[HN Gopher] An intact slave's room found in Pompeii's ruins
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       An intact slave's room found in Pompeii's ruins
        
       Author : agomez314
       Score  : 266 points
       Date   : 2021-11-06 13:37 UTC (9 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (pompeiisites.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (pompeiisites.org)
        
       | trhway wrote:
       | 16sqm for 3 people. Reminds that in USSR the minimum was
       | 6/person.
        
       | peter303 wrote:
       | About as big as my college dorm room.
        
         | TomK32 wrote:
         | and rent-free.
        
           | rexreed wrote:
           | with a window
        
       | HABytes wrote:
       | "This is a window into the precarious reality of people who
       | seldom appear in historical sources that were written almost
       | exclusively by men belonging to the elite, and who as a result
       | risk remaining invisible in the great historical accounts," -
       | declared Director General Gabriel Zuchtriegel - "It is a case in
       | which archaeology helps us to discover a part of the ancient
       | world which we would otherwise know little about, but which is
       | nonetheless extremely important. What is most striking is the
       | cramped and precarious nature of this room, which was something
       | between a dormitory and a storage room of just 16 sqm, which we
       | can now reconstruct thanks to the exceptional state of
       | preservation created by the eruption of AD 79. It is certainly
       | one of the most exciting discoveries during my life as an
       | archaeologist, even without the presence of great 'treasures' -
       | the true treasure here is the human experience, in this case of
       | the most vulnerable members of ancient society, to which this
       | room is a unique testimony."
        
       | uap wrote:
       | Looks like my SF market street studio. We sure have come a long
       | way...
        
         | kingcharles wrote:
         | It's way bigger and nicer than the jail cell I just spent
         | several years in.
        
           | easytiger wrote:
           | What did you do?
        
             | ohyeshedid wrote:
             | What did you do and what did they get you for can be wildly
             | different questions and realities.
             | 
             | Unsolicited personal advice: The latter opens more doors of
             | meaningful conversation, the former can slam those doors
             | before you can walk through them.
        
               | kingcharles wrote:
               | Amen, brother. This is very true. What you did or didn't
               | do, and what they arrested you for, or prosecuted you
               | for, are often wildly different things.
        
           | bserge wrote:
           | What'd they get you for?
        
         | ardit33 wrote:
         | First thing I thought: They look like modern student dorm rooms
         | / living arrangements, but without windows, like that new
         | Munger hall that is being built.
        
           | willvarfar wrote:
           | > The room was lit by a small upper window
        
             | masklinn wrote:
             | On the other hand, extremely limited artificial light, so
             | this would have been penumbral the entire day, with the
             | possible exception of the moments where the sun really
             | faced the window.
             | 
             | According to the plan at the bottom, the window would have
             | been east-north-east and thus really only useful early
             | morning, if at all.
        
               | kingcharles wrote:
               | I just spent 5 years locked in a room with no window and
               | 24x7 artificial lighting, so they have it way better than
               | some modern folks.
        
               | Iv wrote:
               | Let's not be ridiculous. This room has no artificial
               | light and almost no natural light, minimal ventilation,
               | no water, no electricity, which is the norm nowadays even
               | for cheap apartments.
        
               | hourislate wrote:
               | In Toronto you could get $1800 a month for that or sell
               | it for $600k.
        
               | ant6n wrote:
               | ...but not prisons
        
               | secondcoming wrote:
               | Were you in prison or did you lose a key?
        
               | kingcharles wrote:
               | I lost my ke... wait, no it was a cell in a county jail
               | awaiting trial.
        
         | Jupe wrote:
         | Are you being sarcastic?
        
           | Jupe wrote:
           | Wow - apparently asking questions is a bad thing on HN?
           | 
           | The fact that a "slave's" room from 1,942 years ag, resembles
           | the room of a presumably well-educated, skilled and/or
           | technically-focused contributor (as I perceive nearly all
           | contributors to HN), seems rather odd.
           | 
           | So, my question still stands... Is the comment meant to be
           | sarcastic?
           | 
           | Can the the comment be interpreted as:
           | 
           | 1. "They didn't have it as bad as we might think"? 2. "My
           | life is little different from a slave of ~2000 years ago"? 3.
           | "I feel a connection with the people/person who lived in that
           | room"? 4. Something else?
        
           | t8e56vd4ih wrote:
           | homework assignment: watch two Monty Python movies and three
           | flying circus episodes.
        
             | Jupe wrote:
             | Yes, I've seen them all... and "Oh, look, there's some
             | lovely muck over here."
             | 
             | But, I don't see the connection?
        
           | DenisM wrote:
           | Per HN guidelines: _Assume good faith_
           | 
           | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
           | 
           | If you can't, just don't reply at all.
        
         | [deleted]
        
           | [deleted]
        
       | peter303 wrote:
       | Organic material didnt survive. What missing would be mattresses,
       | blankets, cushions, rugs, clothing. These items would be be made
       | of basic coarse material for slaves. Upper classes would have
       | more refined and comfortable items.
        
       | mindvirus wrote:
       | "Sadly, in this room too, a part of the archaeological heritage
       | has been lost due to tunnels dug by grave robbers who, throughout
       | the villa, have caused a total amount of damage estimated at
       | almost 2 million euros."
       | 
       | I'm curious what that means. How do you "value" something like
       | Pompeii? Are they just saying that they stole gold and silver
       | worth that much, or that the damage to the ruins costs that much
       | more to repair/recover?
        
         | kixiQu wrote:
         | I'm imagining it's parallel to cops announcing the value of
         | drug seizures at (variously inaccurate) estimates of "street
         | value", but for black market antiques.
        
           | azinman2 wrote:
           | It could also be how much it costs to repair the damage they
           | did.
        
             | jameshart wrote:
             | 'repair' is a bit of a fuzzy concept when you're talking
             | about an archaeological site, though, still more when we're
             | talking about a site that was caught up in a volcanic
             | eruption.
             | 
             | You can literally never repair it to the state it was in
             | before the robbery, in the sense of restoring it to a
             | pristine condition as it was left by the eruption.
        
               | fragmede wrote:
               | You can also literally never step in the same river
               | twice, but that's a bit more metaphysical than literal.
               | Photos by the robbers before they vandalized the site
               | would be invaluable. Nowhere near as good as if they'd
               | left it intact, but better than nothing.
        
         | buu700 wrote:
         | It could be that they have contemporary documentation on the
         | values of various objects and materials. What's the inflation-
         | adjusted conversion rate between 2021 USD and the 79 Roman
         | denarius?
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | occamrazor wrote:
         | Might also be the value of the stolen property on the black
         | market. There are unfortunately enough unscrupulous antiquities
         | collectors, that one can estimate "market value" of Roman
         | amphorae, jewelry, and other items.
        
         | fipar wrote:
         | I'd guess it's akin to insuring a museum. This is the best
         | reference I've found on a quick search: https://mdpi-
         | res.com/d_attachment/heritage/heritage-02-00029...
        
       | walrus01 wrote:
       | the beds look almost identical to a 'charpoy' you would see
       | anywhere in the modern day Punjab in south asia
       | 
       | "The webbed bases of the beds were made of ropes, the imprints of
       | which are partially discernible in the cinerite,"
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charpai
        
       | integricho wrote:
       | The slave is intact or the room?
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | GhettoComputers wrote:
       | Slaves and slavery were extremely different in Pompeii and
       | Herculaneum then what we usually think of as chattel slavery as
       | the default and only slavery that ever existed. An interviewee
       | either doesn't understand this or made very sweeping claims. >
       | "This is a window into the precarious reality of people who
       | seldom appear in historical sources that were written almost
       | exclusively by men belonging to the elite, and who as a result
       | risk remaining invisible in the great historical accounts," -
       | Many slaves were captured and famous intellectuals (Aesop is a
       | famous example) or educated and used as tutors, they were not as
       | modernists assume to be universally ill treated and abused.
       | Slaves in Herculaneum were able to become free and it was a very
       | racially diverse place where being a former slave of different
       | racial background did not mean you were unable to have social
       | mobility, many of the wealthy people of Herculaneum were indeed
       | former slaves. Slavery was not a permanent state of being and the
       | very elite the quoted author complains about often did write
       | about slaves at least in name; the former slaves would take the
       | last name of the old master and records were excellent.
        
         | throwaway829 wrote:
         | How is that different from slaves like William Ellison in the
         | USA? Pre-Civil War he became one of the wealthiest property
         | owners in South Carolina. Sounds like decent social mobility to
         | me.
         | 
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Ellison
        
           | GhettoComputers wrote:
           | How often did this happen vs Roman times? Before the dreadful
           | US took over the South, slaves were much better treated and
           | had way more upwards mobility, like in Florida when the
           | Spanish and French were the colonizers. Places like New
           | Orleans was much better for African descendants and many fled
           | when they found out they'd be ruled by America.
           | 
           | I don't cite Thomas Jefferson and his treatment of his slaves
           | as the normative, in Roman times it was built into the system
           | for slaves to buy their freedom and also have upwards
           | mobility. That is not institutionalized for slavery in the
           | US.
        
         | neaden wrote:
         | By definition slaves are ill treated because slavery in itself
         | is terrible. To be clear here, even if your master was
         | individually kind you existed in a system where you had no
         | rights, if you were a witness to a crime you would have to be
         | tortured during your testimony to prove it's true, where you
         | were not fully protected from the law by assaults from any free
         | person, and where you could be sold at any point. It was
         | considered perfectly acceptable for a "kind" master to rape and
         | beat you at any time. Slavery is always a horrendous thing.
        
         | marginalia_nu wrote:
         | Epictetus, freedman roman Stoic philosopher seems as a whole
         | have an attitude of like "what of it, it's not like you're free
         | from obligations even as senator or the caesar". As a slave,
         | you are free from all concerns and worries beyond fulfilling
         | your duties.
         | 
         | Discourses 4.1 is perhaps the most direct example of this.
        
           | twright wrote:
           | After reading Discourses 4.1 I would like to summarize it as
           | a defense of the institution of slavery that goes something
           | like "Slavery is good because slaves themselves don't know
           | what it means to be free and freedom is actually a burden in
           | the wrong mindset so it shouldn't be for everyone." (Ignoring
           | that slavery, the deprivation of personhood, is an inhumane
           | burden somehow comparable to "oh no I'm free and now I have
           | to answer to Caesar") Yes, it's an odd opinion from a former
           | slave who was maimed by a former master.
           | 
           | Unfortunately this argument is sustained all through history
           | and today we have people going something like "actually,
           | working multiple minimum wage jobs and struggling to pay rent
           | is good".
        
             | dlhavema wrote:
             | If thats all a person can do would you rather them sit on a
             | couch and live off of/depend on the state? No it's not a
             | super fun existence and that's what my life was like right
             | after high school in the early college years.
             | 
             | The real problem comes in when someone in that situation
             | gives up and does nothing.
        
             | sbacic wrote:
             | I don't think Epictetus was actually defending the
             | institution of slavery. Rather, stoic philosophy is full of
             | these "hacks" for handling unpleasant things in your life.
             | Many of them seem quite morbid and bizarre to the untrained
             | mind (such as actively thinking about the death and absence
             | of a loved one).
        
               | bobthechef wrote:
               | I don't know about "hacks", rather observations.
               | 
               | If most people didn't have to work to survive, they
               | wouldn't know what to do with the time. An observation
               | about slavery is that you've traded in the burden of
               | responsibility that liberty introduces for the comfort of
               | not having to worry about what to do with yourself
               | 
               | It's easier to just go do what you're told than it is to
               | determine what must be done. Most people actually prefer
               | that way of living. Left to themselves, they'd either
               | become paralyzed with indecision, or they'd piss their
               | lives away indulging their appetites and possibly commit
               | suicide.
        
               | sbacic wrote:
               | > I don't know about "hacks", rather observations.
               | 
               | They are definitely hacks: the Enchiridion lists a few of
               | them. Stoicism is anything if not a practical philosophy.
               | 
               | > An observation about slavery is that you've traded in
               | the burden of responsibility that liberty introduces for
               | the comfort of not having to worry about what to do with
               | yourself
               | 
               | I interpreted it as a hedonic treadmill of
               | responsibility; okay, you're not a slave anymore but a
               | citizen so now you have the responsibilities of a citizen
               | to worry about. You're no longer a citizen but a senator,
               | so now you have senatorial responsibilities. You're no
               | longer a senator but the emperor, so now you have to deal
               | with all the problems an emperor needs to deal with it
               | (as Marcus Aurelius can attest to).
               | 
               | Moving up in the world just means that you replace one
               | set of problems with another set of problems. Slave or
               | emperor, it makes no difference if the problems are
               | beyond your control.
        
             | GaryTang wrote:
             | > _"Unfortunately this argument is sustained all through
             | history and today we have people going something like
             | "actually, working multiple minimum wage jobs and
             | struggling to pay rent is good"."_
             | 
             | It's much worse than that -- today we have people
             | justifying why they work for others as opposed to being
             | entrepreneurs. "It's not for everyone. It's too much work.
             | It's all about luck. You have to be rich already. etc..."
        
               | SamoyedFurFluff wrote:
               | It's all about luck and needing to be already wealthy is
               | true in America at least. Healthcare costs will
               | annihilate you otherwise...
        
             | marginalia_nu wrote:
             | I'm not really passing judgement on Epictetus, merely
             | relaying his position, as someone with a far more personal
             | understanding of roman slavery than anyone discussing it
             | 2000 post fact. Difficult to explain to the man how he
             | ought to feel about events in his life we have only a
             | sketch of an idea about.
             | 
             | Within the framework of Stoicism, where worrying is one of
             | the greatest evils, his argument makes every sense.
        
           | lovecg wrote:
           | Ah Stoics, they're the best at turning being a resigned
           | quitter into dignified philosophy.
        
             | bobthechef wrote:
             | I would rather say an ability to be "well-adjusted".
        
             | TheCoelacanth wrote:
             | I think that's a mis-characterization of stoicism. That
             | sounds more like Epicureanism (quit stressful things and
             | live a simple life) or cynicism (quit everything and live
             | like a stray dog so that you don't have to worry about
             | losing anything).
             | 
             | Stoicism because popular with Roman elites specifically
             | because it didn't ask the adherents to quit anything, but
             | simply to adapt themselves to whatever adversity they might
             | face[1].
             | 
             | [1] https://www.exurbe.com/stoicisms-appeal-to-the-rich-
             | and-powe...
        
             | sbacic wrote:
             | I wouldn't be so harsh; it's better to have _some_ way of
             | handling things life throws at you, especially things you
             | have little to no control over, than none at all.
        
             | twright wrote:
             | https://existentialcomics.com/comic/286
        
         | ludamad wrote:
         | Isn't it a bit of a penmanship bias that the slaves you hear
         | about in history have more dignity? All writing is propaganda
         | to a degree, while we see here evidence of multiple people
         | locked in a tiny room
        
           | GhettoComputers wrote:
           | You see evidence for the sleep quarters and assume they're
           | locked in, what evidence do you have to claim that? Where is
           | the evidence of slave abuse you feel is true?
           | 
           | From archeology of Herculaneum they looked at a household
           | with a slave and noted that one of the remains was fat, well
           | fed man and had many signs of eating a meat rich diet, and a
           | girl found was less nourished and had signs of malnutrition.
           | They assumed from his healthy bones he was the master and the
           | teen girl was the slave. The well fed man was the cook, a
           | slave and the young girl was vegetarian by choice and the
           | daughter of the master of the household.
           | 
           | Your assumptions of it being propaganda are not factually
           | accurate.
        
             | tablespoon wrote:
             | >> Isn't it a bit of a penmanship bias that the slaves you
             | hear about in history have more dignity? All writing is
             | propaganda to a degree, while we see here evidence of
             | multiple people locked in a tiny room
             | 
             | > You see evidence for the sleep quarters and assume
             | they're locked in, what evidence do you have to claim that?
             | Where is the evidence of slave abuse you feel is true?
             | 
             | People can be locked in by things other than a physical
             | lock one the door. Didn't some slaves in classical times
             | receive tattoos like "I belong to so and so, return me to
             | him for a reward."?
             | 
             | Edit: here's a citation:
             | https://archive.archaeology.org/9903/abstracts/tattoo.html
             | 
             | > A legal inscription from Ephesus indicates that during
             | the early Roman Empire all slaves exported to Asia were
             | tattooed with the words "tax paid." "Stop me, I'm a
             | runaway" was another standard motto etched on the brows of
             | Roman slaves. New research indicates that Roman authorities
             | punished early Christians with forehead tattoos that
             | condemned them to the mines. In A.D. 330, the first
             | Christian emperor, Constantine, banned the practice of
             | tattooing the faces of convicts, gladiators, and soldiers.
             | Because the human face reflected "the image of divine
             | beauty," he said, "it should not be defiled."
        
             | ludamad wrote:
             | You're right, evidence of locked is not there. And I'm not
             | fully convinced they're slaves, either, as many conditions
             | bind people to work. There's definitely a lot of ambiguity
             | from these time periods, but whitewashing slavery in
             | written text is a well-known phenomenon
        
         | cletus wrote:
         | I've heard this quite a few times now and I'm not sure where
         | the idea comes from that slavery in the Roman Republic and
         | Empire were somehow humane but that wasn't the case at all.
         | 
         | Roman slaves were property and could be treated as such,
         | including sexual exploitation (eg made to be prostitutes) and
         | being summarily executed.
         | 
         | And yes, slaves could be freed but that was also true in the
         | American slave era. Just because something is possible doesn't
         | mean it's accessible, particularly by the slave themselves.
         | Also, freedmen in Rome had less rights than citizens.
         | 
         | The history of Rome is a fascinating one but it's hard to look
         | at through the eyes of modern morality. I think this generally
         | applies to the Ancient World: if somehow we could be
         | transported back to that time I'm sure we'd find it quite
         | alien.
         | 
         | My favourite example of this is the origin of the word
         | "decimate" [1]. If, say, a military unit rebelled against Rome,
         | groups of 10 would have to decide which one of the 10 would die
         | and to kill them.
         | 
         | Slavery has always been brutal.
         | 
         | [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimation_(punishment)
        
           | acdha wrote:
           | I think there's a strong linkage in America's history of both
           | slavery and explicitly modeling our image as continuing some
           | kind of tradition from Rome & Ancient Greece. Slavery can't
           | be so bad if the governments we view as inspiration practiced
           | it, just as many white Americans will downplay the horrors of
           | the American system rather than fully acknowledge what their
           | ancestors profited from.
        
           | GhettoComputers wrote:
           | You claim most slaves in Roman times were not freed, do you
           | know the history or are you just assuming with no evidence
           | that's the case?
        
             | tablespoon wrote:
             | > You claim most slaves in Roman times were not freed, do
             | you know the history or are you just assuming with no
             | evidence that's the case?
             | 
             | Honestly, I think you're the one who needs to be providing
             | the evidence, especially if you're claiming anything close
             | to the opposite of that (i.e. that most slaves in Roman
             | times _were_ freed).
        
           | wisty wrote:
           | Decimation was rarely used IIRC.
           | 
           | But as far as I can tell, the Romans were similar in a lot of
           | ways to the Spartans. Probably everyone was in the region,
           | the Spartans were just a bit more extreme, and had the best
           | propaganda.
           | 
           | But look at what the Romans had - pater familias (the father
           | of a household could legally murder a weak infant, or
           | technically anyone under them including any adult male sons),
           | legends like Troy and Horatius Cocles, plantation slavery to
           | keep the city fed, and a violent and hierarchical society run
           | almost entirely by veteran officers from noble families - see
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cursus_honorum
        
           | Gibbon1 wrote:
           | > And yes, slaves could be freed but that was also true in
           | the American slave era. Just because something is possible
           | doesn't mean it's accessible, particularly by the slave
           | themselves. Also, freedmen in Rome had less rights than
           | citizens.
           | 
           | In the US slaves were used as collateral for loans. In a way
           | slaves weren't owned by plantation owners, they were owned by
           | the banks. That if anything explains some of the pernicious
           | aspects of US slavery. Also likely the US banking system. And
           | the mistreatment of blacks after the civil war.
        
           | watwut wrote:
           | In particular, Sparta was Roman and they were very cruel.
        
         | tablespoon wrote:
         | > Many slaves were captured and famous intellectuals (Aesop is
         | a famous example) or educated and used as tutors, they were not
         | as modernists assume to be universally ill treated and abused.
         | 
         | And far, _far_ more slaves worked the fields or lived short
         | nasty lives in mines, for instance:
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mines_of_Laurion (near Athens):
         | 
         | > Shafts were driven down into the ground and galleries opened
         | where slaves, chained, naked, and branded, worked the seams
         | illuminated only by guttering oil lamps. An unrecorded number
         | were children. It was a miserable, dangerous, and brief life.
         | 
         | > ...The Romans provided cheap slave labor and new technologies
         | gave the Greeks new means of extracting silver in more
         | efficient ways.
        
         | dr_dshiv wrote:
         | The philosophers Plato and Epictetus were, for a time, slaves.
        
           | imbnwa wrote:
           | I've never read anywhere that Plato was a slave. He came from
           | an aristocratic family and was one of the noble youths the
           | Athenians were so concerned about the historical Socrates
           | corrupting with his epistemic skepticism. He had family that
           | were apart of the anti-democratic coup d'etat.
        
             | npongratz wrote:
             | I was also unaware of Plato's possible slavery, and found
             | this [0], but I do not have the background knowledge judge
             | the veracity of the information:
             | 
             | > One source of the story of Plato being sold into slavery
             | is _Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers_ by Diogenes
             | Laertius. An English translation is available online [1] on
             | Project Perseus. You can find the full story in Book 3 that
             | discusses the life of Plato.
             | 
             | [0] https://history.stackexchange.com/a/37499
             | 
             | [1] http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3A
             | text%...
        
               | imbnwa wrote:
               | These sources just highlight that he was, at best, under
               | threat of being a slave though, not that he was actually
               | sold and performed as a slave. He's ransomed for at the
               | last minute by someone recognizing him at the market.
               | 
               | If Plato had actually been a slave, his lifelong
               | commitment to anti-democratic political organization
               | would've been a little different, though maybe not,
               | considering even this experience didn't change his
               | philosophy, to the point that's likely not worth
               | mentioning as a significant experience, unlike Epictectus
               | who was _born_ into slavery.
        
               | dr_dshiv wrote:
               | Sorry being up for sale in a slave market isn't enough--I
               | think it is fascinating and important.
        
             | watwut wrote:
             | Framing that conflict and history as about "epistemic
             | skepticism" is modern simplification. It makes modern point
             | and avoids any hint of actual conflicts in that city.
             | 
             | It completely ignores very real and deadly politics of that
             | city prior and reasons why Socrates was hated.
        
             | GhettoComputers wrote:
             | Many aristocrats could be captured as war prizes, enslaved,
             | and used to tutor the children of the winning army. They
             | weren't all forced to pick cotton or worked to death.
        
         | inglor_cz wrote:
         | Fate of a Roman slave was decidedly different depending on what
         | the slave did.
         | 
         |  _House and urban slaves_ weren 't much worse off than a
         | regular citizen, having a good chance of manumission (release),
         | after which they became freedmen - still not full citizens, but
         | their children would be, and some freedmen became very rich.
         | 
         | Given that those slaves are the ones that we know the most
         | about (from both archeology and written sources), it skews our
         | perception of Roman slavery to being more benign than it
         | actually was.
         | 
         |  _Rural slaves_ which worked in agriculture were worked very
         | hard and they were much more numerous than house slaves. Not an
         | enviable fate, though one must admit that ancient agriculture
         | was a backbreaking work regardless of personal status.
         | 
         |  _Slaves sent to mines_ were basically sentenced to death. Few
         | of them would last more than five years. Ancient Rome had very
         | extensive mining operations and mines  "ate" men by the
         | thousands. These were mostly enslaved men, because they were
         | cheaper and could not say "no". Mining safety back then was
         | basically zero.
        
           | johnny53169 wrote:
           | > Slaves sent to mines were basically sentenced to death.
           | 
           | It's less bad now, but being a miner is not much better
           | nowadays, even more so since most of the mines are in poor
           | countries with little care for the workers and rich countries
           | would prefer not to think too hard where the iron for their
           | eco-conscious steel bottle is coming from.
        
             | germinalphrase wrote:
             | It's beside the point, but historically a lot of the iron
             | ore used in US steel manufacturing has come from northern
             | Minnesota.
        
             | inglor_cz wrote:
             | I grew up in a mining city (Ostrava, black coal). Now the
             | mines are closed, but when I was a kid, they were in full
             | operation.
             | 
             | Disasters happened infrequently, but when they did, they
             | were ugly. A spark at a wrong time in a wrong place, and
             | sixty fathers would never come back home again.
             | 
             | Mining is freaking dangerous. The forces of nature involved
             | are enormous, and human is but a small ant facing them.
        
               | sologoub wrote:
               | A bit off-topic, but how did the city cope with the mine
               | closure and loss of so many jobs?
        
               | inglor_cz wrote:
               | Lots of drinking and a significant loss of younger
               | population that went to study elsewhere and never
               | returned. A sad sight.
               | 
               | The environment is much better, though. The air is mostly
               | clean, while it smelled like burnt tires in my childhood.
        
               | iso1210 wrote:
               | Not just dangerous for the miners too. Aberfan had a
               | major effect on the UK. A slag heap near the village
               | collapsed, burying a school and killing 144, almost all
               | of them schoolchildren
               | 
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aberfan_disaster
        
             | LilBytes wrote:
             | This is region specific. Miners in Australia are all
             | managed by unions and are some of the best paid
             | professionals in the Country. (1)
             | 
             | And with that said due to the level of influence from the
             | unions, also have great safety ratings compared to other
             | regions. Though admitedly still quite dangerous, but less
             | so than cinsteuction, agriculture and warehouse work (3).
             | 
             | (1) https://www.minerals.org.au/news/australian-mining-
             | provides-...
             | 
             | (2) https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/industry_business/
             | minin...
             | 
             | (3) https://www.finder.com.au/most-dangerous-jobs-australia
        
               | johnny53169 wrote:
               | That's nice to hear, and to correct my previous comment,
               | Australia is the biggest producer of iron:
               | 
               | > In 2019, the country was the 2nd largest world producer
               | of gold;[1] 8th largest world producer of silver;[2] 6th
               | largest world producer of copper;[3] the world's largest
               | producer of iron ore;[4] the world's largest producer of
               | bauxite;[5] the 2nd largest world producer of
               | manganese;[6] 2nd largest world producer of lead;[7] 3rd
               | largest world producer of zinc;[8] 3rd largest world
               | producer of cobalt;[9] 3rd largest producer of
               | uranium;[10] 6th largest producer of nickel;[11] 8th
               | largest world producer of tin;[12] 14th largest world
               | producer of phosphate;[13] 15th largest world producer of
               | sulfur;[14] in addition to being the 5th largest world
               | producer of salt.[15]
               | 
               | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mining_in_Australia
        
             | vondur wrote:
             | My grandfather was a coal miner back in the 50s in rural
             | Oklahoma. He died of black lung in his early 50s. I'm
             | hoping today it's not nearly as dangerous.
        
             | arein3 wrote:
             | >being a miner is not much better nowadays
             | 
             | it's allright there are rough aspects but in the end it's
             | worth it, especially since bitcoin is doing well
        
             | secondcoming wrote:
             | Still, it's probably safer than farming
        
               | Ichthypresbyter wrote:
               | Possibly true now, but not in Roman times- cave-ins are
               | more dangerous than angry draft animals.
        
               | inglor_cz wrote:
               | Also, suffocation risk. We are much better at detecting
               | O2 levels, presence of unwanted gases such as CO, and
               | supplying O2 artificially. Ancient Romans lacked both the
               | knowledge and the technology, and most dangerous gases
               | are actually invisible.
        
           | brabel wrote:
           | > Mining safety back then was basically zero.
           | 
           | I don't believe that. People who work in any activity will
           | always learn what's dangerous and take precautions to avoid
           | dying. 2,000 years is not as long a time length as we
           | sometimes think, people then were pretty much exactly like
           | us, except for their culture. And I don't think there's any
           | culture where people don't tend to try to not die.
        
             | hugh-avherald wrote:
             | WW2 had plenty of examples of essentially slave labour with
             | high levels of mortality.
        
             | mulmen wrote:
             | Huh? So, if the mine was unstable the slaves would do what
             | exactly? Go work at another mine?
        
           | JoeAltmaier wrote:
           | I've always found the idea that 'slavery isn't so bad' to be
           | easy for armchair anthropologists to think. I'm reminded of
           | the Pompei skeleton of a boy found in a stable behind the
           | skeleton of a mule, with a mule hoofprint in his skull. "Hey
           | you slaveboy! The volcano is making the mule upset! Go in
           | there and calm him down!" The slave didn't end up any better
           | off than the mule, both abandoned to die/already dead when
           | the citizens fled.
        
             | inglor_cz wrote:
             | People even today underestimate the badness of living in
             | the lowest income quintile of almost any society. It is not
             | just about cashflow, but about (lack of) respect and
             | dignity.
        
               | woah wrote:
               | That's ridiculous. The standard of living has increased
               | astronomically over the past few hundred years in the
               | developed world. People in the lower quintile can afford
               | refrigeration, cheap food, unlimited free entertainment,
               | heating and air conditioning, laundry, plumbing, etc etc.
               | 
               | This is not to take away from the stress and precarity of
               | their situation, but materially, almost everyone in the
               | US is better off than almost everyone in ancient rome.
        
               | ReptileMan wrote:
               | To rule in hell or to serve in heaven.
        
               | pleb_nz wrote:
               | So nothing's changed? :-/
        
               | nverno wrote:
               | It amazes me, when reading stuff from ancient Rome
               | (currently I'm reading Marcus Aurelius' Meditations,
               | which was basically his diary), how similar a lot of
               | society, day-to-day worries and the like, are to ours
               | today. However, I think the normal person's worldview
               | nowadays is much more similar to that of the most elite
               | in those societies than the plebians, mostly because
               | general education has improved so drastically.
        
               | hutzlibu wrote:
               | For the starving, exploited third world workers in the
               | state of illegal immigrants with no rights - probably not
               | so much.
               | 
               | Or for the fate of one of the real slaves.
               | 
               | What is different today, is that slavery is mostly viewed
               | as a bad thing. That is a accomplishment, but it doesn't
               | mean we got rid of the misery.
        
           | User23 wrote:
           | And then there were the superstar slaves, such as champion
           | gladiators and charioteers. They were idolized by the masses
           | and they likely lived more comfortable lives than the
           | majority of the capite censi and maybe some of the poorer
           | knights.
           | 
           | > These were mostly enslaved men, because they were cheaper
           | and could not say "no"
           | 
           | Huh, that's new to me. Did enslaved women have some kind of
           | legal right to opt out of the mines, or was it just that
           | other uses were found for them?
        
             | bluGill wrote:
             | Hormones mean women are less strong and thus less able to
             | do the job. You get more work out of males.
             | 
             | Plus women were more suited for sex, these were not
             | enlightened times so rape of slave women was not frowned
             | on.
        
         | jterrys wrote:
         | I have a simple question: Is it possible that they were
         | servants and not slaves? I'm not very knowledgeable about
         | ancient Roman history but it seems somewhat presumptuous to
         | assume these are slave rooms.
         | 
         | Was there no such thing as a lower economic class of free
         | people that were working as either attendants or servants? This
         | is after all, a villa in a resort area. Its not as if people
         | throughout the annals of history didn't work as attendants
         | alongside slaves.
         | 
         | All of a sudden "An intact servants quarters found in Pompeii's
         | ruins" doesn't sound all that enticing of headline.
        
       | prox wrote:
       | This is the official site of Pompeii archeological park :
       | http://pompeiisites.org/en/
        
         | karmelapple wrote:
         | If you're near Naples, I recommend visiting the site! You can
         | get a tour guide, but just walking around the massive grounds
         | and exploring is fun by itself.
        
       | chmod775 wrote:
       | A whole room to themselves?
       | 
       | Those are better conditions than what is typical of modern-day
       | wage/debt slavery in places like Saudi Arabia and China.
        
         | lostlogin wrote:
         | Modern slavery is a lot closer to home her in New Zealand.
         | Yesterday there was a disturbing story about bottle store
         | owners doing it. Tying residency to paid work with a specific
         | employer is part the problem.
         | 
         | https://i.stuff.co.nz/national/126844667/a-plywood-box-in-a-...
        
           | pleb_nz wrote:
           | I would say slavery is as old as or nearly as old as the
           | species and nearly every culture has been subjected to it.
           | 
           | Quite a shame. I do wonder if we'll ever eliminate it from
           | the planet. Likely not in my life time.
           | 
           | And then there are the animals we hold in slavery well need
           | to address as well.
        
         | 542458 wrote:
         | With all due respect, the article is pretty clear here:
         | 
         | > ...within the room, where three wooden beds have been
         | found...
         | 
         | But additionally, "slave" here could describe a wide range of
         | socioeconomic statuses. It does not necessarily mean that one
         | was the poorest of the poor, the way a modern slave or pseudo-
         | slave would be. Assuming that this represented the poorest
         | housing conditions available may not be accurate.
        
           | masklinn wrote:
           | It is theorised to have been a family which is not bad, but
           | the room is only 16sqm for 3, and apparently doubled up as
           | storage of sorts.
           | 
           | They could also have had more room than average due to their
           | job (taking care of horses and chariots) so they got to use
           | one of the stables's rooms.
           | 
           | Looking at the floor plan at the end of the article, there
           | are two other rooms of similar dimensions (b and d), and the
           | horses (f) and chariot seem to have been granted a lot more
           | space.
        
             | Ekaros wrote:
             | Historically the 16 sqm for 3 persons doesn't really sound
             | too bad. Even currently in many places people live in less
             | space. And little back it was even more common.
             | 
             | Also, I don't think they spend too much time in the room
             | other than sleeping.
        
           | GhettoComputers wrote:
           | He's stating the slaves had privacy and their own quarters.
           | For comparison: https://i.pinimg.com/736x/53/3e/33/533e33c68d
           | bf1f6889f26eb26...
        
             | gruez wrote:
             | Having to share a room with 3 other slaves counts as
             | "privacy and their own quarters"?
        
               | ertian wrote:
               | It's suggested in the article that it was probably a
               | family.
        
             | tylerrobinson wrote:
             | Is there a source or related content for this photo?
        
               | GhettoComputers wrote:
               | They're from Hong Kong.
               | https://allthatsinteresting.com/cage-homes-hong-kong#9
               | 
               | >Cage homes were initially constructed for single men
               | coming over from mainland China in the 1950s. As poverty
               | rose and housing supply fell, the demand for cage homes
               | grew.
               | 
               | >Incredibly, the 16-square-foot cages rent for around
               | $170-$190 USD, which if calculated by cost per square
               | foot makes them more expensive than the most posh
               | apartments in Hong Kong.
        
       | rightbyte wrote:
       | How do they know slaves lived there? Is it just an assumption?
       | The article does not mention any clues.
        
         | antasvara wrote:
         | The article mentions the large amount of storage containers in
         | the room, something (presumably) not present in other rooms in
         | the building. There's also pieces of metal and fabric
         | consistent with being part of a chariot. That evidence,
         | combined with the size of the room and presence of three beds,
         | seems to be consistent with the idea that this is a slave's
         | room.
        
         | robotastronaut wrote:
         | Actually, there were many clues listed, but they didn't
         | directly connect them to "slaves" as such. The rough timber
         | used in the bedding, the amphorae under the bed, a chamber pot,
         | and lots of evidence suggesting the room was used for storage
         | in addition to sleeping. These all point towards someone of
         | much lower class (slaves of some kind) than the owner of the
         | villa.
        
           | IncRnd wrote:
           | Why is there the assumption that people of lower classes were
           | slaves?
        
             | tata71 wrote:
             | Matter of definition, I suppose.
        
             | usrusr wrote:
             | Nominally free lower classes would have lived in an
             | entirely different part of town. We know quite a lot about
             | the society in question from written sources, this is far
             | from blank slate archaeology (where everything we find
             | seems to default to "used for some ceremonial purpose")
        
           | rightbyte wrote:
           | I assume that in 79 A.D. the things you list, like beds no
           | matter the timber roughness, were a luxury. Like, imagine
           | living in a stone house? In a room with decorated walls
           | (looks like carved out patterns on them).
           | 
           | Surely the scrappiest room in the villa was for servants,
           | some distant poor relative or rented out to students or what
           | not. I just don't buy that the inhabitants for sure were
           | slaves.
        
             | djur wrote:
             | Slaves, plebians, and patricians were very distinct social
             | classes. There really wasn't such a thing as a free
             | servant, with the occasional exception of some freedmen.
             | Roman villas had two separate living areas, one for the
             | owner's family and one for the slaves. We know enough about
             | Roman architecture to identify this as the pars rustica,
             | the slaves' quarters.
        
             | throw63738 wrote:
             | Bed luxury? Wood was cheap and with basic tools it takes a
             | few hours to make.
        
               | rightbyte wrote:
               | Ye OK beds in general were no luxury. But:
               | 
               | "The webbed bases of the beds were made of ropes"
               | 
               | Does not sound like cheap 79 AD bed to me.
        
               | spenczar5 wrote:
               | Why not? Was rope particularly expensive?
        
               | jasonhansel wrote:
               | That's how _all_ beds were made prior to the advent of
               | box springs (or modern mattresses, which don 't require a
               | separate box spring). Very old beds still have the hooks
               | necessary to hold up the ropes that supported the
               | mattress.
        
               | verve_rat wrote:
               | Not wooden slats with straw mattress?
        
             | frostburg wrote:
             | Pompeii was a place where rich people lived, not an average
             | town.
        
             | Tagbert wrote:
             | I assume that they have compared these accommodations to
             | others already found and see a noticeable difference in the
             | quality of the furnishings and other components.
             | 
             | Slaves made up 30-40% of the population so it not
             | unreasonable to conclude that the shabby accommodations
             | would be intended for slaves.
        
               | rightbyte wrote:
               | Sure, it is likely that slaves lived there. But I would
               | not state it as a fact.
        
       | DevKoala wrote:
       | I have seen smaller living spaces in San Francisco.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | almeria wrote:
       | _The room was lit by a small upper window, and shows no evidence
       | of having had any wall decorations._
       | 
       | So even slaves at Pompeii had a window to get light from, we see.
        
         | Kaibeezy wrote:
         | You can just barely make it out in the corner there:
         | 
         |  _CAROLVS MVNGER ARCHITECTVS_
        
           | rexreed wrote:
           | I thought he was anti-window?
        
             | Kaibeezy wrote:
             | This was somewhat earlier in his career. People grow
             | professionally. Some downward.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | bluGill wrote:
         | Roman salves in some case could become full citizens. Slavery
         | was different for different cultures treatment varied greatly
         | from situation to situation. The closer the slave was to the
         | rich the better they were treated in general
        
         | brazzy wrote:
         | Probably cheaper than providing them with candles or oil lamps.
        
         | kingkawn wrote:
         | Better than attending USC
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | TheCoelacanth wrote:
         | That would have been an absolute necessity at the time.
         | Artificial lighting was obscenely expensive in antiquity[1].
         | 
         | [1] https://www.statista.com/chart/10567/the-cost-of-light-
         | throu...
        
           | User23 wrote:
           | I wonder how they came up with that 1750 BC figure of 400
           | hours of work for one hour of light. Any ideas? It sounds
           | ridiculously high, so I assume I'm missing something. What
           | are they even talking about? Olive oil or tallow lamps?
           | Firewood? Something else?
        
             | hutzlibu wrote:
             | "One hour of light (referred to as the quantity of light
             | shed by a 100 watt bulb in one hour) cost 3200 times as
             | much in 1800 in England than it does today"
             | 
             | Oil lamps are not so bright, and you would need lots of
             | them to reach the same brightness as a 100 watt bulb.
             | 
             | In other words, they still had light, but not so much and
             | not so often.
        
         | iasmseanyoung wrote:
         | Roman plasterwork was applied in layers, and in first layer
         | (which is quite rough) a diamond pattern is scratched. This is
         | to increase the adhesion of the next layer (also known as the
         | key). This is also true of lime plasterwork done through the
         | ages.
         | 
         | As far as I can see only the first layer with the diamond
         | pattern is visible one the left wall. The other layers may have
         | not survived. Why would you bother to create a diamond pattern
         | if you're not going to put more layers on?
         | 
         | In fact, the wall at the far end does show more layers, and
         | also some decoration right in the the middle.
        
           | supperburg wrote:
           | Because different stages could have been handled by different
           | teams or contractors.
        
           | _jal wrote:
           | Probably for the same reason you sometimes see unfinished
           | drywall in basements and attics.
        
       | xvector wrote:
       | site is down, no one saved it on wayback machine
        
         | throwaway-jim wrote:
         | https://web.archive.org/web/20211106150432/https://pompeiisi...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-11-06 23:00 UTC)