[HN Gopher] Utterances - a lightweight comments widget built on ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Utterances - a lightweight comments widget built on GitHub issues
        
       Author : jdorfman
       Score  : 66 points
       Date   : 2021-11-11 16:37 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (utteranc.es)
 (TXT) w3m dump (utteranc.es)
        
       | ashton314 wrote:
       | I use this on my blog. (If anyone cares to see an example in the
       | wild:
       | https://lambdaland.org/posts/2021-11-09_programs_and_intent/)
       | 
       | It's been easy to set up and maintain. Not that I get many
       | comments!
        
       | SCUSKU wrote:
       | This is amazing!! I hope GH supports this functionality forever
        
       | clircle wrote:
       | I use this for my blog. To my knowledge, this is the only non
       | scummy and free comment system
        
         | _fat_santa wrote:
         | What's not to like about a service like Disqus? /s
        
           | contravariant wrote:
           | Actually, does anyone mind answering this question (non-
           | sarcastically)? I'd be pretty interested in the answer.
        
         | Dedime wrote:
         | Look into Cactus comments! https://cactus.chat/
         | 
         | Not affiliated. Just think it's cool.
        
       | rochak wrote:
       | Can confirm it is good. Have been using it for my blog.
        
       | cwojno wrote:
       | Having been looking for a way to add comments to a static site
       | for a while now, this is very cool and should get more love.
       | Thanks for the service and the post!
        
       | drawqrtz wrote:
       | Will definitely try it out! Love having comment systems for my
       | blog but usually a pain to set up, this seems like a clever
       | solution.
        
       | TickCount wrote:
       | Cool name ... but why do so many apps insist on using simple
       | English words as names? Whatever happened to more boring, uncool,
       | old-fashioned composite names like PhotoShop or Notepad or
       | Powerpoint?
       | 
       | The problem with one word names is that if the app gets big, it
       | pollutes the search results for those words, making information
       | hard to find. Just Google "Kafka", "electron" and you'll see what
       | I mean.
       | 
       | I get that there is a "cool factor" in using "austere" names. But
       | please be considerate of the need of other professions ... Naming
       | your app "electron", "polyhedra", etc makes it harder for
       | physicists and mathematicians or even just the average person to
       | find the information they look for.
       | 
       | It's interesting to note that font designers generally are more
       | considerate of not polluting the public naming space than
       | programmers. Fonts are generally given names that just sound like
       | they are names of a font (just like drugs are generally given
       | names that "sound like names of a drug"). Apps used to follow
       | similar conventions, hence PhotoShop, FrontPage, DreamWeaver,
       | etc. I'm really not a fan of the "austere" naming aesthetics that
       | have prevailed in recent years. And as a Kafka fan I'm tired of
       | constantly coming across results about Apache Kafka when I'm
       | searching for information related to the novelist. Yes, I know I
       | can be more specific in my queries, but you'd be surprised how
       | many good resources there are about Kafka that don't contain
       | "Franz" anywhere, or how many pages on the internet are about
       | Apache Kafka but don't contain "Apache" anywhere on the page. I
       | used to have a Google alert set up for Kafka results and I had to
       | turn it off because the noise to signal ratio is just too high.
        
       | ajvs wrote:
       | This is cool, but I do find it odd that GitLab and Gitea isn't
       | supported. It's always strange to me seeing people choose to
       | build their platforms dependent on proprietary 3rd party
       | infrastructure when good open-source self-hosted alternatives are
       | available and easy to set up.
        
         | rapnie wrote:
         | It would be awesome to see Gitea support as well. Generally
         | speaking targeting other forges than Github is a niche to be
         | filled for many (dev)tools.
        
         | randomluck040 wrote:
         | Maybe I'm alone with this but when I'm on GitHub, for some
         | reason it feels more like I'm part of a community. For some
         | reason gitlab doesn't convey that when I write an issue there.
         | Maybe it's due to the packages that are on GitHub and gitlab
         | themselves. That's why I prefer GitHub over gitlab, although
         | everything we do in my team we do on gitlab.
        
       | kixiQu wrote:
       | "Wow, you can do really cool things if you violate terms of
       | service" is the https://xkcd.com/1494/ of the web
        
       | _fat_santa wrote:
       | Github is a great platform for building apps that use its
       | infrastructure, but not always for its intended purpose, this
       | being a great example.
       | 
       | I've personally built a number of apps on top of Github Gist. One
       | of my apps is a bookmark sharing application, the idea is you
       | create a bookmark collection and share it with others, all
       | seperate from your browsers bookmarks. I ended up using Github
       | Gist and got the ability to share bookmark collections right out
       | of the box with GistID's.
       | 
       | I built an app for bookmarks but you can really apply it to
       | anything where you need to keep small amounts of data and that
       | data doesn't need to be private (gist has a "Private" mode but
       | it's similar to unlisted Youtube videos).
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-11-11 23:01 UTC)