[HN Gopher] The Soviet 1801VM3 Enhanced LSI-11 Processor
___________________________________________________________________
The Soviet 1801VM3 Enhanced LSI-11 Processor
Author : picture
Score : 22 points
Date : 2021-11-20 20:34 UTC (2 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.cpushack.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.cpushack.com)
| ginko wrote:
| This article is really missing some context on when this
| processor came out and how it compares technology-wise with other
| processors of its time.
| rented_mule wrote:
| It's Soviet, so <= 1991 (and there are references to 1991 and
| post-1991 updates). There's a link at the top of the article to
| a similar article about this chip's predecessor, "developed in
| 1982". It appears they implement the PDP-11 instruction set.
| The western-designed contemporaries of the chip in the article
| would roughly be Intel 80386/80486 and Motorola 68030/68040.
| Some of the details (e.g., clock speed, address space,
| transistor count, package, etc.) look closer to 8088 and 68000.
| So it appears to be 2-3 generations behind Intel and Motorola.
| jacquesm wrote:
| The PDP 11 was a 1970's machine. So more like 20 years
| behind.
| thriftwy wrote:
| These were meant for simple PCs aimed at students. Yamaha
| MSX and Sinclair clones used similarly dated Z80 way into
| 90s as well.
|
| If you think late soviet CPUs are behind, wait until you
| see late soviet cars
| p_l wrote:
| PDP-11 was a bit heavier design, and while it started in
| 1970s, it was evolving and built with newer designs till
| 1990s at least (I think last manufactured units were late
| 1990s). 1801 line is curious in how it was single chip
| while the "original" LSI-11 was 2 chip at the time.
| Meanwhile 1801 was small enough that there are pocket
| calculators built on it, that a sufficiently deranged EE
| student can turn into Unix machine.
| p_l wrote:
| The specific variant that it was compatible with was still
| relevant, sold and manufactured design at the time of the
| introduction (ca. 1985? maybe a bit earlier). It was a very
| capable CPU for its weight class, and actually more packed
| than Digital's offering at the time - most LSI-11 at the
| time required two separate chips minimum, and didn't have
| 1801VM3's later "MCU" variants.
|
| The reason for it was that it wasn't designed as PDP-11
| clone - it was own design, which at the last moment got
| modified to run LSI-11 instruction set and support QBus,
| due to orders from on-high to standardize on PDP-11
| compatibles in the segment it was made for.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-11-20 23:00 UTC)