[HN Gopher] Privacy Redirect: Redirects browser requests to priv...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Privacy Redirect: Redirects browser requests to privacy-friendly
       alternatives
        
       Author : ignoramous
       Score  : 117 points
       Date   : 2021-10-18 08:48 UTC (14 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (github.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (github.com)
        
       | black_puppydog wrote:
       | If you're annoyed with public instances of nitter, libreddit,
       | invidious: they're super easy to set up with a bit of caddy &
       | docker and don't require much in terms of compute or maintenance.
       | 
       | I find reddit & twitter much more usable on nitter & libreddit,
       | so Privacy Redirect is one of my default extensions, with my own
       | instances configured.
        
       | pndy wrote:
       | For my needs it's great, I'm using it for about a year now and
       | beside few issues I believe it's worth recommending.
       | 
       | The issues: invidious redirect would be great if would
       | automatically try to go for another instance when loading one
       | fails and that happens a lot. The same happens to nitter but it's
       | way more "stable". Bibliogram redirect works but "tunnel" itself
       | is been limited with what it may fetch from instagram.
       | 
       | And there's also one invidious instance (invidiou.site) that
       | unlike all other asks for disabling ads blocking extension in
       | order to show the content - that's not nice.
       | 
       | I really hope that imgur redirect will be included anytime soon -
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28849936
        
         | burkaman wrote:
         | For Nitter there's https://twitit.gq/, which tracks the uptime
         | of a bunch of instances and redirects you to a healthy one.
         | Very cool, wish there was something like it for Invidious.
        
       | forgotmypw17 wrote:
       | This extension is a lifesaver for my older computers, who
       | inevitably get frozen up by the giant shitpiles of JS on all the
       | ubiquitous sites.
       | 
       | I used to dread accidentally clicking one of those domains, which
       | inevitably happens when I'm googling something, because it
       | usually meant killing the browser process or sometimes even hard-
       | rebooting.
       | 
       | Now I get a usable alternative. Many thanks to the authors. (And
       | many thanks and props to google search for being one of the few
       | Web mainstay services staying accessible to older devices.)
        
         | forgotmypw17 wrote:
         | Having written this, I now notice that my machine stuck with
         | Firefox 66 is not compatible with this extension.
         | 
         | If the author happens to be reading this, it would be great if
         | you could bring older Firefox versions into the fold.
         | 
         | I know it's possible, because I'm using another extension which
         | only does reddit-to-teddit.
        
         | GoblinSlayer wrote:
         | When Mozilla's own site killed my their own browser with a
         | javascript infinite loop, I knew enough is enough and installed
         | noscript and disabled scripts by default, and web unironically
         | became a better place.
        
           | jwilk wrote:
           | You should know that, by default, addons are disabled on some
           | Mozilla websites:
           | https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Privileged-Pages
        
           | forgotmypw17 wrote:
           | Sadly, I have not figured out how to allow JS on a per-site
           | basis in Firefox 66, nor how to allow a bookmarklet on a site
           | with JS turned off.
           | 
           | I like the little JS-driven niceties my own sites (and HN)
           | provide.
           | 
           | My solution has been to block the offending sites at the
           | /etc/hosts level, which works marvelously.
           | 
           | This goes along my philosophy that "the medium is the
           | message", and a site with shoddy markup is unlikely to have
           | any content worth my time either.
           | 
           | Something something AOL.
        
       | WesolyKubeczek wrote:
       | Imagine all the fun when you need to see that one post, that one
       | video, or that one thread that doesn't exist on those alternative
       | platforms.
       | 
       | "Allow me to interject for a moment" of browser extensions.
        
         | commoner wrote:
         | No, this extension redirects users to alternative FOSS
         | frontends for the same services: Nitter[1] instead of Twitter,
         | Invidious[2] instead of YouTube, and Bibliogram[3] instead of
         | Instagram. The main content displayed by these frontends should
         | be the same as the content on the original platforms.
         | 
         | The map, translation, and search engine redirects might produce
         | different results, but each redirection rule can be
         | enabled/disabled separately in the extension in case you don't
         | want to use any of them.
         | 
         | [1] https://github.com/zedeus/nitter
         | 
         | [2] https://github.com/iv-org/invidious
         | 
         | [3] https://sr.ht/~cadence/bibliogram/
        
           | 15characterslon wrote:
           | The README could be improved here. I didn't know about
           | Nitter, Invidious, ... It wasn't clear to me that these are
           | just different frontends for the same services when I read
           | the README.
        
       | saxonww wrote:
       | For any of you that have an "old reddit" redirect plugin, this
       | plugin will do that for you, too.
        
       | worldofmatthew wrote:
       | The lists that this add-on comes with includes many links to dead
       | frontends. Annoying to have to click on a link 5 to 10 times to
       | get a working frontend.
        
         | circularfoyers wrote:
         | This is something I've encountered using this addon as well and
         | I imagine would put off a lot of people (as it has for me on
         | some occasions even). Having a brief look at the issues, it
         | does appear it's something that has been discussed a
         | lot[1][2][3], sadly without any code contributions yet. This
         | might be partly due to how difficult automating the detection
         | of this would be.
         | 
         | [1] https://github.com/SimonBrazell/privacy-redirect/issues/171
         | 
         | [2] https://github.com/SimonBrazell/privacy-redirect/issues/48
         | 
         | [3] https://github.com/SimonBrazell/privacy-redirect/issues/101
        
       | MrJagil wrote:
       | Is it not possible to make such an alternative to facebook?
        
         | tsak wrote:
         | Zuck has high walls around his garden.
        
         | commoner wrote:
         | Facebook is extraordinarily aggressive at obstructing the
         | techniques needed to build an alternative FOSS frontend,
         | including web scraping and HTML parsing. Examples:
         | 
         | - Obfuscating HTML element classes, text, and structures to
         | circumvent ad blocking, while disrupting screen readers at the
         | same time: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-46508234
         | 
         | - Preventing university researchers from obtaining data on
         | Facebook's political ads through web scraping:
         | https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-seeks-shutdown-of-nyu-...
         | and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24874602
         | 
         | - Sending a cease and desist letter to the developer of the
         | Unfollow Everything extension, and banning him from Facebook:
         | https://www.techspot.com/news/91650-facebook-bans-sends-ceas...
         | and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28801908
        
           | piaste wrote:
           | Add to that list:
           | 
           | - Sending a cease and desist to the student who developed a
           | FOSS Instagram app:
           | https://github.com/austinhuang0131/austinhuang0131/issues/2
        
             | Nextgrid wrote:
             | Which is why these offensives should be done anonymously,
             | and preferably served via Tor. If it's safe enough to evade
             | law enforcement for years, it should be safe enough from
             | Zuck.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-10-18 23:02 UTC)