[HN Gopher] M1 Inside a G4 Sunflower iMac
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       M1 Inside a G4 Sunflower iMac
        
       Author : xqcgrek2
       Score  : 122 points
       Date   : 2021-10-07 19:42 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (twitter.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (twitter.com)
        
       | m0ngr31 wrote:
       | Wouldn't the resolution on that be pretty trash if they haven't
       | replaced the panel?
        
         | kccqzy wrote:
         | It would be 1680x1050. If you don't care about Retina it's
         | enough resolution.
        
       | Damogran6 wrote:
       | A)There's a TON of dead air space in a Mac Mini B)the main board
       | would fit nicely where the DVD drive was in the iMac...this would
       | end up being an 'easy' project, based on modern tech being so
       | much smaller, except C) Interfacing with the monitor would take a
       | little doing...pretty sure it's not HDMI
        
         | BoxOfRain wrote:
         | I think for a practical machine the screen would just be too
         | low-res these days, I'd put a more modern LCD in there too if I
         | could although if it's anything like the PowerBooks of that era
         | it'll be a bit of a faff.
        
           | Eric_WVGG wrote:
           | It has been done!
           | https://www.tonymacx86.com/threads/imac-g4-mod-
           | with-27-curve...
        
             | BoxOfRain wrote:
             | That's really impressive!
        
           | djrogers wrote:
           | 1680x1050 isn't horrible for a 20" screen, and it's taller
           | than a 16:19 display to boot.
           | 
           | If you don't insist on retina for your 20" monitors, it
           | wouldn't be remotely impractical.
        
       | alexjplant wrote:
       | In college (so about a decade ago) I bought one of these and put
       | Debian on it. I used it for a year to play Marathon, run XMMS,
       | browse the web, and write OCaml for school. IIRC there was no
       | driver for the Nvidia display chipset so it had to use software
       | rendering but it still (barely) managed to keep up. Fun times!
       | 
       | Later on I decided to install a more spiritually-appropriate OS
       | and threw OpenBSD on it. It sat on my kitchen bar and didn't see
       | much use until I ended up tossing it during a move last year.
       | 
       | Great machine. My grandparents had a Mac catalog at the turn of
       | the millennium that advertised these and boasted about how the
       | processors outperformed P4s with double the clock speed. I didn't
       | believe them back then but now I know better ;-)
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | StrangeDoctor wrote:
       | I did this about 6 years ago with a NUC, many hours of work went
       | into it. Spent so many hours converting the display cable into a
       | dvi connector so any computer could be fit in. Replacing the
       | screen panel was beyond my skill at the time, the springs in the
       | neck and odd data & power cables make that a real pain.
       | 
       | This version is really slick.
        
         | azalemeth wrote:
         | I remember the whole 'megahurtz myth' being a thing at around
         | that time. Apple swore blind that its 1.4 GHz G4 machines were
         | comparable to an equivalent, far higher clock speed P4. I
         | didn't know about pipelining, OOE, and vector extensions to be
         | able to judge that at the time. Was it true? The P4 was a very
         | limited, long pipelined chip, but I don't know what the G4 was
         | actually like in comparison.
         | 
         | One thing that I do remember about those machines is that they
         | were massively memory bandwidth limited though, and iirc took
         | PC100 ram at a time when everyone else had PC166 at least...
        
           | Synaesthesia wrote:
           | Yes a G4 was quite a bit faster than a P4 clock for clock,
           | especially on floating point and vector operations and used
           | quite little power too.
           | 
           | You can go watch the annual videos where they show photoshop
           | benchmarks running faster on the G3, G4 and G5s. But Intel
           | did take the lead on occasion and kept up mostly. XP also
           | felt faster in UI than early Mac OS X versions, although it
           | did more and improved later on.
        
       | freediver wrote:
       | Bought one of these just few weeks ago. iMac G4 is peak Apple
       | design, doesn't get much better than this.
        
       | cehrlich wrote:
       | That's wonderful. The "Lamp" iMac is my favourite design they've
       | ever done. I wish I had the need for a computer that this project
       | could satisfy.
        
         | machinevision wrote:
         | Mine too. I had one as a teenager and it was just wonderful to
         | use.
        
       | sedan_baklazhan wrote:
       | As a retro-computer kind of person, I find this disgusting :-)
        
         | cestith wrote:
         | It would hurt to see a working unit dismantled for this, but if
         | it was already broken then it'd be fine by me.
        
       | iSnow wrote:
       | That's really good looking, if only we could replace the display
       | with a Retina density one...
        
         | sgt wrote:
         | My thought too. Once you get used to retina, you can't go back.
        
       | jandrese wrote:
       | Oh man, the poll below that post makes me weep. Between a Youtube
       | video and a Blog post the Youtube video is winning by a country
       | mile even though a text post would almost certainly be superior
       | for people who want to know the details of how this was done.
       | 
       | I happen to have a spare M1 Mac mini and a G4 at home so this
       | project has my interest. The biggest question for me is how to
       | interface the monitor.
        
         | jccalhoun wrote:
         | Yes. It must be a generational divide or something. I see so
         | many 20 minute videos that could be a 5 minute read and they
         | have tons of views. I don't get it.
        
       | ngcc_hk wrote:
       | How about g5 ... daughter card ... or just replace the whole
       | motherboard ...
        
       | BoxOfRain wrote:
       | This is absolutely wonderful, excellent concept and execution.
       | I've been tempted to use a Power Mac G5 case for a modern build
       | running helloSystem (a Tiger-ish skinned FreeBSD distribution)
       | but this is far cooler!
       | 
       | In my opinion the '00s produced some absolutely wonderful visual
       | designs across Apple's product range. The fifth generation iPod,
       | first generation iPhone, and pretty much all the iMacs and
       | MacBooks from 2002-2008 are just really nice _objects_ to look at
       | and touch. This is true for the software as well, Tiger remains
       | to this day my favourite interface for any OS ever and I think it
       | 's a real shame you can't skin modern macs to look like 2005-era
       | macs!
        
         | arcticbull wrote:
         | I actually did an mATX retrofit on an old PowerMac G5 tower I
         | picked up on Craigslist for $20. Took some Dremel work, an
         | adapter motherboard tray, a front panel conversion kit, some
         | Noctua NF-A9 fans, uh, an SFX-L power supply and a few sliced
         | fingers - but I'm very happy with how it turned out!
         | 
         | The airflow really can't be beat, it's a gorgeous case, and
         | it's remarkably quiet.
         | 
         | There's a subreddit for this, r/G5mods
        
         | kitsunesoba wrote:
         | My favorite iterations of early Aqua are those seen in 10.2
         | through 10.4, too. 10.4 would be on top, but I prefer the matte
         | menubar used in 10.2 and 10.3.
         | 
         | 10.5 and 10.6's Aqua aren't bad and certainly better than the
         | newer flat looks, but I was never a big fan of the darker metal
         | look taken on by window chrome in those versions. Aqua in
         | 10.2-10.4 was much more bright and cheery, and as strange as it
         | may sound that reflected in my mood when using my Macs.
         | 
         | Out of the later iterations of Aqua I think the best is that of
         | 10.9. It pulls back on the darkening brought by 10.5/10.6 while
         | refining the rough edges that came with 10.7 and 10.8, and as a
         | whole reminds me a lot of 10.2-10.4 Aqua minus the brushed
         | metal.
        
         | johnebgd wrote:
         | Completely agree.
         | 
         | Tiger was the most pleasing OS I've used from a visual
         | perspective. It was also peak skeuomorphic design. I miss Scott
         | Forstall's influence in every Apple product since he's been
         | gone.
        
         | jjtheblunt wrote:
         | agree entirely : also just want to mention the NeXTstation
         | pizza boxes were just awesome magnesium cases, and, having had
         | one 28 years ago, i sure wish i'd kept mine rather than sell it
         | online....it would be a great case for anything modern.
        
           | smoldesu wrote:
           | Only thing I disliked was their keyboard layout, I can't
           | think of a more awkward place for the power button than
           | sandwiched between your brightness and volume controls.
        
           | arcticbull wrote:
           | The magnesium mass would be really fun to figure out how to
           | use as a passive sink a-la-Noctua NH-P1.
        
       | tablespoon wrote:
       | > In celebration of Steve Job's life and his inspiration to many,
       | I wanted to show a passion project I've been working on that I
       | think Steve would be proud of. Something that wasn't possible 20
       | years ago but is now.
       | 
       | Steve Jobs didn't strike me as the kind of person who'd be
       | _proud_ of a fan doing something like this.
        
         | hinkley wrote:
         | There was an anniversary edition over ten years ago, but the
         | last time a decade passed by they didn't seem to do anything
         | special. Might have something to do with how much money they
         | make off of non-Mac sales, or maybe Steve was super enthused
         | and everyone else was just humoring him. I suspect the headache
         | of managing a low-volume specialty product is substantial.
        
           | drewzero1 wrote:
           | I think you're thinking of the Twentieth Anniversary
           | Macintosh, released in spring 1997 a few months before Steve
           | Jobs came back as CEO. He reportedly hated the computer[1]
           | and canceled it soon after he came back[2].
           | 
           | [1] https://www.engadget.com/2009-03-20-remembering-the-
           | tam.html
           | 
           | [2] https://www.fastcompany.com/3066213/the-one-jony-ive-
           | compute...
        
           | djxfade wrote:
           | *over twenty years ago
        
         | 908B64B197 wrote:
         | There's an other Steve at Apple who loves that kind of
         | tinkering however.
        
           | st_goliath wrote:
           | > There's an other Steve at Apple ...
           | 
           | *There Woz
           | 
           | Assuming you mean Wozniak, who left in 1985[1]. Then again,
           | the company is big enough, I cannot exclude the existence of
           | other Steves[2], some of whom might like this kind of
           | tinkering.
           | 
           | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Wozniak#Final_departu
           | re_...
           | 
           | [2] https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/OneSteveLimit
        
             | sgt wrote:
             | Wozniak is actually still an Apple employee.
        
               | BitwiseFool wrote:
               | I'm pretty sure Woz mentioned in an interview that he
               | still "reports to Steve" on the Org Chart.
               | 
               | Edit: "Based on the last Apple organizational chart that
               | he was aware of, Wozniak said that he still reported to
               | Jobs."
               | 
               | https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/18/steve-wozniak-still-on-
               | apple...
        
         | mhh__ wrote:
         | Apple's entire being seems to be against allowing the customer
         | any control at all. Maybe it was different years ago but every
         | Apple product I've touched has been a very pretty prison (which
         | isn't necessarily a bad thing)
        
           | dijit wrote:
           | I seem to recall, though I can't find it: Steve Jobs (while
           | working at NeXt) talking about Apple and the different people
           | vying for control of the company.
           | 
           | He said (and I'm paraphrasing of course) that there are
           | people who really want to push computing forward, and there
           | are people who want to be like Sony and make an integrated
           | commodity. He said that there's a marriage between the two
           | that could be had "but sadly the Sony guys are winning".
           | 
           | I'm not an apologist for Jobs, I don't really care for the
           | man enough to love _or_ hate him the way most seem to, but I
           | believe he was as much a product of the company values as
           | anyone else was.
           | 
           | I'm considered to be very hard nosed and pushing the
           | direction of my company forward and often I clash with
           | people, and granted, I'm not at the top of the company, but
           | the people around me still shape my mentality a lot.
        
           | nojito wrote:
           | >Apple's entire being seems to be against allowing the
           | customer any control at all.
           | 
           | If customers were right we would have never had touchscreen
           | phones.
        
             | mhh__ wrote:
             | OK but when can I run gcc on my ipad
        
             | smoldesu wrote:
             | If Steve Jobs was right we'd still be holding it wrong.
        
             | rowanG077 wrote:
             | How great would that have been. Touchscreens have been one
             | of the greatest setbacks in computing history. This comment
             | was typed on a touchscreen.
        
         | rahoulb wrote:
         | Then again, he made his start dismantling phone kit and making
         | free long distance calls just to find out how it all worked
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | tablespoon wrote:
           | > Then again, he made his start dismantling phone kit and
           | making free long distance calls just to find out how it all
           | worked
           | 
           | Are you talking about this?
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_box:
           | 
           | > Blue box designed and built by Steve Wozniak and sold by
           | Steve Jobs before they founded Apple. Displayed at the
           | Powerhouse Museum, from the collection of the Computer
           | History Museum[1]
           | 
           | Also: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/02/
           | the-d...
           | 
           | If so, you might have your Apple Computer Steves mixed up.
        
             | reaperducer wrote:
             | Blue boxes were around long before Woz made his. Also red
             | boxes, pink boxes, black boxes, yellow boxes, and a few
             | others. Each had its purpose.
             | 
             | /Former phreaker and cypherpunk
        
       | mortenjorck wrote:
       | Someone could make a mint with a high-quality, Sunflower-style
       | base for the VESA-mount M1 iMac. Make it a docking station with
       | some additional I/O, maybe a color-matched accent of some kind,
       | and you'd have a winner.
        
       | Apocryphon wrote:
       | Come to think of it, it _would_ be nice to bring back the iMac G4
       | form factor, or something similarly playful.
        
         | noneeeed wrote:
         | I really miss the playfulness and willingness to experiment in
         | some of the old designs. Even the G4 cube was a really
         | interesting idea, even if it had issues.
         | 
         | As much as the asthetic doesn't appeal to me, I love that a lot
         | of gamers mod their PCs with lights and other effects and
         | really pimp them up. I like that people are having fun with the
         | objects that fill their lives. Sometime all the sleek modernism
         | just gets a bit soulless.
        
           | Apocryphon wrote:
           | Apple should leapfrog them by creating an Apple Silicon
           | gaming computer with a gradient of flickering lights that
           | isn't just rainbow colors.
        
           | mhh__ wrote:
           | The cube is weird to me. I wasn't around when it came out,
           | but I have seen one or two online and in person. I find it
           | intensely ugly but also really beautiful at the same time.
           | It's almost like an ugly baby. It's ugly, but it's alive and
           | it's yours.
        
         | filereaper wrote:
         | Totally agree about the playfulness.
         | 
         | I still remember this ad for the G4 which feels very similar to
         | Luxo Jr. from Pixar. Really fun.
         | 
         | https://youtu.be/b5P3QDm61go
        
       | yjftsjthsd-h wrote:
       | That is remarkably polished - can't even tell from the outside
       | that it's been refitted:)
        
       | Tijdreiziger wrote:
       | Somewhat related: Hackintosh inside a G4
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34en3ET7cqY
       | 
       | (Make sure to turn on subtitles when watching.)
        
       | gedy wrote:
       | Really nice! I'd be tempted to instead replace the whole screen
       | with the new iMac VESA (https://www.apple.com/shop/buy-mac/imac-
       | vesa) and just use the base as a stand
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-10-08 23:01 UTC)