[HN Gopher] Google's new related search box optimizes for the wr...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Google's new related search box optimizes for the wrong metric
        
       Author : smitop
       Score  : 43 points
       Date   : 2021-11-10 19:15 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (smitop.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (smitop.com)
        
       | vbernat wrote:
       | They are likely to get penalized, thanks to the CLS metric.
        
       | thomascz wrote:
       | Layout shift. Google has an entire article [0] about why it's
       | bad. But as this is likely never going away, I made a Chrome
       | extension [1] (5 lines of code) that gets rid of the box.
       | 
       | [0]: https://web.dev/cls/
       | 
       | [1]: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/remove-people-
       | also...
        
         | zamadatix wrote:
         | For anyone with uBlock Origin already installed these 2 rules
         | should be equivalent to what this extension is doing:
         | google.com##div[id^=eob]:nth-ancestor(1):style(height:auto
         | !important;)         google.com##div[id^=eob]
         | 
         | Though "auto-genned div starts with eob" seems unlikely to last
         | forever as a reliable method (Google News recently changed the
         | div naming structure as an example). has-text():nth-ancestor(n)
         | would be more reliable but a slightly less performant rule.
        
       | grandpoobah wrote:
       | The great irony is that Google of all companies should know this
       | is poor UI design.
        
       | jackconsidine wrote:
       | I've also had this experience with Google Ads- they pop up a
       | second after all results right where I'm about to click. And
       | someone's paying for that click somewhere
        
       | cosmotic wrote:
       | After repeatedly updating user styles to remove that box from my
       | google search results, I gave up and moved to Bing. The result
       | quality has been great and the result pages are much better (less
       | wikipedia-link-hiding than google). Plus I get tens of dollars in
       | gift cards a year.
        
         | chongli wrote:
         | Yeah. I swear Google has been burying Wikipedia as hard as it
         | possibly can. Most of the top so-called "organic" results
         | nowadays are commercial sites full of ads. Every year, Google
         | squeezes more value out of their search engine at the expense
         | of users. In the long run this should open the door for
         | competitors to build a better product.
         | 
         | Personally, I want to see an open source search engine. The
         | world desperately needs community-run search that helps users
         | find real information and real communities while filtering out
         | all of the spam and other commercial garbage that has been
         | gradually strangling the web over the past two decades and a
         | bit.
         | 
         | I think some of the pieces are already in place to do this.
         | Community-run blacklists for plugins like uBlock Origin are
         | comprehensive and well-maintained. A repository of crawled
         | pages is already available from Common Crawl [1]. What we need
         | is a search engine that makes use of these resources to index
         | and rank results so that pages without ads and without
         | obnoxious heavy Javascript are pushed to the top of the results
         | page. Ideally, this engine would allow users to run NoScript
         | and have a really smooth experience searching for and browsing
         | clean sites without having to add stuff to their whitelist all
         | the time.
         | 
         | [1] https://commoncrawl.org
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | bionhoward wrote:
       | Agreed, this box is really just annoying and I've never found it
       | useful because it shifts everything down after the first paint,
       | so you wind up clicking on a pop-up.
       | 
       | I wish they'd delete it, and also wish the search box would steal
       | the common feature from IDEs like Atom or VS Code, where you can
       | highlight stuff and hit the " quote button to wrap it in quotes,
       | for example. Maybe only a small subset of users would want to
       | treat the search box like an IDE but it could shave a few seconds
       | off searches when you need to wrap stuff in quotes. Just a random
       | unrelated idea!
        
       | downWidOutaFite wrote:
       | In my products one way I've tried to fix the UI jumping around
       | when a separate network call responds is to add a facebook-style
       | "shimmer" view while it loads. But that doesn't work when the box
       | might be hidden based on the network response.
        
       | TrianguloY wrote:
       | I remember a previous comment here on HN with a filter for ublock
       | (or a similar blocker) that removes that suggestion box. I now
       | use DDG but when I need to switch to Google you notice really
       | quickly if the script is there or not.
        
         | ivank wrote:
         | The longer uBlock Origin rule in
         | https://gist.github.com/mmazzarolo/34e5418aade64abe7618885e0...
         | takes care of it, currently                 ! Hide the 'People
         | also search for' slide-in box when going back on Google Search.
         | ! We require the other attributes here to reduce the risk of
         | false positives.       www.google.com#$#div[id^=eob_][jscontrol
         | ler][jsdata][jsaction][data-ved] { display: none !important; }
        
           | Groxx wrote:
           | When you do this (and I highly recommend doing it! using ad-
           | blockers as crap-blockers is one of my favorite things about
           | browsers!), please leave feedback somewhere! Otherwise you're
           | nothing more someone that simply doesn't engage with a
           | feature. That's unlikely to do much to help shift behavior
           | away from building crap, as it's not _negative_ feedback in
           | most cases - unused things are generally assumed to be
           | harmless.
        
           | cecilpl2 wrote:
           | Thank you
        
       | cecilpl2 wrote:
       | This box is absolutely infuriating and frequently comes up for me
       | using the repro steps in the article.
        
         | gundmc wrote:
         | How are you able to reproduce this? I didn't see steps in the
         | article and I haven't seen this appear, but now I'm curious.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-11-10 23:01 UTC)