[HN Gopher] Why Paper Jams Persist (2018)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Why Paper Jams Persist (2018)
        
       Author : kejaed
       Score  : 54 points
       Date   : 2021-11-25 13:13 UTC (2 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.newyorker.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.newyorker.com)
        
       | TomMasz wrote:
       | I worked at Xerox during this period and know and/or worked with
       | all of the people in this article. Dealing with paper is a
       | colossal PITA but it's why printers and copiers exist so you have
       | no choice. Xerox's strategy of building platforms that could be
       | scaled helped somewhat but paper can act differently at different
       | speeds so it's not a guarantee that scaling won't bring new
       | challenges.
       | 
       | Many years ago I worked on a small 14 ppm machine that was
       | intended for worldwide distribution. We spent considerable time
       | testing in "hot/wet" environmental chambers because in Brazil,
       | where Xerox had a large factory and sold domestically, people
       | would set up copiers on the sidewalk and sell copying to
       | passersby. Damp paper is very different than dry paper and we had
       | to be robust against it.
        
         | HeyLaughingBoy wrote:
         | Likewise I worked at a company whose business revolved around
         | mail processing and high-speed paper handling. The problems
         | caused by an ink that can dry fast enough to not smear when
         | you're printing 200 pieces/minute drove a ridiculous amount of
         | software design.
         | 
         | OTOH, it was some of the most fun I've had at work.
        
         | speeder wrote:
         | Whoa! Never realised that was a thing, and I am thankful for
         | you and your colleagues work.
         | 
         | I am brazillian, and the reason we have those sidewalk copy
         | shops is that a large amount of government bureaucracy (and we
         | have a huge amount of these, according to the "ease to do
         | business" there was years where we had the dubious honor of
         | having most bureaucracy of all countries in the world) has
         | paper copies of documents mandatory many government offices do
         | not make copies for you but will happily tell you the nearby
         | shops with Xerox machines (literally, here Xerox and
         | photocopier is same thing).
         | 
         | Even basic things like: open bank account, close bank account,
         | get internet, or a new phone, require at least a Xerox copy of
         | a bill in your name to prove you live nearby (yes, this
         | sometimes result in circular reference, like power company
         | wanting a power bill to start the contract).
         | 
         | For more complex things like opening a company it is not rare
         | to visit in person 5 different government offices taking with
         | you 50+ pages of Xeroxed stuff (I know this from personal
         | experience. Also closing a company is similarly nuts).
         | 
         | So without these machines working perfectly we would all be
         | screwed, sometimes a humid paper jam could mean you having to
         | wait months to get a new appointment with government office to
         | solve your problem. Or outright epic fines (for example if you
         | needed copies to comply with regulations or taxes)
        
           | gugagore wrote:
           | >(literally, here Xerox and photocopier is same thing).
           | 
           | In case it was missed, the word for "photocopy" is "xerox"
           | (like often "kleenex" is the word for "tissue").
        
           | [deleted]
        
       | KennyBlanken wrote:
       | Long ago I worked support at an advertising firm and we had a
       | _lot_ of color laser copiers with attached RIP engines for
       | printing out not-quite proofs and whatnot. (Sidenote: Terrible
       | software to have to support. FieryRIP can eat a bag of dicks. In
       | general the RIP engines, which ran Win 2k I think...just never
       | seemed to work right, I think lots of print queue issues, and
       | calibration was a PITA?)
       | 
       | Out of the middle of nowhere we suddenly started getting jams on
       | the machines. It was like an infection.
       | 
       | Turns out that some genius decided they'd save the company money
       | (which it didn't need to do, it was rolling in dough) by
       | switching to a cheaper paper. The new stuff ended up in the
       | machines around the building in a seemingly random order.
       | 
       | Xerox sent a tech out. He inspected and cleaned some rollers,
       | then concluded that our paper sucked. Proved it by printing ~500
       | pages on good paper he'd brought, and then using a ream of the
       | old paper.
       | 
       | If your laser printer is mis-feeding or jamming a lot, buy better
       | paper.
       | 
       | Also, humidity can be important. We had a "proof printer" room
       | where the expensive color printers were that generated the actual
       | "proofs" before stuff went off to get printed by the thousands-
       | to-millions or shown to clients, and there was a household
       | humidifier in the corner to keep things from getting too dry in
       | the winter.
        
         | eropple wrote:
         | Paper quality is so huge - spending $4 more at Staples or
         | whatever, amortized across 500 sheets, is a no-brainer even
         | (especially) in a cheap home printer.
        
           | fmajid wrote:
           | Paper is an organic material and like all such, it is subject
           | to variability machines don't always deal well with.
           | 
           | I get this one on Subscribe and Save:
           | 
           | https://smile.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B000H9HMJ6/
           | 
           | The 120gsm quality and surface finish is amazing compared to
           | ordinary paper. I pay PS7 for a 500 page ream and it's well
           | worth it.
        
         | tinus_hn wrote:
         | Also, if you don't print a lot, buy paper in 500 sheet packs,
         | even if buying a 2500 sheet box is cheaper.
        
       | kkjjkgjjgg wrote:
       | Love the subject.
       | 
       | Also had to chuckle, even though it is not the same thing,
       | because it reminded me of the first time I experienced a paper
       | avalanche. Several years into my adult life, somehow unprocessed
       | papers and bills had stacked up so high that they went sliding
       | into an avalanche, burying other stuff beneath them. It somehow
       | felt like a milestone in life.
        
       | azalemeth wrote:
       | This article (published in 2018) really conveyed the joy of
       | engineering. It also frankly made me want to buy Xerox for my
       | next printer: I've noticed a huge amount of similarity between
       | different brands and I would not be surprised at all if they have
       | a large amount of "shared IP" if diagnosing a jam requires a team
       | of high-end researchers like as described.
       | 
       | Printing is an odd business. My grandmother was a typographer --
       | a layout artist, in the days before desktop publishing -- and had
       | a unique combination of artistic skills and highly technical
       | ones. The fundamental tension between those two aspects, together
       | with an ever-present focus on minimising cost, makes for a cut-
       | throat marketplace of multi-domain experts. It's an art we should
       | celebrate. I took great pleasure in printing my PhD thesis, and
       | the person who did the book binding both noticed and appreciated
       | it, and as a result used machines and processes developed in the
       | late 19th century to artistically produce the 10 hardback copies
       | I had to have made. It's a wonderful mix of craft and care and I
       | think a very misunderstood industry.
       | 
       | [DRM'd inkjet printers can go screw themselves, however]
        
         | jazzyjackson wrote:
         | I always wondered how the bookbinder in town stayed in
         | business, must be some arrangement with the university down the
         | road requiring these hardcopies xD
        
         | clmay wrote:
         | Your grandmother was a _typesetter_ , not a typographer. The
         | former lays out type on a page, the latter designs the
         | typefaces themselves.
        
           | jonsen wrote:
           | In my language (Danish) a typesetter is called a typograph
           | (typograf) and they do typography according to WP:
           | 
           | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typography
        
           | jazzyjackson wrote:
           | this distinction may be related to computers putting
           | typesetters out of the job, leaving just the font designers
           | to claim the title "typographer" (just a hunch)
        
           | azalemeth wrote:
           | She called herself a typographer and a layout artist -- she
           | had a qualification in typography and set the title font used
           | for an obscure newspaper, the Antiques Trade Gazette, where
           | she worked for many years. Although she's dead, I'd use the
           | term that she did for describing her own job!
        
       | tanelpoder wrote:
       | Also, cats on printers.
        
         | 1cvmask wrote:
         | And then we can upload that video to YouTube
        
       | dylan604 wrote:
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5QQdNbvSGok
       | 
       | My 2 least favorite things about computers: fonts and printing.
       | Even in 2021, printing still sucks. Sure, we've decided we want
       | to print on so many different types of printing surfaces, that
       | modern printer manufactures probably dream of the days only
       | printing on white paper. Makes me wish for a laser printer with
       | an option to use dot matrix fan folded style paper feed. At least
       | you know it's going to pull straight.
        
         | nradov wrote:
         | Those exist
         | 
         | https://www.pecoinc.com/products/mp/index.htm
        
           | dylan604 wrote:
           | The 90s called, and they want their tech back. Good gawd
           | those are horrendeously large.Also, I think that page you
           | linked might be from the 90s as well. Every link results in a
           | 404. At least their 404 page has live links to get to current
           | website. Any website that has a Request Quote instead of a
           | listed price just means move along for me. I also saw no info
           | on expendables like paper costs or toner costs. I just don't
           | understand having so much basic information missing from a
           | website. It's almost as if the companies like this are
           | telling you "you don't want to do business with us".
           | 
           | Thanks for the link though. At least I now know these exist,
           | and I can one day be a hero in a meeting with this knowledge.
        
         | sharikous wrote:
         | Printing will probably suck more and more as we are moving away
         | from paper.
         | 
         | OSes like macOS had entire graphics stacks tailored for
         | printing support (quartz uses pdf as its intermediate format).
         | I bet newer OSes will provide much weaker support for printing
        
       | gota wrote:
       | https://archive.ph/SJlAS
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-11-27 23:02 UTC)