[HN Gopher] High Performance Django
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       High Performance Django
        
       Author : xojoc
       Score  : 16 points
       Date   : 2021-10-08 19:08 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (lincolnloop.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (lincolnloop.com)
        
       | TekMol wrote:
       | Estimated Response Times         100-300ms Django with warm cache
       | 500ms-2s Django with cold cache
       | 
       | That sounds very slow to me.
       | 
       | How do these numbers compare with other popular frameworks like
       | Laravel, Symfony, Flask, nextjs ... ?
       | 
       | I for one use my own PHP framework (own routing, templating
       | engine, db abstraction) and see response times of about 40ms.
        
         | guggle wrote:
         | I get roughly 46ms from a cheap distant vps with no particular
         | care for performance in my Django app so these numbers are
         | strange.
        
           | ehutch79 wrote:
           | on a laptop in 2014 with a poorly configured mysql instance,
           | these numbers are about right
        
         | sgt wrote:
         | Yes, this is too slow. You can definitely go faster with
         | Django.
        
       | develatio wrote:
       | This seems to be from 2014, the code is completely outdated.
        
         | ashconnor wrote:
         | > We originally released High Performance Django in 2014
         | following a successful Kickstarter campaign. While the packages
         | and code samples may now be outdated, we stand by the general
         | concepts and still use them in production sites today.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-10-08 23:02 UTC)