[HN Gopher] Adapt or Abandon? Hard Choices in the Himalayas
___________________________________________________________________
Adapt or Abandon? Hard Choices in the Himalayas
Author : CapitalistCartr
Score : 31 points
Date : 2021-10-27 11:56 UTC (1 days ago)
(HTM) web link (www.sapiens.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.sapiens.org)
| jl6 wrote:
| We don't think enough about decommissioning settlements. Whether
| coastal towns threatened by rising tides, or desertifying inland
| villages, there are many places that used to be habitable and
| will soon not be.
|
| This is nothing new, in the long history of Homo Sapiens. We have
| abandoned homes before, as conditions changed. See Doggerland for
| an example of an inhabited area that is now completely
| underwater.
|
| But we now seem to be living in an age of extreme entrenchment
| and calcification of things like borders, citizenship, land
| ownership, and of course the sturdy permanence of modern houses
| (which are usually a 100+ year investment in a location, unlike
| more primitive structures).
|
| I welcome experiments into how to unblock, destigmatize and
| finance (a) the movement of people and, and (b) the end-of-life
| phase of cities, towns and villages.
|
| We should of course also try to slow and reverse climate change,
| but let's be realistic about the level of warming we are already
| locked into, and the need for humane migration solutions.
| throwaway123x2 wrote:
| The subcontinent is one of the first places that will be hit by
| climate change. That's 1.5-2 billion people that will need
| relocating. Where are we going to put them? Bangladesh alone is
| like 200 million.
| 32gbsd wrote:
| Its foolish to assume that the coast line is going to stay where
| its most convenient for housing. Its like building a tree house
| then complaining that the tree keeps growing despite the
| uselessness of further growth.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-10-28 23:02 UTC)