[HN Gopher] The Structure of a Stand-Up Comedy (2018)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Structure of a Stand-Up Comedy (2018)
        
       Author : Brajeshwar
       Score  : 129 points
       Date   : 2021-10-07 11:17 UTC (11 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (pudding.cool)
 (TXT) w3m dump (pudding.cool)
        
       | lecarore wrote:
       | I didn't completely hate the abuse of JavaScript in this. But
       | still it's not as enjoyable as a simple responsive page of static
       | HTML and images you could scroll.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | stnmtn wrote:
       | I loved the presentation of this
        
         | shard wrote:
         | It did not work for me on mobile. Multiple clicks with no
         | response, threw me back to the first page once, I gave up a few
         | pages into it.
        
         | moate wrote:
         | I hated it and stopped after about 3 prompts/clicks
        
         | pboutros wrote:
         | Yeah, that was fantastic
        
       | tptacek wrote:
       | This is impressive. But, those poor frogs.
       | 
       | Snark aside, it also doesn't say that much; Ali Wong's biggest
       | laugh comes in large part from the fact that all her bits are
       | arranged to build up to it. Ok!
       | 
       | If you're interested in this stuff, a good listen is Mike
       | Birbiglia's "Working It Out" podcast, which is a little bit like
       | Marc Maron's "WTF", but with an emphasis on workshopping bits in
       | progress. Part of what makes it interested in this context is
       | that Birbiglia is working out his next special (something that
       | apparently takes years, which I guess shouldn't surprise me), and
       | so talks a lot about the themes he's building jokes around and
       | what he's trying to say overall.
        
       | saltmeister wrote:
       | she's not funny
        
       | hellbannedguy wrote:
       | I have not seen a funny comic in such a long time.
       | 
       | Maybe it my age, but I thought I had decent taste in comedy.
       | 
       | I never thought Leno was funny. Seinfield was tedious.
       | 
       | It just seems like the last two decades have been pitiful?
       | 
       | I heard a convict being interviewed a few years ago. The
       | interviewer asked him what he does all day. He said, "I try to
       | figure out why Saturday Night Live is not funny, and ways to make
       | it funny again." The lady looked at him like he was crazy, but I
       | kinda understood what he was getting at.
       | 
       | I think about some of my favorite comedians over the years, and
       | they all had two things in common: were poor, or low middle
       | class, griping up. And did a fair amount of drugs.
       | 
       | Drugs that would get you fired these days.
       | 
       | I'm not equating drugs with good comedy. I just don't know the
       | reason. It couldn't be that all the material has alwready been
       | said?
        
         | dsr_ wrote:
         | Humor is notoriously subjective and also dependent on mood.
         | 
         | The Goes Wrong Show is reliably funny for me; the premise is
         | that a small-town serious theater troop has lucked into a time
         | slot on a BBC channel, and they do their earnest utmost to do
         | theatre well. But -- it all goes wrong. There's a stage version
         | and two (UK) seasons of the show.
         | 
         | Whose Line Is It Anyway? typically manages a few howlingly good
         | bits in any given show.
         | 
         | Key and Peele did five seasons and I get something hilarious
         | out of basically every show, but I also think they fall flat
         | several times per show.
         | 
         | Saturday Night Live has had good years and bad; they've always
         | had a problem with knowing when to stop a sketch, but they're
         | still worth watching, if not worth staying up for. There's a
         | lot of survivorship bias with SNL: you can see the best bits of
         | 45 years, and compared with that, how's this week's show going
         | to rate?
        
         | nkingsy wrote:
         | Ronny Chieng
         | 
         | Bill Burr
         | 
         | Nate Bargatze
         | 
         | Fortune Feimster
         | 
         | Gary Gulman
         | 
         | Just a few I was able to dig up who made me laugh a lot.
         | 
         | I guess it depends what you like, but the art form has been
         | really sharpened over the last 10-20 years, to the point where,
         | similar to film, the majority of the content out there conforms
         | to a style that everyone seems to agree is good.
         | 
         | In comedy, that style is confessional, tagged storytelling with
         | interwoven callbacks. If you don't like that, yeah, you
         | probably don't like modern comedy.
        
         | hguant wrote:
         | Most cities have comedy clubs; don't go to those. Go to the
         | bars that do weekly standup, those are the places the comedy
         | show folks go to try out new material, or where newer folks try
         | to break into the scene. You get exposed to a lot of things
         | that would never be allowed on any sort of broadcast medium,
         | and are often uproariously funny.
        
       | almostjamboree wrote:
       | Related (but with not nearly as creative a presentation), here's
       | an analysis of James Acaster's Repertoire series on Netflix (with
       | a brief reference to Ali Wong's special): [0]
       | 
       | [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GP3Gr-ZV0Tw
        
       | glxxyz wrote:
       | Saying that some/all other standups "just [tell] 100 individual
       | jokes" is a straw man. She demonstrates textbook Stand-Up Comedy:
       | 
       | From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stand-up_comedy : "Bits
       | (linked jokes) and chunks (linked bits) are an arrangement of
       | interlinked thematic units from within the set or routine. [...]
       | Stand-ups structure jokes, bits, and chunks to end on climactic
       | laughter. [...] A callback is a reference to a previous thing
       | that was experienced by the audience during that set, designed to
       | create an inside joke."
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | gkoberger wrote:
       | If you like this, definitely go down a https://pudding.cool
       | rabbit hole. There's some really amazing visualizations they've
       | built out.
        
       | iptrans wrote:
       | Terrible presentation format. Exceedingly annoying on mobile.
        
         | shard wrote:
         | Likely it was not optimized for your browser. I had a lot of
         | trouble navigating this site, multiple presses with no
         | response, and I gave up a few pages through it.
        
         | a1371 wrote:
         | I respectfully disagree. I found it nice, engaging, and easy to
         | follow.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | logshipper wrote:
       | [Meta] Looks like the article is from 2018, perhaps it would help
       | to reflect that in the title?
       | 
       | Another really cool Pudding project was the "How bad is your
       | Spotify?" [0]
       | 
       | [0] https://pudding.cool/2020/12/judge-my-spotify/
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | wonder_er wrote:
       | I believe the humor and novelty and interestingness of this
       | standup routine is related to the _density_ of information
       | conveyance.
       | 
       | I read this paper a while back, it was so good I wanted to make
       | it more sharable:
       | 
       | https://josh.works/driven-by-compression-progress-novelty-hu...
       | 
       | The title is:
       | 
       | Driven by Compression Progress: A Simple Principle Explains
       | Essential Aspects of Subjective Beauty, Novelty, Surprise,
       | Interestingness, Attention, Curiosity, Creativity, Art, Science,
       | Music, Jokes
       | 
       | And... it's really good. It argues that a common thread among
       | many different domains (as listed in the title) is how much
       | information can be compressed into the information stream, like
       | the bit-rate. Higher bitrate, more interesting information.
        
         | Yoric wrote:
         | As a practitioner of improv comedy (including a little
         | clowncraft), I'd argue that you can produce laughs from
         | essentially doing nothing, repeatedly.
         | 
         | So, I'm not really convinced. Maybe that principle can explain
         | some cases of beauty, novelty, .... jokes. Definitely not all.
        
         | dvt wrote:
         | > It argues that a common thread among many different domains
         | (as listed in the title) is how much information can be
         | compressed into the information stream, like the bit-rate.
         | Higher bitrate, more interesting information.
         | 
         | Piet Mondrian, Philip Glass, Andy Kaufman would provide trivial
         | counter-arguments to the idea that high-density = "better"
         | (more interesting, funnier, etc.).
        
           | dgb23 wrote:
           | I only know of Andy Kaufman from your examples.
           | 
           | Wasn't some of his work very much reliant on what he didn't
           | say directly? An argument one could make would be that the
           | information density is still high in terms of what is
           | perceived or experienced. That would still be a kind of
           | compression but it involves the context and audience to a
           | very high degree. I think he sometimes made his performances
           | so intense, that it would be unbearable not to engage with
           | them.
        
           | alanbernstein wrote:
           | You might argue that work like Mondrian's _implies_
           | additional information, in the form of implied commentary on
           | centuries of art history (arguably necessary for his work to
           | be considered interesting or  "good"). You might then argue
           | that this makes up for the lower explicit information
           | density.
        
       | peakaboo wrote:
       | Guess I'm old because there is nothing funny about what she does.
       | Just awkward and embarrassing.
        
         | nkingsy wrote:
         | You saw her special? Everything else I've seen of hers was
         | cringey, but baby cobra was solid work. If you don't like it
         | you likely don't like most "good" stand up comedy these days.
         | Awkward and embarrassing is a pretty good description of the
         | art form.
        
       | suyash wrote:
       | Love the interactive website, how does one make website like
       | this? any pointers on tech used?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-10-07 23:01 UTC)