[HN Gopher] The Framework Laptop Could Revolutionize Repairabili...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Framework Laptop Could Revolutionize Repairability. We Hope It
       Does
        
       Author : mikhael
       Score  : 69 points
       Date   : 2021-10-14 16:42 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.nytimes.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.nytimes.com)
        
       | dfdz wrote:
       | I really like the idea of the Framework laptop, but at the same
       | time it is hard to imagine the time scales involved
       | 
       | My personal experience is that a thinkpad laptop lasts 6 years if
       | you replace the keyboard and battery. I am sure that the same is
       | true for other brands.
       | 
       | After 6 years, my old laptop starting having other issues with
       | the screen, and ssd. Everything about the laptop was out of date,
       | low resolution screen, comparatively slow processor, bad webcam,
       | not a lot of memory, keyboard started having issues. So it make
       | sense to buy a new laptop.
       | 
       | I am having trouble imaging how things would be different with a
       | Framework laptop. What is the imagined life span of this laptop?
        
       | rrrrrrrrrrrryan wrote:
       | I don't think repairability is the big deal here. It's the
       | customizable ports.
       | 
       | Pretty much everyone's laptop has at least one port they
       | literally never use, and is missing a port they wished it had.
       | E.g. I'll literally never use the SD card slot, nor the 1/8"
       | audio jack, but right now I really wish it had one oldschool USB
       | port. In a year or two, it might be nice to swap that out for an
       | extra usb-C.
       | 
       | This laptop design is a dongle-eliminator.
        
         | revolvingocelot wrote:
         | It's a dongle-eliminator, but it also affords a form of
         | traditional dongle fetishism in that nothing stops fetishists
         | from carrying around the excess port-blocks they so desire, and
         | swapping in the field when needed.
        
         | 0xbadcafebee wrote:
         | Does anyone else miss PCMCIA? I do!
         | 
         | Some Dell laptops used to have these plastic cages around their
         | hard drives, so you could take out a single screw and cold-swap
         | drives in 10 seconds, no need to open the case. Same to pop in
         | a sound card, ethernet card, USB card, SD card reader, etc.
         | Still my favorite "hacker laptop". Lost it somewhere in Vegas
         | during a bender at DEFCON. Thank goodness for hard drive
         | encryption.
        
           | NathanielK wrote:
           | If you're clever, you can usually hotswap that drive too,
           | since it's just a dumb SATA port. More convenient to do with
           | the CD-bay 2.5" drive caddies.
        
         | Infernal wrote:
         | Agreed, my laptop now has 2 USB-C, 1 USB-A, a microSD, and a
         | headphone jack. I would absolutely swap the second USB-C for a
         | USB-A, and the microSD for an SD. Or some days an ethernet
         | jack.
        
       | nottaylorswift wrote:
       | People supporting this are missing the point. When you look at
       | the demographic responsible for purchasing the majority of these
       | types of product, they have enough expendable income to buy a
       | replacement every 5 years at least. The minority intent on making
       | their product last forever through disassembly and endless
       | repair, don't have enough purchasing leverage to change policy.
       | Further after 5 years most people prefer to upgrade and those who
       | don't simply need a new battery in >80% of the cases. I can see
       | demand for the return of a replaceable battery in phones and
       | laptops, but the rest is futile resistance against a natural
       | progression. Repair simply isn't worth it.
        
         | adriancr wrote:
         | You are missing:
         | 
         | - the customization. I for one would like to be able to change
         | laptop at will. (try out oled, quantum dot, change color, put
         | in weird components when available)
         | 
         | - Other purposes for components - I could take the
         | motherboard+cpu+ram, put it in another enclosure and make a
         | router out of it, or robots or other hobbies. Take one or more
         | displays, put it behind windows and have smart windows, etc...
         | 
         | Only thing for me is size, too small display, but I'll likely
         | compromise and get it for christmas.
        
         | technofiend wrote:
         | I disagree that the only two buckets of consumers are people
         | who can afford a new laptop anyway and those who want their
         | laptops to live forever. There's a broad spectrum of people who
         | simply want options. IMHO they want the option to repair,
         | replace, upgrade or some combination of the three and they want
         | it on their terms, not the manufacturers'.
         | 
         | Warranties and extended purchase plans are profit centers. So
         | as one example you can either pay $199+ on a warranty, gambling
         | that the issuer agrees to honor it in case of failure, or
         | instead pocket the money and use it on a repair or upgrade when
         | the laptop fails. I know which I prefer and it's not tacking on
         | $200 to the cost of a laptop for a Microcenter warranty or
         | Applecare.
        
           | nottaylorswift wrote:
           | Most electronics fail from manufacturing defects within 6
           | months of use. After that, it will probably last as long as
           | you want to use it, or until you pour coffee on it. Excluding
           | the battery. Just because something might fail doesn't mean
           | it's going to. Much of the equipment you use will function
           | longer than you will.
           | 
           | And there's another side to this right to repair movement.
           | There's now less incentive to make the individual components
           | reliable. Since the penalty is no longer a full logic board
           | replacement, the components can have a lower MTBF - that
           | lowers cost and promotes the product at the same time by
           | convincing the customer of the need for repairability.
           | 
           | Many of the customers are really just laymen hobbyists
           | looking for a project that seems technical. Kind of like the
           | gamers who wire up a series of unnecessary fans and RGB LEDs
           | and pretend they invented the microprocessor. They have no
           | buying leverage.
        
             | jaywalk wrote:
             | I know you're not Taylor Swift, but are you Tim Cook? My
             | goodness, I've never seen a regular person so against
             | allowing people to repair/upgrade stuff they own.
        
               | nottaylorswift wrote:
               | If I gave the impression I'm against it, I'm not. It's
               | nice to have repairability, a bonus feature, but not a
               | competitive or innovative incentive to purchase over the,
               | and at this point everyone has to admit, very well
               | designed Apple line of product. I do believe we are well
               | into the era of disposable electronics, and both
               | assembly, disassembly, recycling and repair will be fully
               | automated in the near future. Because, in order to make
               | products more compact and continuing the SoC trend moving
               | components to silicon, there's no longer a place for the
               | human technician.
        
               | technofiend wrote:
               | Well I suppose that depends on what you consider well
               | designed. Designed to maximize Apple's profit and prevent
               | consumer choice or upgrades? Undeniably true. Woe to the
               | buyer who decides a year later he needs double the RAM or
               | storage. At the very least he or she must resell their
               | device and buy new again. So to that buyer I dare say
               | frame.work is both competitive, innovative and a better
               | choice than a glued shut hunk of electronics with
               | everything soldered on. System on a chip is not relevant
               | here as both storage and memory are outboard, as is a GPU
               | once one needs better graphics performance than an
               | integrated GPU/CPU can provide.
        
               | felistoria wrote:
               | Framework can't compete with the M1 chip unfortunately. I
               | love what Framework is doing though.
        
         | forgotmypw17 wrote:
         | I think you under-estimate how many people want to reduce their
         | contribution to landfill with old products and ecological
         | demolition with new products.
        
           | nottaylorswift wrote:
           | I think you overestimate - wildly - how much people care
           | about the environment. Further the idea that recycling as
           | policy offsets pollution is a delusion. That issue needs to
           | be solved by materials science before even the design phase,
           | not after the fact do good mitigation. It's a type of
           | indoctrination; that's the purpose of recycling laws. If you
           | follow them you're affirming voluntary compliance with
           | government policy and that precedent makes you more agreeable
           | to their continuing agenda. Doesn't make a bit of difference
           | to the environment. It's a mind game. I've seen cargo ships
           | pour metric tons of waste into the ocean as routine waste
           | from industrial zones. The sheer size of the waste is almost
           | unbelievable. Don't worry about the aluminum in your laptop
           | and soda cans.
        
             | forgotmypw17 wrote:
             | This isn't about recycling, but REUSE, and extending the
             | life of a computer instead of pulling another one out of
             | the supply chain and all of the consequences which follow.
        
             | throwaway946513 wrote:
             | Sorry to jump in wildly here - but this reminds me of a
             | similar attack on the idea where we shouldn't use "air
             | cleaners" to reduce carbon emission already in our
             | atmosphere.
             | 
             | I get it, it's not a the only solution to a problem, but
             | again - why not use this technology if the job it is
             | designed to do helps, even enough to mitigate some other
             | issues. Just because a solution does not address all 10
             | parts of a problem, doesn't mean that you can't use that
             | solution for 1/10 of the problem.
        
         | paxys wrote:
         | According to this logic the entire desktop computing segment
         | shouldn't exist, yet it is a thriving ecosystem made up of
         | thousands of vendors, millions of buyers and components at
         | every possible price point. Meanwhile no one is buying a Mac
         | Pro tower. Turns out people like choice and customizability. If
         | I have the disposable income I'd rather replace my CPU/GPU
         | every year and RAM every other year rather than the entire
         | laptop every 5 years.
        
           | faeriechangling wrote:
           | Desktop PC sales are in freefall and were stagnant years
           | before that.
           | 
           | Laptops nowadays are about ~2 years behind mainstream desktop
           | platforms and are now capable of serving the needs of most
           | gamers, video editors, and programmers. Consumers, prosumers,
           | and businesses are increasingly are asking themselves why
           | they should give up the flexibility of a laptop and dedicate
           | valuable space to a traditional desktop setup. From the
           | business perspective, laptops are also logistically easier to
           | deploy.
           | 
           | The biggest ways I've seen upgradability used is to deal with
           | HDD failures, which are several times less likely than they
           | were ten years prior. To deal with running oom, which is far
           | less of an issue because swapping to SSD isn't as profound of
           | a performance hit. To deal with running out of disk, which
           | you can compensate for with cloud storage. To deal with
           | running out of compute, which can be dealt with using cloud
           | compute. It should also be said that an alternative to
           | upgrading a component is to just sell the entire machine and
           | get a new one, even if this might be less efficient, it's
           | still an option.
           | 
           | One might say "but aha - doesn't an upgradable laptop give
           | you the best of both worlds?" but being honest a framework is
           | not a better value or better performer for most users than a
           | 8gb MBA even if you can slap in 32gb of memory and a 1tb
           | drive into a framework for cheap. The integration of the MBA
           | offers unique benefits when it comes to battery life and
           | performance, and just the fact that TSMC n5 is only available
           | on an integrated laptop is really a huge if artificial
           | competitive edge for integrated laptops.
           | 
           | I don't really see repairability coming back if I'm going to
           | be honest, I see the laptop of the future being harder to
           | repair not easier.
        
         | heavyset_go wrote:
         | On the other hand, every college student ever needs a computer
         | in order to do their school work. College students and new
         | grads with a ton of student debt are not exactly demographics
         | that can afford to drop several thousands of dollars on new
         | laptops each time they break or become too slow.
        
           | zepto wrote:
           | I'm using a 7 year old Mac for software development and it's
           | not 'too slow'. Cheap computers are readily available on the
           | used market.
        
             | heavyset_go wrote:
             | Software development, in general, doesn't require much
             | resources. You're just editing text most of the time. Most
             | of my development is done remotely via a Raspberry Pi.
             | 
             | But that also depends on the development you're doing.
             | There's a night and day difference between compiling Rust
             | projects on my 2015 MBP versus the Ryzen desktop I just
             | built. Same thing goes for development that requires VMs or
             | modern IDEs. Sure, I can run a single VM on an old MBP, but
             | I can't run much else. I can run a modern IDE, but it will
             | be slow and I won't be able to open more than one browser
             | tab at the same time.
             | 
             | Students in certain fields also rely on heavy applications
             | to do CAD, special effects, 3D modeling/rendering, graphic
             | design, video and photo editing, etc. It would be a shame
             | for them to have to buy additional machines because the
             | ones they already own have 4/8GB of soldered memory and
             | they need 2 to 4 times that, or because their processors
             | are too slow or don't have enough cores. The Framework
             | laptop would allow them to upgrade their memory and CPU
             | without having to buy a whole other machine.
        
             | felistoria wrote:
             | Yeah, I daily drive a 6 year old Macbook Pro and it feels
             | just as fast as when I first got it. I'm sure you can pick
             | one up on eBay for a few hundred bucks.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-10-14 23:01 UTC)