[HN Gopher] The Unknown Story of Phil Zimmermann
___________________________________________________________________
The Unknown Story of Phil Zimmermann
Author : 0des
Score : 26 points
Date : 2021-11-30 15:32 UTC (7 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.michaelrinderle.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.michaelrinderle.com)
| not2b wrote:
| s/important 5th amendment issue/important 1st amendment issue/
| lisper wrote:
| "Checking your browser before accessing www.michaelrinderle.com"
|
| WTF? What exactly is it about my browser that you want to check?
| And why is it taking so long?
| webmobdev wrote:
| It's just free advertisement for CloudFlare. They offer "free"
| DDoS protection to sites, and use this as a form of advertising
| too by showing this to any visitor that browses a "cloudflare
| protected" site that use some kind of improved privacy settings
| or privacy oriented browser extension on their browser. (They
| are the equivalent of the old _" your xxx antivirus is
| protecting"_ you popups). The better the privacy settings, the
| more it will make you go through what is now infamous as the _"
| Captcha hell"_.
|
| (Ofcourse, they kindly offer you a "solution" to avoid this
| nagging - the _Cloudflare Privacy Pass_. Install the browser
| extension and sacrifice your privacy, and CloudFlare will not
| nag you).
|
| I am from India, where many unsecure computers are often
| infected with malware, and often part of large bot networks.
| Thus, many indian IPs are already in blacklists or treated
| suspiciously. So I see this a lot. So much, that I just despise
| CloudFlare now (recently even recommended Netlify over
| Cloudflare to a client to have my petty revenge over them).
| tenebrisalietum wrote:
| Cloudflare DDOS protection?
| lisper wrote:
| Well, yeah, that's what it says. But how exactly is "checking
| my browser" for 30 seconds or more (I gave up on it after
| that) supposed to prevent a DDOS attack?
| dec0dedab0de wrote:
| I would assume it is fingerprinting you and checking you
| against a list of bad fingerprints.
| tenebrisalietum wrote:
| If you're serious about accessing the site and not just a
| script creating trouble, you'll stick around.
| asasidh wrote:
| Potential Satoshi candidate
| bob332 wrote:
| Lol no he is far too clever to waste his time on crypto crap
| lixtra wrote:
| Seems to be overwhelmed
|
| https://web.archive.org/web/20210517082014/https://www.micha...
| DFHippie wrote:
| Alas, it is doomed to stay unknown hidden behind this link.
| [deleted]
| nickdothutton wrote:
| I'll save you the bother. Chances are you know everything this
| article tells you.
| AlexCoventry wrote:
| Seems likely that some of the details are wrong, too. I think
| it would have been a 1st amendment issue, not 5th. Also, I
| doubt the government backed off because they were worried he
| would become a martyr. Seems more likely that they knew they
| would lose.
| shkkmo wrote:
| The voice of this article reminds me strongly of "you won't
| believe what happened next" crappy click-bait articles. I'm not
| sure why exactly but I think it has something to do with the
| weird tense it is written in.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-11-30 23:02 UTC)