[HN Gopher] Rewriting the History of Computing
___________________________________________________________________
Rewriting the History of Computing
Author : AlbertCory
Score : 9 points
Date : 2021-11-11 15:31 UTC (1 days ago)
(HTM) web link (www.albertcory.io)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.albertcory.io)
| YeGoblynQueenne wrote:
| The title seems a little off. The article is retelling the
| history of Sillicon Valley technology companies, not "computing"
| (for example, the article has nothing to do with the theory of
| computation, Kurt Godel, Alan Turing, Alonzo Church etc).
| AlbertCory wrote:
| Although the book has a strict no-hindsight rule, because it's a
| novel, I also have a section "Let's DO have hindsight" [1] where
| Jerry Morrison and I look at the counterfactual: what _should_
| they have done?
|
| My conclusion is that anything Xerox _as a corporation_ did would
| have turned out as badly as the IBM PC did. Middle management
| screws everything up.
|
| So then the question is: what _else_ could they have done? In
| fact, PARC did spin off some companies which turned out quite
| well -- in one case, ending up with a larger market cap than
| Xerox itself.
|
| Jerry looks at it more as a process issue: Waterfall was the only
| respectable business school methodology then, and that's what
| they tried to do. It was a colossal misfit for a product like
| Star.
|
| [1] https://www.albertcory.io/lets-do-have-hindsight
| AlbertCory wrote:
| Xerox vs. Apple - what _should_ Xerox have done?
|
| By the way, almost everything you think you know about the Steve
| Jobs visit to PARC is wrong.
| trebligdivad wrote:
| The thing about the AMD bitslice having too little memory seems
| odd. The Three Rivers/ICL Perq ran them with a few MB of RAM;
| they do seem to have been the way to do things just before the
| micro era.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-11-12 23:02 UTC)