[HN Gopher] Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi has died
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi has died
        
       Author : fagnerbrack
       Score  : 307 points
       Date   : 2021-10-21 04:22 UTC (18 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (twitter.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (twitter.com)
        
       | kashyapc wrote:
       | One of my favorite quotes from his book, _Flow_ :
       | 
       |  _" The ultimate test for the ability to control the quality of
       | experience is what a person does in solitude, with no external
       | demands to give structure to attention. It is relatively easy to
       | become involved with a job, to enjoy the company of friends, to
       | be entertained in a theater or at a concert. But what happens
       | when we are left to our own devices? Alone, when the dark night
       | of the soul descends, are we forced into frantic attempts to
       | distract the mind from its coming? Or are we able to take on
       | activities that are not only enjoyable, but make the self grow?"_
       | ***
       | 
       | Csikszentmihalyi's _Flow_ also introduced me to Seneca and Marcus
       | Aurelius (although, I prefer Epictetus to Aurelius).
        
         | akkartik wrote:
         | I wonder if future generations will totally misunderstand "left
         | to own devices." No, it doesn't mean with your phone, tablet
         | and watch.
        
           | kashyapc wrote:
           | Yikes ... I didn't even consider the "devices == gadgets"
           | angle when I was writing it (I'm old enough to have lived a
           | decent portion of my life without any gadgets and gongs).
           | I'll be charitable and hope that a sensible future reader
           | will situate the book in its time and place.
        
         | DocTomoe wrote:
         | > Csikszentmihalyi's Flow also introduced me to Seneca and
         | Marcus Aurelius (although, I prefer Epictetus to Aurelius).
         | 
         | Flow led me down the rabbit hole to philosophical Daoism. It is
         | astonishing how closely intertwined philosophy and psychology
         | turn out to be.
        
           | rgrieselhuber wrote:
           | Very much so. My early studies of Taoism were affected
           | heavily by the notion that the philosophy was a response to
           | an unknown cataclysm of some sort, I just wish I could track
           | down the original source on that idea. Jung's investigation
           | into Aion is also connected somehow to this but it is an area
           | I need to research further.
        
           | kashyapc wrote:
           | Not at all astonishing. :-) Modern cognitive behavioral
           | therapy (CBT) originates[1] from the 2000-year-old work of
           | Epictetus. Cicero memorably called philosophy as "the
           | medicine of the mind". Going back to Socrates and Epictetus,
           | philosophy was "a way of life", and not tying clever knots in
           | thin air and untying them.
           | 
           | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_emotive_behavior_t
           | her...
        
           | layer8 wrote:
           | > It is astonishing how closely intertwined philosophy and
           | psychology turn out to be.
           | 
           | It'd be surprising if they weren't, if you think about it. :)
        
         | leobg wrote:
         | Well. In such situations, I turn to HN. Now what does that say
         | about me?
        
         | agumonkey wrote:
         | And it's staggering that most social structures are impeding
         | that.
         | 
         | We need to rethink social interactions to focus on beneficial
         | self/group growth, and not only the material/economical side.
        
       | rob74 wrote:
       | The correct name is Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (never mind the
       | diacritics, but the "i" appended to the first name is definitely
       | wrong).
       | 
       | Explanation for language nerds: Mihaly is the Hungarian version
       | of "Michael", Csikszentmihaly is a Hungarian village in Romania
       | with a name derived from St. Michael
       | (https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mih%C4%83ileni,_Harghita), and the
       | "i" at the end denotes a toponymic surname
       | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toponymic_surname).
        
         | fagnerbrack wrote:
         | That was copy/paste from the tweet
        
         | MadeThisToReply wrote:
         | "Cheeks sent me high"
        
           | friendly_chap wrote:
           | Hungarian here: that is a remarkably close approximation.
           | Almost perfect, except the vowel in "me" is longer than our
           | short "i" which sounds just like the vowel in the word "in".
        
         | madcaptenor wrote:
         | Looks like there are a whole bunch of towns with similar names:
         | Csikszentgyorgy, Csikszentkiraly, Csikszentmiklos, ... (from
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cs%C3%ADk_(disambiguation)) -
         | Csik was a county of Hungary that's now in Romania, so a lot of
         | towns in that area have Csik in their Hungarian names.
        
         | dang wrote:
         | Fixed in title now. Thanks!
        
       | sebmellen wrote:
       | That is a remarkable last name.
       | 
       | Never knew of this man, but getting into the "flow state" more
       | often has become one of my core objectives in life. Sad to hear
       | of his passing.
        
         | froh wrote:
         | "Chick-sent-me-high" was given as a good approximation to
         | pronounce his name in one of his books.
        
           | kmarc wrote:
           | cheek-sent-me-high would be even better.
           | 
           | One of the lesser known Hungarians (even Hungarians don't
           | really know of him), but definitely remarkable life and
           | research.
        
           | shaldjfb wrote:
           | Is chick-sent-me-holly wrong?
        
             | yosito wrote:
             | Yes. In Hungarian, ly is pronounced like y, the l is
             | silent.
        
             | [deleted]
        
           | vekerdyb wrote:
           | Me-high Cheek-sent-me-high-y would be my approximation for
           | the full name. The Twitter post and the HN title has an extra
           | 'i' after his first name. Rest in peace, nyugodj bekeben.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | matmatmatmat wrote:
           | HN readers in Hungary are just waking up to this news, but I
           | can confirm that's a pretty decent approximation.
        
           | sturza wrote:
           | I can confirm this. On the back of "Good work" - book with
           | Gardner, Csikszentmihalyi and Damon they mention the Chick-
           | sent-me-high pronunciation.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | troppl wrote:
       | Tangentially related, but has anyone here read his other book,
       | "Creativity: The Psychology of Discovery and Invention". I loved
       | "Flow" (his main book) so I wanted to read something else from
       | him, but somehow it was just not the same. In the Flow book, I
       | understood which concepts I should understand as a reader and the
       | background of them, including individual stories, was very
       | coherent. I can't really say the same about the other book. I
       | would be interested what others think about this.
        
         | relativeadv wrote:
         | ten years ago I took a college freshman course that centered
         | around "Creativity." I've never actually read all of Flow and
         | so "Creativity" was my introduction to the Flow concept. I was
         | an art student at the time so it was convenient to have source
         | material that did the work of showing me how any of this was
         | relevant to what I do. That said, it definitely seems like
         | "Creativity" was a re-hash of the concepts originated within
         | Flow. It has been a long time since I read it and should
         | probably revisit.
         | 
         | I often forget, but it was this book that helped me decide to
         | become a programmer. I flip-flopped a lot between college
         | majors and just generally what the hell it was i wanted to do
         | for a living. The professor who ran that course asked me what
         | job would easily create (and sustain) flow states for me. For
         | me, it was programming that did the trick. Not even art, which
         | i did for 12 hours a day at the time, worked quite as well.
        
       | louis___ wrote:
       | For those interested in the flow state, I became convinced that
       | this is the kind of state achieved while practicing Zazen
       | meditation :
       | 
       | https://zmm.org/teachings-and-training/meditation-instructio...
       | 
       | At one point, the only activity of being sit is the one necessary
       | to reach the flow state.
        
       | romanhn wrote:
       | Sad to hear. At one point I realized (due to his name) that three
       | non-fiction books I read in a row all referenced his studies,
       | despite spanning entirely different subjects. Clearly an
       | influence on many authors and researchers.
        
         | zaplin wrote:
         | can you tell us the titles of the books you've read?
        
           | romanhn wrote:
           | I believe it was these three:
           | 
           | Daniel Kahneman, "Thinking, Fast and Slow"
           | 
           | Susan Cain, "Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That
           | Can't Stop Talking"
           | 
           | Daniel Pink, "Drive: The Surprising Truth About What
           | Motivates Us"
           | 
           | So, maybe not entirely unrelated, but I certainly wasn't
           | looking for a specific theme. Just working down my non-
           | fiction list.
        
             | djrockstar1 wrote:
             | Might be a strange question to ask, but do you "get"
             | anything out of reading non-fiction? Like, is there a
             | substantive benefit you gained from reading these books?
        
               | neogodless wrote:
               | As an adult human, my life experience contains too many
               | variables to reach scientific certainty about the entire
               | causal chain.
               | 
               | However, my early 30s were still marked with a heavy
               | insecurity, ennui, lack of direction, failure to focus
               | and achieve in the workplace, and failed romantic
               | endeavors.
               | 
               | I began with work on boundaries and understanding self by
               | Henry Cloud, ways to achieve like Find Your Strengths,
               | and even business related work like Good to Great.
               | 
               | Flow was an excellent part of this collection, as it
               | helped me turn work into something more enjoyable and
               | progressive. Drive was very neat, and I really enjoyed
               | Your Brain at Work.
               | 
               | I also have a personal interest in education, so I read a
               | lot on that, including by Sir Ken Robinson. And I read
               | Power of Habit.
               | 
               | Overall I think the things I learned improved my habits
               | at home and at work, grounded me, improved my confidence,
               | and made me a better resource for others. (Of course I
               | must not assume I always have the answer or am absolutely
               | right just because I read things in a book.) In general
               | when I have deep conversations, I seem to be able to
               | follow along and better understand how people work and
               | how relationships work.
               | 
               | I'm very happy with my job, feeling very productive,
               | significant and learning new skills (in my 40s). I've
               | been married 6 years and have a very high satisfaction
               | with our marriage. There's still a struggle with getting
               | everything done I want, like gathering firewood for the
               | winter, but largely I feel that I rise to meet my
               | responsibilities.
               | 
               | Now I can't say how much came from dedicating time and
               | effort into learning, and how much comes naturally from
               | experience and age. But I certainly don't regret any of
               | that self-education today.
        
               | romanhn wrote:
               | It is an interesting question, and one I think about once
               | in a while. My recall of specific facts from books I've
               | read is pretty terrible (not sure if this true for
               | others, or if it is related to my aphantasia in any way).
               | That's true both for fiction and non-fiction I read. That
               | said, I do feel that a certain amount of _knowledge_ does
               | remain, somewhere below the surface. I can carry on a
               | conversation on a variety of topics, concepts that I have
               | encountered before are processed faster, my worldview
               | shifts and expands. I have general awareness of Mihaly
               | Csikszentmihalyi and his work :) Is the benefit
               | substantive? Hard to say. But I enjoy the process and get
               | to be a slightly more well-rounded person, so why not.
        
               | dredmorbius wrote:
               | Mortimer Adler's classic _How to Read a Book_ addresses
               | both the why and how. I 'd suggest ... reading it,
               | synoptically, to answer your question.
               | 
               | https://www.worldcat.org/title/how-to-read-a-
               | book/oclc/11137...
               | 
               | Simply: reading is communication over time. It enables
               | earlier others to share their thoughts and insights.
               | Often, as suggested in this thread, ideas arising in one
               | domain have relevance in others --- they provide
               | insights, clarity, metaphors, understanding, mechanisms,
               | skills, ...
               | 
               | Why do you read Hacker News?
        
               | ramenator wrote:
               | That is an odd question to ask, lol.
        
               | pmdulaney wrote:
               | I agree -- it is an odd question to ask. One might as
               | well ask, "Do you derive any benefits from this life
               | thing?"
        
               | killtimeatwork wrote:
               | It's a perfectly fine question. A lot of nonfiction books
               | contain their authors' pet theories, along with a bunch
               | of anecdotes and handwaving to make them seem justifiable
               | or even scientific. Some of them quote "scientific"
               | research from fields like psychology - but that research
               | itself is hardly scientific (hence recent replication
               | crisis) and is also used out of context in the book.
               | 
               | As for the question if these books add value - they
               | certainly provide entertainment for the reader, but they
               | may also warp his view of the world (if the reader is not
               | careful, they may become convinced that the book's thesis
               | is true even if the evidence/ancedotes laid out are
               | hardly conclusive).
        
               | jhedwards wrote:
               | This seems like a very bizarre characterization.
               | Technically On the Origin of Species by Charles Darwin
               | and Relativity by Einstein are non-fiction. I'm very
               | happy to say I've had my mind warped by their pet
               | theories.
        
               | killtimeatwork wrote:
               | They both present compelling evidence and can be thus
               | classified as science. Darwin spent a couple decades
               | accumulating evidence before he wrote the book.
               | 
               | Also, majority of non-fiction textbook are about
               | psychology, economy, sociology, history etc. which are
               | vastly more intractable than biology and physics.
        
       | kmarc wrote:
       | For the casual HN reader, he was the one who recognized and
       | scientifically described the creative state of "flow" [1]
       | 
       | Why would it be of interest for the audience of hackernews? Well,
       | programmers and related fields' mostly creative workers tend to
       | experience the flow, and even though it is hard to explain (or
       | describe, for that matter) most of us agree that it's great to be
       | in.
       | 
       | [1]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flow_(psychology)
        
         | stavros wrote:
         | I tend to describe flow as "when an hour passes in three
         | minutes".
        
           | obtusifolia wrote:
           | I love it how it's ambiguous whether the three minutes or the
           | hour is supposed to be the real time passed in your comment,
           | but according to Csikszentmihalyi both can indicate a flow
           | state.
           | 
           | > One of the most common descriptions of optimal experience
           | is that time no longer seems to pass the way it ordinarily
           | does. The objective, external duration we measure with
           | reference to outside events like night and day, or the
           | orderly progression of clocks, is rendered irrelevant by the
           | rhythms dictated by the activity. Often hours seem to pass by
           | in minutes; in general, most people report that time seems to
           | pass much faster. But occasionally the reverse occurs: Ballet
           | dancers describe how a difficult turn that takes less than a
           | second in real time stretches out for what seems like
           | minutes: "Two things happen. One is that it seems to pass
           | really fast in one sense. After it's passed, it seems to have
           | passed really fast. I see that it's 1:00 in the morning, and
           | I say: 'Aha, just a few minutes ago it was 8:00.' But then
           | while I'm dancing... it seems like it's been much longer than
           | maybe it really was." The safest generalization to make about
           | this phenomenon is to say that during the flow experience the
           | sense of time bears little relation to the passage of time as
           | measured by the absolute convention of the clock.
        
           | gHosts wrote:
           | Or that which open plan offices most effectively destroy.
        
           | kevinmgranger wrote:
           | "...and you're happy with the time spent", to exclude time
           | blindness, zoning out in a meeting, etc.
        
             | AccountToUse wrote:
             | Strategy video games (Civilization series, SimCity, Total
             | War series, Tycoon games) are right on the knife edge of
             | this. I love the process. I love playing the game.
             | Especially total war. I love conquering my neighboring
             | nations and living out historical fantasies. But the next
             | day, I feel awful.
        
             | stavros wrote:
             | Ah yes, though those tend to be "three minutes pass in an
             | hour" for me.
        
         | laserlight wrote:
         | He didn't just describe the flow state, but also identified the
         | conditions to achieve it. One can modify their experience
         | according to these conditions to enter a flow state. For
         | example, when the problem you're working on is too hard, then
         | first work on a simplified version; or make it harder if it's
         | too easy! When feedback cycle is long, then first make it
         | shorter, e.g., make tests run faster, etc.
         | 
         | I highly recommend reading his book "Flow: The Psychology of
         | Optimal Experience".
         | 
         | Rest in peace sir.
        
         | QuestingElf wrote:
         | Summoning that successful kind of creative, productive, free
         | play state of mind is really difficult in software coding job
         | interviews. There's a lot of back and forth, warming up as well
         | as looking up things and experimenting to reach that flow
         | state. Once you're in it, you know you're in it. You've shipped
         | robust apps thanks to it.
         | 
         | Having to explain that almost instinctive process to a complete
         | stranger who has control over your career and income can really
         | hamper or destroy the ability to get into that groove. I've
         | found it really useful to know about flow, what can get it
         | going and when it's just not happening, and most interviews
         | just aren't set up to encourage it. Csikszentmihalyi wrote a
         | shorter book called "Finding Flow" which speaks of creating
         | situations that bring out the best in others and us.
        
       | fallat wrote:
       | Tangential question: Could someone tell me how you're supposed to
       | read "Csikszentmihalyi" ?
       | 
       | To me it seems that names are supposed to be broken up into their
       | syllables, but I could be very wrong:
       | 
       | Csiks-zent-mihal-yi
       | 
       | Essentially the same as:
       | 
       | Sixzent-mehalyee
        
         | vladoski wrote:
         | It should be something like: tcheek-sent-me-hal-yee in english
        
           | telesilla wrote:
           | With which accents? I teach and always embarrassingly stumble
           | when I need to announce him.
           | 
           | As a musician his work has been immensely important.
        
         | neogodless wrote:
         | If you look through the few dozen comments here, there's
         | several threads about this. In fact, it seems to be the primary
         | topic of conversation.
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28940355
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28944034
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28943790
         | 
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28941100
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | QuestingElf wrote:
         | I remember a cassette set from 2 authors who referred to his
         | works on creativity. They eventually met him and occasionally
         | consulted.
         | 
         | The audio said, "His last name is pronounced Chick-SENT-me-
         | high-ee. We call him Mike!"
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | Koshkin wrote:
       | (OT) One big problem of completely different languages sharing
       | the same alphabet is the tendency to keep the spelling of names
       | in the original language rather than convert it to reflect the
       | way it may be read off in your own. For the life of me I can't
       | even guess how to pronounce this post's title. (Or, when you have
       | to call a guy whose last name - in _English_ - is Chrzaszcz, what
       | do you do?)
        
         | treszkai wrote:
         | He and his name have Hungarian origins, and Hungarian words can
         | be pronounced letter-by-letter, with emphasis on the first
         | syllable. The main problems: what are the letters (some consist
         | of multiple _characters_ ), and how are they pronounced.
         | 
         | Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi
         | 
         | - M: /m/
         | 
         | - i: /i/ _approximately_ as in big
         | 
         | - h: /h/ as in "hi"
         | 
         | - a: /a:/ as in "father"
         | 
         | - ly: /j/ as in "yes"
         | 
         | - Cs: /tS/ as in "cheek"
         | 
         | - i: /i:/ as in "cheek"
         | 
         | - k: /k/ as in "cheek"
         | 
         | - sz: /s/ as in "scent" or "saint" (which means "szent" in
         | Hungarian)
         | 
         | - e: /e/ as in "scent"
         | 
         | - n: /n/ as in "scent"
         | 
         | - t: /t/ as in "scent"
         | 
         | - mihaly: as his first name
         | 
         | - i: /i/
         | 
         | Overall: /'mihaI 'tSi:ksentmi,ha:ji/ [?] mihaay cheek-scent-
         | mihaayi
         | 
         | https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/59/Mih%C3%A...
        
         | thebrainkid wrote:
         | The Mnemonic (which I heard from Merlin Mann's podcast) is to
         | approximate the pronounciation of "Csikszentmihalyi" as "Chick
         | sent me, hi"
        
         | pronik wrote:
         | I can wholeheartedly recommend languages which do not care
         | about original spelling, either by having different alphabets
         | (was it "Khriashch" you wanted to know? Easy-peasy in Cyrillic)
         | or just imposing their own rules (e.g. Latvian: "Mihajs
         | Ciksentmihaji"). Elsewhere, if you are e.g. learning German,
         | you have to at least master German, English and French
         | pronounciation with some bits of Latin grammar.
        
           | Koshkin wrote:
           | _Proper_ pronunciation is, of course is a completely separate
           | topic, because Chrzaszcz, for instance, might end up sounding
           | like "crotch" in English, even though in the original
           | language it sounds different but uses phonemes that are
           | difficult to approximate.
        
       | dennis_moore wrote:
       | There was a recent episode of CBC Ideas discussing him and the
       | concept of flow in general: https://www.cbc.ca/radio/ideas/flow-
       | making-the-impossible-po...
        
       | techsolomon wrote:
       | I just checked Flow out from the library yesterday. :(
       | 
       | Mentions on HN: https://hacker-recommended-
       | books.vercel.app/category/0/all-t...
        
       | dsizzle wrote:
       | Noticed there are two other stories on the HN front page now
       | featuring pop psychology: one on Kahneman's work and another by
       | Dunning. I wonder if this news is part of the reason why?
        
       | dredmorbius wrote:
       | I had a brief email exchange with Csikszentmihalyi a few years
       | ago over a concept he'd mentioned in an Edge essay. Discussion
       | turned to other notable Hungarians (and Austrians), including the
       | Polanyis (Karl and Michael). He'd known their neice, Eva Zeisel
       | Polanyi, a ceramicist, and he dropped this small-world gem:
       | 
       |  _Karl Popper used to go hunting in the summers through the
       | Carpatian Mountains with my grandfather; occasionally they were
       | joined by August von Hayek, who later also got a Nobel in
       | Economics . . . I learned a lot about my grandfather from him . .
       | . And indirectly a lot from Popper, whose Das Logik Der Vorschung
       | (translated into English with the strange title of The Logic of
       | Scientific Discovery) was for years my Bible._
       | 
       | I'd first heard of his Flow concept on a public radio interview I
       | caught whilst on a road-trip through a remote rural high plateau,
       | in the 1990s. Highly memorable and mildly surreal listening to
       | his voice as the countryside flowed past.
       | 
       | Vale, Mihaly.
        
       | bprasanna wrote:
       | May his soul rest in peace _/|\\_
        
         | dmos62 wrote:
         | May he flow in peace _/|\\_
        
       | yosito wrote:
       | Csikszentmihalyi was Hungarian. I live in Hungary, and often work
       | from a coffee shop called Flow with a Csikszentmihalyi quote on
       | the wall, "Flow is being completely involved in an activity for
       | its own sake. The ego falls away. Time flies. Every action,
       | movement, and thought follows inevitably from the previous one,
       | like playing jazz."
       | 
       | RIP
        
         | underyx wrote:
         | I love Flow, it's my favorite cafe to work from in Budapest.
         | Can't wait to visit home so I can hang out there again.
        
           | BostonEnginerd wrote:
           | Thanks for the recommendation! In pre-COVID times, I would
           | visit Budapest a few times per year.
           | 
           | My coffee stops are usually Addicted2Caffeine on Bartok Bela,
           | and Tamp & Pull, depending on which hotel I'm staying at.
           | 
           | There's also Barako Kavehaz, which serves an interesting
           | Filipino coffee varietal called Liberica Barako.
        
             | browningstreet wrote:
             | I'm a regular visitor to Budapest (both parents were born
             | there) and have added all of these to my list of things to
             | include on my next trip.. whenever that may be (borders).
        
       | pjbk wrote:
       | Oh, what a loss. I think I first heard of his work in Lyall
       | Watson's book _Neophilia_ in the late 80s. I was so mesmerized by
       | the concept of flow that was always looking for anything new
       | Csikszentmihalyi had published, or any psychology or neuroscience
       | studies about flow and related ideas on human cognition. He will
       | certainly be missed.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-10-21 23:01 UTC)