[HN Gopher] Towards a Theory of Bullshit Visualization [pdf]
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Towards a Theory of Bullshit Visualization [pdf]
        
       Author : polm23
       Score  : 82 points
       Date   : 2021-09-26 07:50 UTC (15 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (research.tableau.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (research.tableau.com)
        
       | raphlinus wrote:
       | A more sophisticated exploration of this topic is Calling
       | Bullshit[1], by Carl Bergstrom and Jevin West. That's a book, but
       | the linked website also has a lot of freely available resources.
       | It's been taught as a college course - week 6 is data
       | visualization.
       | 
       | [1]: https://www.callingbullshit.org/
        
       | kowlo wrote:
       | I feel this would have been more suitable as a blog post rather
       | than a two-column layout under a "research" subdomain. I wonder
       | if "Tableau Research" has a rigorous peer-review process for its
       | research publications.
        
         | w-j-w wrote:
         | I was almost wondering if that was going to be the punchline of
         | this paper. "Surprise, we tricked you with an academic format
         | into taking an opinion piece more seriously than you should
         | have, further proving the point we are trying to make"
        
         | sk5t wrote:
         | The layout and URL are part of the joke. The article opens with
         | "In this unhinged rant"--I really don't think this is any sort
         | of attempt to fool the reader.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | rjuyal wrote:
       | Talking about bullshit visualizations I think this should top the
       | chart:
       | 
       | https://cms.qz.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Modi_Chart.jpg...
       | 
       | https://qz.com/india/1388030/indias-bjp-peddled-a-prime-exam...
        
         | aaron695 wrote:
         | No, this is not what's being talked about. That's a deceptive
         | chart, not their idea of Bullshit Visualization's. It's an
         | example of the minority of bad charts, as your link shows it
         | gets jumped on quick.
         | 
         | This from your article is a better example -
         | 
         | https://theatlas.com/charts/HkBllCLO7
         | 
         | What does that mean? Is it CPI? Is it consistent with worlds
         | prices? Because of inflation prices go up over time. It goes up
         | over time. Is the chart saying anything?
         | 
         | Here's a good example of Bullshit Visualization's -
         | https://xkcd.com/1138/
         | 
         | It's things you'll see in the media/PR Journal articles that
         | are nothing but look pretty and give a story a feel of
         | authority when it shouldn't.
        
       | OliverJones wrote:
       | With respect, this author misunderstands Edward Tufte's use of
       | the term "Chart junk." Chart junk isn't just pointless decoration
       | on charts. It's also misleading or missing scales, deceptive or
       | inept ways of representing data, and so forth.
        
         | kristjansson wrote:
         | Of course Tufte's body of work a whole, and VDQI in particular
         | address those issues, but chartjunk is, in my reading, a
         | specific and limited complaint. His leading two examples are
         | unintended moire effect in cross hatching unnecessary grid
         | lines. His third (the duck) is a bit more nebulous, but I read
         | it as any sort of overly cute "we can so we did" effect on a
         | visualization.
         | 
         | The mortal sins of data visualization misrepresent the data;
         | the venal sin of chartjunk distracts from the data.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | gavinray wrote:
       | Thanks for sharing this, gave me a smile and a good chuckle.
       | 
       | Some other people who are knowledgeable in the domain have posted
       | that there might be some rigor issues.
       | 
       | But I think a lot of us can empathize with the feeling of _" No
       | you idiot, that's not how you use that at all!"_ when it comes to
       | some area we know more about than the average person.
       | 
       | I'm pretty sure my car mechanic winces every time I bring my
       | vehicle back into the shop. That's what I pay him for I guess.
        
       | AlbertCory wrote:
       | So disappointed :) I was hoping this was going to be a
       | visualization _OF_ bullshit, not a rant about bullshit
       | visualizations.
       | 
       | All seriousness aside, Correll fails to realize that the layout,
       | length, and organization of your text are _also_ forms of
       | visualization, and at those, he fails completely.
       | 
       | "It is my contention that many (most?) visualizations are
       | bullshit in either the Frankfurt sense of attempting to persuade
       | while being totally disconnected from notions of truths about the
       | world, or in the Graeber sense of being created for no readily
       | apparent purpose and to no real useful end."
       | 
       | So he's shown us some erudition by throwing in Frankfurt &
       | Graeber. Whoopee. When he mentions Tufte, a pioneer and a giant
       | in his field, he's dismissive.
       | 
       | All that said, there is some worthwhile stuff in here. He needs
       | to study _The Elements of Style_ , hire an editor, and reduce it
       | to a readable three pages or so, single-column.
        
         | pc86 wrote:
         | Have you ever read an academic paper? This is a pretty bog
         | standard layout.
        
       | aaron695 wrote:
       | The recent/many old "Submarine cable map rendered onto a globe"
       | is a good example of this.
       | 
       | If there existed a good digital globe you could have in your
       | house I'd have it as one of the skins, because it looks cool, but
       | it is useless for learning about the true topography.
       | 
       | Or a more obvious example the stupid sliding photos the media
       | use. Before and after a storm or whatever. Actually hiding the
       | data from you to get your dopamine up from making you slide to
       | try and see it. Which if you view the media as just entertainment
       | is ok.
        
       | spenrose wrote:
       | "In this unhinged rant, I lay out my suspicion that a lot of
       | visualiza- tions are bullshit: charts that do not have even the
       | common decency to intentionally lie but are totally unconcerned
       | about the state of the world or any practical utility. I suspect
       | that bullshit charts take up a large fraction of the time and
       | attention of actual visualization pro- ducers and consumers, and
       | yet are seemingly absent from academic research into
       | visualization design. ... It is my contention that many (most?)
       | visualizations are bullshit in either the Frankfurt sense of
       | attempting to persuade while being totally disconnected from
       | notions of truths about the world, or in the Graeber sense of
       | being created for no readily apparent purpose and to no real
       | useful end. When they inform, these bullshit charts do so in the
       | most superficial and unsatisfying ways-- for instance, a bar
       | chart might tell me that so-and-so many widgets were sold during
       | a particular period of time"
        
         | Tarq0n wrote:
         | > "for instance, a bar chart might tell me that so-and-so many
         | widgets were sold during a particular period of time"
         | 
         | Funny, considering that's a core part of Tableau's value
         | proposition.
        
           | vanderZwan wrote:
           | If their product becomes saturated with bullshit charts it
           | will hurt them in the long run.
           | 
           | Also, it's a sign that at the very least this person working
           | there genuinely cares about the product they're selling, so
           | that's good
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-09-26 23:01 UTC)