[HN Gopher] Scientists discover a highly potent antibody against...
___________________________________________________________________
Scientists discover a highly potent antibody against SARS-CoV-2
Author : byproxy
Score : 47 points
Date : 2021-10-12 17:49 UTC (5 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (actu.epfl.ch)
(TXT) w3m dump (actu.epfl.ch)
| The_rationalist wrote:
| Or simply upregulate your lymphocite T by 600%..
| denton-scratch wrote:
| I thought "potent" was a term referring to the strength of a
| particular composition of a particular drug. I thought "powerful"
| was the term that you could use to compare one drug to another,
| irrespective of dose.
|
| Have I got it back-to-front?
| hanselot wrote:
| When the cine shills and bots haven't figured out what the new
| script is yet...
| mechanical_bear wrote:
| 404?
| derecerca wrote:
| @dang: this should be the proper URL:
| https://actu.epfl.ch/news/scientists-discover-a-highly-poten...
| byproxy wrote:
| Oops! Yep, looks like I mis-entered the URL and can't seem to
| edit. =/
| dang wrote:
| No, you entered it fine, but our software has recently
| begun rewriting URLs to the canonical URL if the page has
| one, and this page has
| //actu.epfl.ch/news/scientists-discover-a-highly-potent-
| antibody-again/
|
| ...which isn't valid, but we might as well tweak the code
| to handle such cases. In the meantime I've restored the
| URL. Sorry for the error!
| pvg wrote:
| As the other comment says, it's a valid URL but to really
| rub it in, the canonical link RFC (6596) says it's valid
| and then also uses a relative URL in an example like they
| were just waiting for someone to be wrong about this on
| the internet.
| mircea wrote:
| That's a valid URL, AFAICT.
|
| https://www.paulirish.com/2010/the-protocol-relative-url/
| dang wrote:
| Whoa! TIL
|
| Edit: fixed now. Thanks you guys.
| mircea wrote:
| Glad I could contribute something :)
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-10-12 23:00 UTC)