[HN Gopher] China's Foreign Ministry 'not aware' of situation of...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       China's Foreign Ministry 'not aware' of situation of tennis player
       Peng Shuai
        
       Author : bryan0
       Score  : 132 points
       Date   : 2021-11-19 19:03 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.espn.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.espn.com)
        
       | reunification wrote:
       | I grew up in China. As someone who has personal experience of
       | growing up there, I would really like foreigners and foreign
       | countries to stop concern trolling and telling us what to do.
       | This is no longer the 19th century and white men no longer own
       | Asia. Chinese values are different from Western values and I
       | expect people on the other side of the world to respect and
       | understand that. One of our most important values is internal
       | stability, and the Peng Shuai situation reflects that.
        
         | throwaway02465 wrote:
         | Looks like finding abuse by a powerful man acceptable in the
         | name of internal stability isn't part of Peng Shuai's values.
        
         | inglor_cz wrote:
         | Let me tell you as a white man that does not own anything but
         | his laptop and a few clothes: crushing individuals in the name
         | of Greater Good always backfired on us and it will backfire on
         | you, too.
         | 
         | I am not even sure if we learnt this lesson yet here in the
         | West - power is corrosive to human rights - but your answers
         | seems to be radically rejecting its validity altogether.
         | 
         | Several empires disintegrated after treating their own people
         | badly.
        
           | kleton wrote:
           | The Chinese civilization has at least 2000 (the commonly
           | given 5000 is way too generous) years of experience with
           | statecraft. I think at this point they know what will or will
           | not backfire on them.
        
             | inglor_cz wrote:
             | So does the Western civilization, our roots are in deep
             | Antiquity and a lot of Greek philosophy and Roman law still
             | forms a base of our contemporary institutions.
             | 
             | But we still repeated the same mistakes on different
             | occasions. It often happens that when someone gets all the
             | power, he (usually he) deems himself better at statecraft
             | than those backward ancestors.
        
             | JudasGoat wrote:
             | After the "Cultural Revolution", what is left of Chinese
             | history, to learn from?
        
               | inglor_cz wrote:
               | Taiwan?
        
             | mint2 wrote:
             | The government was completely overthrown three times in the
             | 20th century, and the prior centuries saw immense turmoil
             | as well.
             | 
             | Do Italians have inherently good government skills due to
             | Ancient Rome?
             | 
             | Edit: oops overthrown two or three times depending on
             | whether the Japanese take over of major cities counts. But
             | anyway what I really mean is it had three distinct and
             | extremely different governments. Transfer of skills seems
             | questionable, to understate it.
        
               | inglor_cz wrote:
               | A country with even longer tradition of governmental
               | skills would be ... Iraq.
        
         | kolp wrote:
         | >>Chinese values are different from Western values and I expect
         | people on the other side of the world to respect and understand
         | that.
         | 
         | The ability to criticise public officials and politicians
         | without fear of being "disappeared" should surely be a globally
         | shared aspiration, regardless of cultural differences.
         | 
         | As you say, this is no longer the 19th century. Societies
         | evolve and leave behind unfair practices previously regarded as
         | cultural norms.
        
           | throw8932894 wrote:
           | You really have no idea about chinese real politik. CCP is
           | just group of competing gangs. "Disappeared" in western sense
           | does not make a sense, there is no central authority, just
           | some mobster who ordered it.
           | 
           | Politician who caused this mess is done, he may disappear
           | latter when things are quiet.
        
         | howinteresting wrote:
         | I realize the CCP would like foreigners to treat all Chinese
         | people as a monolith, but there's no reason anyone else should
         | agree to that.
        
       | Akwi wrote:
       | I dont understand how with 1.4 billion people there is absolutely
       | no sign of opposition. Whats the lower bound on how many people
       | you have jail or kill to domesticate the whole herd? It has to be
       | an insanely large number.
        
         | Aperocky wrote:
         | Welcome to the eastern concept of "Mandate of Heaven"
        
         | brokencode wrote:
         | China has a massive surveillance apparatus. If opposition is
         | visible to us, it's visible to the Chinese government and can
         | be snuffed out. It's possible that many people there disagree
         | with the government's actions, though.
        
       | echelon wrote:
       | Every person deserves the freedom to criticize their leaders and
       | to speak out against abuse without fear of reprisal.
       | 
       | This is a shame.
        
         | chrischen wrote:
         | Dang, tell that to Edward Snowden.
        
           | whatever1 wrote:
           | Half America was publicly making fun of the previous
           | president. Try that in China.
           | 
           | Snowden while having noble intentions he broke the law and he
           | should face the consequences of his actions.
           | 
           | If I kill the guard to break into the CIA HQ and expose a
           | massive scandal do I deserve jail time or a Medal of Honor? I
           | would argue both.
        
             | coldtea wrote:
             | > _Half America was publicly making fun of the previous
             | president. Try that in China._
             | 
             | If the whole establishment and the deep state was similarly
             | with you, you could do that in China too.
        
               | SllX wrote:
               | So how is Chairman Winnie the Pooh taking his licks?
        
               | whatever1 wrote:
               | So now that Biden is the laughingstock of the Right, I
               | guess they have the establishment and the deep state on
               | their side and that is why they are not exiled?
        
               | coldtea wrote:
               | No, it's because there are no stakes. The right can laugh
               | in their limited outlets, but can't mobilize all the
               | "good people", media, state apparatus, three letter
               | agencies, and so on.
        
               | whatever1 wrote:
               | What stakes does a single tennis player control? She
               | still got whacked.
               | 
               | The president of the US could easily make an annoying
               | opposing journalist disappear. But they don't.
               | 
               | That is what makes America a functioning democracy and
               | China an authoritarian regime.
        
               | adventured wrote:
               | No, the right doesn't have much media power (only Fox
               | News is of consequence), and it's quite weak politically
               | until the midterms. Biden can largely ignore the right in
               | that sense, he doesn't have to care if the political
               | right mocks him. Mostly Biden has to pay attention to
               | being his own worst enemy. The media protects Biden as
               | much as possible, and the deep state tries to utilize him
               | to get what they want (war, larger budgets, various
               | globalist policies, war on domestic terrorism to set up a
               | more advanced surveillance state).
               | 
               | Biden's biggest problem by a dramatic margin, is the
               | political center, which he has almost entirely lost
               | already.
               | 
               | If the right mocking Biden had any power behind it, he
               | would have never won the election in the first place. It
               | was close enough at the Electoral College that if the US
               | media landscape were 50/50 left/right, Biden would not
               | have prevailed.
               | 
               | Obviously most everyone here understands that despite the
               | flaws of the US, it generally doesn't disappear or exile
               | as China does. The super structures that the left
               | controls, which the right does not, do have very
               | substantial power however (social media, big tech,
               | hollywood, old media & news, journalism, education,
               | welfare state).
        
           | googlryas wrote:
           | Snowden went on the run for stealing government documents,
           | not for speaking out.
        
           | seanmcdirmid wrote:
           | False equivalence.
           | 
           | Edward Snowden ran afoul of the boundaries for freedom of
           | speech in a first world country. If he did the same thing as
           | a Chinese in China, they would have sent a squad to
           | repatriate him long ago (being in Russia is just a minor
           | inconvenience).
           | 
           | Just because the USA and China both have problems in this
           | area doesn't make them anywhere near having the same scale
           | and severity.
        
             | mc32 wrote:
             | Agreed. If Snowden had been Chinese and had exposed Chinese
             | secrets like that and he escaped to Russia, Russia would
             | have found reasons to return him and then there would have
             | been a quick farcical trial and he'd've been executed and
             | the family billed as well as ostracized. Had he escaped to
             | Canada or Australia, etc., they have found a way for an
             | accident to happen to him. Russia, China, N Korea, KSA,
             | Iran deal with dissidents quite harshly.
        
               | sudosysgen wrote:
               | If he went to the USA and got governmental assistance he
               | would be safe. In Russia he is definitely getting a lot
               | of government protection otherwise he would have been
               | "extraordinarily renditioned".
        
               | mc32 wrote:
               | Assange even though isn't protected by the UK isn't
               | getting extraordinarily renditioned. Yes, the UK has
               | treated him badly and we know Hillary wished him dead via
               | drone, but so far, that has not happened (either
               | extraordinarily renditioned nor droned) though it may
               | come to pass that he gets extradited someday.
        
           | lowkey_ wrote:
           | I support Snowden, but "Every person deserves the freedom to
           | criticize their leaders and to speak out against abuse" is
           | not equal to "Every employee of secret government
           | intelligence agencies deserves the freedom to steal thousands
           | of government documents and release them to the press."
           | 
           | Peng Shuai's situation is so far from Snowden -- if you're
           | trying to point to a parallel between the US and China, it
           | doesn't work. The US equivalent would be if the women who
           | accused Trump, Kavanaugh, Cuomo, etc., of sexual harassment
           | were kidnapped by the government.
        
           | throwaway19937 wrote:
           | There's a big difference between leaking intelligence
           | information and criticizing your country's government.
        
         | HenryKissinger wrote:
         | The Party couldn't care less, unfortunately.
        
         | xdennis wrote:
         | What makes this worse is that it's not even political
         | criticism. She accused him of a crime.
        
       | crate_barre wrote:
       | Does it have to be the CCP that disappeared her? China still has
       | all the hallmarks of a third-world country with things like
       | corruption, and certainly life is just as cheap as a place like
       | Russia. Interested parties could have just had her off'd, no ccp
       | needed.
       | 
       | Say what you want about America, but we don't 'off' our #metoo
       | people. I'm actually laughing in a sad way at how humans
       | literally have an 'off' button in these other countries that
       | these societies just flick. There really is another version of
       | cancel-culture out there.
       | 
       |  _> The 35-year-old former top-ranked player in women 's doubles
       | won titles at Wimbledon in 2013 and the French Open in 2014. Peng
       | also participated in three Olympics_
       | 
       | ^^ That person had an off button in China, unbelievable. I grow
       | disillusioned by the moment.
        
         | NalNezumi wrote:
         | Absolutely horrifying how people can just "off" there, like a
         | button. Unlike in the USA, where a high profile, human
         | trafficker with connection to former presidents and
         | billionaires, mysteriously "popped off" in the daylight by
         | surveillance cameras "unfortunately" malfunctioning and guards
         | mysteriously not in their place.
         | 
         | Or some other guy, was he called Edward? That revealed that the
         | government itself was breaking its own laws, sneaking and
         | policing innocent citizen. Something proven even later by
         | investigations by the government itself! and he still had to
         | flee the country and can't come back!
         | 
         | And 330 Million people, without fear of censorship or anything
         | just "meh"ed it off
         | 
         | Gee CCP have to step up their "off" game, truly horrifying that
         | they still have to employ censorship and fear to do it!
        
         | mshockwave wrote:
         | it's absolutely possible and, unfortunately, not surprised CCP
         | would do that.
        
           | crate_barre wrote:
           | From the wiki, looks like they are holding her:
           | 
           |  _On 17 November, Chinese state media outlet China Global
           | Television Network released an email allegedly written by
           | Peng to chief executive of WTA Steve Simon, which stated that
           | she was resting at home and that her allegation of sexual
           | assault was not true, and that she was not missing. The email
           | also criticized the WTA for releasing what it claimed was
           | unverified information about Peng without her consent. The
           | authenticity of the email was cast in doubt with many
           | pointing out that a typing cursor appears to be visible on
           | the screenshot of the email. Responding in regard to the
           | email, Simon stated that it only raised his concerns as to
           | her safety and whereabouts. He reiterated that Peng 's sexual
           | assault allegation must be investigated "with full
           | transparency and without censorship"._
           | 
           | CCP is insane.
        
         | caiomassan wrote:
         | > Say what you want about America, but we don't 'off' our
         | #metoo people.
         | 
         | Jeffrey Epstein was a suicide for sure.
        
           | seanmcdirmid wrote:
           | I'm pretty sure Jeffrey Epstein didn't voice any #metoo
           | grievances.
        
             | sudosysgen wrote:
             | Functionally, he was about to, actually. If he went on
             | trial he would have been compelled to give up names of
             | sexual abusers.
        
       | throw8932894 wrote:
       | Why should government even comment on this? Accusations on social
       | media are private matter, this crime was not even reported to
       | police.
        
         | poorjohnmacafee wrote:
         | In CCP land you don't report to the police crimes of top CCP
         | officials. I'm sure they won't comment, but it's a major
         | scandal involving the "vice president" equivalent in the CCP, I
         | think any other administration anywhere would comment.
        
         | chrischen wrote:
         | For things like this publicity is the only weapon.
        
         | olliej wrote:
         | Indeed, why should the government comment on the disappearance
         | of a public figure just after they stated that they were
         | sexually assaulted by a major figure in that government?
         | 
         | What possible reason could there be?
        
         | zht wrote:
         | because the person making the accusation has been missing?
        
         | saghm wrote:
         | I mean, if the worry is that the government disappeared her,
         | the police would at best not be much help and at worst be the
         | ones who kidnapped her in the first place. The police saying it
         | wasn't reported doesn't necessarily mean that's true, and even
         | if it is, it doesn't necessarily mean much.
        
         | xdennis wrote:
         | > this crime was not even reported to police
         | 
         | Maybe she would have, but it's difficult to report something
         | when you've been disappeared.
        
       | Romanulus wrote:
       | This was touched on here (China Uncensored):
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WuFayKQ3CTA
        
       | olliej wrote:
       | This just in: kidnapper has no knowledge of whereabouts of
       | kidnapped person
        
       | fodmap wrote:
       | This kind of situation is sadly usual in China and the World
       | tends to turn a blind eye, like with the 'Uyghurs situation' so I
       | hope WTA keeps the pressure.
       | 
       | Coincidentally I'm reading Red Roulette by Desmond Shum. His wife
       | is in a similar state than Peng Shuai.
        
       | outside1234 wrote:
       | I'm sure she is "safely" in tiny pieces somewhere.
        
       | bkishan wrote:
       | It is a good thing that Andy Murray, Novak Djokovic and Serena
       | Williams are speaking up. The WTA has also shown impressive
       | courage in dealing with the matter.
        
         | zibzab wrote:
         | Yeah, kinda like the NBA but the opposite.
        
           | e40 wrote:
           | Except for Enes Kanter, but 100% agree.
        
         | htk wrote:
         | I was also very impressed with WTA. So much to lose financially
         | and they not only didn't stay silent, but also took a hard
         | stance.
        
         | mc32 wrote:
         | I am really encouraged by this. An organization as well as
         | individual players risking millions on principle, which is very
         | much unlike the NBA and even Apple Inc.
        
       | powerapple wrote:
       | As a Chinese I expect this: Peng Shuai is safe; Zhang is probably
       | in investigation; investigation probably will last some time;
       | Zhang is most likely over, if investigation finds evidence for
       | anything else, he most likely will go to jail.
        
         | xdennis wrote:
         | Why do you expect her to be safe if she's not communicating?
        
           | arvigeus wrote:
           | She is probably in custody. I am very anti-CCP, but I don't
           | believe they are that plain evil (or stupid) to simply kill
           | someone - mafia style. Especially someone with such high
           | profile.
           | 
           | Look at what happened to Jack Ma - he was also "disappeared",
           | but he showed couple of times since. Such a flamboyant
           | persona like him to turn into a "monk" in just couple of
           | months shows that CCP knows how to shut people up without
           | harming them.
           | 
           | When they release her she will also be put on a short leash
           | and try staying lower than grass.
        
             | phd514 wrote:
             | How is disappearing someone in order to intimidate them
             | into operating "on a short leash" anything other than plain
             | evil?
        
               | davorak wrote:
               | Potentially you are talking about different things, the
               | action and the organization.
               | 
               | I can read
               | 
               | > but I don't believe they are that plain evil
               | 
               | so that the writer does not think the ccp is just evil,
               | meaning they are more than just evil. So the writer might
               | think the cpp does evil things probably including:
               | 
               | > disappearing someone in order to intimidate them into
               | operating "on a short leash"
               | 
               | but without making the cpp just or only evil.
        
             | newacct583 wrote:
             | To be clear: "safe" in this context generally implies more
             | than merely "physically unharmed". It's quite clear that
             | Jack Ma was coerced into giving up control of Alibaba. It
             | seems likely that Peng Shuai is being similarly pressured.
             | 
             | Having authorities (for example) scream in your face about
             | their ability to wreck your career and that of all your
             | friends and family is not what most people would consider
             | "safe".
        
             | uoaei wrote:
             | > without harming them
             | 
             | Without leaving evidence of harm, maybe, but I wouldn't be
             | so forthright as to claim that there is no harm. Torture
             | tactics have become quite advanced and many leave invisible
             | scars.
        
               | crate_barre wrote:
               | They most definitely threaten close and extended family
               | members if they don't comply. That's the only reason I
               | can see so many people buckling. It's one thing if you
               | shame/hurt me, but I'd rather shut up before you take it
               | out on anyone close to me.
               | 
               | Peng Shuai can easily come over for Wimbledon or an
               | Olympics and ask for amnesty and get it. But her family
               | are at the CCPs mercy if she does that.
               | 
               | 'We'll find everyone in your family, your family's
               | family, and so on, you will never be in peace'. There's
               | nothing more effective than that.
        
               | inglor_cz wrote:
               | When somebody defected from the Czechoslovak Socialist
               | Republic, his/her relatives would be punished by being
               | fired from good jobs and forbidden to take new ones;
               | usually they had to do some harder and worse paid work.
               | Unless they were members of the Party; in that case,
               | their position was a bit shaken by a defection in family,
               | but they usually could survive in place.
               | 
               | And yeah, their kids were either banned from studying
               | interesting majors, or at least their education became
               | more complicated.
               | 
               | This even concerned highly qualified people such as
               | surgeons.
        
           | yumraj wrote:
           | In CCP China, _safe_ is probably a euphemism for being alive
           | while in house arrest or prison.
        
         | e-brake wrote:
         | Safe, probably, but hopefully isn't going through what Ai
         | Weiwei went through; 81 days in detention with two Chinese
         | state military personnel looking over him 24 hours a day -
         | while sleeping, going to the toilet...
         | https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Expo_SACRED_Venice...
        
         | chunghuaming wrote:
         | As a Chinese I expect this: Peng Shuai, much like Jack Ma, has
         | been kidnapped by the CCP, and tortured and brainwashed until
         | she becomes a harmless sheep, much like Jack Ma. Then she will
         | be released to do CCP's bidding, kind of like Jack Ma right now
         | traveling in EU, trying to get EU secrets on farming to
         | increase food production.
         | 
         | Zhang, because he is part of the Jiang Zemin faction, which is
         | against Xi Jing Ping action, will be dealt like most of Xi Jing
         | Ping's opponent - crushed.
         | 
         | Everyone should realize that basically, CCP is a gang. The
         | biggest evil group of gangsters the world has ever seen.
         | Selling body parts of concentration camp prisoners might just
         | be the surface. It's hilarious that some people actually
         | believe if US and the world somehow lost to CCP, we would be ok
         | under CCP's rule.
         | 
         | Sha Bi Ta Ma Gei Sha Bi Kai Men Zhen Shi Sha Bi Dao Jia Liao
        
           | sudosysgen wrote:
           | There are no EU secrets on farming. You can just ask any
           | farmer how they do it. The actual gap in farming efficiency
           | between China and the EU is fairly low for most basic crops,
           | see: https://ourworldindata.org/crop-yields and compare crop
           | yield gaps.
           | 
           | It's very unlikely Jack Ma is trying to exfiltrate "secrets"
           | of agricultural production from poor European farmers. You
           | can just go and ask them. There are not really any secrets.
        
           | curt15 wrote:
           | >Everyone should realize that basically, CCP is a gang.
           | 
           | And as you would expect of gangsters, to get leverage on
           | someone they go after the person's family (e.g.
           | https://www.vice.com/en/article/jgxdv7/chinese-police-are-
           | vi...)
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-11-19 23:01 UTC)