[HN Gopher] Designer's Guide to DPI
___________________________________________________________________
Designer's Guide to DPI
Author : omarfarooq
Score : 23 points
Date : 2021-10-12 11:01 UTC (2 days ago)
(HTM) web link (sebastien-gabriel.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (sebastien-gabriel.com)
| radley wrote:
| It's good, but dated (2014).
| kevingadd wrote:
| Lots of errors in this article. This for example is blatantly
| wrong and has been wrong for an eternity:
|
| Current OS do not scale 4K, it means that if you plug a 4K
| display to a Chromebook or a macbook, it will use the highest DPI
| asset, in this case the 200% or @2x ones, and display them at
| normal ratio, making everything look good but tiny. Hypothetical
| example: If you plug a 12" 4K screen to a computer with a 12" hi-
| res screen (2x), everything will appear twice as small.
|
| Windows has literally had some degree of high-DPI support since
| 95, and has been able to adapt to that hypothetical example for
| years. All of Apple's devices handle it too even if you have to
| coax them a bit to understand your display geometry. I really
| don't know what the author is trying to convey there.
| marcellus23 wrote:
| Yep. macOS only supports 1x and 2x (maybe 3x?) natively, but
| will happily let you render at a higher-than-native res and
| scale down so you can approximate intermediate UI scales. And
| Windows seems to natively support vector rendering, with a
| large offering of different UI scales -- albeit 3rd party
| support for this is really hit or miss in my experience.
| rudian wrote:
| This looks pretty comprehensive and saves me from writing an
| article I've had in the back of my mind for a while.
|
| One core concept: Forget about "DPI" unless you're printing or
| engineering monitors. You, designer, can't decide how many pixels
| go in an inch. "72DPI" is a lie.
| kevingadd wrote:
| Screen DPI values for modern devices tend to be pretty accurate
| and are useful if you want to at least approximate how big a
| square should be on someone's screen. For accessibility
| purposes you really want to make sure your text is big enough.
| isatty wrote:
| I thought this was about deep packet inspection. Maybe we should
| disambiguate acronyms in the title if there's space.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-10-14 23:00 UTC)