[HN Gopher] How to Identify that Light in the Sky (flowchart)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       How to Identify that Light in the Sky (flowchart)
        
       Author : hoyd
       Score  : 98 points
       Date   : 2021-11-18 10:41 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (apod.nasa.gov)
 (TXT) w3m dump (apod.nasa.gov)
        
       | nickcw wrote:
       | Ha! I love the "Masthead Light" option - that reminds me of a
       | story.
       | 
       | When you are sailing at night you take bearings of lights you see
       | with a hand-bearing compass. This is a device you look through
       | and it tells you the magnetic bearing of the object you have
       | lined up in the cross hairs. If you see a light that you can't
       | identify then you take bearings on it over the course of a few
       | minutes, and you remind yourself of the sailing motto, "If the
       | bearing does not change, a collision will occur".
       | 
       | I was on a night sail in the Mediterranean with one of my younger
       | cousins who came down below in a panic to report we were on a
       | collision course as the bearing of the light she had spotted was
       | not changing.
       | 
       | I think she could have done with this flow chart, because it
       | turned out to be Venus :-)
        
         | jhgb wrote:
         | > and you remind yourself of the sailing motto, "If the bearing
         | does not change, a collision will occur".
         | 
         | It's also the anti-aircraft-missile's proportional guidance
         | motto. (Being from a landlocked country, it doesn't surprise me
         | that I learned about it from anti-aircraft missiles first.)
        
           | gue-ni wrote:
           | Isn't this how the early AIM-9s worked?
        
             | jhgb wrote:
             | It's pretty much how most modern missiles work, as far as I
             | can tell, and it's very natural to use it on missiles with
             | passive guidance in particular (as opposed to for example
             | missiles with control guidance, the oldest of which used
             | beam riding). Maybe some super-advanced ones calculate
             | optimal trajectories of some sort but that requires more
             | storage, more computing power, and perhaps even a way of
             | estimating distance, whereas proportional guidance only
             | requires angles.
        
         | thewakalix wrote:
         | > collision with Venus
         | 
         | It's a reasonable concern! ...if you've installed a Silmaril on
         | your ship.
        
         | Galxeagle wrote:
         | If it makes her feel better, professional pilots make the same
         | mistake!
         | 
         | https://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/air-canada-pilot-misto...
        
         | _Microft wrote:
         | If someone wants to know more about why such a situation would
         | eventually result in a collision, look for the term "Constant
         | bearing, decreasing range", e.g. in Wikipedia:
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constant_bearing,_decreasing_r...
        
           | jedimastert wrote:
           | It did make me stop and think for a second. Like it totally
           | makes sense, but I don't think I would have come up with that
           | rule on my own for whatever reason. Of course, I don't do
           | much in the way of sailing...
        
           | henvic wrote:
           | Interesting. Thanks for the reference.
        
       | narag wrote:
       | Star-like (4th to 5th mag) point, not blinking, moving across the
       | night sky in about five minutes, consistent _sinusoidal_ (full
       | moon wide) trajectory... this wasn 't too helpful, really.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | astockwell wrote:
       | As we all know, a decision tree without room for "Unknown
       | Behavior" or error/failure modes (a.k.a. UFOs) is bound to result
       | in a 2am page for a production outage very soon.
        
       | teeray wrote:
       | "Any sudden impossible changes of course?"
       | 
       | Yes - Aliens
        
         | JJMcJ wrote:
         | Or not - old aircraft spotter joke "It approached me at great
         | speed till it disappeared over the horizon".
         | 
         | Really hard to tell when direction a plane is really headed in
         | sometimes. So it can look like it made a 90 degree turn when it
         | really didn't.
        
           | genewitch wrote:
           | I had a drone get out of video range once, and I couldn't
           | tell which way it was moving. I would rotate, then strafe
           | left. I never was able to rotate it enough to clearly see any
           | left or right movement relative to me, so eventually it auto-
           | returned and crashed with 0% battery about 50' from where I
           | launched it.
           | 
           | I should note it was either wind or microwaves that
           | originallyl made it go out of video range, this was me trying
           | to get an idea of flooding and hurricane damage the afternoon
           | after hurricane Laura hit us.
        
       | rossdavidh wrote:
       | Somehow this seems like it ought to be an xkcd comic.
        
       | jcims wrote:
       | Another tell for a satellite is if it's moving along then
       | somewhere mid-trajectory it dims from white to deep red to gone.
        
       | dmurray wrote:
       | My rule of thumb is, when someone asks "what's that star?" it's
       | Venus. If it's later in the night, it's Jupiter.
        
         | SamBam wrote:
         | Or Mars, but what's nice is that you generally only have to
         | look up what that "other planet" is once every few months or
         | so, and you'll know it for a good long while. Right now it's
         | Jupiter.
         | 
         | Venus is actually surprisingly far from the sun right now,
         | although still clearly the evening star.
        
         | nanidin wrote:
         | I whip out my phone, pull up Sky Guide, then point it at the
         | star in question. Around here depending on the time of the year
         | it's typically Jupiter, Mars, Venus, or Sirius.
        
         | Razengan wrote:
         | If we're indoors, it's a paid actor.
        
         | recursive wrote:
         | Why would it be related to the time of night?
        
           | Uehreka wrote:
           | Venus's orbit is between us and the Sun, so if it's going to
           | be visible at all, it won't be at a time when your part of
           | the Earth is facing totally away from the Sun. Venus would be
           | visible a lot during the day if the Sun were less bright.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | soamv wrote:
       | Speaking of lights in the sky, I recently fell into a wikipedia
       | rabbit hole and learned about the Gegenschein[0]. This is the
       | backscatter reflection of sunlight from interplanetary dust. You
       | need an extraordinarily dark sky to be able to see it.
       | 
       | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gegenschein
        
       | csomar wrote:
       | > "Are your retinas burning?"
       | 
       | Who thought the people at Nasa could not be funny!
        
         | KiranRao0 wrote:
         | My favorite was "are any astronauts waving at you"
        
       | oxymoran wrote:
       | This doesn't help me identify the bright red orb that I saw weave
       | in and out of buildings at breakneck speed through the Chicago
       | skyline at 3am. It was also seen by my friend as we were out on
       | the balcony looking at the city. And no, it was not an emergency
       | vehicle, it went from one side of the city to the other in a few
       | seconds and also changed altitude drastically multiple times as
       | it made its way around building. The light was also solid, like
       | it was emoting it's one light, not a reflection and it was very
       | bright. It looked like a futuristic rollercoaster ride. This was
       | over a decade ago, around the time of the famous O'hare ufo
       | sighting.
        
         | OldHand2018 wrote:
         | Wikipedia says that happened in November 2006.
         | 
         | Going out on a limb here, but I am betting that you and your
         | friend weren't hanging out on the balcony at 3AM in winter in
         | Chicago. Can we assume it was the following spring or summer?
         | 
         | Because that's exactly when Christopher Nolan spent almost 4
         | months filming the Dark Knight in downtown Chicago. I was
         | working downtown at the time. A large part of the loop was the
         | set. During the day all the props and equipment were stored on
         | the sidewalks and street parking areas. Late at night they set
         | it all up, did their filming, and then put it all away again.
         | And yeah, they used black helicopters zooming around all over
         | the place as camera platforms. Downtown isn't _that_ big, a
         | helicopter can easily cross it in a matter of seconds.
         | 
         | That's what you saw.
        
       | kqbx wrote:
       | The blog where the chart was originally posted has a slightly
       | bigger version of the picture:
       | https://www.leagueoflostcauses.com/blog/2013/08/astronomy-10...
        
       | kamel3d wrote:
       | Planets do twinckle
        
       | xg15 wrote:
       | This is urgently missing "Oil refinery gas flare" which competes
       | with the moon in brightness around here :)
        
       | irrational wrote:
       | I'm disappointed they didn't include one for UFOs. I thought they
       | might since they had other jokes in the flowchart.
        
         | recursive wrote:
         | Why would it be a joke? Anything uncertain in the sky is a UFO
         | almost by definition.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-11-19 23:00 UTC)