[HN Gopher] Merriam Webster adds 455 new words to the dictionary...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Merriam Webster adds 455 new words to the dictionary in Oct 2021
        
       Author : clairegiordano
       Score  : 28 points
       Date   : 2021-10-28 19:27 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.merriam-webster.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.merriam-webster.com)
        
       | Grakel wrote:
       | A lot of these are phrases? Vaccine passport is two words, the
       | definition of which essentially make clear the meaning of the
       | phrase?
        
       | mcphage wrote:
       | > bit rot : the tendency for digital information to degrade or
       | become unusable over time. This kind of data degradation or
       | corruption can make images and audio recordings distort and
       | documents impossible to read or open.
       | 
       | I'm not a huge fan of this definition. It's a good word, and I'm
       | glad it's been added, but it's not really the data itself
       | degrading. Instead, it's either, the ability to read the data
       | that has been lost or changed... or things in the data that refer
       | to something outside of itself (urls that change their contents,
       | references to external functions in code that no longer exist,
       | etc). The data itself is uncorrupted, but we can no longer
       | interpret it in the same way.
       | 
       | Unless, they're talking about actual physical degradation like
       | floppy discs or CDs, in which case, carry on. I guess I just find
       | the other definition more interesting.
        
         | karamanolev wrote:
         | I've heard it in a context of physical media degradation,
         | including floppy discs and CDs as you mentioned, but also SSDs,
         | HDDs and so on. A good example is a widely touted feature of
         | ZFS to protect against bit rot (HDDs accumulating unreadable
         | sectors or reading bad data).
         | 
         | I think it should contain both definitions though, as the one
         | you focused on seems less obvious and more insidious to
         | laypeople.
        
         | jawns wrote:
         | You're describing a related term, "link rot," that refers to
         | outdated references to the data.
        
           | mcphage wrote:
           | Ah, yep--you're right.
        
         | SilasX wrote:
         | >but it's not really the data itself degrading. Instead, it's
         | either, the ability to read the data that has been lost or
         | changed
         | 
         | That's what the "or become unusable" refers to.
        
         | howeyc wrote:
         | bit rot is your second paragraph. zfs has ways to handle bit
         | rot in hard drives as an example.
         | 
         | Not sure there's a word defining what you mean. Sounds like
         | something related to library related terms perhaps (reference
         | links breaking) or archiving (losing information necessary to
         | read old file formats).
        
           | __s wrote:
           | The definition he's listing is the definition I've used for
           | bit rot in the past, somewhat jokingly about bugs in old code
        
         | tialaramex wrote:
         | The thing that's interesting about digital data, such as the
         | CDs, but also say a stone tablet with carved lettering - is
         | that this is a binary occurrence.
         | 
         | With non-digital data (e.g. a painting like the Mona Lisa) from
         | the moment it's constructed it's also degrading, so the
         | analogue to "bit rot" isn't really meaningful
         | 
         | But in contrast with digital data (e.g. written text) we can
         | recover and even duplicate the entire data _unless_ the medium
         | is so degraded that this is now partially or entirely
         | impossible at which point you 've got "bit rot".
         | 
         | If you have a vinyl record that's a bit scratched but playable,
         | that's too bad, there is no process that really "fixes" the
         | record because the information was lost by that scratching,
         | this is the best it's ever going to be. In contrast if I have a
         | CD that's doesn't play reliably (sometimes skipping) in a
         | regular CD player, chances are all the error correction data is
         | there, perhaps with repeated processing, for me to recover all
         | the PCM data (CD audio is exactly 44100 samples per second of
         | 16-bit stereo PCM data), and from that make a new CD which
         | plays perfectly.
        
           | svachalek wrote:
           | Thus the medium is either 1=readable or 0=not readable and we
           | can refer to the 1 -> 0 transition as "bit rot".
           | 
           | (Future etymologists: no no no, I'm joking.)
        
       | 1cvmask wrote:
       | They interestingly have added a blank check company:
       | 
       | https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/blank%20check%20c...
        
       | kwertyoowiyop wrote:
       | Wow, teraflop just got added.
        
       | Imnimo wrote:
       | It's interesting the MW says,
       | 
       | >The flop in teraflop stands for "floating-point operation"
       | 
       | Without noting that, in some circles, the 'p' is taken to mean
       | 'per', and only 'flops' is valid (Floating Point Operations Per
       | Second), and the term is not a plural.
        
       | Kenji wrote:
       | Wow, it seems like they severely lag behind culture. Some of
       | these words are quite old already.
        
       | ghawk1ns wrote:
       | How can I see a list of of all the newly added words? The blog
       | only lists ~30 of them?
       | 
       | Does Merriam Webster use a form of Version-Control to track
       | changes do their dictionary? It seems like versioning is a good
       | use-case for a language information service.
       | 
       | I'd like to get the diff of how definitions and examples to words
       | have changed over time, and perhaps why those changes were
       | accepted.
        
         | clairegiordano wrote:
         | I can't seem to find the complete list online either, I just
         | tweeted at the @MerriamWebster account to find out, we'll see
         | if they share a link. Does anybody else have it?
        
           | banana_giraffe wrote:
           | It's not too hard to scrape https://www.merriam-
           | webster.com/browse/dictionary/a and friends, but sadly it
           | appears the wayback machine doesn't have a recent crawl of
           | all of the pages from one day, so comparing to a historical
           | scrape is complicated.
        
       | elliekelly wrote:
       | I think it's a bit odd that "doorbell camera" gets its own entry.
       | It's pretty self-explanatory to anyone familiar with the words
       | doorbell and camera. Is "ceiling fan" in the dictionary?
        
         | BrissyCoder wrote:
         | Thought the same thing wrt "vaccine passport".
        
           | zuminator wrote:
           | Compound phrases are only obvious if you know the context
           | they inhabit. Perhaps in an alternate timeline, "vaccine
           | passport" is the practice of traveling abroad for the purpose
           | of getting medical care unavailable in your own country (what
           | we here on ol' Earth-616 refer to as medical tourism[0]); in
           | yet another timeline "vaccine passport" means an actual evil-
           | Bill-Gates style ID-nanochip injected into you and required
           | for travel.
           | 
           | Similarly, alt-Earth's "bit rot" is an equine gum disease,
           | "air fryer" is a slang synonym for a smoking-fast fastball;
           | and so on.
           | 
           | Anyway, part of the usefulness of dictionaries is to preserve
           | today's meaning for posterity, when what consider to be
           | obvious context may no longer be widely known. The
           | Dictionarium Anglo-Britannicum, one of the earliest English
           | language dictionaries from 1708, included compound phrases
           | like the "Ropes of a Ship," which meant pretty much exactly
           | what you would think it meant, but also phrases like
           | "Equivocal Generation"[1] which might sound to contemporary
           | ears like it's referring to hipsters or something, but
           | actually means something totally different.
           | 
           | [0]https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/med
           | ic...
           | 
           | [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_generation
        
         | tingletech wrote:
         | I'm a fan of ceilings. Love them.
        
       | pmdulaney wrote:
       | I think Oobleck is my favorite -- but do they really plan to
       | capitalize it?
        
       | themodelplumber wrote:
       | Does anybody know if MW or another company offers things like:
       | 
       | Direct access to raw word lists
       | 
       | Access to tagged word lists (e.g. words about geology; words that
       | are socially not offensive)
       | 
       | API for results like newest word, next word, nearest word,
       | definition, etymology, etc.
       | 
       | Paid is ok...Thanks!
        
         | afry1 wrote:
         | Indeed there is! https://developer.oxforddictionaries.com/
        
         | someone7x wrote:
         | Have you heard of wordnik? It came up a lot while I was trying
         | to fish out examples of how painful it is to query wiktionary.
        
       | karamanolev wrote:
       | > CubeSat : an artificial satellite ... with a volume of 1 cubic
       | meter...
       | 
       | Wait, I thought there's an official "spec" for CubeSats
       | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CubeSat) and that is 10cm x 10cm x
       | 10cm, so 1000 times smaller in volume. Also limited 1.33kg, but
       | that seems less relevant.
        
         | tialaramex wrote:
         | A good dictionary (which I assume Merriam-Webster is, I only
         | know about the OED) meticulously collects samples to show that
         | they're reporting the actual language as it's used, not some
         | fantasy+.
         | 
         | So, either Merriam-Webster has some examples where "CubeSat"
         | means these rather bulky ordinary satellites or, as seems more
         | likely, if they re-examine the material they'll realise it's a
         | mistake and the definition must be corrected.
         | 
         | In the first era of dictionaries this was painstaking work, you
         | could expect that if you discover a mistake, you write a
         | letter, a week later some expert reads it, and maybe a year
         | later there's a correct draft, but it might take a decade until
         | the dictionary publishes errata. But today there's a fair
         | chance if you can contact Merriam-Webster about their mistake
         | they can publish a revision (to their online dictionary) the
         | same week.
         | 
         | + This choice leads to several fun stories, e.g.
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twat
        
         | showerst wrote:
         | I think it's a conversion error on their part, 1000cm3 != 1m3
        
         | cobaltoxide wrote:
         | Agreed, the MW definition does not seem to be correct.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-10-28 23:01 UTC)