[HN Gopher] Baby boomers are snatching houses out of the hands o...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Baby boomers are snatching houses out of the hands of millennials
        
       Author : harambae
       Score  : 19 points
       Date   : 2021-10-16 20:36 UTC (2 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.businessinsider.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.businessinsider.com)
        
       | maxerickson wrote:
       | Assisted living is a much higher level of care than a retirement
       | community, which I think is probably the sort of place the
       | article means.
       | 
       | (assisted living is where you go when you can't meet all of your
       | own daily needs anymore, not where you go when you get sick of
       | mowing the lawn)
        
       | gruez wrote:
       | The article is trying really hard to push an inter-generational
       | conflict narrative, but it's missing a very important detail: are
       | boomers adding/subtracting from the housing supply, on net? They
       | are "more active in the housing market" and are responsible for
       | more of the housing purchases, but that itself isn't really an
       | indication of anything. If they're just upsizing/downsizing, then
       | they're not "snatching houses" from the overall housing supply.
       | If anything, boomers selling houses in urban centers for
       | suburban/rural houses (I suspect boomers aren't dying to get a
       | house in SF for the nightlife) should be a good thing for
       | millennials. The linked zillow report hints at this, because they
       | also mention boomers using their equity for all-cash offers. If
       | they were buying a second house, that would indeed be bad, but I
       | doubt this is the case. I don't think banks would give a $500k
       | mortgage to 60 year olds.
        
         | GaryTang wrote:
         | Even if they are buying second houses, I highly doubt that
         | boomers are having anywhere near as large an impact on housing
         | markets in relation to large corporations and financial
         | institutions that are buying more and more residential
         | properties. These larger organizations are pinning the blame on
         | boomers via PR, when there is really no comparison in who has
         | more invested.
         | 
         | https://www.usnews.com/news/business/articles/2021-09-09/com...
        
           | fxtentacle wrote:
           | Great point. "nationally, investors bought more homes than
           | they sold in the first half of this year"
        
         | fxtentacle wrote:
         | In my neighborhood, old people are investing their savings into
         | houses and then rent them out. The hope is that they'll be able
         | to live off the rent during their retirement. And since covid,
         | people are more afraid of upcoming inflation, so housing prices
         | grew even stronger in 2020 than in 2019.
        
       | 1270018080 wrote:
       | If you're buying a home and living in it (which is what it sounds
       | like the boomers are doing), I can't really find room for
       | criticism. I think having a chance to build equity in a home you
       | live in is a great thing.
       | 
       | If they're snatching these houses to rent out, deny others a
       | chance at equity, and profit off of (overcharge) the less
       | fortunate, especially during a housing shortage with no end in
       | sight, I have a problem.
       | 
       | Building more housing will always be the primary solution to the
       | housing crisis, but not letting the greedy steal homes would be a
       | nice short-term bandaid.
        
         | GaryTang wrote:
         | Is it really a problem if boomers are buying second, third, or
         | even fourth homes to rent out? This has long been a common path
         | for the elderly to afford healthcare and living expenses in
         | their golden years rather than relying on the government.
         | 
         | I feel large companies and financial institutions that are
         | buying up swaths of residential properties are trying to find a
         | scapegoat and they have found one in boomers. I imagine we will
         | see more propaganda pieces like this one, pinning the blame on
         | them.
        
       | tuatoru wrote:
       | Setting us up for a house price crash in ten to fifteen years, as
       | the Boomers age into their years of disability and want to sell
       | their houses so they can move into "assisted living" /
       | "sheltered" housing.
       | 
       | It's really worth having a look at the charts in [1]. People are
       | living longer (age at death is compressing to a peak around 90
       | years old), but there are still about 15 years of ill health
       | before death.
       | 
       | Since we know the age of the baby boomers, we can predict this
       | crash.
       | 
       | 1.Robine, Jean-Marie, UN Department of Economic and Social
       | Affairs, September 2021. _Ageing Populations: We are living
       | longer lives, but are we healthier?_ UN Ref: UN DESA
       | /POP/2021/TP/NO.2. Downloaded from
       | https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/ on 11 Oct 2021.
        
         | rsj_hn wrote:
         | > Setting us up for a house price crash in ten to fifteen
         | years, as the Boomers age into their years of disability and
         | want to sell their houses so they can move into "assisted
         | living" / "sheltered" housing.
         | 
         | I'm really not sure where you are getting your numbers. Only
         | 4.5% of seniors live in assisted living facilities. Most people
         | will never set foot in one -- they will live independently up
         | until they die, possibly spending a few weeks in hospice if
         | things drag out. With new tech it is even easier now to live on
         | your own -- e.g. you can order things delivered, there is
         | telemedicine, grocery delivery, meal delivery, house cleaning
         | services, uber, etc. Moreover you can now get little motors to
         | take you up stairs, there are all sorts of automated
         | appliances. The days of a large share of seniors needing to
         | live in assisted living are long gone.
         | 
         | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK51841/
        
           | tuatoru wrote:
           | Yes, I put that badly. But medical and living assistance
           | costs go up steeply after 75, and many people will sell
           | properties to pay for them.
        
             | rsj_hn wrote:
             | For nursing homes, it's 1% for ages 65-74, 3% for 75-84 and
             | 9% for persons age 85 and over. Half of all those in
             | nursing homes are older than 85.
             | 
             | For general expenses, there are reverse mortgages for this.
             | But again, I'm not sure what difference it makes to sell
             | the house before rather than after you die -- especially
             | for really old people. It will go on the market either way.
             | Even if you give the home to a child, they will either sell
             | it, or move into it and sell their existing home.
             | 
             | Either way, when someone dies, the demand for housing
             | decreases by 1. So declining populations do lead to cheaper
             | housing (which is a good thing in places where housing is
             | expensive).
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-10-16 23:02 UTC)