[HN Gopher] New mineral davemaoite discovered inside a diamond f...
___________________________________________________________________
New mineral davemaoite discovered inside a diamond from Earth's
mantle
Author : pseudolus
Score : 72 points
Date : 2021-11-13 11:14 UTC (1 days ago)
(HTM) web link (www.newscientist.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.newscientist.com)
| sandgiant wrote:
| > No one has ever successfully retrieved a high-pressure calcium
| silicate from the lower mantle before. This is because the high-
| pressure CaSiO3-perovskite is "unquenchable," meaning that it
| cannot retain its structure after being removed from its high-
| pressure environment.
|
| > "When we broke open the diamond, the davemaoite stayed intact
| for about a second, then we saw it expand and bulge under the
| microscope and basically turn into glass," says Tschauner.
|
| Science paper (paywalled):
| https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abm4742
| kwonkicker wrote:
| Oh man, they killed the only davemaoite we ever had, it's so
| sad
| cbozeman wrote:
| Biologists do this as well. Once we encounter a new species,
| it's killed and then studied.
|
| This is called a 'voucher specimen'. Obviously it's possible
| to make a species extinct if you kill the only one of it's
| kind, and the necessity of voucher specimens is a topic of
| debate amongst field biologists.
| msrenee wrote:
| But now that they know where to look for it, I'm pretty sure
| they'll find more.
| steve_adams_86 wrote:
| This is fascinating in that if the davemaoite wasn't encased in a
| diamond, we'd never see it. It came back to the surface in this
| perfect little package to be discovered.
|
| I wonder how often this happens. Is it normal for minerals to
| occur inside of other minerals like this? Would davemaoite occur
| outside of diamonds? Or is it common for diamonds to be imperfect
| and contain other minerals, but I'm so used to them being
| advertised and worn in their perfect pure form?
| bozhark wrote:
| It's rare to have a perfect clarity diamond.
|
| Almost all have some inclusion.
| thaumasiotes wrote:
| Well, if you're finding the diamond. You can _make_ them as
| perfect as you want.
| msrenee wrote:
| It's very normal for minerals to occur inside of other
| minerals. It's called an inclusion. This can be another mineral
| or liquid like water or petroleum. It's really cool to see a
| piece of quartz with a little pocket of water that's been
| trapped inside for millenia.
|
| It sounds like davemaoiteoccurs outside of diamonds as well,
| but won't stay stable on the earth's surface without being
| encased in something which maintains the pressure on it.
| driggs wrote:
| It makes me sad every time a mineral, chemical, or species is
| named after some arbitrary human (or worse) because the name is
| arbitrary, telling you nothing about the thing itself or
| diagnostic differences from similar things.
|
| It's even worse when the name sounds stupid. "Dave"?! After
| somebody's nickname, who wasn't even a "David"?!
|
| Thanks for making science even harder!
| capableweb wrote:
| Names are just names, after a while you'll get used to it. Not
| sure how you can claim that Ho-Kwang (Dave) Mao was not named
| "Dave", you get the name you claim to have, so in my mind, Dave
| is indeed named Dave.
|
| I for one think it's nice that we still pay tribute to people
| by naming newly discovered things after them, they are
| immortalized that way.
|
| By the way, the mineral is named davemaoite, both Dave and Mao
| is from their name, not just "Dave".
| dataflow wrote:
| > The tiny crystals turned out to be a form of calcium silicate
| that was theorised to exist in the lower mantle but had never
| actually been observed before.
|
| So awesome to see theory validated like this!
| shironandon wrote:
| It feels disappointing that they "cracked it open" but I guess
| this was for science. Now it has depressurized it would take a
| significant amount of energy to pressurize davemoaite for
| exciting experiments similar to those taken to explore superionic
| ice.
| _Microft wrote:
| Diamond anvil cells should be able to reach the given pressure
| (20 GPa?) easily.
|
| https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamond_anvil_cell
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-11-14 23:00 UTC)