[HN Gopher] Methane plume seen by satellite over Alabama mystifi...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Methane plume seen by satellite over Alabama mystifies experts
        
       Author : marc__1
       Score  : 55 points
       Date   : 2021-11-10 20:03 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.bloombergquint.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.bloombergquint.com)
        
       | curiousllama wrote:
       | Title is clickbait. The Alabama Department of Environmental
       | Management saying "there is no permanent facility allowed to do
       | this" is not mystifying.
       | 
       | > The Oct. 22 release was detected by satellite and pinpointed to
       | an area in Marion County near natural gas wells in the Black
       | Warrior Basin, a pair of gas pipelines and coal mines.
       | 
       | Read: it's almost certainly gas from the mines.
       | 
       | > The Alabama release is the fifth largest detected by the ESA's
       | Sentinel-5P satellite this year in the lower 48 U.S. states,
       | according to Kayrros.
       | 
       | "Fifth largest in this part of the country" is... not news.
       | 
       | > The Alabama Department of Environmental Management wasn't able
       | to identify a permanent facility that would be responsible for
       | any releases after a diligent review of its records.
       | 
       | This isn't even a "they don't know" it's just a "they didn't tell
       | us."
       | 
       | C'mon Bloomberg...
        
         | lxe wrote:
         | You're just assuming as much as Bloomberg. What makes you reach
         | these conclusions?
        
       | amelius wrote:
       | > The EPA said that the potential area is too broad and the
       | satellite data "does not provide enough tangible information of
       | potential sources in which to conduct a programmatic review,"
       | 
       | Perhaps we should have airplanes/drones fitted with similar
       | measurement instruments as the satellite, so we can take a closer
       | look when necessary?
        
         | drewda wrote:
         | I believe that's become standard practice in the last few
         | years. For example: https://www.microdrones.com/en/integrated-
         | systems/ge-industr... or https://kairosaerospace.com/methane-
         | detection/
        
           | mistrial9 wrote:
           | waves from Berkeley
        
       | skybrian wrote:
       | Apparently this satellite (the Sentinel-5p) has a 7 x 7km
       | resolution. [1] There are other satellites with much higher
       | resolution that might be used to narrow it down, and more
       | launching soon.
       | 
       | [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentinel-5
        
         | entangledqubit wrote:
         | If they image repeatedly at various offsets over an area -
         | perhaps over multiple flybys - shouldn't they be able to
         | localize it better than that?
         | 
         | The Wikipedia pages claims that pictures are taken every second
         | but I am not sure how that translates to image density on the
         | ground.
        
       | Splendor wrote:
       | That link isn't working for me, but I think this is the same
       | article:
       | https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-11-10/methane-p...
        
         | ra wrote:
         | _" An emissions rate of about 58 tons of methane per hour would
         | have been required to generate the plume, according to an
         | estimate from Kayrros SAS, which analyzed European Space Agency
         | data."_
         | 
         | That sounds like a lot!
        
           | wolfram74 wrote:
           | For context [0] says global annual methane generation is
           | ~570E6 tons, which puts hourly production at
           | 570E6/(24*365)~=65000 or over a thousand times this source.
           | Like, not /great/ definitely want to address. But unless it's
           | a symptom of a new mechanism I don't know if I should be
           | super alarmed.
           | 
           | [0] https://www.iea.org/reports/methane-tracker-2020
        
           | bbulkow wrote:
           | Maybe hard for surveillance though? A single railcar of
           | liquid is 100 tons (I don't know if liquid methane is
           | shipped, this is just a way to visualize - and this is a
           | rough number. Methane is about 12 pct lighter than water.)
           | 
           | I wonder what the most likely reasons are. I might think a
           | fracking based earthquake opening up an underground reservoir
           | that feeds into a mine? But that is very speculative! I am
           | assuming there are no chemical plants in the area.
        
             | MisterTea wrote:
             | > I wonder what the most likely reasons are.
             | 
             | Per the article you didn't read: "The Oct. 22 release was
             | detected by satellite and pinpointed to an area in Marion
             | County near natural gas wells in the Black Warrior Basin, a
             | pair of gas pipelines and coal mines, some dating back to
             | the late 1800s."
        
       | aaron695 wrote:
       | > The Oct. 22 release
       | 
       | > An emissions rate of about 58 tons of methane per hour
       | 
       | This 'leak' might have happened for 10 seconds.
       | 
       | The article doesn't even say if it might have run for a hour.
       | 
       | So some facts might be interesting. But it's HN, lets just run
       | around with our heads cut off, don't need facts, or the ability
       | to read proper. It's the great filter, the internet allows the
       | stupid and uninquisitive people to control the narrative.
        
       | el_don_almighty wrote:
       | Annual chili eating competition?
        
       | OldHand2018 wrote:
       | Look at the photograph, and read the EPA response.
       | 
       | Ladies and Gentlemen of Earth: climate change is not going to be
       | solved. Protect your family. Protect your property. You are on
       | your own.
        
         | belval wrote:
         | Now now, it's hard to open Google Maps/Earth and look at what
         | is in that very specific spot plus it's four o'clock already,
         | they have to go home to their family.
        
         | pengaru wrote:
         | > Ladies and Gentlemen of Earth: climate change is not going to
         | be solved. Protect your family. Protect your property. You are
         | on your own.
         | 
         | Skip the family by not reproducing and adding more fuel to this
         | raging dumpster fire, just stock up on the marshmallows and
         | popcorn.
        
         | _jal wrote:
         | The Great Filter == Collective action problems.
        
       | kcplate wrote:
       | Well, now I'm concerned that European satellites could be
       | counting my farts. Great...
        
         | nuerow wrote:
         | > _Well, now I'm concerned that European satellites could be
         | counting my farts. Great..._
         | 
         | You only have anything to worry about if you're gunning for at
         | least the fifth largest ever recorded in your part of the
         | country.
        
           | h2odragon wrote:
           | not "ever recorded", just "this year". Time for more protein
           | powder chilli!
        
         | bell-cot wrote:
         | Compare the current market value of ~58 tons/hour of CH4
         | (needed to generate the plume which the satellite saw) with the
         | market value of 12 solid gold goose eggs per day.
         | 
         | https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/CursedWithAwesom...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-11-10 23:01 UTC)