[HN Gopher] LaTeX Input for Impatient Scholars
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       LaTeX Input for Impatient Scholars
        
       Author : karthink
       Score  : 58 points
       Date   : 2021-11-06 17:10 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (karthinks.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (karthinks.com)
        
       | CJefferson wrote:
       | This is an interesting article, with some nice packages.
       | 
       | However, just in case anyone is starting out in LaTeX, I've been
       | involved in over 100 papers written in LaTeX, and wrote my
       | thesis, and it is incredibly rare that I've found the speed at
       | which I can edit LaTeX in an advanced way was my limiting factor.
       | 
       | Nowadays I often use overleaf, which has an incredibly simplistic
       | editor, but makes multi-person editing so easy I find it worth
       | it.
       | 
       | The one 'avanced feature' I do find really useful is finding
       | 'jump to this point in the PDF' from your editor, and 'jump to
       | this point in the LaTeX' back from your PDF viewer back to the
       | editor.
        
         | sigg3 wrote:
         | What do you think of TexLive?
        
           | sigg3 wrote:
           | Damn it, I meant TexStudio.
        
             | CJefferson wrote:
             | I've used it, found it works well.
             | 
             | In general when I'm writing latex, personally I spend most
             | of my time writing and editing text, so any reasonable
             | editor will do.
        
         | balsam wrote:
         | > 'jump to this point in the PDF' from your editor, and 'jump
         | to this point in the LaTeX' back from your PDF viewer back to
         | the editor.
         | 
         | That sounds really cool. Can you give me a link or at least the
         | name of a piece of software with this feature? Is Overleaf it?
         | Is there an offline piece of software with such a feature?
         | Thanks!
        
           | iflp wrote:
           | Overleaf and VSCode (with LaTeX workshop) support this.
        
           | mixedmath wrote:
           | I have this set up with vim and evince as well. It's very
           | handy.
        
             | balsam wrote:
             | Just vim and evince? No synctex as suggested (thanks guys!)
             | 
             | Found a nice SO thread explaining the gist of it:
             | https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/118489/what-
             | exactly-...
        
           | techphys_91 wrote:
           | I believe this functionality is provided by SyncTeX. I'm sure
           | it can be used in other editors, but it can be accessed from
           | the right click menu in TeXstudio.
        
           | diffeomorphism wrote:
           | That is a standard latex feature called synctex. Pretty much
           | any editor does that.
        
           | jfk13 wrote:
           | Quite a few TeX-oriented editors support something like this;
           | a couple that I've used personally are TeXShop (macOS only),
           | TeXworks (cross-platform). Searching for "SyncTeX" suggests
           | that others such as TeXnicCenter and TeXStudio also support
           | it.
        
           | smegcicle wrote:
           | texworks from a regular miktex install seems to support it
           | via SyncTeX
        
           | universa1 wrote:
           | Latextools through some other means in sublime text can do
           | this as well, both on windows and linux
        
       | iflp wrote:
       | This is interesting and follows the line of [1].
       | 
       | Personally I find it more comfortable to use TeXmacs for
       | quick/throwaway notes, and macros in longer documents for better
       | readability.
       | 
       | [1]: https://castel.dev/post/lecture-notes-1/
        
       | thangalin wrote:
       | LaTeX is often written having content and presentation logic
       | intertwined. In contrast, ConTeXt employs the concept of "setups"
       | that make keeping the two aspects of a document distinct [0].
       | Part 8 of my Typesetting Markdown series [1] shows how to use
       | annotations to write a poem in plain text, then subsequently
       | format it using ConTeXt.
       | 
       | In many cases, authors need only basic TeX, which can be rendered
       | by LaTeX, ConTeXt, and other TeX-based typesetting solutions. My
       | desktop text editor, KeenWrite, provides such basic TeX rendering
       | in real-time. See the screenshots [2] for examples of inline
       | math, variables, and applying different themes to PDF files based
       | on a single source document.
       | 
       | [0]: https://wiki.contextgarden.net/
       | 
       | [1]: https://dave.autonoma.ca/blog/2020/04/28/typesetting-
       | markdow...
       | 
       | [2]:
       | https://github.com/DaveJarvis/keenwrite/blob/master/docs/scr...
        
       | gtpedrosa wrote:
       | Haven't read the whole article yet, but the state of latex
       | editing in emacs diagram caught my attention. Anyone has a clue
       | what software was used to create it? Found the color schemes and
       | hyperlinks pretty neat.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | named-user wrote:
       | I wouldn't bother. Fire up MS Word and use your journal's
       | provided template.
        
         | CJefferson wrote:
         | Slightly extended, learn whatever your field / journal uses.
         | 
         | Many A.I. or maths conferences won't provide a Word template,
         | only LaTeX. Other conferences and journals I've been involved
         | with are Word only. Trying to fight against the default
         | generally isn't worth the pain.
        
         | salamandersauce wrote:
         | And then spend twice the time formatting equations correctly
         | and dealing with things that require workarounds because Word
         | only handles a tiny subset of what LaTeX and LaTeX packages can
         | do? No thanks.
        
           | s1291 wrote:
           | Could you provide an example where you need to spend twice
           | the time to correctly format equations in MS Word?
        
             | salamandersauce wrote:
             | There is no easy way to get Word to automatically right
             | align equation numbers and number equations you have to
             | fiddle with invisible tables and shove a reference in the
             | right side, there's no equivalent to the "bm" LaTeX package
             | available so instead of just typing "\bm{\phi}" I have to
             | type the whole equation go back and then bold and italicize
             | the phi.
        
         | faustlast wrote:
         | for some people it makes things easier. Otherwise they would
         | not use it.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-11-07 23:01 UTC)