[HN Gopher] The Martians of Budapest
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The Martians of Budapest
        
       Author : privatdozent
       Score  : 296 points
       Date   : 2021-10-02 06:38 UTC (16 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.privatdozent.co)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.privatdozent.co)
        
       | areoform wrote:
       | I feel like trying to extract a trend here might be overstating
       | the case a bit. It is important to remember that many European
       | intellectuals, such as Hans Bethe, Enrico Fermi, James Franck,
       | Emilio Segre, Maria Goeppert-Mayer etc, fled to the US due to the
       | rise of fascism in Europe.
       | 
       | On the European side, it was one of the greatest acts of self-
       | sabotage seen at a civilizational scale. At the American end, it
       | was a boon. There were more Noble prize winners hanging around
       | coffee machines than you could shake a stick at.
       | 
       | The analysis fails to account for this; for e.g. they weren't
       | intelligent just because they were of jewish heritage. They fled
       | because they were intelligent _and_ jewish. And those who didn 't
       | flee were killed. Is it any wonder that a list of fleeing
       | European geniuses that the US govt. allowed entry into the States
       | is dominated by jewish geniuses?
       | 
       | Out of this list, the only anomaly that truly stands out, and is
       | perhaps the reason why the term "The Martians" was coined is John
       | von Neumann. Quoting from a prior comment,
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25455028
       | 
       | It is difficult to overstate just how smart and well rounded von
       | Neumann was. Most contemporary accounts are from the outside
       | looking in, but his mind was truly extraordinary. He wasn't just
       | a genius in one capacity, but he was a genius in every capacity.
       | It is tempting to think of him as a savant, but he was far from
       | it. He was social, brilliant, artistic, ethically considerate,
       | and gifted in every sense of the word. His mind is the kind of
       | mind that comes along only once in a millennia. And it becomes
       | more and more obvious the closer you get to him.
       | 
       | One of the best memoirs I've read is that of Marina Whitman nee
       | von Neumann, his daughter. It is her memoir, with her memories
       | and her extraordinary life and career. But her genesis was this
       | extraordinary being. von Neumann doted on her. He loved her and
       | tried to fulfil the whole of her extraordinary being and train
       | her gifted mind. The result was a woman who became an
       | extraordinarily perceptive economist who helped guide _some_ of
       | the economic policy of the United States. In a way, this wasn 't
       | unexpected, as she was, of course, von Neumann's bridge to the
       | future.
       | 
       | I would like to avoid reducing her story to him, but she offers a
       | unique, familial glimpse into his mind. The early parts of her
       | book deal with her father, and talk about his extraordinary mind.
       | It's genuinely hard to capture the true dimensions of his mental
       | prowess. And it's harder to capture the fact that he knew it and
       | he tried to do his best to live up to it. That's what's so
       | special about von Neumann. He wasn't just the greatest mind of
       | the past millennia in sheer intellectual throughput and ability;
       | he was a mind willing to make sacrifices to leave the Earth
       | better than he found it. As his daughter puts it,
       | 
       | > _Were it not for his oft-repeated conviction that everyone--man
       | or woman--had a moral obligation to make full use of her or his
       | intellectual capacities, I might not have pushed myself to such a
       | level of academic achievement or set my sights on a lifelong
       | professional commitment at a time when society made it difficult
       | for a woman to combine a career with family obligations._
       | 
       | and,
       | 
       | > _But my father 's intellectual appetite was by no means
       | narrowly confined to mathematics, and his passion for learning
       | lasted all his life. He was multilingual at an early age; and
       | until his final days, he could quote from memory Goethe in
       | German, Voltaire in French, and Thucydides in Greek. His
       | knowledge of Byzantine history, acquired entirely through
       | recreational reading, equaled that of many academic specialists.
       | My mother used to say, only half jokingly, that one of the
       | reasons she divorced him was his penchant for spending hours
       | reading one of the tomes of an enormous German encyclopedia in
       | the bathroom. Because his banker father felt that he needed to
       | bolster his study of mathematics with more practical training,
       | Johnny completed a degree in chemical engineering at the
       | Eidgennossische Technische Hochschule (ETH) in Zurich, at the
       | same time that he received a PhD in mathematics from the
       | University of Budapest, both at age twenty-two._
       | 
       | He became cynical over time. She describes his deep pessimism of
       | humanity; something compounded by The Bomb. But then again who
       | hasn't become a pessimist with time? He still tried to fix humans
       | and give them things that would help move them forward. And yes,
       | I'm talking about him separately from the rest of humanity,
       | because his mind was profoundly different from the rest of
       | humanity. As the article quotes Hans Bethe's famous saying, "I
       | have sometimes wondered whether a brain like von Neumann's does
       | not indicate a species superior to that of man." He was The
       | Martian.
       | 
       | I don't wish to spoil the book for those who'd like to read it,
       | but the prologue is heart wrenching. He died far too young. I
       | can't imagine what he might have transformed had he lived into
       | his nineties and hundreds.
       | 
       | > _The more important consideration, though, was national
       | security. Given the top secret nature of my father 's
       | involvements, absolute privacy was essential when, in the early
       | stages of his hospitalization, various top-ranking members of the
       | military-industrial establishment sat at his bedside to pick his
       | brain before it was too late. Vince Ford, an Air Force colonel
       | who had been closely involved in the supersecret development of
       | an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), along with General
       | Bernard Schriever and my father, was assigned as his full-time
       | aide. Eight airmen, all with top secret clearance, rotated around
       | the clock. Their job was both to attend to my father's everyday
       | needs and, in the later stages of his illness, to assure that,
       | affected by medication or the advancing cancer, he did not
       | inadvertently blurt out military secrets._
       | 
       | And this, the saddest part,
       | 
       | > _After only a few minutes, my father made what seemed to be a
       | very peculiar and frightening request from a man who was widely
       | regarded as one of the greatest--if not the greatest--
       | mathematician of the twentieth century. He wanted me to give him
       | two numbers, like seven and six or ten and three, and ask him to
       | tell me their sum. For as long as I could remember, I had always
       | known that my father 's major source of self-regard, what he felt
       | to be the very essence of his being, was his incredible mental
       | capacity. In this late stage of his illness, he must have been
       | aware that this capacity was deteriorating rapidly, and the panic
       | that caused was worse than any physical pain. In demanding that I
       | test him on these elementary sums, he was seeking reassurance
       | that at least a small fragment of his intellectual powers
       | remained._
       | 
       | > _I could only choke out a couple of these pairs of numbers and
       | then, without even registering his answers, fled the room in
       | tears. Months earlier we had talked, with a candor rare for the
       | time, about the fact that, at a shockingly young age and in the
       | midst of an extraordinarily productive life, he was going to die.
       | But that was still a father-daughter discussion, with him in the
       | dominant role. This sudden, humiliating role reversal compounded
       | both his pain and mine. After that, my father spoke very little
       | or not at all, although the doctors couldn 't offer any physical
       | reason for his retreat into silence. My own explanation was that
       | the sheer horror of experiencing the deterioration of his mental
       | powers at the age of fifty-three was too much for him to bear.
       | Added to this pain, I feared, was my apparent betrayal of his
       | dreams for his only child, his link to the future which was being
       | denied to him._
       | 
       | Whitman, Marina. The Martian's Daughter (p. 3). University of
       | Michigan Press. Kindle Edition.
       | 
       | https://www.amazon.com/Martians-Daughter-Memoir-Marina-Whitm...
       | 
       | On a more shameless note, I'm compiling this as a part of my
       | Project Karl. It's one of those books that I think everyone
       | should know about and read, but few do.
       | https://www.projectkarl.com
        
         | cinntaile wrote:
         | > His mind is the kind of mind that comes along only once in a
         | millennia.
         | 
         | I'm sure the guy was smart, but lets not overdo it.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | kragen wrote:
           | Maybe Newton was on the same level? Or Gauss? Or Leonardo?
           | 
           | Or maybe not.
           | 
           | There have probably been dozens of people in the past
           | millennium who had the _potential_ to develop that kind of
           | mind, but most of them probably lived and died without the
           | opportunity to develop their gifts, whether because of
           | enslavement, rural poverty, or lack of access to education.
        
           | mandmandam wrote:
           | I really don't know if that's overdoing it. Da Vinci might
           | compare, but I suspect that even he would be in awe at some
           | of Neumann's abilities.
        
           | throwaway34241 wrote:
           | His wikipedia page goes into more detail on that front.
           | Considered the top mathematician of his time (with also major
           | contributions to physics and computer science), other world-
           | class mathematicians and physicists being in awe of his
           | abilities, sometimes solving (never before answered) math
           | problems _easily_ , being able to recite word-for-word the
           | books and articles he read, years after reading them,
           | simultaneously translating them as necessary, etc.
           | 
           | Ordinarily that would be hyperbole...
        
           | carapace wrote:
           | I don't think you can overdo it when it comes to Jansci
           | 
           | "There was a seminar for advanced students in Zurich that I
           | was teaching and von Neumann was in the class. I came to a
           | certain theorem, and I said it is not proved and it may be
           | difficult. von Neumann didn't say anything but after five
           | minutes he raised his hand. When I called on him he went to
           | the blackboard and proceeded to write down the proof. After
           | that I was afraid of von Neumann" -- _George Polya_
           | 
           | "von Neumann would carry on a conversation with my 3-year-old
           | son, and the two of them would talk as equals, and I
           | sometimes wondered if he used the same principle when he
           | talked to the rest of us." -- _Edward Teller_
           | 
           | ...One afternoon around 4:50 p.m. John von Neumann came by
           | and saw what Fermi had on the blackboard and asked what he
           | was doing. So Enrico told him and John von Neumann said
           | "That's very interesting." He came back about 15 minutes
           | later and gave him the answer. Fermi leaned against his
           | doorpost and told me, "You know that man makes me feel I know
           | no mathematics at all." -- _Enrico Fermi_
           | 
           | "You know, Herb, Johnny can do calculations in his head ten
           | times as fast as I can. And I can do them ten times as fast
           | as you can, so you can see how impressive Johnny is" --
           | _Enrico Fermi_ again
           | 
           | "One had the impression of a perfect instrument whose gears
           | were machined to mesh accurately to a thousandth of an inch."
           | -- _Eugene Wigner_
           | 
           | It goes on and on...
           | 
           | https://superintelligence.fandom.com/wiki/John_von_Neumann_(.
           | ..
        
             | cinntaile wrote:
             | How does this tell us something about the last 1000 years?
             | You want to call him the smartest man of the 20th century
             | sure go ahead, but you hardly have any idea about the other
             | 9 centuries.
        
               | carapace wrote:
               | Can you point to anyone like him in the recorded history
               | of the last thousand years? There may well be some whose
               | lives were unrecorded or of whom the records were lost.
        
               | marton78 wrote:
               | Gauss comes to mind.
        
               | rsj_hn wrote:
               | Gauss far exceeded von neuman in mathematical impact and
               | pushing math forward. So did many other mathematicians
               | that were contemporaries of von neuman. The same for
               | physics. Von Neuman would not even be in the list of top
               | 10 mathematicians in the 20th Century, let alone of all
               | time. The twentieth century had giants like Kolmogorov,
               | Hilbert, Grothendieck, none of whom were smarter than von
               | neumann, but they made far greater discoveries.
               | 
               | But this just shows that when you are talking about
               | _impact_ as opposed to _intelligence_ , a lot of things
               | other than IQ come into play. I am certain von neumann
               | was much smarter than Gauss, but Gauss had an instinct
               | for discovery that was remarkable. Newton is another
               | example -- someone not nearly as brilliant as Von Neuman
               | (my impression) but had an incredibly deep insight and
               | much bigger impact. They say that Feynman's IQ was ~120,
               | which would certainly be lower than von neuman, but he
               | made a much bigger impact as well.
        
               | 363849473754 wrote:
               | I wouldn't go far as to say Von Neumann was smarter than
               | Grothendieck. I think they're both different types of
               | geniuses, where their genius manifest in different ways.
               | Grothendieck was a genius in working with extremely deep
               | abstractions, I'd say he eclipses Von Neumann in this
               | way, whereas Von Neumann had a different type of genius
               | in which he eclipsed others at. In Grothendieck's case he
               | was a profound genius, who made profound impacts in
               | mathematics.
               | 
               | Another mathematician that reminds me of Von Neumann is
               | Euler. He also memorized long passages and could do
               | complicated calculations in his head quickly.
               | 
               | A quote on Euler from wikipedia:
               | 
               | "He was able to, for example, repeat the Aeneid of Virgil
               | from beginning to end without hesitation, and for every
               | page in the edition he could indicate which line was the
               | first and which was the last even decades after having
               | read it"
        
               | prvc wrote:
               | >I wouldn't go far as to say Von Neumann was smarter than
               | Grothendieck
               | 
               | He famously recounted his inability to derive Heron's
               | formula for the area of a triangle when he was a teenager
               | (despite realizing that such a formula ought to exist via
               | conceptual reasoning), and seems to have subsequently
               | kept an unbalanced set of talents in the same vein.
        
         | G3nD wrote:
         | "ethically considerate" Didn't he want to nuke the USSR as soon
         | as possible?
        
           | TeMPOraL wrote:
           | IIRC the quote I've seen on HN, it wasn't "nuke USSR as soon
           | as possible", but more like "given that you already want to
           | nuke Moscow tomorrow, why not do it today?".
        
           | SaintGhurka wrote:
           | It's probably not fair to judge that without recalling that
           | he was a teenager during the Red Terror in Hungary.
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Terror_(Hungary)
        
             | sudosysgen wrote:
             | Right. So it's ethically considerate to kill 50 million
             | people in pure vengeance for 600?
        
               | marton78 wrote:
               | That was not his reason, as I stated in another comment.
               | You're free to educate yourself about his thoughts on the
               | matter, which would be much more productive than a snarky
               | comment.
        
               | sudosysgen wrote:
               | I have already. I don't believe what he said publicly. I
               | see no reason why I would have to. He was noted to be
               | much more cruel and unconcerned with the destructive
               | power of the nuclear bomb than his peers and recommended
               | the nuking of civilian targets. He spoke of the necessity
               | to destroy the USSR on ideological grounds. The idea that
               | a preemptive strike would be limited against a nuclearly
               | armed country is preposterous and ridiculous, and he had
               | already suggested nuking for population destruction
               | instead of military use.
        
           | marton78 wrote:
           | Yes, but due to ethical considerations. One doesn't have to
           | agree with the outcome of his reasoning, but it's well
           | established that his reasons were ethical, not cynical or
           | egoistic.
        
             | sudosysgen wrote:
             | The ethical considerations of killing 50+ million?
        
               | marton78 wrote:
               | He was convinced that without an American preemptive
               | strike, even more would die. He was wrong of course, as
               | we now know, but it wasn't clear at that time.
               | 
               | There's an episode of Hardcore History on this topic, I
               | think the title was "Destroyer of Worlds".
        
               | sudosysgen wrote:
               | It was pretty clear at the time that the Soviets had no
               | intention or capability to destroy the US in such a way
               | that the US would not able to respond with a nuclear
               | strike.
               | 
               | He was noted by his colleagues to be exceptionally
               | unperturbed by his work. He recommended that the US
               | strike Kyoto despite having no military significance to
               | speak of.
               | 
               | He himself admitted that he was ideologically violently
               | opposed to the existence of the USSR. It's clear that his
               | motives were not about minimizing death and destruction.
        
           | beerandt wrote:
           | One of the early arguments for a first strike was the ability
           | to target military installations only.
           | 
           | Due to the limitations in early US targeting ability, a US
           | counter strike likely meant having to go with a counter-value
           | response instead of a counter-force one. Meaning bigger
           | targets like cities over smaller military-only targets.
           | 
           | So if you worked under the presumption that war with the
           | Soviets was inevitable, a first strike _avoided_ mass
           | casualties in the magnitude of 10s of millions in favor of
           | decapitating military targets.
           | 
           | So yes, there is a logical argument that it would be the more
           | ethical choice.
           | 
           | It wasn't until the 80's with advances in both
           | surveying/geodesy (predicting precise ballistic trajectories
           | taking into account local variances in gravity) and
           | targeting/ delivery accuracy (B-1, B-2, peacekeeper ICBMs,
           | and better SLBMs) that the game-theory changed.
        
             | sudosysgen wrote:
             | That's just not realistic. The Soviet army relied on its
             | productive capabilities to wage war. Without destroying
             | cities, nuclear war with the USSR would simply be absurd.
             | 
             | Beyond that, American intelligence in the USSR was weak,
             | and they wouldn't have been able to pin down high value
             | military targets. They'd also have serious issues striking
             | deep within the USSR.
             | 
             | Von Neumann also recommended that Kyoto, instead of
             | Hiroshima or Nagasaki, be nuked, despite it having very
             | little military significance and leading to many more
             | deaths.
             | 
             | By the time he started proposing a strike of the USSR, the
             | USSR had already started deploying early warning radar, jet
             | interceptors and even guided missile systems designed
             | specifically to stop B-29s carryig nuclear bombs. In
             | testing they proved to be even more effective than needed
             | to completely protect the installations they were defending
             | against slow and heavy bombers. A strike in 1951 would have
             | been a total disaster and would have not at all stopped
             | their industry. The US didn't even know where they were
             | making bombs.
             | 
             | His political views were that coexistence with the USSR was
             | impossible. As it turns out, the USSR had no plans of
             | invading the US, he was simply wrong.
             | 
             | Let's not try to whitewash history. Neumann knew that
             | Soviet intelligence and counter intelligence was
             | formidable. He knew that the strength of the Soviet
             | military was in its cities . He had already recommended
             | nuclear strikes on civilian population centers with low
             | military value. He was noted by his fellow physicists to be
             | unperturbed by his work. It's quite unlikely that he had
             | any illusions about what as needed to actually stop the
             | Soviet war machine.
             | 
             | He thought that the Soviet Union could coexist with the US.
             | He was violent in his hatred of the Soviets and was
             | militaristic. He thought that the US had to defeat the
             | Soviets sooner than later. Surely we both realize that this
             | means millions of dead.
        
         | AQuantized wrote:
         | I do think someone European geniuses like Heisenberg were
         | destroyed by WWII instead of enlivened by it, working on the
         | German nuclear project they didn't want nor think they could
         | succeed in, and surrounded by comparatively few other geniuses.
        
       | NancyFXTrade wrote:
       | Hi,
       | 
       | I am Nancy robert, a professional bitcoin miner and forex trader,
       | i can assist you on how to make money online by getting involved
       | with a high profitable business (Forex, Binary Options, Bitcoin
       | Mining ). Make huge profits weekly from your initial investment.
       | Do you know with my trading software and signals you can make a
       | good profit weekly if you invest with minimum of:
       | 
       | INVEST $500 GET $6000
       | 
       | INVEST $1500 GET $15,000
       | 
       | INVEST $3000 GET $30,000
       | 
       | INVEST $4000 GET $40,000
       | 
       | INVEST $5000 GET $50,000
       | 
       | But the major condition here, is that at the end of every trading
       | session, after successful withdrawal, we will have 20% of profit
       | made, leaving you with 80%.
       | 
       | This forex trading is helping the life's of me and my investors.
       | Get started today with trading and earn a living. Work from
       | anywhere and monitor your trade with your phone or computer.
       | 
       | Kindly reply me if interested or Ignore if otherwise, No risk
       | involved 95% safe.
        
       | prvc wrote:
       | When I was a child, I enjoyed working through a book called
       | "Hungarian Problem Book", which contained much more interesting
       | and fun problems than I had seen up to that point. It certainly
       | had a stimulating and energizing effect on me. Worth a look if
       | you're interested in math problems.
        
       | graycat wrote:
       | There is a lot of discussion in this thread about intelligence,
       | Hungarians, Jews, old central European schools and coffee shops,
       | etc.
       | 
       | In my experience, the main conclusion I come to is: Humans are
       | super TOUGH to characterize, measure meaningfully, predict, etc.
       | SUPER tough.
       | 
       | E.g., there is the stumbling block of the usual dichotomy of
       | _nature_ (i.e., genetics, DNA) and _nurture_ (i.e., the
       | environment of their childhood, etc.).
       | 
       | We can try to focus on just the _nature_ part, but again we get
       | stumbling blocks of the wide variety of outcomes from, seemingly,
       | too many _factors_.
       | 
       | Sure, can give a test with 100 questions to millions of people
       | and then use the linear algebra principle components
       | decomposition to find 100 orthogonal _factors_ and eigenvalues.
       | Then there is a claim that IQ is just the largest of the 100
       | factors. Sooooo, that omits 99 other factors. Hmm .... Then,
       | tough to have much faith in IQ.
       | 
       | So, we can suspect that the other 99 factors can help or ruin the
       | effect of the IQ factor. In my experience, that can happen.
       | 
       | I'm not Jewish or Hungarian and have never made any particular
       | effort to have contact with either, but one way and another by
       | accident or forces unknown at the time to me have had some
       | contact. So:
       | 
       | (a) Dad thought that a big advantage would be a college education
       | so I got one.
       | 
       | (b) Mom thought that a big advantage would be a Ph.D. so I got
       | one. So did my brother.
       | 
       | (c) In grades 1-8, the teachers regarded me as in the bottom half
       | of the class, maybe near or at the bottom of the class. So I
       | tended to give up on school or trying to do well. My parents were
       | fine with that.
       | 
       | (d) I'm a male, and, as is common for boys, by the 8th grade my
       | handwriting was still a mess. So, with that mess, my accuracy in
       | 8th grade arithmetic was poor, and the teacher warmly advised me
       | never to take anymore math.
       | 
       | (e) In the 9th grade, I saw that I could do well in math so did.
       | My main motivation was to reverse the 8 years of the teachers
       | treating me as a poor student. Sooooo, that was the goofy reason
       | I got into math. Lesson: A lot of what happens to people can be
       | from just goofy reasons that have nothing to do with IQ or
       | ability.
       | 
       | The school I went to in grades 1-12 was intended as the city's
       | premier college prep school. Supposedly 97% of the students went
       | on to college. Since there was no Jewish high school in town, the
       | Jewish kids also went to that school. Then in the Math SATs, of
       | #1, #2, #3, I was #2 and #1 and #3 were Jewish. I had done nearly
       | as well or a little better than both of them in grade 9-12 math
       | classes. I had made no effort to _compete_ : I had come to like
       | math and enjoyed cutting off insults from the teachers. I didn't
       | see anything very special about the _abilities_ of the Jewish
       | students.
       | 
       | As I continued in math, I heard about several of the names of the
       | Jewish Hungarian mathematicians in the OP: Halmos remains my
       | favorite author. Once I got von Neumann's _Quantum Mechanics_ and
       | got through the first half, just some math, the physics was
       | later, easily enough before got interrupted by other work. Von
       | Neumann 's game theory work was heavily around the saddle point
       | result, and that is an easy result of duality in the linear
       | algebra of linear programming. I heard about Wigner since my
       | ugrad honors paper was on group representations for molecular
       | spectroscopy. Early in my career, I was at GE as they took
       | Kemeny's work on Basic and timesharing, etc. and made a business
       | out of it. Later I was reading Feynman's _Lectures_ and saw his
       | remark that a particle of unknown position has uniform
       | probability distribution over all of space. If that space has the
       | usual assumption of infinite area, then there can be no such
       | distribution. For the Manhattan Project picture of von Neumann,
       | Feynman, and Ulam, once I used Ulam 's result _tightness_ in a
       | paper I published. Once I published a paper on a fine detail
       | about the (Karush) Kuhn-Tucker conditions. Later I saw that the
       | famous paper of Arrow (mentioned in the OP), Hurwicz, and Uzawa
       | mentioned a problem, and my work solved that problem also. The
       | Chair of my Ph.D. orals committee was Jewish -- the brightest
       | prof in his department was not Jewish or Hungarian.
       | 
       | Point: I've never had any ambitions to be at the top of
       | academics, but I have not found that work the Jews or Hungarians
       | do is too difficult to understand or, in some cases, extend.
       | 
       | As an example of the influence of the other 99 _factors_ , maybe
       | the brightest person I knew was my wife. She was Valedictorian,
       | PBK, _Summa Cum Laude_ , ..., etc. But some of those 99 factors
       | proved fatal.
       | 
       | Concluding Suggestion: When see some good work, e.g., the Halmos
       | work on _sufficient statistics_ , a good performance of the Bach
       | _Chaconne_ , e.g.,
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngjEVKxQCWs
       | 
       | or the
       | 
       | Rachmaninoff: Piano Concerto no.2
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEGOihjqO9w
       | 
       | etc., just be glad for such good parts of civilization, credit
       | the person doing the work, and f'get about whatever 100 _factors_
       | , nature, nurture, etc. were the _cause_.
        
       | qsi wrote:
       | For further perspective, I also recommend reading Scott
       | Alexander's retelling at
       | 
       | https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/05/26/the-atomic-bomb-consid...
        
         | IlliOnato wrote:
         | It's a bit strange that Scott Alexander, when counting famous
         | physicists with Jewish ancestry, counts zero of Russian/Soviet
         | ones, and ever tries to explain this (pogroms, persecution,
         | etc.)
         | 
         | There is quite a number of such physicists. Lev Landau, Abram
         | Ioffe, Igor Tamm, Mikhail Leontovich, Zhores Alferov, Alexander
         | Friedmann, Matvei Bronstein.
         | 
         | A list of famous Russian/Jewish mathematicians is also
         | impressive.
         | 
         | Overall, ethnic Jews were totally over-represented in Soviet
         | science...
        
       | epivosism wrote:
       | Noticeably long lifespans. I realize it's hard to quantify this
       | but just eyeballing it, for a group of 10 people who got famous
       | before age 50, born that far back, to have four members break 90
       | seems unusual - including wartime or other disease-related
       | deaths.
       | 
       | The fact that IQ tests can predict longevity is interesting.
       | 
       | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC30556/
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lothian_birth-cohort_studies
       | 
       | John von Neumann=54, Paul Erdos=83, Eugene Wigner=93, Leo
       | Szilard=66, Edward Teller=95, Theodore von Karman=82, John
       | Hersanyi=80, John G. Kemeny=66, Paul Halmos=90, George Polya=98
        
         | dredmorbius wrote:
         | n: 10, sum: 807, min: 54, max: 98, mean: 80.700000, median:
         | 82.5, sd: 14.507086
        
         | mritchie712 wrote:
         | Does that control for income? I'd imagine a good bit would be
         | explained by that.
        
           | ovi256 wrote:
           | IQ predicts income too.
        
           | beebeepka wrote:
           | I'd imagine the main thing is genetics and way of living. One
           | of my grandpas lived to almost 100 and he's always been poor.
           | Very, very poor
        
             | ricardobayes wrote:
             | Same with my grandpa, has to do with calorie-rich food like
             | meat was only consumed maybe once a week, on Sunday. Meat
             | was a luxury, they ate mostly potatoes, bread and thick
             | veggie soups.
        
             | oblak wrote:
             | Kind of shocking this has been downvoted. I guess it is
             | finally daytime in the US...
             | 
             | These kinds of threads always go downhill around that time
        
               | potatoman22 wrote:
               | That's a pretty prejudiced thing to say
        
               | oblak wrote:
               | Sadly, it has been my experience
        
             | riffraff wrote:
             | I think "some" poverty for people born in the first half of
             | the 20th century is correlated with long life spans.
             | 
             | People didn't eat much and had healthier food (more veggies
             | because those were cheaper), spent a lot of time outdoors
             | or doing physical work. They got the good stuff of the
             | "olden times", but still reaped a lot of the benefits of
             | modern medicine especially in their late years.
             | 
             | I am worried my generation won't live as long as my
             | grandparents' on average.
        
       | zuzun wrote:
       | Since the article discusses the origin of the term, Richard
       | Rhodes in The Making of the Atomic Bomb writes:
       | 
       | > Otto Frisch remembers that his friend Fritz Houtermans [..]
       | proposed the popular theory that "these people were really
       | visitors from Mars"
       | 
       | His Wikipedia article goes into more details:
       | 
       | > Houtermans had a great sense of humor. Many have commented on
       | this, and one of his colleagues, Haro von Buttlar, collected
       | stories told by Houtermans and privately published them in a book
       | with more than 40 pages. One story purports to explain the
       | contributions of seven of the twentieth century's most
       | exceptional scientists, Theodore von Karman, George de Hevesy,
       | Michael Polanyi, Leo Szilard, Eugene Wigner, John von Neumann,
       | and Edward Teller, all Hungarians. According to Houtermans, they
       | are Martians, who are afraid that their accents will give them
       | away, so they masquerade as Hungarians, i.e., people unable to
       | speak any language but Hungarian without an accent.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritz_Houtermans#Personal
        
         | wolf550e wrote:
         | They were all Jewish. Jews are over-represented in Physics
         | Nobel prize laureats, not just Hungarian Jews.
        
           | proto-n wrote:
           | More discussion about this:
           | https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/05/26/the-atomic-bomb-
           | consid...
        
           | noir_lord wrote:
           | Possibly a double whammy effect of been Hungarian _and_
           | Jewish.
           | 
           | My partner is Hungarian and they put an emphasis on rigorous
           | education across the board that we (in the UK or at least my
           | part of it) don't.
           | 
           | Outside of the upper middle-class and above there is a strong
           | streak of anti-intellectualism in England (I can't speak for
           | the other member countries of the UK) and certainly the case
           | in the working class schools I was educated in, you'd get
           | bullied for been the class swot basically.
        
             | Swizec wrote:
             | > My partner is Hungarian and they put an emphasis on
             | rigorous education across the board that we (in the UK or
             | at least my part of it) don't.
             | 
             | I wonder if this is an Austro-Hungary effect or a central
             | Europe thing. Every country I know of that follows the
             | German education system is considered to "put an emphasis
             | on rigorous education across the board".
             | 
             | Whenever we compare notes from my Slovenian schooling with
             | American friends it seems like the US education system is a
             | joke by comparison.
             | 
             | Although in official rankings we score lower so who knows.
             | Maybe I just got lucky
        
               | ricardobayes wrote:
               | It's called the prussian school model, focuses heavily on
               | memorizing and lexical knowledge. But is very poor on
               | teamwork and preparing you for real life. Prussian
               | (German) society needed reliable factory workers so
               | that's why school starts so early (7:30-8:00 AM) to
               | pretty much condition children to get up early, be
               | obedient and just focus on the job.
        
               | riffraff wrote:
               | I believe this is the average experience of most in
               | Europe, I am Italian and I find the US (lower) education
               | system worse than the Italian one too, and we score
               | _terribly_ in all international rankings.
               | 
               | I believe it's probably a different distribution:
               | european education is maybe flattened around the average,
               | while in the US there is possibly a wider distribution.
        
             | kaba0 wrote:
             | I'm sorry but as a Hungarian, this is laughable.
             | 
             | Any positive we had at a time comes from socialism's
             | general focus on education (one of the few positives of it)
             | - eg. both Russian and Hungarian math education went up to
             | differentiation/integration by the end of secondary school.
             | It also had very extensive programs for talented students.
             | 
             | Unfortunately, currently we have seriously laughable pay
             | for teachers (barely above the seriously laughable minimal
             | pay), so we have a bunch of burnt out, old teacher with no
             | motivation.
        
               | dralley wrote:
               | >Any positive we had at a time comes from socialism's
               | general focus on education (one of the few positives of
               | it)
               | 
               | If we're still talking about "the martians" here, don't
               | they predate the socialist control of Hungary by at least
               | a decade?
        
               | emteycz wrote:
               | Yes. But the Austro-Hungarians had famously good (for the
               | time) schools all over the empire.
        
             | cpursley wrote:
             | This is a big problem in America as well, especially
             | pronounced in certain subcultures.
        
       | mountainplus wrote:
       | I'd like to offer my point as Hungarian, and enthusiast of the
       | history of Hungarian mathematics education, who heard lots of
       | stories from math teacher grandparents.
       | 
       | This article is great read, well researched and quoted. Still, I
       | think what it really misses to hit home and hammer down is the
       | context and background where it all came from: the unbelievable
       | greatness of the math education and math teachers of this country
       | with streak going on over 100 years even though we might be at
       | the end tail now (but still, great results still being achieved
       | at the math olympics, if that is a metric that would matter to
       | the reader: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38xeYPAUPd0).
       | 
       | So while the Martians are of course worthy of accolades since
       | their (+ || -) contributions and their unique and sad background
       | are much more exceptional than every one of their peers but they
       | weren't just one off geniuses. They were a culmination of many
       | things.
       | 
       | From year to year, like some american sports draft an unusually
       | high output of great systems thinkers and numbermongers entered
       | almost all fields of real sciences.
       | 
       | It all starts perhaps w/ Sipos Pal, Farkas Gyula, and the father
       | Bolyai Farkas, figureheads of Hungarian sciences of the 19th
       | century. They set down the basics of sciences education of
       | Hungary with decades of hard work. They and their peers organised
       | societies for math and physics and later started publishing KoMal
       | math journal - mentioned in the article - in 1891 which is still
       | active to this day) to be able to build out common curriculum
       | integrating the advanced concepts of the time, Bolyai also
       | traveled Europe went to Gottingen and befriended Gauss to start
       | creating continental connections. The wider context always proved
       | to be favorable except the abhorrent times of 2nd world war. But
       | even then, these amazing people of course had to flee for their
       | lives but during their childhood they were able to develop their
       | crafts because first the Austro-Hungarian Empire then also the
       | interwar "kingdom" needed to display intellectual sovereignty and
       | then when socialism slided in, that regime was highly interested
       | in praising the sciences instead of religion, and also did good
       | by opening up universities and education in general for the women
       | the poor the peasents. For the past 150 years, up until now this
       | also meant that being sciences teacher in elementary or high-
       | school were most respectable and lifelong vocations held in high
       | regard in these societies. It's an incredibly delicate and
       | complicated topic that I might not have the vocabulary to flesh
       | out fully.
       | 
       | So to get back to the main poin, that the Martians weren't
       | Martians in the context of the history of maths in Hungary. By
       | the time the next generation grew up the flood gates have opened,
       | here's a semi-random sampling sans Martians, starting from 1802
       | until 1960s, the main epicenters being Transylvania -> Budapest
       | -> Szeged -> Budapest && Debrecen && Szeged, so it was really not
       | just a locality in say 1 city:
       | 
       | son Bolyai Janos, Eotvos Lorand, Valyi Gyula, Konig Denes &
       | brother Konig Gyorgy, Fejer Lipot _, Szego Gabor, Riesz Frigyes_
       | & brother Marcell, Haar Alfred _, Szokefalvy-nagy father & son_
       | (before the Martians these 4 were the first generation of widely
       | famous Hungarian mathematicians, I believe), Szego Gabor,
       | Egervary Jeno, Kerekjarto Bela, Lanczos Kornel, Rado Tibor,
       | Nemenyi Pal, Redei Laszlo, Kalmar Laszlo, Janossy Lajos, the
       | couple Szekeres Eszter and Gyorgy, Peter Rozsa, Hajos Gyorgy, the
       | power couple Turan Pal and T. Sos Vera, Gallai Tibor, Fejes Toth
       | Laszlo, Suranyi Janos, Bodo Zalan, Erdos' favourite pal Renyi
       | Alfred, Fary Istvan, Lax Peter, Csaszar Akos, Hajnal Andras,
       | Aczel Janos, Csakany Bela, Szemeredi Endre, Bollobas Bela, Lovasz
       | Laszlo, Csirmaz Laszlo, Tusnady Gabor, Barany Imre, Babai Laszlo,
       | Furedi Zoltan, Komjath Peter, Pach Janos, Stipsicz Andras
       | 
       | (Important to note that as in many fields these great scientists
       | were also teaching, and many of the teachers below were also
       | researching and publishing.)
       | 
       | My heart and admiration goes out to all these brilliant minds.
       | It's all due to the opportunity to learn, which was made
       | available through the works and sacrifices of great teachers:
       | 
       | Ratz Laszlo has been portrayed in the article but there are more:
       | 
       | Sutak Jozsef, Arany Daniel, Konig Gyula, Farago Andor & brother
       | Laszlo, Bauer Mihaly, Jordan Karoly, Szele Tibor, Soos Paula,
       | Varga Otto, Szasz Pal, Kunfalvi Rezso, Bakos Tibor, Szenassy
       | Barna, Imrecze Zoltanne, Farkas Miklos, Rabai Imre, Posa Lajos,
       | Pataki Janos, and the many unnamed dedicated and humane teachers
       | who worked hard every day with every class.
       | 
       | (And not to forget Kulin Gyorgy, who founded amateur astronomy in
       | Hungary and is the most important astronomy teacher and
       | discoverer of our country.)
       | 
       | I wouldn't know this much if not for the collected writings of
       | Vekerdi Laszlo, a great historian of maths educators and
       | mathematicians of the country and Szenassy Barna who wrote a huge
       | monography.
       | 
       | Unfortunately there aren't many good links in [EN] except for
       | Wikipedia but I tried to extend on the part of the article that I
       | think it is crucial for correct understanding and historical
       | clarity. I wish I would have time to write a sentence or two
       | about each of these names. I can't do that right now but there
       | are some great books in English to read for those who are
       | interested.
       | 
       | How odd but how great. It's a disaster and hard to quantify the
       | loss caused by the fascistic decade or so.
       | 
       | And to the author, lastly: Thanks for spreading the word!
        
       | Animats wrote:
       | This is an old story, and is mentioned in various books about the
       | Manhattan Project and Los Alamos.
       | 
       | Part of the article is missing, in the section about the high
       | school years, above "of von Karman in 1872". Many of that group
       | went to high schools in a very small geographical area.
        
       | friendly_chap wrote:
       | Hungarian perspective here:
       | 
       | I believe there are a couple of factors at play here.
       | 
       | First of all, most (perhaps all) of those people are Hungarian
       | Jews, and Jewish people (imho) are both very intelligent and
       | their culture values education a lot. Hungary had a very large
       | Jewish population at the time, so no wonder we produced so many
       | great scientists!
       | 
       | Second is the Hungarian language. Ede Teller specifically said
       | his scientific achievements are thanks to the Hungarian language,
       | and without it he could only be a high school teacher. I can find
       | a few sources if you want, and the ones I know about might not be
       | accurate, but for example Cardinal Giuseppe Mezzofanti, who spoke
       | 58 languages himself, said of our language: "Do you know which
       | language, because of its constructive ability and the harmony of
       | its rhythm, comes before all the others? The Hungarian! It seems
       | as if the Hungarians themselves do not know the treasure of their
       | language...".
       | 
       | Third Hungary at that point was a rather developed country,
       | unlike now. Budapest metro opened after the London one, as the
       | worlds' second.
       | 
       | Edit: Fourth, not related to the previous 3 as not unique to
       | Hungary, but there were probably "network effects" at play.
       | Science does not happen in a vacuum, as Paul Erdos said for him
       | maths is a social activity (as witnessed by his vagabond tendency
       | to move in with his peers and work on problems while living at
       | their house). So probably having all these great minds in related
       | fields was a kind of a feedback loop.
        
         | jiggawatts wrote:
         | I've never heard anyone before making the claim that Hungarian
         | in any way assists intellectual capacity.
         | 
         | I do believe there is something to the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis,
         | but not to _this_ degree. I know that, for example, Chinese
         | students have a greater aptitude for basic arithmetic because
         | in Chinese the sounds for the numbers are shorter and simpler
         | than in most languages. This makes longer numbers easier to
         | hold in short-term memory, assisting mental arithmetic. But...
         | that 's not going to churn out award-winning theoreticians!
         | 
         | I'm curious to know why anyone would make the claim that
         | Hungarian is "that special" for intellectual thought. It's a
         | bit of an odd duck of a language, sure. But not _that_ special.
         | To my knowledge the main beneficial property it has is that its
         | structure makes it especially suitable for poetry. However, it
         | shares that trait with Latin and I believe French also.
        
           | kaba0 wrote:
           | I'm not sure why you are downvoted.
           | 
           | I'm a native speaker and I did have a phase as a teenager
           | when I thought that language must have to do something with
           | intellect, mostly based on some nationalistic feeling. But
           | I'm yet to find anything that would make it that special.
           | 
           | The only rare linguistic thing it has is double negation (we
           | say I've never not eaten something instead of never eaten) -
           | which might paradoxically help? (Due to people having to
           | leave behind linguistic symbolism to properly do logical
           | reasoning? But I'm entirely guessing here)
        
         | AQuantized wrote:
         | It's interesting that Hungarian is one of the few Uralic
         | languages in modern Europe, alongside Finnish and Estonian as
         | the other 2 major representatives. Finland and Estonian could
         | be argued to have enjoyed outsized success in STEM fields as
         | well. I wonder if there could be value in learning languages
         | with divergent roots. Most Europeans learn multiple languages,
         | but typically they have similar roots (Indo-European) and a
         | fair amount of crossover.
         | 
         | There is some evidence for the weak form of linguistic
         | relativity, the idea that language can have significant impact
         | on cognition. Perhaps taken to the extreme, with learning many
         | varied and highly divergent languages at a young age, it can
         | explain some of e.g. von Neumann's brilliance.
        
           | sampo wrote:
           | There is a fringe theory, that agglutinative languages with
           | consistent vocabulary are more effortless for children to
           | learn. So children would spend less time learning and
           | memorizing words, and could proceed faster to learn other
           | things.
           | 
           | English vocabulary is a patchwork with origins from several
           | different languages, so words with related meaning can look
           | different. Whereas for example Finnish is consistent:
           | kirjoittaa - to write         kirjailija - writer
           | kirja - book         kirje - letter         kirjasto -
           | library         kirjallisuus - literature         kirjasin -
           | font
           | 
           | In this way, you can learn the same vocabulary by learning
           | maybe 5x smaller amount of root words.
           | 
           | http://finnish-and-pisa.blogspot.com/
        
             | jiggawatts wrote:
             | I learned to read and write Hungarian in a matter of
             | _weeks_. It is spelled phonetically, with only a handful of
             | special cases. It 's hilariously easy.
             | 
             | English is a random mish-mash of at least four languages,
             | making it seem very random and ad-hoc. However, it
             | mercifully uses the latin alphabet. Chinese is just a
             | nightmare, with students spending most of their schooling
             | just to become literate...
        
               | tigerlily wrote:
               | Which resources did you use to learn to rw Hungarian so
               | fast?
        
           | kaba0 wrote:
           | As far as I know, even the weak form of linguistic relativity
           | is heavily disputed.
           | 
           | Please see my sibling comment with a well-written article on
           | a more likely reason.
        
             | friendly_chap wrote:
             | Probably. But when Edward Teller himself states it, I tend
             | to listen. Perhaps he said jokingly though.
        
               | growt wrote:
               | I believe it. My wife is Hungarian and I'm trying to
               | learn the language. I'm german myself and I think german
               | is already quite complex, but Hungarian is just nuts (or
               | probably martian). At some points I accused my teacher
               | that she is just making stuff up on the fly ;)
        
           | friendly_chap wrote:
           | I do believe that is the case and I have my pet layman
           | unscientific theories too about languages. For example I
           | believe English not being phonetic and often times
           | pronounciation not making any sense trains people to accept
           | things "as is", make them get over illogical things way
           | easier. I believe this makes a someone more prone to respect
           | authority, which was confirmed by my years in the UK. Of
           | course life is messy and you can never be sure.
           | 
           | Just a toy hunch I like to think about from time to time. I
           | wish I could see English with its original alphabet before
           | being forced into the confines of the latin one. Apparently
           | many sounds are misrepresented due to that.
        
             | tome wrote:
             | > I believe this makes a someone more prone to respect
             | authority, which was confirmed by my years in the UK.
             | 
             | Whether the British are prone to respect authority because
             | of their language is debatable. It's less debatable whether
             | those in a larger Anglophone nation are prone to respect
             | authority! Just look at some of the behaviours we've seen
             | over the last 18 months.
        
             | bserge wrote:
             | I've observed the British respect other people, society and
             | hierarchy. Not authority per se. That's the Germans heh.
        
             | noir_lord wrote:
             | > I believe this makes a someone more prone to respect
             | authority, which was confirmed by my years in the UK. Of
             | course life is messy and you can never be sure.
             | 
             | I doubt that as the largest country by English as a first
             | language is the US and I wouldn't say that those folks on
             | the whole respect authority in the same way that we do.
             | 
             | I think the way authority is respected in the UK has more
             | to do with our endemic class system (which still exists)
             | _and_ the fact that unlike most European countries we never
             | had a revolution in the last couple of centuries (came
             | close at points and of course there was Cromwell but that
             | was a different kind of revolution and much earlier).
        
             | _moof wrote:
             | Lots of languages have orthographic depth. I doubt you'll
             | find a correlation if you look at more than one or two
             | languages/cultures. Heck, the French only pronounce half
             | their letters, and they _killed_ their monarchs.
        
               | friendly_chap wrote:
               | Hungarian pretty much only does that to ease
               | pronounciation, ie. when two consonants can't be
               | pronounced after each other eg. "utca" (means street)
               | etc.
        
         | kaba0 wrote:
         | For a more accurate dissection on the topic please read this
         | already linked blog post:
         | 
         | https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/05/26/the-atomic-bomb-consid...
         | 
         | TLDR: the reason indeed has to do with Ashkenazi Jews, who are
         | genetically more likely to have high IQ (at the price of
         | several illness specific only to them), but also the number of
         | them at the country and their class. The reason Martians is
         | called out as an "anomaly", is due to Hungary being thought of
         | as a small country unlikely to give so many talented people to
         | the world. But the fact is, that countries having similar
         | percentage of Ashkenazi Jewish people had similar percentage of
         | Nobel price winners, eg. Germany. It's just thought of as a
         | bigger country where it doesn't seem as extraordinary.
        
           | rat87 wrote:
           | > Ashkenazi Jews, who are genetically more likely to have
           | high IQ
           | 
           | As an Ashkenazi Jew I think this theory is likely nonsense,
           | but dangerous nonsense which can drive racism.
        
             | kaba0 wrote:
             | Well, I did found a few studies on the topic, but would not
             | call it having overwhelming evidence so you may be right.
             | 
             | I couldn't make as good a job as the linked article, but
             | what other explanation could you give on the very real
             | difference between the racial composition of scientific
             | geniuses vs the "average" people (define the former as you
             | prefer)? Because one definition (number of Nobel prize
             | winners) will definitely wake racist explanations. The
             | article very clearly goes into several possible
             | explanations, rejecting most of them.
             | 
             | It was not the particular school, nor the city, Jewish
             | cultural heritage could have an effect but afaik not every
             | Jewish Nobel prize winner held strictly onto religious
             | traditions (though still, it is a standing possible
             | explanation, especially with a strong view on the
             | importance of education as culture doesn't stop at
             | religion). Being of higher class families definitely
             | correlates with every sorts of success, but it is not
             | specific to Jewish people.
             | 
             | So I'm still not bought on the environment-only
             | explanation. Of course it is never only nature or nurture
             | for complex situations, but a more "fertile ground" for
             | studying will amplify other nurture effects as well.
             | 
             | I'm writing all these as a non-Jewish Hungarian though, so
             | my thoughts are definitely not from nationalism or racism,
             | but more from a form of awe (though I agree that positive
             | discrimination/bias may also be problematic)
        
             | rbanffy wrote:
             | Racism is always a stick. The same reasoning that would say
             | Ashkenazis are smarter than the general population can be
             | used to say the general population is less intelligent, or
             | valuable.
             | 
             | Humanity is immensely diverse and our tools to measure
             | value are extremely flawed and unreliable.
             | 
             | Let's not forget there are probably many Tellers and Von
             | Neumanns that never got to university because they couldn't
             | afford it and are now tending tables to pay for rent. It
             | doesn't make them any less valuable or talented. It just
             | makes them less successful and visible.
        
             | xyzelement wrote:
             | Just curious, why? Are you looking at the theory, saying "I
             | don't like what it implies therefore I wish it were false"
             | or is there more to it?
             | 
             | I don't know what the answer is but I do feel that Jews
             | culturally value intelligence/education and I can see how
             | that leads to it being sought and passed on in marriage and
             | children.
        
               | pvg wrote:
               | Because it's fairly plain genetic determinism, the same
               | kind of theory that postulated the superiority of, say,
               | 'Aryans'.
        
               | IlliOnato wrote:
               | While I have my doubts about that theory, there is
               | nothing deterministic about this "genetic determinism".
               | It says nothing about human value or "superiority".
               | 
               | It basically says that in Ashkenazi Jewish gene pool
               | there could be higher prevalence of genes that make
               | carriers better than average in certain cognitive tasks
               | (which happened to be valuable in XIX-XX centuries, but
               | were in much lesser demand before, BTW).
               | 
               | It says nothing whatever about any particular Jew or non-
               | Jew.
               | 
               | And even if we find a particular gene in a particular
               | person, there is no determinism. Other genes,
               | nurture/upbringing, and sheer luck would play just as
               | important a role.
               | 
               | And of course IQ is not a measure of human "value".
               | Frankly, I find _that_ idea repugnant...
        
               | tptacek wrote:
               | "IQ isn't a measure of human value" is a message board
               | scientific racism debate trope. When you can reconstruct
               | an entire thread from the search bar, we're better off
               | just leaving the discussion for the search bar.
        
               | xyzelement wrote:
               | Hang on. You are mixing "what's true" and "how I feel
               | about what it implies." That sounds highly unscientific
               | to me.
               | 
               | "Ashkenazi Jews selectively breed for intelligence and
               | therefore have higher inate IQ" is either true or false.
               | That's the first question to answer and it seems logical
               | to me that this is at least possible/likely. Once we
               | establish that it's true, we can confront the
               | implications with intellectual integrity.
        
               | tptacek wrote:
               | We're now recapitulating essentially every thread about
               | scientific racism that has ever occurred on any message
               | board. I would like to gently suggest we not do this.
               | There are values HN holds dearer than "intellectual
               | integrity", whatever that may mean to whoever writes it,
               | and the most important of them is creating a space for
               | curious conversation. As moderatin' Dan has said over,
               | and over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and
               | over, and over, and knitting, and knitting, and knitting,
               | and knitting, ah-hah-hahhnd knitting, ah-hah-hahhnd
               | knitting, ah-hah-hahhnd knitting, and knitting again:
               | appeals to these kinds of polarizing arguments do nothing
               | but threaten to burn down that space.
        
               | IlliOnato wrote:
               | Steven Pinker suggested that scientists should
               | voluntarily avoid research and discussion of such topics,
               | not because it's not worthwhile, but because (given human
               | history and social organization, and the fact that "race"
               | can be used as a highly visible marker) it can provoke
               | the worst in people, or be used by bad ones to justify
               | their nasty attitude and behaviour.
               | 
               | I could subscribe to a version of this dictum, but it
               | should apply to all participants and views, not just a
               | particular theory someone prefers.
               | 
               | If there are rules (better spelled out) like "any
               | discussion of a connection or lack thereof between genes,
               | race, and cognitive abilities is not allowed on this
               | site", fine with me. I can see the reason, and anyway
               | it's fair.
               | 
               | Allowing some people to say that there is no connection,
               | while suppressing ones of a different opinion (in a
               | scientific context, mind you) is entirely different.
        
               | tptacek wrote:
               | The metadiscussion about scientific racism is no more
               | productive.
        
               | IlliOnato wrote:
               | "citation needed" :-)
        
         | mdp2021 wrote:
         | > _I can find a few sources if you want_
         | 
         | Yes please. Thank you in advance!
         | 
         | > _Jewish people (imho)_
         | 
         | That was presented more as an _impression_ than a data-based
         | evaluation, but ok - it means HN has a little tolerance for
         | para-intellectual bursts. :) (If all impressions were
         | heartwarming, they would constitute less of a problem. They
         | would probably not constitute a problem at all, if the mandate
         | was clear that one 's thoughts must duly be vetted.)
        
           | friendly_chap wrote:
           | I got blocked from posting more in this thread. Will collect
           | them in this comment if I can edit it. I don't deny most of
           | these lists are probably tainted by national pride, and their
           | contents might be partially fabrications.
           | 
           | I have tied to check them over the years and found some to be
           | indeed true, but a good number of them evaded my google fu.
           | Perhaps not that valuable sources, nevertheless:
           | 
           | https://magyarmegmaradasert.hu/in-english/our-
           | language/1632-...
        
             | mdp2021 wrote:
             | If you will be unable to post here, maybe you could collect
             | some material, publish the best article on HN as a
             | submission, and post the rest of the material in your
             | comments there. We can check your submissions from your
             | profile.
        
         | giorgioz wrote:
         | It seems you're discriminating positively. The Jewish
         | population in Hungary was very large at the time. Many of them
         | were just farmers. Some of them were doctors and engineers and
         | business-men. Those exceptional mathematicians were indeed an
         | exception. This is not to negatively discriminate. Believing
         | that an ethnicity has super-powers or super-flaws is a bias.
         | You notice all the exceptions and don't notice all the other
         | average samples that don't confirm your hypothesis. Also small
         | sample of populations are just more likely to have extreme
         | values. This is more because of the narrow sample.
         | 
         | Finally on the language part, great scientists flew nazi
         | countries from all over Europe. Only some of them were
         | Hungarian-speaking. Enrico Fermi was from Rome, from a not
         | particularly religious Catholic family. Enrico Fermi went to
         | the US for better opportunities AND to protect his wife Laura
         | whom was Jewish.
        
           | rbanffy wrote:
           | > whom was Jewish.
           | 
           | Biased sample indeed. The brilliant scientists who had no
           | reason to flee didn't and it's not surprising the reasons to
           | flee are over represented in a sample taken from those who
           | did.
           | 
           | I also suspect a lot of Jewish Hungarians who fled were not
           | brilliant scientists, just rich or talented enough to afford
           | escaping.
        
             | MagnumOpus wrote:
             | No, you misunderstand. In 80 years before or since, these
             | dozen or so ethnically Jewish scientists were literally the
             | _only_ world-leading Hungarian scientists. (Maybe I would
             | add Eotvos and Szenty-Gyorgyi, but that's about it...)
             | 
             | Given that only 5% of the pre-WW2 population of Hungary was
             | Jewish, the fact that 80% of geniuses were of Jewish
             | parentage is highly unusual, emigration or not.
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | hpcjoe wrote:
         | Not sure why you are being down voted.
         | 
         | I am conservative jewish, and of Hungarian descent on my
         | mother's side. Russian on my fathers. Neither parent has a
         | Ph.D. I do, and one of 2 brothers is a DDS, other is MS in CS.
         | Daughter is double majoring in math and physics, with now a
         | minor in complex systems. Going to grad school next year. She's
         | half me, half my wife (Mexican American).
         | 
         | Conservative and orthodox jews tend to have quite a bit of
         | familial pressure with regards to education. You are expected
         | to go to school. Expected to excel. Expected to pursue a
         | professional or medical career. I recall this growing up in the
         | 1970s.
         | 
         | My dad is an EE, with a penchant for math. My mom is more
         | psychologically inclined. Wife has an MS in Physics, and
         | teaches college prep high school math. Daughter started out as
         | an Art major. I kid you not. Transitioned over to Physics in
         | her second year.
         | 
         | Ok, with that as the back story, a few observations.
         | 
         | Many of my fellow jewish students, easily a majority, have gone
         | to post graduate education, and are doctors, lawyers,
         | scientists, and engineers. Very few have not. The familial
         | pressure was common, and we all talked about it in our groups.
         | I see a very similar trend with Indian and Chinese American
         | families. Same drive to succeed, with pushes from family.
         | 
         | Jews are not a "racial" group, we don't share locus of genes
         | that can be used to easily identify us as such. Apart from
         | certain families with markers for Tay-Sachs or others.
         | 
         | Conservative and Orthodox jews do share a culture where
         | education is seen as the pathway to success, a better life,
         | taking care of the extended family, etc. That is, its kind of
         | built in to our way of life.
         | 
         | I interpret this to mean a number of things.
         | 
         | 1) Genetics, while important, isn't the dominant feature of
         | highly successful people.
         | 
         | 2) Nurture, culture, society, support systems, etc. are the
         | things that matter. Put another way, if you set low bars, you
         | get results appropriate to setting of low bars. If you set high
         | bars, and provide both a support system, and strong cultural
         | motivation, you will get results appropriate to the setting of
         | high bars.
         | 
         | For me, the martians have always been fascinating. JvN was
         | foremost, though Paul Erdos was always a fascinating character.
         | I don't think genetics/religion was the deciding factor for
         | them. I think it was their environment. If it was an aberration
         | for this time and place, or if it was common, that environment,
         | the support systems behind it, should be studied, and
         | leveraged.
        
           | golemiprague wrote:
           | Jews do share genes that can be used to easily identify,
           | every genetic check company can do it easily. Especially Jews
           | from the same group like Ashkenazi Jews, but also across the
           | Jewish diaspora. One exception are the Ethiopian Jews who
           | don't share those markers and are probably mostly converts.
           | So genetics could be a dominant feature here although those
           | type of things are hard to prove.
        
         | anovikov wrote:
         | The fact of Budapest being a rich city is not a surprising one
         | because it was the capital of Hungary that was many times
         | larger than today's Hungary, spreading from Split to Lemberg -
         | to be reduced to "ethnic quarter" of Magyars after WWI. And
         | every monarchy is a very center-leaning entity so the capital
         | would concentrate wealth of the entire - much bigger than today
         | - nation. It was a co-capital of Habsburg Empire on the same
         | rights as Vienna.
        
           | friendly_chap wrote:
           | Indeed, having its territory reduced by 73% after the war all
           | but killed her. I mean Hungary was already on a downward
           | trajectory after the 1526 Battle of Mohacs which she lost
           | against the Ottomans, and that downward slope culminated in
           | the Treaty of Trianon, which reduced the country to
           | irrelevance ever since.
        
             | rbanffy wrote:
             | What can I say about it? It seems we like to be on the
             | wrong side of history...
        
               | leaveyou wrote:
               | And looking at the Hungarian politics and geopolitics
               | it's like you insist on being on a collision course with
               | the majority of your closest neighbors. The odds of
               | anything good coming out of that for Hungary are very
               | slim IMHO.
        
       | hansvs wrote:
       | This was an interesting read; I was shocked to find so many
       | seemed to enter straight into PhD programmes after completing
       | school. Most were done by the time they were 25. Wow!
        
         | abecedarius wrote:
         | I don't think that was unusual at the time? Mean age of
         | finishing a PhD has gone up over the decades, though I can't
         | give a figure from memory, and there may be a U.S./Europe
         | difference too.
        
       | cameronperot wrote:
       | These interviews with Edward Teller [1] offer first hand insight
       | into some of this fascinating history, I quite enjoyed watching
       | them.
       | 
       | [1]
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRdAp4A5KEA&list=PLVV0r6CmEs...
        
         | marton78 wrote:
         | This interview with Cornelius Lanczos is also worth watching.
         | He is not one of the Martians, because he went to England
         | rather than to America, but he grew up in Budapest in the same
         | time -- and he is a formidable storyteller.
        
           | marton78 wrote:
           | I forgot the link:
           | 
           | https://youtu.be/PO6xtSxB5Vg
        
       | igarcia wrote:
       | I have a feeling that Erno Rubik (the creator of the Rubik's
       | Cube) should be on that list, except that he didn't move to the
       | US. He's 77 now.
        
         | IlliOnato wrote:
         | Since we are talking about ethnicity here, I've heard that
         | Rubik's father's ethnicity was Armenian. I don't have a link,
         | though.
        
       | cerealbad wrote:
       | There is an informative interview with Linus Pauling on youtube
       | from 1990 in which he discusses his life and scientific work.
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8maetlPd8Q
        
       | Red_Tarsius wrote:
       | My pet theory is that Jewish culture didn't suffer from the
       | generational drain of monastic orders. In Medieval times, a smart
       | Jewish kid - especially future Rabbis - would be expected to "be
       | fruitful and multiply". A smart Catholic kid would more often
       | become a celibate cog of the Church, thus ending their line.
        
         | flexie wrote:
         | Protestant priests have married since the reformation (Luther
         | married). So in the mostly protestant Northern and Western
         | Europe, and in the mostly protestant US, there was no celibacy
         | requirements for 4-500 centuries.
        
           | redtexture wrote:
           | > 4-500 centuries.
           | 
           | that would be 500 years
        
           | cat199 wrote:
           | > Protestant
           | 
           | this article is about hapsburg empire - direct line to the
           | holy roman empire & 100% catholic officially
        
         | DalasNoin wrote:
         | Is there evidence that monastic orders selected kids for
         | intelligence? This effect should have then stopped with the
         | protestant reformation in parts of europe. Maybe it is part of
         | the reason why protestant heritage countries are more
         | successful than catholic ones.
        
           | kaba0 wrote:
           | I think Jewish culture has a tendency of making the cleverest
           | man marry the richest woman -- and overall pay close
           | attention to discovering talent within their communities.
        
           | JasonFruit wrote:
           | It's more likely to have selected _younger_ sons, who did not
           | inherit, and were more likely to seek a monastic or otherwise
           | religious life.
        
             | marton78 wrote:
             | Aren't younger sons less risk averse and thus more likely
             | to bring forth societal change?
        
         | [deleted]
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | hdjjhhvvhga wrote:
         | This is interesting but wouldn't explain the lack of such
         | achievements in non-European cultures.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | goblinden wrote:
           | Mathematics in medieval Islam were lit during the 8th-12th
           | centuries! Would these guys have had such an impact without
           | Algebra?
        
             | hdjjhhvvhga wrote:
             | I'm a great fan of mathematical achievements in medieval
             | Middle East, India and China. However, it does not explain
             | why the Martians of Budapest were Jews, not Persian or
             | Chinese, in the context we are discussing in this thread,
             | that is "the end of smart-male line by means of celibacy."
        
               | beebeepka wrote:
               | Culture. It can't be just genetcs
               | 
               | Edit: whoever downvoted me is a racist! Hohoho
        
               | hdjjhhvvhga wrote:
               | Don't worry about downvotes, they're just a "I don't
               | agree with you/don't like what you say but I don't bother
               | to explain why"-type message.
               | 
               | Back to the topic: maybe it could be a combination of the
               | two. Still, it would be interesting to know what exactly
               | - in both genetics and culture - made the Budapest
               | Martians so successful.
        
           | mandmandam wrote:
           | Ignoring your questionable use of the word achievement, Guns,
           | Germs and Steel by Jared Diamond explains the massive bulk of
           | this. It might not be written for academics, and may jump to
           | a conclusion or two, but it's pretty damn convincing all the
           | same.
           | 
           | In any case, discounting the geographic luck that Europe has
           | benefited from is unwise. And a lil bit racist.
        
             | DalasNoin wrote:
             | I think Jared Diamond told a number of convincing stories
             | in this book to convince people of geographical
             | determinism. However, I don't think that any of it amounts
             | to a real proof. Essentially, he picks out more or less
             | "successful" societies and then correlates it to the
             | features of the environments they existed in. Almost
             | certainly overfitting since there is no real test set. His
             | theory also does not account for the topic of this link:
             | extreme success of a minority group.
        
         | goblinden wrote:
         | It is an interesting theory. Makes even more sense when you
         | consider that Islamic law of inheritance served as an impetus
         | behind the development of algebra!
        
           | Telemakhos wrote:
           | Wow, someone should explain the history of algebra to
           | Diophantus of Alexandria.
        
             | goblinden wrote:
             | Diophhntus certainly is the father of Algebra, but he only
             | laid a concrete foundation that al-Khwarizmi solidified
             | into a distinct field and built into the castle its become
             | today. A lot more than that simple foundation, but you're
             | point is taken.
        
         | mandmandam wrote:
         | Honestly Catholicism doesn't have a stellar history with smart
         | people in general. Or kids, for that matter.
         | 
         | When I mention anti-intellectualism in Catholic doctrine,
         | people often retort "Well, St. Augustine...". Guys, if you need
         | to go back 1,700 years for a counter-example your argument
         | might not be on the firmest ground.
         | 
         | Yes, there are many smart Catholics. I'm not saying Catholics
         | are lesser people. This isn't bait, or flaming Catholics. I'm
         | adding to the guy above's pet theory, which at first glance
         | looks pretty compelling, when you add up the effect of those
         | very real and well documented trends over generations.
        
           | marginalia_nu wrote:
           | It might just be shifting degrees of intellectual challenge.
           | 
           | St Augustine came to shine as part as a response to the
           | threat of competing movements such as pelagianism and
           | arianism.
           | 
           | (As a side-note, reading the Confessions I came off thinking
           | St Augustine felt really anti-intellectual; especially in
           | contrast to someone like Boethius)
           | 
           | Then the church went largely intellectually unchallenged for
           | a thousand years, and that's never great for bringing out the
           | best and the brightest. A lot of what made for example the
           | philosophers of antiquity so sharp was the fierce competition
           | between rival schools.
           | 
           | Later when the church came under real pressure from the
           | reformation, you had counter-reformation groups like the
           | Jesuits form as a response which was a huge step up
           | intellectually.
           | 
           | I also think we sort of tend to unfairly view the church
           | through the writings of its critics; both reformists and
           | later the enlightenment had a lot to say that we just seem to
           | take as true without consideration of the source. A lot of
           | stuff, even bad stuff like the inquisition, wasn't _as_ bad
           | as we tend to think. Against the background of what legal
           | systems in general looked in the period, the inquisition was
           | almost gentle.
        
             | danielvf wrote:
             | > A lot of stuff, even bad stuff like the inquisition,
             | wasn't as bad as we tend to think. Against the background
             | of what legal systems in general looked in the period, the
             | inquisition was almost gentle.
             | 
             | The Inquisition, in places, was every bit as bad as it was
             | rumored. You are correct that the inquisition was supposed
             | to be "gentle" up until it pleased the Holy Spirit to have
             | the heretic burned who did not change their beliefs.
             | 
             | ----
             | 
             | And in some places, the program went more according to
             | plan:
             | 
             | Inquisitor: Yo dude, do you believe the $CATHLOC_TRUTH
             | 
             | If dude say yes, dude goes free, otherwise continue.
             | 
             | Inquisitor: Yo, here's fifty reasons that $CATHLOC_TRUTH is
             | true. Do you believe now?
             | 
             | If dude say yes, dude goes free, otherwise continue.
             | 
             | Inquisitor: Yo, I'm locking you up for six months to think
             | about it.
             | 
             | Inquisitor: Yo dude, do you believe the $CATHLOC_TRUTH, if
             | not you are going to burn.
             | 
             | If dude say yes, dude goes free, otherwise dude gets burnt.
             | 
             | ----
             | 
             | So at each step of the process there is an "escape hatch"
             | if someone is willing to renounce what they believed and
             | submit.
             | 
             | ---
             | 
             | But in Spain, it was different. The Spanish style went with
             | the theory that the worst heretics would try to hide their
             | heresy, and therefor agreeing with the $CATHLOC_TRUTH was
             | actually a sign of hidden evil. So in Spain:
             | 
             | Inquisitor: Yo dude, you are a HERITIC!
             | 
             | Dude: I believe the $CATHLOC_TRUTH.
             | 
             | Inquisitor: That's just what a hectic would say! We are
             | going to torture you until you say you don't really believe
             | the $CATHLOC_TRUTH and you tell us the names of at least
             | six of your friends and relative who are also secret
             | heritcs. Then we will burn you. Lastly, once you are dead
             | I'll keep all your money and lands, and then go arrest your
             | friends/family and repeat.
             | 
             | ----
             | 
             | Again, in theory, the inquisition was supposed to use only
             | very gentle forms of torture, like waterboarding, but the
             | actual practice in southern Spain was even worse.
        
               | marginalia_nu wrote:
               | I think our views of the inquisition largely are in
               | agreement. I'm not trying to whitewash the inquisition.
               | Things did go overboard, especially in Spain, and I'm not
               | denying that.
               | 
               | The public conception of the inquisition is _only_ of the
               | horrors. That just isn 't correct; and it's especially
               | not something that the pope intended to happen.
        
           | flohofwoe wrote:
           | A more recent (fairly famous) example, the Big Bang theory
           | was formulated by a Catholic priest:
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lema%C3%AEtre
        
             | mandmandam wrote:
             | That's actually a good illustration of my point - he
             | believed science and religion shouldn't mix.
             | 
             | Contrast with Judaism, or Buddhism, where integration of
             | the spiritual and scientific is often encouraged.
        
               | kaba0 wrote:
               | Jesuits definitely look at science as a way of
               | discovering the beauty of the world created by God.
        
               | mandmandam wrote:
               | Have you heard the phrase, "the exception that proves the
               | rule" before?
        
               | kaba0 wrote:
               | Then the litany of Christian scientists will disprove
               | you.
        
               | mandmandam wrote:
               | Scientists are roughly half as likely as the general
               | public to believe in God or a higher power -
               | https://www.pewforum.org/2009/11/05/scientists-and-
               | belief/
               | 
               | Compound that effect over generations.
        
         | onetimemanytime wrote:
         | In practice I'd say that a lot of priests did father children.
         | Made of flesh and blood...
        
           | mandmandam wrote:
           | And those 'bastards' were often treated horrifically for the
           | mother's crimes. This lasted well up into the last century.
           | 
           | Even today children of single mothers are at a large
           | disadvantage, but at least it's not quite as institutional
           | and savage.
        
             | onetimemanytime wrote:
             | Most likely their mom's husband was "daddy" and they were
             | raised like their half-siblings, as peasants.
        
             | lelanthran wrote:
             | > Even today children of single mothers are at a large
             | disadvantage,
             | 
             | Except that today, with few exceptions, the decision to
             | have that child rests entirely with the mother.
             | 
             | With respect to family matters, females, especially in
             | modern societies, have many more options than any other
             | demographic of that society, or indeed, in all of history.
             | 
             | It's not quite comparable to how bastard children and their
             | mothers were treated in the past.
        
               | redtexture wrote:
               | Except except coerced sex.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-10-02 23:01 UTC)