | questiondev wrote:
       | my anxiety is getting the best of me whenever i see this type of
       | stuff i always think of how a state can abuse it to get rid of
       | people legally and use an excuse. but then again i am extremely
       | distrusting of new "progress" in general.
        
       | drakonka wrote:
       | I'm glad more options for a peaceful chosen death are becoming
       | available.
       | 
       | Between a sudden, unexpected death and dying in pain from a
       | progressive disease, my "ideal" way to die would be chosen death
       | before a progressive disease becomes bad enough to cross some
       | personal threshold of suffering.
       | 
       | At the same time, I plan to do whatever I reasonably can to
       | prolong my life (and its quality) for as long as possible.
       | 
       | Hopefully by the time this becomes relevant more options like
       | this capsule and others will be readily available.
       | 
       | Having said that, his quote about an AI giving you permission to
       | die seems a bit preposterous. The actual method of death he
       | described sounds reasonable, but I don't know that I'd want a
       | machine to permit me to end my own life. Not that having to get a
       | doctor's permission sounds any better. Ideally, nobody should
       | have a say over a life but the individual themselves. I recognize
       | in saying this though that it isn't really that simple, and that
       | there are complex nuances with potential undue influence family
       | members or others surrounding a person can have in the situation.
        
         | LorenPechtel wrote:
         | Yup. There are a lot of ways to die that are worse than dying.
         | Why bother with the pod, though? A big plastic bag and a tank
         | of nitrogen can do the same thing.
        
         | BrandoElFollito wrote:
         | > my "ideal" way to die would be chosen death before a
         | progressive disease becomes bad enough to cross some personal
         | threshold of suffering.
         | 
         | It is a long time I wish there was some kind of deice you can
         | implant in your body that would release poison when not
         | responding to some kind of regular request. This would at least
         | solve neurological cases (either degenerative, or alive in a
         | coma which is terrifying, or vegetative state)
        
       | ehPReth wrote:
       | What's/where's the best "available now" service that takes
       | foreigners?
        
       | cadence- wrote:
       | Wow, even better looking than this: https://i.kym-
       | cdn.com/entries/icons/facebook/000/023/876/sui...
       | 
       | More seriously, I like it. I'm always petrified of dying a slow
       | and painful death from some disease that cannot be cured. I would
       | much rather just use this and be done with it.
        
         | iso1210 wrote:
         | Go parachuting
        
           | LorenPechtel wrote:
           | If you're in good enough shape to go parachuting it's
           | unlikely you're in bad enough shape that suicide is a sane
           | answer.
        
       | cambaceres wrote:
       | I wonder how they test these.
        
       | ag8 wrote:
       | > Our aim is to develop an artificial intelligence screening
       | system to establish the person's mental capacity.
       | 
       | I'd like to see how that works!
        
         | criddell wrote:
         | I can imagine it getting into a catch-22 scenario where wanting
         | to die is considered a sign of mental illness and mentally ill
         | people are excluded from using the suicide machine.
        
           | tomjen3 wrote:
           | Then it wouldn't been AI, it would just be the current
           | medical system.
        
       | User23 wrote:
       | It's neat that Robert Chambers predicted this well over a century
       | ago in _The King in Yellow_.
        
         | analog31 wrote:
         | Socrates drank hemlock.
        
           | User23 wrote:
           | While Plato presents it as a principled stand, it remains
           | that Socrate's death was the result of a judicial conviction
           | and thus isn't exactly a voluntary suicide.
        
       | gigglesupstairs wrote:
       | > A 3D-printed capsule, destined for use in assisted suicide, may
       | legally be operated in Switzerland, according to advice obtained
       | by Exit International, the organisation that developed the
       | 'Sarco' machine.
       | 
       | > It's a 3-D printed capsule, activated from the inside by the
       | person intending to die. The machine can be towed anywhere for
       | the death. It can be in an idyllic outdoor setting or in the
       | premises of an assisted suicide organisation, for example.
       | 
       | > The person will get into the capsule and lie down. It's very
       | comfortable. They will be asked a number of questions and when
       | they have answered, they may press the button inside the capsule
       | activating the mechanism in their own time.
       | 
       | > The capsule is sitting on a piece of equipment that will flood
       | the interior with nitrogen, rapidly reducing the oxygen level to
       | 1 per cent from 21 per cent. The person will feel a little
       | disoriented and may feel slightly euphoric before they lose
       | consciousness. The whole thing takes about 30 seconds. Death
       | takes place through hypoxia and hypocapnia, oxygen and carbon
       | dioxide deprivation, respectively. There is no panic, no choking
       | feeling.
        
         | annetipasto wrote:
         | this feels like a phenomenal advancement on this front. now if
         | only I could read about it without slipping into existential
         | panic...
        
           | DenisM wrote:
           | Yeah, there is something claustrophobic about this
           | description.
        
           | derbOac wrote:
           | FWIW, this is just automating something that has been in use
           | for some time. The person interviewed has a book and
           | organization advocating for this in various forms for some
           | time.
        
         | jonnybgood wrote:
         | What can a person do if they change their mind? I'm assuming it
         | can be stopped. I think about those who jumped from the Golden
         | Gate and survived. Them changing their mind after jumping.
        
           | throwawayboise wrote:
           | Presumably there's a "cancel" button, for if you change your
           | mind before you lose consciousness.
        
             | Biganon wrote:
             | And now due to the prolonged hypoxia, you're a vegetable.
        
               | hatesinterviews wrote:
               | No. If you are still conscious (it takes <30 seconds
               | before losing consciousness) then you haven't experienced
               | sufficient oxygen deprivation to have severe permanent
               | side effects. Brain death takes several minutes of
               | sustained hypoxia. If you're unconscious then obviously
               | there's no cancelling by your own will.
        
               | throwawayboise wrote:
               | I think if you're still conscious enough to press a
               | cancel button, you'd be OK in that regard (but I'm not an
               | expert on the subject, to be sure).
        
       | rklaehn wrote:
       | Suicide capsules? Reminds me of this short story:
       | 
       | https://zerohplovecraft.wordpress.com/2019/09/28/the-green-n...
        
       | krisoft wrote:
       | I think this device is designed to provoke a conversation rather
       | than to solve the problem it says it sets out to solve. There is
       | no reason it has to look like a futuristic coffin. Most people
       | breath only through their nostrils and mouth. A simple mask could
       | do the same job this huge contraption is sets out to do. Except
       | you couldn't exhibit a scuba mask hooked up to a nitrogen tank in
       | a museum. It wouldn't have the same visual impact and scifi
       | otherworldlyness.
        
         | jsn wrote:
         | Yeah, this is seriously overengineered. A cellophane hood with
         | elastic collar and a nitrogen nasal cannula is all it takes.
        
           | majkinetor wrote:
           | That must be exactly how most people envision their death:
           | with cellophane hood and elastic collar.
        
       | xwdv wrote:
       | The next step for such a machine IMO is something that can
       | automatically cremate the corpse inside the machine and vacuum
       | the ashes, dispensing them into either a canister or into some
       | kind of plumbing network for scattering them high into the air
       | where the wind can carry them.
        
         | mleonhard wrote:
         | Immediate cremation would reduce cost. It would also save loved
         | ones from seeing or dealing with the corpse. The blue tinted
         | windows prevent attendees from seeing the body's color change.
         | 
         | My mother died after months of agony from cancer. The mortuary
         | staff came and put the corpse in a black plastic bag and
         | wheeled it out of the house on a stretcher. They used an
         | extremely pungent chemical to disinfect the bed. The chemical
         | smell filled the house. At the funeral, I carefully avoided
         | looking at the corpse. I'm thankful that, in my last memories
         | of her, she was alive and showing me tenderness.
         | 
         | I think she and all of us involved would have been better off
         | if she could have used a machine like this several weeks
         | earlier. We could have said goodbye, she would push the button,
         | and then it would be over.
         | 
         | EDIT: The machine could refrigerate/freeze/preserve the corpse
         | for ceremonies, until burial/cremation.
         | 
         | For burial, the pod could be in two parts, the top part is a
         | casket for burial and the bottom part holds the gas delivery
         | system and refrigerator. They could disconnect and bury the
         | casket without ever opening it. This would eliminate the
         | expensive embalming process. It would also reduce the risk of
         | disease transmission from handling the corpse.
         | 
         | This could be useful for regular anticipated deaths, too. The
         | patient could spend their last week or so in the pod bed. What
         | would be the psychological impact of that on the patient and
         | the loved ones? I think it could be a positive impact for most
         | people.
        
       | scruple wrote:
       | But weed is still illegal over there, right?
        
         | fetzu wrote:
         | Because weed goes hand-in-hand with assisted suicide how?
         | 
         | Not illegal, CBD/low THC (-1%) cannabis has been legal for a
         | while, and << weed >> can be prescribed medically.
        
       | bserge wrote:
       | High quality exit bag lol. Actually, I'm surprised no one sells
       | readymade suicide kits.
       | 
       | A well made exit bag, or a capsule like this, would be totally
       | legal pretty much anywhere.
       | 
       | Hmm, good idea for a business! If I don't use it first :D
        
       | mensetmanusman wrote:
       | " There is no panic, no choking feeling. "
       | 
       | I'm amazed the author of the article was able to determine this.
       | May they rest in peace.
        
         | throwawayboise wrote:
         | The panic/choking feeling comes from a buildup of CO2 in the
         | air and body, not lack of oxygen. We know from
         | experiments/accidents that when CO2 saturation does not happen,
         | people don't feel like they are choking or can't breath even if
         | they are not getting any oxygen.
        
         | DominikPeters wrote:
         | The reaction to nitrogen is well-understood:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inert_gas_asphyxiation
        
           | nosianu wrote:
           | Some comments mentioned that some people who attempted to use
           | nitrogen had problems. According to the Wikipedia a fast
           | switch to breathing a nitrogen and no oxygen atmosphere has
           | "no symptoms at all", but when it happens slowly what happens
           | to people varies:
           | 
           | > _a slow decrease in oxygen breathing gas content has
           | effects which are quite variable.[5] By contrast, suddenly
           | breathing pure inert gas causes oxygen levels in the blood to
           | fall precipitously, and may lead to unconsciousness in only a
           | few breaths, with no symptoms at all.[3]_
           | 
           | They cite scuba diving rebreather accidents as one source for
           | experiences. I think there should be people to tell the tale
           | if they got rescued, "never dive alone", after all, and ships
           | for divers should be equipped for emergencies. I guess other
           | than observation of someone committing suicide with this
           | method we may actually have personal experience stories.
           | 
           | I looked into this when I had a huge health scare that
           | changed my life (it "only" was heavy metal poisoning and
           | after lots of chelators I'm doing very well, better than
           | before), and nitrogen was what I considered because I saw a
           | chance to actually get my hands on some, compared to drugs.
           | Bad thoughts, but I'll still keep it in mind in case I ever
           | need it. Living through all the heavy metal issues was bad
           | enough but at least I had hope. If it's similar or worse
           | problems or even pain with no hope I don't want to have to
           | endure.
        
       | charles_f wrote:
       | > A 3D-printed capsule
       | 
       | How is the 3d printing of any relevance? Is as relevant a claim
       | as "a lipo powered capsule" or "a raspberry pi controlled
       | capsule"
        
       | prirun wrote:
       | This seems like way too much bother, and it looks expensive. I've
       | read the same thing can be done with a plastic bag over the head
       | and helium gas (maybe nitrogen works just as well).
       | 
       | I still believe people should be allowed to have a safe,
       | painless, unmessy death if they want it, for whatever reason. I
       | don't understand why it's such a controversy. Why does a person
       | who wants to leave have to resort to messy, violent methods? Our
       | pets have more access to humane ways to die because of bad
       | situations, than humans.
        
         | DantesKite wrote:
         | It cannot be done so easily.
         | 
         | Your body has a thousand instincts inside trying to preserve
         | itself.
         | 
         | Many of these people who try asphyxiating themselves end up
         | ripping the bag even after they go unconscious. And if you
         | fail, you risk long-term brain damage.
         | 
         | Trying to kill yourself is like trying to kick a the corner of
         | a concrete wall with your shin as hard as possible. You have to
         | override a lot of self-preservation instincts. It's not like
         | you suddenly become immune to pain, loss, and fear.
        
           | LorenPechtel wrote:
           | Asphyxiating without a replacement gas does trigger your body
           | to try to fight it.
           | 
           | However, when you use enough replacement gas (helium or
           | nitrogen will do) the body won't fight it because it's the
           | buildup of CO2 that's the trigger, not the lack of oxygen. I
           | do agree brain damage can happen from a failure.
        
         | rootusrootus wrote:
         | > I've read the same thing can be done with a plastic bag over
         | the head and helium gas (maybe nitrogen works just as well).
         | 
         | My older brother attempted suicide a few years ago and he tried
         | to asphyxiate himself using nitrogen. When he was found, he was
         | vomiting all over himself. Some part of his plan failed to
         | work, obviously. So I don't know that I'd assume it's a trivial
         | exercise to make a working setup on your own.
        
           | asdfasgasdgasdg wrote:
           | I'm sorry that happened to your brother, and I hope things
           | are better for him now.
           | 
           | I imagine there are probably approaches with complexity
           | between "plastic bag" and "lie-in 3d printed
           | electromechanical apparatus" that would be still be reliable.
           | Particularly, I would imagine a device that seals around the
           | neck but otherwise operates by the same principle would be a
           | lot cheaper and more environmentally friendly to produce. You
           | would have a regulated, switchable input, one arm of which
           | would be the atmosphere and the other arm of which would be a
           | pure nitrogen supply. And then a check valve for output.
           | 
           | I hope never to have to use such a device myself . . . dying
           | peacefully in my sleep would be the ideal, like my
           | grandfather did, or of a sudden stroke like my other
           | grandmother and grandfather. But if it comes to pass that I
           | am dying of a painful and debilitating disease, I hope that
           | by then a device like this is easily obtainable.
        
             | rootusrootus wrote:
             | > I'm sorry that happened to your brother, and I hope
             | things are better for him now.
             | 
             | Yep, that unfortunate time of his life has passed and he is
             | in a much better place. Found someone who helps keep him
             | grounded mentally. Finally qualifies for social security so
             | he isn't struggling just to find a roof to live under.
             | Luckily he was an engineer for many years and so his social
             | security payment isn't half bad. He's going to be okay now,
             | and for that I'm grateful.
             | 
             | I agree with your sentiments. I'm glad that I live in
             | Oregon, so we do have assisted suicide as an option. The
             | law makes it somewhat difficult, IMO, but in practice the
             | rules seem to get bent. My father died with assistance a
             | few years back when he had terminal kidney disease. Two
             | nurses came to the house and prepared the pills for him by
             | converting them into a liquid he could drink, they even
             | helped him hold it. He'd have had difficulty doing that
             | himself, so I'm grateful they were willing to help. I don't
             | _think_ the law allows for that much assistance, but maybe
             | I 'm wrong.
             | 
             | In lieu of euthanasia, I'll pin my hopes on opiates, I
             | guess. A friend of mine passed away about a week ago
             | (cancer) and I had the opportunity to talk with him about
             | three weeks ago -- he was on a significant dose (but not
             | quite lethal) of fentanyl, and he said he had zero pain.
             | They were willing to crank the dose up to whatever it takes
             | -- this seems normal when hospice is involved. No worries
             | about anyone getting addicted. And if the patient
             | inadvertently dies a little early, nobody asks any
             | questions.
        
       | bjt2n3904 wrote:
       | Is suffering a valid reason to end your own life? How much
       | suffering is the threshold where suicide is "medically
       | necessary"? How can it be quantified, what are the units? Does
       | mental anguish count, or only physical suffering? What about
       | existential suffering?
       | 
       | This isn't a treatment, and it's certainly not compassionate.
       | Joni Eareckson-Tada is a testament to the wonderful life that can
       | be lived in spite of suffering, and she has much to say on it
       | that is worth a listen.
        
         | LorenPechtel wrote:
         | You have no way to quantify the suffering without having been
         | there or at least seen the suffering of someone who has. I
         | don't believe the form of the suffering matters, only the
         | untreatability of whatever is causing the suffering. It has to
         | come down to the person--at what point do they feel the
         | suffering is too much, that whatever remaining life they have
         | isn't worth it. Everyone is going to draw the line at a
         | different place and I don't believe there is a right or wrong.
         | 
         | I dislike not having the doctors involved, though--many people
         | won't know if there's something that can be done or not.
        
         | f6v wrote:
         | You remind me of people who talk about vaccination without any
         | knowledge of immunology. Don't you think the countries that
         | have legalized assisted suicide have already devised methods
         | for quantifying suffering? You just have to spend a load of
         | time to study their frameworks.
        
           | LorenPechtel wrote:
           | No, they haven't--because it can't be quantified, nor would
           | it do any good if it could be. The patient decides what's too
           | much.
        
         | BrandoElFollito wrote:
         | > Is suffering a valid reason to end your own life?
         | 
         | Yes.
         | 
         | > How much suffering is the threshold where suicide is
         | "medically necessary"?
         | 
         | When I say so.
         | 
         | > How can it be quantified, what are the units?
         | 
         | 1 unit of my will to do so.
         | 
         | > Does mental anguish count, or only physical suffering?
         | 
         | Anything I feel to be.
         | 
         | > What about existential suffering?
         | 
         | This is everyone's choice.
         | 
         | > This isn't a treatment, and it's certainly not compassionate
         | 
         | Have you had anyone close to you trying to end their life and
         | you were helpless because _someone else_ said no?
         | 
         | If you did and still think that people should suffer no matter
         | what you should seriously rethink this.
         | 
         | If you did not then get to a palliative ward in a hospital and
         | discuss with people.
         | 
         | Seriously - all these discussions from people who are either
         | into religion or some books and did not experience the problem
         | themselves is exasperating.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | owlbynight wrote:
         | Why does someone else's threshold for anguish have anything to
         | do with you?
        
       | vmception wrote:
       | > His family sees it differently. His mother begs. "I want you to
       | live no matter what." But that ignores his pain and his dignity,
       | Yoshi says.
       | 
       | This is my observation of suicide hotlines and ambiguous generic
       | anti-suicide advice.
       | 
       | It seems this conversation is so immature, patronizing and
       | invalidating.
       | 
       | I haven't found people able to articulate their thoughts on the
       | matter as they just invalidate my comments on social media
       | platforms until they are no longer visible.
       | 
       | Do things compatible with self-preservation like me, or don't.
        
         | mcguire wrote:
         | Only something like 10% of suicides are related to chronic or
         | terminal illnesses. One could reasonably assume that most of
         | the rest are suffering from mental illnesses.
        
           | oxfeed65261 wrote:
           | Depression is a chronic, and sometimes terminal, illness.
        
           | LorenPechtel wrote:
           | And how many are that aren't really counted as medical? I
           | know one medical suicide--she never went to the doctor about
           | what drove her to suicide. She didn't have all that long to
           | live anyway and she perfectly well knew a broken hip meant
           | she would never leave bed again.
        
           | vmception wrote:
           | Which means what about the messaging, to you.
        
           | LandR wrote:
           | It doesn't make their experience or suffering invalid.
           | 
           | If we are to allow suicide for chronic physical pain, then
           | why not for chronic mental pain?
        
       | guilhas wrote:
       | Imagine next year, besides covid vaccines governments, will also
       | be able to mandate suicide pills to save the planet
        
         | fetzu wrote:
         | I wouldn't worry too much, it sounds like gouvernements are not
         | even able to enforce the << read the article >> rule yet; son
         | you probably still have some time ahead of you.
        
           | guilhas wrote:
           | The same was said about the vaccine mandates
        
       | throw03172019 wrote:
       | I wouldn't want to be on the QA team here.
        
         | sarsway wrote:
         | I heard they have a huge churn rate
        
         | thejackgoode wrote:
         | works on my machine
        
           | can16358p wrote:
           | They might just test on production.
        
           | [deleted]
        
       | SavantIdiot wrote:
       | It's an interesting new method: hypoxia via nitrogen. I'd prefer
       | this to the drinkable concoctions that put you to sleep after a
       | brief panic of thirst.
        
         | LorenPechtel wrote:
         | It's not new. It's just there isn't a consumer use for nitrogen
         | so it's harder to obtain. Helium has a consumer market in
         | inflating balloons, though. It occurs to me that argon would
         | also work although there isn't a lot of consumer market.
        
       | bmmayer1 wrote:
       | Fascinating. It seems interesting that far more innovation has
       | occurred in the service of corporal punishment (from the torture
       | devices of the middle ages to the guillotine to lethal injection)
       | than in the service of suicide (arguably cyanide tablets?).
        
       | MeteorMarc wrote:
       | Let,s call this procedure euthanasia instead of suicide.
        
         | codetrotter wrote:
         | I like the term suicide, because they allow the person whose
         | life it is about do it themselves with a button.
         | 
         | Reminds me of the Suicide Booths from Futurama.
         | https://futurama.fandom.com/wiki/Suicide_Booth
        
         | meepmorp wrote:
         | This is literally suicide, as the person within the capsule
         | triggers the thing that kills them. In that way, it's no
         | different than pills or a gun.
        
           | sprucevoid wrote:
           | I suspect MeteorMarc meant 'euthanasia' in the philosophy
           | sense of a death that is (a1) rationally planned over a
           | period of time and (b1) in the dying persons overall
           | interest. Which can be contrasted with 'suicide' in a sense
           | commonly used in suicide prevention care and research, where
           | the act (a2) often results from temporary cognitive or
           | emotional instability and (b2) is seldom in the dying persons
           | overall interest. You on the other hand perhaps meant to
           | distinguish between the dying person (a) getting assistance
           | vs in dying (b) acting alone. A third termological option is
           | 'assisted dying'. A big complication is that 'euthanasia'
           | comes with quite different historical baggage in different
           | countries.
        
         | Biganon wrote:
         | No. Euthanasia is well defined in Swiss law, and it is not the
         | same as assisted suicide. Let's not complicate things even
         | further.
        
         | schroeding wrote:
         | "Euthanasie", the german word for euthanasia, is *heavily*
         | stained by its meaning during the Nazi era, and the pod is made
         | in (german speaking) switzerland.
         | 
         | That's probably one of the main reasons why they called it
         | "suicide capsule", even in english :)
         | 
         | Edit: I don't really get why this is downvoted ^^ The link goes
         | to an article that was originaly written in German and only
         | translated by the swiss television station SRF.
         | 
         | "Euthanasia" is not a neutral term in German, take a look at
         | the wikipedia entry and how much of the page contains "NS",
         | "Nationalsozialismus" or dates between 1939 and 1945:
         | https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthanasie
         | 
         | It was used as a euphemism by the Nazis, and this still taints
         | it. It has lost much of its original meaning because of this.
         | If you say "Euthanasie" in German, even to someone from
         | switzerland, there is a very high chance people think of it as
         | "the killing of people that disabled, against their will". :/
         | 
         | There is a reason most people use "aktive Sterbehilfe" ("active
         | help to die") instead of "Euthanasie", even though both things
         | mean the same.
        
       | detaro wrote:
       | > _P.N.: Currently a doctor or doctors need to be involved to
       | prescribe the sodium pentobarbital and to confirm the person's
       | mental capacity. We want to remove any kind of psychiatric review
       | from the process and allow the individual to control the method
       | themselves.
       | 
       | Our aim is to develop an artificial intelligence screening system
       | to establish the person's mental capacity._
       | 
       | That sounds like a terrible idea. There are valid concerns about
       | doctor involvement in the process, but AI won't fix those.
        
         | johnisgood wrote:
         | > Our aim is to develop an artificial intelligence screening
         | system to establish the person's mental capacity.
         | 
         | Please let me know when this is done, I am very curious how one
         | would implement such a thing. How can an AI determine if the
         | person is in a "clear" state of mind? What does it even mean?
         | Can they actually define this mental capacity that a person
         | must be in to be able to make the choice? They have to define
         | it, and then they have to somehow turn it into something that
         | the computer can understand and work with. I believe that it is
         | not possible.
        
           | theragra wrote:
           | It is also not possible with human doctors, yet it it is
           | widely used for important decisions
        
             | johnisgood wrote:
             | OK, because we have patterns of behavior, we do this and
             | that, we do not do this and do not do that when we are in a
             | clear state of mind[1]. Now, to make it usable for AI, we
             | have to define what these behaviors are that you do and do
             | not do that makes you be in a clear state of mind. It is
             | not enough to give an exhaustive list, or use heuristics;
             | you have to consider the context as well.
             | 
             | Sure, humans might do it in a more or less accurate way,
             | but could an AI? If it could, would you please tell me how?
             | I really am curious[2], I work at the hospital.
             | 
             | Oh, about working at the hospital: a patient has been
             | deemed aggressive when in fact it is just her voice and
             | looks and whatnot that makes it seem like she is
             | aggressive. She is not actually aggressive in any way, she
             | just looks and sounds as if she were. The moment you have a
             | discussion with her, you would be able to tell that she is
             | not aggressive at all. How would an AI deal with this, if
             | even humans cannot? You also have to consider that these
             | behaviors are heavily influenced by the environment and
             | changes in environment that one has to consider.
             | 
             | [1] Mind you, there are cultural differences at play here
             | as well. There are some behaviors that would consider you
             | "not in a clear state of mind" in one culture, but not in
             | another.
             | 
             | [2] I am also wondering if an AI would be able to determine
             | if a person has dementia based on behavior alone.
        
         | bjt2n3904 wrote:
         | This whole thing is a terrible idea. All of it.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | Quarrelsome wrote:
           | I see you haven't had to care for someone with Alzheimer's
           | before.
           | 
           | Its not a terrible idea, as a society we retain some naive
           | and arguably zealous notions around death which often makes
           | us push towards natural outcomes. Some natural outcomes are
           | different from others in that they're significantly worse for
           | all parties involved. Those outcomes are a subject that
           | should be given more attention and seriousness as opposed to
           | mere emotional rejection.
        
             | 14 wrote:
             | Care giver here and someone who has directly worked with
             | individuals who have done the MAID (medically assisted
             | induced death). A person with Alzheimer's would
             | automatically be disqualified for consideration as they
             | lack the mental capacity to consent to such a thing. This
             | will most likely never be offered for that group of people.
             | They typically are not suffering though some do get
             | terrified at times but in general they are just lost in
             | their world with not much insight as to why things are that
             | way.
        
               | Quarrelsome wrote:
               | > A person with Alzheimer's would automatically be
               | disqualified for consideration as they lack the mental
               | capacity to consent to such a thing.
               | 
               | Which is part of the reason that people who have seen it
               | with their parents often want to submit their consent in
               | advance. If I get Alzheimer's, please fucking kill me.
        
               | 14 wrote:
               | Currently the law does not support that type of advanced
               | directive. You can say do not leave me in a vegetative
               | state after a car accident but not for Alzheimer's.
        
               | datameta wrote:
               | > They typically are not suffering
               | 
               | How on earth did you get such an out-of-touch callously
               | asinine idea?
               | 
               | It is the most mentally debilitating state one can
               | possibly be in. Their depth of recollection comes and
               | goes. There is a persistent growing and waning sense of
               | confusion. Their grasp on reality is in a shattered
               | state. They recollect details out of context or in false
               | connection to current events. I seriously fail to
               | understand how you could underplay this disease.
        
               | 14 wrote:
               | I used to work in a facility with the highest rating of
               | care required for Alzheimer's and dementia like
               | conditions and typically if well looked after they are
               | not suffering. Yes some do get scared and confused but
               | with medication and skilled workers you can minimize that
               | type of suffering. What ends up often happening is family
               | feels guilty placing their loved ones in such a facility
               | and instead struggle and eventually burn out. At that
               | point they may already be short with the person and yes
               | they truly are suffering. But a well trained staff can
               | really help reduce such interaction through distraction
               | and conversation or music and medications. There are even
               | now in the world dementia villages where people don't
               | actually know they are in a facility and they can wonder
               | around because the entire thing is fenced off but looks
               | normal with shops and places they can go to. Usually the
               | person who is suffering is the family who can no longer
               | manage the 24/7 care required. And that is not a poor
               | reflection on them it takes a lot of mental drain to deal
               | with a person ask you the same thing 300 times a day.
        
               | datameta wrote:
               | I apologize for my pointed accusation. I did indeed
               | experience the difficulties of at-home care, it can be
               | too much for a few loved ones to manage. The training
               | isn't there. I think you paint the overall picture well
               | from experience. I'm glad to hear that the average case
               | of dementia, when properly looked after, can be milder on
               | the person than I imagined.
        
               | therealdrag0 wrote:
               | What if you had an advanced directive that explicitly
               | called out that scenario? Not saying the law would cover
               | that, but it plausibly could.
        
               | Pasorrijer wrote:
               | In Canada, yes, advanced directives can be written.
        
               | 14 wrote:
               | Not for assisted death and something like Alzheimer's.
               | That directive is for something like you are in a car
               | accident and are on life support. You can have it say no
               | life support. You can not currently say if I get
               | Alzheimer's I want to die it is not legally possible at
               | this time.
        
           | 14 wrote:
           | Could you elaborate on what parts you find terrible? It seems
           | like a peaceful way to die for some.
        
             | pydry wrote:
             | Giving AI the power to approve suicides?
        
               | 14 wrote:
               | Well I don't know the details but I don't think this is a
               | suicide booth just anyone can use you would still need to
               | have a doctor verify you had a terminal illness and then
               | I could be left with you to use at the time you were
               | ready. The AI is simply making sure you are of sound mind
               | at the time of death. Which means you can answer a few
               | questions and it wouldn't be that hard to determine if
               | someone was if sound mind there are plenty of mental
               | state exams that a computer could give.
        
           | cadence- wrote:
           | Why? There is no more personal thing than your own life. Why
           | should not we be able to choose when to end it? People will
           | be doing it anyways, just in all the gruesome ways it is
           | usually done. Hopefully this container doubles as a coffin
           | that can be either buried or burnt.
        
             | ajsnigrutin wrote:
             | Sucide is a permanent solution to a temporary problem.
             | 
             | Usually, atleast a few other methods should be used to
             | help, before deciding on suicide (with a notable exception
             | of being close to a very painful, inevitable death, and
             | just wanting to shorten the suffering).
        
               | sokoloff wrote:
               | Suicide is a permanent solution. Sometimes it's a
               | solution to a temporary problem; other times to a
               | permanent problem.
        
               | avgcorrection wrote:
               | I'm personally biased towards hope. Meaning that I keep
               | thinking that things will be better and that I will reach
               | a point where things will be meaningful. I call this a
               | bias because I can remember the past and how long I've
               | been in this state of mind without it panning out--it's a
               | false hope more often than not.
               | 
               | If average people are anything like me then I would think
               | that they are more likely to think that a permanent
               | problem is a temporary one rather than the other way
               | around.
        
               | yumraj wrote:
               | That is just a silly quote/generalization.
               | 
               | As an example: Old age is a permanent, and worsening,
               | problem. Why should one be forced to live to an old age
               | where they are dependent on others, IF they don't want
               | to?
        
               | pbsull wrote:
               | Suicide causes permanent state change. Life and all of
               | life's problems are temporary state.
        
               | PUSH_AX wrote:
               | > all of life's problems are temporary state.
               | 
               | Not all. Incurable disease is just one example.
        
               | kergonath wrote:
               | That's such an absurd point of view. When the duration of
               | the problems is comparable to your expected lifespan, it
               | is permanent for all intent and purposes. Sure, an
               | incurable illness is not permanent in that it has to end
               | when the person die. That's not a useful point to make.
        
               | gregoryl wrote:
               | Can you agree that there's some threshold where the time
               | required to endure the temporary state is untenable?
               | 
               | How can anyone except myself decide what that threshold
               | is?
        
               | rad_gruchalski wrote:
               | Until one dies anyway.
        
               | ajsnigrutin wrote:
               | So, what harm is it to try a few talks with a therapist,
               | try to fix the problem, and if it doesn't work, you can
               | still kill yourself?
               | 
               | Even buying guns in some states has a 3 day cool-off
               | period.
        
               | csee wrote:
               | Perhaps it could work with a much more extended cool-off
               | period. Over the course of a year, the person needs to
               | affirm they want to go through with it on the last day of
               | each month. If over the last 12 consecutive months they
               | have said yes 12 times, then assist them, otherwise no.
        
               | ajsnigrutin wrote:
               | Yep, with therapy in between... Of course, the inevitable
               | painful death being an exception, that can be done a lot
               | faster.
               | 
               | Anything is better than AI in a 3d printed box.
        
               | weego wrote:
               | Without being at all patronising, you're lucky to be able
               | to have such a binary view of mental and physical health.
               | 
               | There are so many non-temporary conditions that people
               | live with that can lead to wanting people, very
               | rationally, to speed up end of life.
        
               | jes wrote:
               | Curious as to why you see parent as lucky to hold a
               | binary view, if you care to say. I would say holding such
               | a view is unlucky. Perhaps I'm missing something
               | important.
        
               | notreallyserio wrote:
               | The use of the cliche "Sucide is a permanent solution to
               | a temporary problem" demonstrates binary thinking, as
               | though there is only one temporary problem and no
               | compounding factors.
               | 
               | It's also a pretty shitty thing to say. It's designed to
               | make people who may want to die feel worse about
               | themselves by calling their feelings merely "temporary".
        
               | jes wrote:
               | I was asking weego why they consider ajsnigrutin lucky to
               | hold the binary view you outline.
        
               | notreallyserio wrote:
               | Sure, but publicly, and I had a response (as I was
               | thinking the same thing).
        
               | jannyfer wrote:
               | The part you didn't respond to is why they are "lucky" to
               | be able to hold a view...
               | 
               | My guess is that if you have such a binary view of the
               | world, you might have lived a simple or sheltered or
               | privileged life.
        
               | ajsnigrutin wrote:
               | Sure... but they should atleast try some kind of therapy,
               | before deciding to end it all permanently.
        
               | drivingmenuts wrote:
               | That's nice and all, but but in the real world, those
               | things aren't always available (for any number of
               | reasons, not just financial). In the absence of other
               | solutions, sometimes the best choice may be to end a life
               | rather than continue suffering.
        
               | meepmorp wrote:
               | What kind of therapy ought someone consider before
               | deciding to end it because their terminal illness is
               | excruciatingly painful?
        
               | ajsnigrutin wrote:
               | Yes, this is the exception i put in the braces in my
               | previous post.
               | 
               | But being physically ok, but having depression is
               | something that can be solved by therapy.. or atleast
               | should be tried before ending it
        
               | macNchz wrote:
               | Studies of psychedelic therapy for terminally ill
               | patients have had some super interesting results, there's
               | a section on the topic in Michael Pollan's book _How to
               | Change Your Mind_ which I found fascinating. Seems there
               | is a lot of potential for helping people deal with the
               | existential dread and get more enjoyment from their
               | remaining time with friends and family. Here's an article
               | for reference: https://nyulangone.org/news/mental-health-
               | benefits-one-dose-...
               | 
               | That said I'm a Swiss citizen and knew someone with a
               | terminal illness who used the "Exit" program and it
               | seemed extremely humane and a positive thing overall and
               | I fully support having it available to everyone in that
               | situation.
        
               | asdfasgasdgasdg wrote:
               | Presumably most if not all people who end up doing an
               | assisted suicide _have_ tried one or more methods to
               | ameliorate their issue before they go to the more extreme
               | approach. Do you have some reason to believe they do not?
        
               | ajsnigrutin wrote:
               | I still think there should be a human safeguard to verify
               | that everything else has been tried.
               | 
               | A few questions and an AI box is not 'that'.
        
               | 5e92cb50239222b wrote:
               | Please advise: what therapy could help the terminally ill
               | father of a friend of mine? Stage 4 lung cancer. Talk to
               | a psychologist? The only thing that "helped" him were
               | large doses of opiate painkillers.
        
               | ajsnigrutin wrote:
               | Yes, this is the exception i put in the braces in my
               | previous post.
               | 
               | But being physically ok, but having depression is
               | something that can be solved by therapy.. or atleast
               | should be tried before ending it
        
               | throwawayboise wrote:
               | What's wrong with large doses of optiate painkillers, if
               | you're terminally ill? Addicition isn't a worry,
               | certainly.
        
               | zdragnar wrote:
               | The side effects of most pain killers can also be
               | extremely unpleasant. You'll have more time, but you'll
               | be miserable or marginally conscious for most of it.
        
               | johnisgood wrote:
               | In case of opiates, what side-effects are you thinking
               | of? Constipation is an easy fix. Assuming proper use and
               | dosage, opiates are way safer than NSAIDs.
        
               | stan_rogers wrote:
               | And they don't always work. Look up intractable pain.
        
               | loonster wrote:
               | Sometimes the problems are permanent.
        
               | avgcorrection wrote:
               | What a neat slogan. Also misleading.
               | 
               | Life itself temporary, hence the death-is-permanent
               | thing. Hence all things in life--pain, happiness,
               | pleasure, suffering--are temporary. Suicide is just the
               | shortening of all of these possible states (or potential
               | states--for the hopeful). Thus a shortening of a bunch of
               | temporary states.
               | 
               | Doesn't sound as menacing and dramatic when you put it
               | like that. And it's equally true.
        
               | stan_rogers wrote:
               | And what of the excruciatingly painful existence that
               | doesn't come with a near-term "inevitable death". What
               | you're advocating is long-term inescapable torture.
        
               | PUSH_AX wrote:
               | > Sucide is a permanent solution to a temporary problem.
               | 
               | This quote is supposed to be used in the correct context
               | of the specific situation, *if* it's truly temporary. Not
               | just as a generalisation.
        
               | f6v wrote:
               | > Usually, atleast a few other methods should be used to
               | help
               | 
               | I bet most of people who resort to assisted suicide in
               | Switzerland have terminal disease or incurable pain.
        
               | antris wrote:
               | This suicide capsule concept is clearly targeted for
               | people who have made a well thought out decision on their
               | life. Heat-of-the-moment suicides, won't happen with rare
               | specialty devices but common
               | tools/environments/drugs/poisons that are found all over.
               | 
               | It would be a weird assumption to think that a person who
               | carefully plans their suicide in advance, and orders a
               | specialty device for it, hasn't considered options other
               | than suicide. Most likely such a person has tried
               | everything else already.
        
               | sgustard wrote:
               | It's a good point about the rollout strategy. Is this a
               | specialty device you must order? Or is there a row of
               | them on display at the mall next to the massage chairs?
        
               | daenz wrote:
               | You can also be against the act of suicide and for the
               | freedom to commit suicide. The two ideas don't have to be
               | conflated.
        
             | johnisgood wrote:
             | Because we cannot even define what "clear state of mind" is
             | in a way that an AI would be able to determine.
        
             | otabdeveloper4 wrote:
             | You can already kill yourself if you really want to. Nobody
             | can stop you.
             | 
             | The whole idea of "assisted suicide" is like Bitcoin -
             | invented for the express purpose of finding and abusing
             | loopholes in the current legal frameworks.
        
               | gambiting wrote:
               | Yes, someone who is paralyzed from their neck down can
               | easily take their own life, of course. Don't see any
               | issue here.
               | 
               | You have to excuse the sarcasm, but if you really can't
               | think of any cases where taking your own life in a
               | dignified manner is not actually possible, then I'm not
               | sure there's any discussion to be had here
        
               | tasty_freeze wrote:
               | There are multiple ways one might commit suicide, it is
               | true. But some are more reliable than others; some leave
               | a terrible mess for someone (perhaps a family member) to
               | clean up; some are more painful than others; some may put
               | other people at risk. The worst outcome is when a person
               | tries to kill themselves and ends up alive but in an even
               | worse condition.
               | 
               | For people who don't have religious prohibitions on
               | suicide, having a reliable, simple, low cost, low-pain,
               | low-mess option sounds great to me.
        
               | kergonath wrote:
               | Sometimes legal frameworks are inhumane, immoral, cruel,
               | and ought to be loopholed. I can think of at least 5
               | examples right now.
        
           | throwaway6734 wrote:
           | Why? If I ever get dementia I would like the opportunity to
           | end my own life before it progresses too far.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | can16358p wrote:
           | Then don't use it.
        
         | eikenberry wrote:
         | There should be no gatekeepers to control what you can do with
         | yourself. No doctors nor AIs nor governments have that right. I
         | should be able to buy a humane means of death with no questions
         | asked whenever I want. I am the only person who has the right
         | to determine if/when I die, it is not their call. It makes me
         | so mad that you have to break the law to try to find a humane
         | way to commit suicide and that so many people resort to
         | terribly unpleasant means. And while I'm glad to see progress
         | from things like this and mad dog brewing in AU, it isn't
         | enough.
        
           | dillondoyle wrote:
           | I agree for ill and end of life.
           | 
           | But I think it's more complicated for otherwise healthy
           | people temporarily passing through a mental illness crisis or
           | untreated depression. Though there is a distinction here in
           | it's a government providing the means. Anyone can figure out
           | a means themselves.
        
           | DanBC wrote:
           | You have a right to life. You don't yet have a right to
           | death. Given that, it's understandable that there are
           | barriers in place for people who temporarily think they want
           | to die.
        
             | baobabKoodaa wrote:
             | You don't have the right to dictate what people can and
             | can't do with their own bodies. Furthermore, you should
             | accept the fact that some people hold opinions different
             | than yours and it's not always "temporary", yes, differing
             | opinions actually do exist. There's many documented cases
             | of people consistently wanting to die over a long period of
             | time, you deny these people exist?
        
             | eikenberry wrote:
             | My point is that you do have a right to death. You could
             | understand it in terms of the right to life... that it is
             | your right to control. If you don't have the right to die
             | do you really have control of your life and the right to
             | it. IMO the right to life requires a right to die.
        
         | hardwaregeek wrote:
         | Are they trying to create the suicide booths from Futurama?
         | Because that sounds about as good of an idea
        
         | hereforphone wrote:
         | > I wan't to commit suicide HAL
         | 
         | > I'm sorry, I'm afraid I can't let you do that Dave
         | 
         | Better than the opposite case where the AI has the ability to
         | mandate suicide.
        
           | i_like_waiting wrote:
           | > I wan't to commit suicide HAL > I'm sorry, but you have
           | outstanding debt please resolve it before continuing >
           | Program will continue after this short ad from Coffins Inc.
           | 
           | you cannot scale those things effectively with doctors as
           | middlemen
        
           | fennecfoxen wrote:
           | > the ability to mandate suicide
           | 
           | 'to mandate suicide' is typically reduced to 'commit
           | homicide'
        
             | hereforphone wrote:
             | Can AI commit homicide? Does cancer commit homicide?
        
               | johnisgood wrote:
               | Someone who programmed the AI committed homicide
               | using/programming the AI. But then... what about bugs?
               | What if these bugs are not incidental? Let us assume that
               | they are. Would it count then as non-premeditated murder?
               | Who are the people who reviewed the code in this case,
               | then? Accessories?
        
           | throwawayboise wrote:
           | https://memegenerator.net/instance/67435723/clippy-hi-i-
           | am-c...
        
           | dqpb wrote:
           | Well, you know Apple watches can detect you are getting sick,
           | before you experience any symptoms, via changes to your heart
           | rate.
           | 
           | A maximally effective suicide AI should also be able to
           | detect that you are a good suicide candidate before you even
           | start having ideation, and proactively convince you of this
           | fact.
        
             | [deleted]
        
           | AJ007 wrote:
           | I'm not sure if there is any difference. They are assuming
           | that their "AI" is acting alone and in a very narrowly
           | defined context.
           | 
           | What's to say the human voluntarily entered this capsule and
           | the "AI" does what that person wishes? One could take the Kim
           | Jong-nam assassination as an example where the participants
           | may have believed something completely different was
           | occurring than the true context.
           | 
           | In the absence of "AI" someone could reverse the do die/do
           | not die button. However, adding an additional, pliable layer
           | is a bad idea.
           | 
           | Whether it is autonomous weapons or this, once AI or machine
           | learning is added, the human is no longer in full control.
        
         | cstross wrote:
         | That's just plain crazy.
         | 
         | The software only knows what the (human) user tells it. What
         | assurance does it have that the patient isn't being pressurized
         | into giving the correct answers? Or that the suicide capsule is
         | going to be used correctly (as opposed to being a murder tool)?
         | 
         | If you start looking for edge cases where this might go wrong,
         | it turns out to be razor-sharp edge cases all the way down. A
         | human with a remit to prevent false positives should be the
         | last link in the kill chain: sure, allow the applicant to
         | appeal if the human practitioner has made a mistake, but the
         | default outcome should be "no kill" unless their mental
         | capacity can be positively confirmed (which is a GAI-complete
         | requirement, hence wanting a human being in the loop).
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | phailhaus wrote:
         | I can't believe he said that with a straight face. He actually
         | thinks you can write a _computer program_ that can give humans
         | permission to _kill themselves_. I don 't think he consulted
         | with a single engineer before making that statement.
        
           | cyanydeez wrote:
           | just to be clear, what exactly is the epistomological basis
           | against sucide.
        
             | phailhaus wrote:
             | I'm not arguing against assisted suicide. I just think it
             | is wildly ignorant to think that a computer can accurately
             | assess someone's mental capacity.
        
             | zdragnar wrote:
             | Most hold that life has value, and the desire to continue
             | living t9 be axiomatic. There are very few cases where
             | suicide may be considered a rational choice, and in those
             | cases it is difficult to determine that the choice was made
             | of their own free will, and not pressured into it by lazy
             | family, doctors or government (dictating available
             | treatments, providing appropriate pallative care, etc).
        
               | drivingmenuts wrote:
               | Wouldn't the desire to die be proof that the desire to
               | live is not axiomatic?
        
               | cyanydeez wrote:
               | hold whose life valueable to who.
               | 
               | the very consent required for life doesnt exist.
               | 
               | people dont consent to being alive.
               | 
               | holding someone who feels suffering alive would be
               | considered torture.
               | 
               | when you strip away the selfishness that is keeping
               | others alive, suicide might be the only truly zelfless
               | act.
               | 
               | i do not think you need a complicated ai to allow a
               | suicide machine. you treat it as you would the way we
               | sane people regulate guns. cool down periods, background
               | checks and coercion checks.
        
           | mongol wrote:
           | Ethical AI, anyone?
        
           | Nextgrid wrote:
           | You could argue nobody needs "permission" to decide what to
           | do with their lives to begin with?
        
             | wutwutwutwut wrote:
             | But that was not what was being argued.
        
               | Nextgrid wrote:
               | My point is that the developers of the device may not
               | believe that anyone needs such a "permission" either and
               | thus the whole AI/computer program is merely there to
               | fulfil some legal obligation - they don't actually care
               | whether it's good or not.
        
               | [deleted]
        
               | wutwutwutwut wrote:
               | The thing we are talking about is verifying that the
               | person is in a mental shape to take the decision to end
               | his life. The word "permission" is an odd choice here.
        
           | sokoloff wrote:
           | I think it's an interesting framing/premise to think that a
           | human _needs to be given_ permission to kill themselves.
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | smusamashah wrote:
             | Permission is probably correct here. Unless you can live in
             | a close box in isolation without ever needing to depend on
             | another living or having someone depend on you, then sure
             | you can live/die on your own terms.
             | 
             | You live by the rules of whatever society you are living
             | in. You don't live in isolation, you depend on countless
             | other living beings to be where you are in this point of
             | time in your life. Life is interconnected web, not an
             | isolated event.
             | 
             | Your life has a value for other people too. No one can
             | force you to live. "Permission" does not mean being forced.
             | Unless you are physically unable to have a life, you should
             | be needing a permission.
             | 
             | We already give permission in courts and write rules on how
             | a person should live (or not) their lives for so many
             | reasons we think are beneficial/harmful for rest of us. How
             | is this any different?
        
               | analognoise wrote:
               | Because it's naive to think a person wanting to end their
               | own life is going to be deterred by a law?
               | 
               | Like what are they doing to do, throw your body in
               | prison? Hand your body a fine?
        
               | gnull wrote:
               | They will not let you have a reliable and painless death.
               | I bet some people will be stopped by the pain that a
               | traditional suicide methods might bring, as well as the
               | risk of staying alive but getting mutilated for the rest
               | of their life as a result.
        
               | goldenkey wrote:
               | ^ This. The risk of becoming a vegetable from a botched
               | suicide is pretty high. The last thing a suicidal person
               | wants is to make their life even worse.
        
               | smusamashah wrote:
               | That's the kind of suicide one is going to do anyway. I
               | am here talking about the one which someone is sane
               | enough to seek assistance or buy a device like in the
               | article.
               | 
               | We already put people with mental issues in mental health
               | facilities instead of killing them. We could probably do
               | something similar (not the same) for people who decide to
               | take their own lives and seek out before doing it.
        
               | analognoise wrote:
               | So the plan is to cause bureaucratic headaches and forced
               | treatment options for people who openly and sanely admit
               | they don't like being here, leaving only the messy and
               | less effective methods easily available?
               | 
               | This is one of those, "in theory, there's no difference
               | between theory and practice. In practice, there are"
               | situations.
               | 
               | Nobody owes society anything. In fact, the reverse is
               | true: society owes things to those brought into this
               | world without being asked: clean water, safety, clean
               | environment, reasonable standards of living. I just don't
               | see how it could cross anyone's mind to try to prevent
               | people from ending their life, since they didn't ask to
               | be here in the first place, to support a society that has
               | clearly failed that individual.
               | 
               | If a society is good and just and receives conscious
               | support from people, that's acceptable. But I don't see
               | how it could possibly justify interfering with a right of
               | self determination w.r.t. ending the ride early.
               | 
               | I guess I just don't get it. It seems cruel and
               | Kafkaesque.
        
             | Aidevah wrote:
             | Destruction of government property is generally considered
             | illegal.
        
             | gnull wrote:
             | "Permission" was just a bad way to put it. I'm sure what
             | they are actually talking about is making sure that the
             | person is making the decision in clear mind and not under
             | the effect of drugs, strong temporal emotions and is not
             | being forced by someone to do this.
        
               | A4ET8a8uTh0 wrote:
               | Some do. Some don't. It is very hard to generalize here.
               | 
               | I personally don't really think that a person, who is
               | making that a leap and decide and stop existing, has a
               | 'clear' mind. It may be an objectively rational decision
               | ( and frankly, I believe it is up to each of us to make
               | that decision ), but I would be hard-pressed to argue
               | that 'this individual, who I find of sound mind opted for
               | the chair'. There is a reason society has certain level
               | of concern for those that try and fail.
               | 
               | It is possible that I do not have enough of a population
               | sample, but I personally see it as part of an effort way
               | to keep world population control at certain level. Before
               | anyone accuses me of tin-foiling, I mean it in the same
               | sense as that there are efforts to prevent suicides by
               | means of suicide prevention hotlines.
               | 
               | I guess what I am saying, as a society, we are grappling
               | with with two competing interests:
               | 
               | 1. We care about certain individuals and we don't want
               | them gone from our life. 2. We care about certain
               | individuals and we want them to have control over their
               | own body.
        
               | cjfd wrote:
               | I don't find it very hard to think of situation where it
               | is likely that a person has a clear mind and decides to
               | stop existing. In particular in case of a disease where
               | the person knows that the only thing that life has in
               | store for them is either more pain or being palliatively
               | sedated.
        
               | tednoob wrote:
               | A reverse Turing test. A discussion with a computer to
               | convince it you are a sane human.
        
               | [deleted]
        
               | 5e92cb50239222b wrote:
               | > strong temporal emotions
               | 
               | That's a pretty loaded statement. You're probably
               | thinking of those ostentatious fools who end up in the
               | news like "man was prevented from jumping off the
               | bridge". Not every suicide does it on a whim, some think
               | about that decision for many years.
        
               | thisiswater wrote:
               | Yes, but the vast majority of people who survive a
               | suicide attempt do not go on to die by suicide.
        
               | mortehu wrote:
               | As a general trend, when you make effective suicide less
               | convenient, e.g. switching from lethal gas to carbon
               | monoxide free natural gas in ovens, they happen less
               | often. Not necessarily because of fewer attempts though.
               | 
               | https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/means-matter/means-
               | matter/saves...
        
               | detaro wrote:
               | yes, that's the point, making the distinction between
               | those two? How is that a loaded statement?
        
               | diognesofsinope wrote:
               | > strong temporal emotions
               | 
               | Well said. As Jim Jefferies said in his gun control bit
               | referencing suicide -- 'We all have bad days.'
        
               | [deleted]
        
             | api wrote:
             | It's not about permission in the idealistic sense. It's
             | about issues like people being pressured or manipulated
             | into it so someone can have inheritance, so the healthcare
             | system can save money, etc.
             | 
             | These would be even larger concerns in the US than
             | Switzerland for cultural and economic reasons.
             | 
             | I am personally against assisted suicide for the same
             | reason I am against the death penalty: the logic works but
             | only if you ignore the ugliness and messiness of real human
             | behavior.
        
               | theragra wrote:
               | So you think several cases of unintended death are more
               | important than suffering of all who really want to die?
               | Cause I can't imagine that percentage of wrong deaths is
               | more than several percents.
        
               | sgustard wrote:
               | A "wrong death rate of several percent" sounds
               | problematic in almost any circumstance.
        
               | sokoloff wrote:
               | That must be traded off against a "prolonged suffering
               | rate of X%" as the overwhelmingly likely alternative.
               | 
               | We chose to euthanize our dog this summer. No matter how
               | obvious her medical condition was, I still questioned
               | whether we did it too early, too late, or just right.
               | (Upon reflection, I think _very_ slightly too late [by
               | days or maybe a week].) I also couldn't help but compare
               | that experience to that of people. In many ways, I think
               | we treat our family pets with more compassion.
        
               | syshum wrote:
               | >>It's not about permission in the idealistic sense
               | 
               | Then you proceed to give an idealistic reason to oppose
               | it... A person choosing to end their life to preserve a
               | family inheritance IMO would / should be a valid reason,
               | your opposition to such a choice is idealistic.
               | 
               | >I am personally against assisted suicide for the same
               | reason I am against the death penalty
               | 
               | There is no logical or idealistic similarities between
               | the two as there is a difference between actions being
               | forced upon you, and voluntary actions.
               | 
               | This has become a common trend in the modern era where we
               | attempt to expand the idea of coercion to include
               | scenario;s where people have only poor choices. Examples
               | include people taking a poor paying job being "coerced"
               | into it because they did not have "good" choices,
               | 
               | it is very dangerous to equate a circumstances where
               | there are no good options to coercion
        
               | sokoloff wrote:
               | I suspect I'm generally aligned with you on the topic,
               | but I agree that "choosing suicide for grandma to
               | preserve a family inheritance" is perfectly valid if
               | grandma is choosing it, but acknowledge that it's
               | terribly problematic if the kids or grandkids are behind
               | it. Being in the middle part of my life, I've seen the
               | pressures that arise here, the concerns over finances and
               | quality of life, and the diminishment of mental capacity
               | of many elderly folks.
               | 
               | I had a close family member express repeatedly and
               | regularly that "they were done" and "are looking forward
               | to finally dying". That's what makes me strongly support
               | individual choice here, but I'm not blind to the
               | possibility of abuse here (and near certainty that it
               | will happen in some cases).
        
             | cyber_kinetist wrote:
             | Baudrillard's going to laugh in his grave for this one.
             | 
             | Our modern society has tried so hard to defeat death that
             | we have essentially surrounded ourselves in it. Once we've
             | made machines that try to defeat death, the only natural
             | extension is to make machines that do the exact opposite,
             | since there is no longer a distinction between the two.
             | 
             | (I highly recommend reading Chapter 5 from Baudrillard's
             | _Symbollic Exchange and Death_ , which elaborates about how
             | modern society has ripped apart the symbolic exchange
             | between life and death and neatly partitioned it, and as a
             | consequence death becomes an immortal force that we cannot
             | deal with.)
        
             | [deleted]
        
           | timwaagh wrote:
           | A Dutch engineer maybe. The views on this topic are so
           | extreme in my country i find it a bit creepy. I'm sure
           | everyone involved thinks people should be able to die at the
           | touch of a button. The rest is just there for compliance
           | reasons.
        
           | tomjen3 wrote:
           | As an Engineer, I wouldn't necessarily be against it if it
           | made EOL decisions more available to humans. I would prefer
           | no program at all, and just have a waiting period of 14 days
           | to nullify those who insist that all suicidal thoughts are
           | just spur of the moment things.
           | 
           | But given access to data and an appeals process for those it
           | turned down, I would be morally okay with writing the
           | software.
           | 
           | We let parents have as many children as they want, why
           | shouldn't those children get to say if the life they have is
           | worth living?
        
             | logifail wrote:
             | > I would prefer no program at all, and just have a waiting
             | period of 14 days to nullify those who insist that all
             | suicidal thoughts are just spur of the moment things
             | 
             | I've not posted about this before, for a variety of
             | reasons:
             | 
             | A close family friend of mine - in his mid 20s - took his
             | own life a week or so before Christmas a couple of years
             | ago.
             | 
             | I was with him and his father in a pub the evening before,
             | he was telling jokes and buying drinks, he was dead a few
             | hours later.
             | 
             | Unfortunately taking your own life doesn't have a cooling-
             | off period :(
        
             | xupybd wrote:
             | I have found depression can last much longer than 14 days.
        
           | oneepic wrote:
           | While it's not in the article, I could see them adding _some_
           | in-person contact (ie interview /screen with a human, but not
           | a doctor) to get a rough idea of the person. Not just accept
           | or deny them 100% according to the AI.
        
           | tsuujin wrote:
           | > The second turned out not to be aesthetically pleasing. For
           | that and various other reasons it's not the best one to use.
           | 
           | Also on the list of concerning statements. Why do I get the
           | feeling that "various other reasons" play a bit of a more
           | important role than he's letting on there?
        
           | bryanrasmussen wrote:
           | at that level you talk to the salespeople, not the engineers.
        
           | A4ET8a8uTh0 wrote:
           | I will add more to this. What is really fascinating is the
           | idea 'ai' has been so successfully sold as a solution to just
           | about any problem out there. I am genuinely trying not to
           | just not add 'using novel blockchain protocol for full
           | transparency' ( while naturally keeping all transparency out
           | from the ai blackbox ).
           | 
           | We live in a weird time leg.
        
           | kqr wrote:
           | Not so fast. Meehl (1989) is the obvious reference here: http
           | s://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=meeh...
           | 
           | But going beyond that, Kahneman in his latest book summarises
           | the recent research in the area as such:
           | 
           | - Simple linear models generally outperform experts.
           | 
           | - Simple linear models generally outperform experts when the
           | experts get additional information to base their decisions
           | on, that the model does not get.
           | 
           | - Simple linear models generally outperform experts when the
           | experts get to know and use the outcome of the linear model.
           | 
           | - Simple linear models trained only on an expert's judgments
           | and not the actual outcome outperform the very expert they
           | were trained on.
           | 
           | - Simple linear models with random weights (!) outperform
           | experts.
           | 
           | - Simple linear models with equal weights (i.e. transform the
           | predictors to the same scale and then just sum them)
           | outperform experts.
           | 
           | - Simple linear models with equal weights and almost all
           | predictors removed except the best 1--3 outperform experts.
        
             | phailhaus wrote:
             | > Simple linear models generally outperform experts
             | 
             | At what? At correctly diagnosing patients or predicting
             | prognosis once an issue has already been identified, as in
             | Meehl's paper? That is not the same thing as determining
             | whether a patient has the "mental capacity" to commit
             | suicide.
        
           | actually_a_dog wrote:
           | Nor did they consult with an ethicist, clearly.
        
         | punnerud wrote:
         | "Hi Tesla, can you help me kill my self?"
         | 
         | Sounds like a terrible feature
        
           | zabzonk wrote:
           | "You already own me, don't you?"
        
           | Y_Y wrote:
           | "Full Self Driving activated."
        
       | danielovichdk wrote:
       | Outrageous. You want me to believe that it's humane to lie in a
       | fucking blue capsule and commit suicide?
       | 
       | People need to understand that when and if you really want to
       | kill yourself, this is often done in affect if not the individual
       | is very psychical sick.
       | 
       | I don't like this. I think its ethically wrong to have people go
       | away in a plastic box and building an actual product around that.
       | I mean, how inhumane are you trying to make this look?
       | 
       | Have people go out in their own bed, have their loved ones next
       | them and have professional medical staff help out during the
       | process.
        
         | BrandoElFollito wrote:
         | > this is often done in affect if not the individual is very
         | psychical sick
         | 
         | You also have the population of people who are sick and simply
         | want to end their life.
         | 
         | No affect. No psychological issues.
         | 
         | Just the fact that you want to be in control of your life. I
         | find this very courageous - I for one certainly do not want to
         | be a burden for my family if I am in a state that requires them
         | to take care of me when my brain is gone.
        
         | throwawayboise wrote:
         | Yes that was my feeling just about the appearance of the thing.
         | Why does it have to look so cold, alien, sterile?
        
         | throwaway675309 wrote:
         | I think a person who's had to live in chronic excruciating pain
         | for years is not gonna give a shit what color the freaking
         | capsule is, if this provides them a relatively painless way out
         | of their never ending suffering then it's their goddamn choice.
         | 
         | It's not up to their family, and it's not up to their friends.
         | They can't begin to understand the anguish that person is going
         | through and frankly neither can you.
        
         | xf13d wrote:
         | This is to eliminate the pesky doctor from the situation.
         | 
         | Doctors have ethics, morals, and feelings. Doctors, at least
         | ostensibly, agree to "first do no harm". If you take that
         | statement literally that means doctors are obligated to not
         | help a patient commit suicide because killing someone is
         | ostensibly more harm than having them in pain. I know this
         | isn't popular on HN being very pro individual liberty, and I
         | agree people _should_ have control over their own lives, but
         | the inclusion of doctors presents a problem to people who want
         | to enable anyone to kill themselves easily.
         | 
         | The sarco is a techno-dystopian solution. Now that the cat is
         | out of the bag, 3d printable, and theoretically reliable, it's
         | only a matter of time before it's used for something other than
         | killing yourself. Or, even worse, it's used to create some new
         | tech startup that starts to approach soylent green. Just throw
         | a nice screen in there with images of pretty scenery and you
         | have the "exit" in the most literal sense.
         | 
         | It's humane in theory because the nitrogen provides a painless
         | death. I say in theory because this only works in theory. There
         | have been many failed suicides directed by exit international
         | that demonstrate the method is not as effective as they tout
         | but no one seems to mention the quackery by EI when they talk
         | about them.
         | 
         | My concern is these people walk the line between "helping the
         | actual sick have a peaceful death" and "homicidal psychopath"
         | and with this device I believe they are leaning far, far closer
         | to the latter. Creating mass scale suicide devices with the
         | specific intent to end people's lives is immoral and unethical.
         | As stated above, it will only be a matter of time before a
         | company decides to provide suicide-as-a-service.
        
       | pengaru wrote:
       | Am I alone in wishing the person in the photo would climb in for
       | a live demonstration?
        
       | paxcoder wrote:
       | Pain is a part of life, God is the answer. People belong to God,
       | they have no right to kill themselves. Furthermore, people change
       | their minds when they jump. In short, euthanasia is an
       | abomination
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | isodev wrote:
       | Excellent! Every person should have the right to make the choice
       | for themselves.
        
       | newintellectual wrote:
       | Simple fact: everybody dies.
       | 
       | The remaining question is whether you have any control over it.
        
       | duxup wrote:
       | There was PBS Frontline episode about a man who after being
       | diagnosed with ALS traveled to Switzerland to die. They follow
       | him until the very end.
       | 
       | Very powerful episode, I still remember it vividly.
       | 
       | https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/suicidetourist/
        
       | Apocryphon wrote:
       | Every day we draw closer to _Children of Men_
       | 
       | https://youtu.be/IacY-MYuQQ0
       | 
       | https://youtu.be/QYy80trSPSI
        
       | bobthechef wrote:
       | The nihilistic culture of death is well established, so I'm
       | surprised it took this long or if this thing can truly be said to
       | be "new".
        
       | jliptzin wrote:
       | The capsule itself is interesting, seems like a peaceful and pain
       | free way to die. I don't understand why they feel they have to
       | replace doctors and psychiatrists with an AI in prescribing the
       | procedure, one of the worst ideas I have ever heard.
        
         | xwdv wrote:
         | Replacing with AI solves the issue of having to wait weeks to
         | see a doctor and also the costs associated with it.
        
           | schroeding wrote:
           | But so does replacing it with an algorithm that randomly says
           | "yes" or "no" ^^
           | 
           | (Costs shouldn't be an issue, switzerland has pretty good
           | medical insurances AFAIK)
        
       | politician wrote:
       | I'm glad to see this uses nitrogen asphyxiation. It's the humane
       | alternative.
       | 
       | Edit: Clicked the link
        
         | mrshadowgoose wrote:
         | I'm not sure if you're joking, or simply did not read the
         | article. The capsule described in the article is person-sized,
         | and uses nitrogen asphyxiation.
        
         | jack_riminton wrote:
         | When did people stop reading the articles on here? this
         | affliction seems to have spread from Twitter
        
           | gwbas1c wrote:
           | The same problem existed on Slashdot 20 years ago. Assuming
           | you have good karma, the easiest thing to do is downvote.
        
           | bogwog wrote:
           | It's not even about reading, this guy did not even click the
           | link. If you do, the first thing you see is a picture of the
           | thing.
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | Minor49er wrote:
             | He might have thought it was too big a pill to swallow
        
       | amne wrote:
       | Has anyone heard from the QA team?
        
       | qualudeheart wrote:
       | I find this very depressing.
        
         | BrandoElFollito wrote:
         | I find it very reassuring that there is a place around me where
         | I can do this (I am in France, and have Switzerland, the
         | Netherlands and BElgium nearby).
        
       | [deleted]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-12-05 23:01 UTC)