[HN Gopher] AR pioneer warns that metaverse could make "reality ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       AR pioneer warns that metaverse could make "reality disappear"
        
       Author : bonkerbits
       Score  : 43 points
       Date   : 2021-11-13 20:48 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (futurism.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (futurism.com)
        
       | seltzered_ wrote:
       | Eh, I think of what Jaron Lanier said years ago about how VR is
       | more ethical when it's time-limited and kinda clunky:
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDRN_dZNJUM&t=1935s
        
       | gfodor wrote:
       | Well we are getting _a_ metaverse, just like we are getting _a_
       | crypto economy. Our choices are around the form it takes, not if
       | it will happen. If good people sit idly by, or dismiss it, we
       | will get the worst versions of both.
        
       | wyre wrote:
       | I can't help but draw a comparison between metaverse, and meta as
       | is used describe an optimal play strategy in competitive games.
       | In the latter, the meta is controlled by the company pushing out
       | new content. In the former, I imagine the company formerly known
       | as Facebook will have control over the metaverse in a similar
       | way. The difference being one is an entertaining game and the
       | other will have real effects on the real world.
        
       | silvi9 wrote:
       | "You have violated the terms of service and your account has been
       | suspended. You no longer have access to Reality."
       | 
       | You know you're going in the wrong direction as a species if a
       | corporation can have control of your every interaction, and they
       | can take that access away if they so wish. They do it today, why
       | should it be any different when the metaverse exists?
        
         | ashtonkem wrote:
         | It's the company town again, but worse.
        
           | mc32 wrote:
           | There's only one town and it only has one company, don't
           | waste it.
        
         | version_five wrote:
         | I think it's fine if a company can control what I do in their
         | property, real or virtual.
         | 
         | The issue (and I wouldn't say this usually) is government.
         | There need to be updated monopoly laws so that that companies
         | with defacto state-level control over what people do cannot
         | exist or are treated as utilities that everyone had a right to.
         | 
         | And government has to stop restricting people from doing stuff
         | in real life, so that we're not pushed into on online dystopia.
         | Importantly, this includes ready ways for everyone to go about
         | their lives and interactions with government without a need for
         | a smart phone, digital ID, or anything similar. Maybe if
         | governments solve the monopoly problem this can be revisited.
        
           | oceanghost wrote:
           | I _strongly_ disagree.
           | 
           | How much of the world do you own that you get to "make the
           | rules" for?
           | 
           | If corporations are allowed to "make the rules" for property
           | with impunity-- you will find yourself at their mercy for the
           | vast majority of your life.
        
             | amelius wrote:
             | Yes, companies do not have some kind of right to do
             | anything they want because "they worked for it". It's the
             | other way around: people grant companies the privilege of
             | making money as long as they provide a benefit and thus (of
             | course) don't hurt consumers.
             | 
             | Companies are an agglomeration of humans, and we should
             | never allow an organized group of people to make life
             | miserable for ordinary individuals. If that happens, then
             | democracy is lost.
        
             | version_five wrote:
             | I'm confused by the strength of your disagreement. You're
             | using a website that has rules about what you can do.
             | Presumably you only let the people you want to into your
             | house? Are you saying you don't agree with property rights?
             | I suspect I'm misunderstanding.
        
           | spoonjim wrote:
           | If every company in the world said you couldn't buy from
           | them, you would die. Does Corporate America get to have that
           | power?
        
       | FridayoLeary wrote:
       | Isn't that the whole point? We get somewhere to escape the real
       | world and Big Company get their own world without existing
       | regulation and oversight.
        
       | icedchai wrote:
       | It feels like many of us are already living in a dystopian
       | nightmare, even without the metaverse. Day-after-day of mentally
       | draining video calls, constant slack notifications...
        
         | 908087 wrote:
         | Mark Zuckerberg is here to tell you: "We can still make it
         | worse"
        
       | klyrs wrote:
       | If the people addicted to social media disappear behind VR
       | headsets, that will be _so_ nice.
        
         | contravariant wrote:
         | I'm not convinced this is any different from the current
         | situation where they bury themselves behind their phone
         | screens.
        
       | tylermauthe wrote:
       | Dystopian maybe, but think of the great ROI.
        
         | ashtonkem wrote:
         | The 21st century (so far) distilled down to a single sentence.
         | Bravo.
        
       | spaetzleesser wrote:
       | That trend had been going on for quite a while now. When you
       | consider the amount of time people are spending on TV, gaming,
       | movies and social networks it's pretty clear that people are
       | already spending a lot of time in virtual reality and prefer it
       | that way. And I see that trend continuing.
       | 
       | What's scary is that if this reality is controlled by large
       | companies with profit motives. They already manipulate us a lot
       | all kinds of media.
        
       | silvi9 wrote:
       | I'm already inundated with endless popups, advertisements,
       | surveys, and other requests when I browse the web on my mobile
       | device.
       | 
       | I don't want to have to do that for everyday living too.
        
         | BeFlatXIII wrote:
         | I look forward to my sketchy Billboard blocker that uses my
         | spare neural electricity to mine Monero after its developer
         | gets hacked.
        
         | reincarnate0x14 wrote:
         | Hate sounding like an ad myself but the builtin adblocker on
         | Brave is a lifesaver for cleaning up shitty mobile sites (ie,
         | almost all of them).
         | 
         | Not looking forward to have to whitelist the programs being
         | side-loaded into my VR interface so I don't get giant modal
         | popups blocking my entire universe.
        
       | mc32 wrote:
       | Somewhat ironic is that lots of people are looking forward to
       | virtual worlds where they can explore without reality getting in
       | the way.
       | 
       | Slowly at first, in fits and starts, but likely people will get
       | ensnared into it and like social media, find it difficult to live
       | without.
       | 
       | Then, the company, or whoever controls it will become pretty
       | powerful not only in this synthetic realm but also in reality as
       | the barrier from one to another is blurred.
        
       | specialist wrote:
       | So more of the same.
       | 
       | Lifecycle of medias is immutable. IIRC, the stages are something
       | like pioneers, settlers, robber barons, wasteland, rediscovery by
       | hipsters, etc.
        
       | BenoitEssiambre wrote:
       | It's dystopian, but maybe inevitable? It might be the only way
       | for economic growth and standard of livings (or some dystopian
       | version of these standards) to continue increasing globally
       | without the human ecological footprint becoming even more
       | disastrous than it currently is. People's lives becoming more
       | virtual may be a (sad) way to use a smaller amount of real world
       | resources and stop trampling the planet.
        
       | bellyfullofbac wrote:
       | It feels like different people have a different understanding
       | what the Metaverse is[1]. Is it Microsoft Chat[2] but in 3D and
       | VR and Zuck spying on you? Is it reality but with augmented data
       | on top of it (I just gave the definition of AR)?
       | 
       | We already have technology modifying reality, like how you can be
       | in the middle of Mongolia and still be in constant contact with
       | your friends in San Francisco. I've had friends meeting in real
       | life and laughing about the funny post someone made on FB (when
       | FB was still a thing...).
       | 
       | [1] https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2021/11/everyone-pitching-
       | the...
       | 
       | [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goEqyQgWIe4
        
       | atweiden wrote:
       | Rosenberg contends AR will be practically impossible to live
       | without [1], and that its most obvious use case is labeling
       | persons in your environment -- and labeling them in a way they
       | have zero control over, and limited ability to opt out of.
       | Rosenberg hints this may exacerbate interpersonal conflict, and
       | that removing the shroud of anonymity from public spaces could
       | make the metaverse difficult to escape from.
       | 
       | [1]: https://bigthink.com/the-future/metaverse-augmented-
       | reality-...
        
       | rackjack wrote:
       | Let's all love Lain.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-11-13 23:02 UTC)