[HN Gopher] United States will place travel restrictions on S. A...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       United States will place travel restrictions on S. Africa and 7
       other countries
        
       Author : lukegen
       Score  : 24 points
       Date   : 2021-11-26 20:01 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.nytimes.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.nytimes.com)
        
       | Mountain_Skies wrote:
       | It's already been detected in Hong Kong, Israel, and Belgium.
       | We're not banning travel from any of them.
        
       | Aliabid94 wrote:
       | Ridiculous response - travel bans are not effective (the strain
       | is definitely already here) and punish countries for
       | transparency.
        
         | hn_throwaway_99 wrote:
         | The US has been pretty transparent on that, that the goal is
         | not to prevent it from coming here (that's impossible), but to
         | slow its spread here to give scientists more time to evaluate
         | its impact.
        
           | spookthesunset wrote:
           | And what evidence suggests that travel bans actually do
           | anything to "slow the spread"?
        
             | hn_throwaway_99 wrote:
             | Math? Any particular transmission event is chance of
             | someone being infected X probability of transmission.
             | Reduce the first term and the total number of infected
             | individuals at a given time T is reduced (until any
             | exponential growth swamps the terms).
             | 
             | Point of saying "it's impossible to prevent" is that it's
             | not possible to reduce the first term to 0.
        
               | spookthesunset wrote:
               | Okay, even if it works (which is unlikely), what about
               | the costs to society? Do the benefits outweigh those
               | costs?
               | 
               | There are other things in life to worry about than
               | slowing the spread of exactly one illness... is it worth
               | continuing to put those on the backburner?
               | 
               | When does this end?
        
               | somewhereoutth wrote:
               | It might end when universal vaccination and other
               | measures suppress COVID to occasional outbreaks that can
               | be quickly put down.
               | 
               | Otherwise it may never end. With widespread circulation,
               | and selection pressure to evade immunity from vaccines
               | and prior infection, escape variants may become the norm.
               | Each new escape variant will require lockdowns, travel
               | restrictions, and new vaccination.
               | 
               | Pretending it is not happening is not an option either,
               | when basic medical services are not available due to
               | overwhelmed healthcare systems.
        
               | adam_arthur wrote:
               | It's been seen that vaccines do reduce the spread, but
               | breakthrough infections are common. Even with 100%
               | vaccination rate, we should expect new variants to
               | continue to appear.
               | 
               | The only way for covid to "end" is to accept that it's
               | endemic and change our mentality towards living with it.
               | 
               | Truthfully even if everybody on earth caught it
               | simultaneously tomorrow, only a few percent would die,
               | and society would not fundamentally change.
               | 
               | It may sound heartless, but that's the truth. 1-2% of US
               | population dies every year as a baseline as it is.
        
               | Barrin92 wrote:
               | >until any exponential growth swamps the terms
               | 
               | but isn't that almost immediately the case? Let's say you
               | have only 50 people in the States who have the new
               | variant before you notice it, with an r naught of 2-6
               | that most of these strains seem to have after a few days
               | you're probably already way beyond the few falsely
               | negatively tested people who come in by plane. (the US
               | still requires tests right?)
        
           | somewhereoutth wrote:
           | and if that impact is bad (i.e. vaccine escape, severe
           | illness, and outcompetes Delta) then lockdowns are our only
           | option.
        
       | newbie2020 wrote:
       | Racist and xenophobic president
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-11-26 23:01 UTC)