[HN Gopher] Using RSS to replace social media
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Using RSS to replace social media
        
       Author : Researcherry
       Score  : 213 points
       Date   : 2021-09-24 18:08 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (lukesmith.xyz)
 (TXT) w3m dump (lukesmith.xyz)
        
       | tofukid wrote:
       | I think RSS is a way to read social media, it's not a replacement
       | for social media. But that's a good thing! I just want to stay
       | updated with blogs, forums, _and_ social media - in one place. I
       | built and use https://sumi.news to follow Twitter, newsletters,
       | and RSS in a peaceful, chronological feed, and it works well for
       | me. I still comment, reply, and interact, but I only have to
       | check one website for updates.
        
         | spockz wrote:
         | Why? We could have something federated where I add my response
         | to a particular post/thread to my RSS feed. We then leave it up
         | to the client to generate a proper tree representation of a
         | discussion.
        
           | skymt wrote:
           | Mastodon uses an HTML microformat called h-feed for
           | federation of user feeds. h-feed is based on hAtom, which is
           | a microformat encoding of the Atom feed format. So your idea
           | isn't all that far off from how the most popular federated
           | social network system is designed (though there's more to
           | it).
        
             | throwdecro wrote:
             | How much of this does an end-user need to think about? It
             | seems very complicated.
        
       | Kaze404 wrote:
       | It's fascinating to me that even in a post for something as
       | simple and mundane as RSS feeds somehow Luke Smith still manages
       | to sprinkle in some of his disgusting alt-right vocabulary. I
       | have to respect the grift.
        
         | Andrew_nenakhov wrote:
         | Can you please explain what you mean by 'disgusting alt-right
         | vocabulary'? After your comment I read his post twice and
         | didn't find anything remotely political.
        
           | Kaze404 wrote:
           | > Nitter.net is a Twitter proxy that mirrors Twitter, but
           | without Javascript soyware and spying.
           | 
           | With "soy" here being an old dogwhistle that refers to the
           | "theory" that men are being feminized through the estrogen
           | contained in meals that have soy as ingredient.
        
             | smitty1e wrote:
             | You are offering significant interpretation here. Note the
             | adjaceny if 'o' and 'p' on the QWERTY.
             | 
             | 'Soyware' is possibly a simple 'spyware' typo.
             | 
             | I know neither you nor The Famous Article's author, but
             | your remark does not instill confidence in your judgement.
        
               | pcranaway wrote:
               | not a typo
               | https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Soydev
        
               | voltagex_ wrote:
               | It's not a typo, the author also uses this on their
               | YouTube channel.
        
               | riffic wrote:
               | by definition a dog-whistle. something which can be
               | innocently handwaved away by those not attuned, but sends
               | a clear signal to those capable of reception.
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | jetstreamSam wrote:
             | >disgusting alt-right vocabulary
             | 
             | I am unconvinced that a "dogwhistle" that is a word play on
             | spyware is truly disgusting and clearly alt-right. And with
             | all due respect, why make a personal snarky attack because
             | of 1 word?
        
               | batch12 wrote:
               | This is interesting because I passed over the word
               | without noticing and even didn't understand even when it
               | was pointed out. Now that it has been spelled out for me,
               | a word has gone from being unnoticed to communicating the
               | idea that the complaint is against. By making a larger
               | issue about this, the objection has enabled the idea to
               | spread giving the author more reach for his views than he
               | originally had.
        
               | Kaze404 wrote:
               | Because Luke Smith is not shy to express his alt right
               | political views both on his website and his YouTube
               | channel. As long as he's free to do that, I'm free to
               | criticize it.
        
               | jetstreamSam wrote:
               | I would completely agree on that, if his general blog
               | would be what was posted. But this is an unrelated
               | informative article, which is why I don't think
               | discrediting critique of the person is valid. Especially
               | since the 'offenses' seem impressively minor in this
               | case.
        
               | Kaze404 wrote:
               | I agree that this is an unrelated article, but he opened
               | this can of worms himself by inserting dogwhistles in it.
               | Which is unfortunate, because the information in there is
               | actually useful and something I would gladly link in the
               | "Library" section of my blog. But I can't do that now,
               | otherwise I'd be platforming speech that wants me dead.
        
               | jetstreamSam wrote:
               | Would you care to explain to me how "consooome" and
               | "soyware" imply your death?
               | 
               | In my vocabulary those are a joking reference to
               | overconsumption and a play on bad software that serves as
               | spyware, which social media sites arguably often are imo.
               | 
               | If you argue that you associate these words with people
               | that want you dead it would seem to me that that is your
               | narrow personal perspective. I certainly don't want you
               | dead.
        
               | _dain_ wrote:
               | > platforming speech that wants me dead.
               | 
               | can you point to a single instance where luke smith has
               | advocated violence, against you or others?
        
               | pixxel wrote:
               | Perhaps you're over sensitive or you get a kick out of
               | derailing. Either way, time here has been lost to the
               | topic.
        
               | spErased wrote:
               | I'm not sure what to look for as evidence of Luke
               | suggesting he would want yourself or anyone else dead. I
               | would appreciate some quotes or the name of a particular
               | blog entry for my reference.
        
               | Kaze404 wrote:
               | Sorry, that was definitely bad wording on my part. But
               | still, I think my hesitancy to platform people who openly
               | use the vernacular of people who actually _do_ want that
               | is reasonable. I obviously don 't know Luke Smith and
               | have no idea on what he actually wants, but I know the
               | people who use those words and what they want.
        
               | kkoncevicius wrote:
               | Do you have some examples of his alt-right political
               | opinions? I've watched a few videos of his that were
               | recommended and don't remember anything there.
        
               | jetstreamSam wrote:
               | If I remember correctly he's very critical of modern
               | society and the modern human living conditions. Very
               | disillusioned from big cities and academic institutions.
               | Example; "modern man is a slave to his impulses and calls
               | it freedom. Previous societies forbid giving into these
               | impulses and thus were more free." ~see his blog
               | 
               | To me it seems quite conservative and always well
               | explained but never outright alt-right.
        
               | [deleted]
        
               | Kaze404 wrote:
               | I think the FAQ (https://web.archive.org/web/201805230342
               | 52/http://old.lukesm...) says it all really, especially
               | the section where he talks about "the SJWs".
        
               | kkoncevicius wrote:
               | After reading I think you are blowing this out of
               | proportion by stating that "it says it all". There is a
               | section there about his political beliefs and he says his
               | main belief is that tech-monopolies should be broken down
               | and society should be governed on a smaller scale. I
               | think half of HN readers would agree with some version of
               | that. And about "the SJWs" - he only says that people are
               | asking him to make video about them and he is not going
               | to do that.
               | 
               | Maybe I don't know what alt-right is but I don't see how
               | this is alt-right. Just because he uses the term "SJW" ?
               | I don't use it but I know what it means. You apparently
               | do also. That doesn't make us alt-right, right?
        
               | Kaze404 wrote:
               | There isn't much alt-right about that specifically, but
               | it's clear wording that the alt-right has been using
               | online for years. Talking about "SJWs" controlling the
               | media and universities (and in the very same paragraph
               | saying every "normal" person wants them "gone") and
               | calling things you dislike "soy" are both plays in the
               | years old alt-right playbook. If it walks like a duck and
               | it quacks like a duck...
        
               | Andrew_nenakhov wrote:
               | I have noticed that people commonly referred to as SJW
               | often consider everyone who is not them to be alt-right.
               | 
               | And yes, people sharing social justice values do obsess
               | over it and it shows.
               | 
               | Anecdotal example: random article brought to me by
               | sliding android home screen to the left about new
               | Foundation series spent more than half of the volume
               | addressing the diversity of the cast and lamenting that
               | on-screen sex was showing only heterosexuals.
               | 
               | This can be said about almost any article about any piece
               | of media directed to me by Google, from which I do
               | conclude that SJWs, indeed, control the media.
               | 
               | (I have no personal experience with the US universities,
               | so I can't say anything about them being controlled by
               | the SJWs)
        
               | the_third_wave wrote:
               | Ah, the blessings of the Google-free Android experience
               | get proven once again by this counterexample of Google -
               | or rather those working for Google who are in control
               | these feeds - pushing their agenda onto unsuspecting
               | (...?) victims.
               | 
               | May I suggest removing whatever stock distribution you
               | have and replacing it with e.g. LineageOS, doing away
               | with Google services - use microG [1] et al if you need
               | something which depends on them - and dropping whatever
               | "news aggregator" feed is offered by third parties? Use
               | something like Nextcloud News [2] and add the feeds for a
               | number of publications, both corporate as well as
               | alternative, from all sides of the political spectrum.
               | Compare how events are reported between them and form
               | your own conclusions. Also give up on the hope of non-
               | political culture reporting from corporate media, this
               | seems to be one of the most heavily politicised areas
               | with nearly all publications slanted towards the "left"
               | side of the political spectrum.
               | 
               | [1] https://microg.org/
               | 
               | [2] https://apps.nextcloud.com/apps/news
        
               | fascistusa wrote:
               | It does still blow my mind that so much absurd rhetoric
               | is coming out of the left over the past decade. The
               | absurdity blows my mind and it definitely doesn't promote
               | a conversation.
               | 
               | You want a war.
        
               | nerdponx wrote:
               | Because the "soy" thing is an overt aspect of alt-right
               | and toxic incel discourse.
        
               | jetstreamSam wrote:
               | Are jokes on the debated but possible phytoestrogenic
               | side effects of soy really exclusively alt right?
        
               | nerdponx wrote:
               | No, but the associated cultural memes were born in and
               | currently thrive in the overlapping alt-right and toxic
               | incel cultures. And Luke Smith openly associates himself
               | with the former.
        
           | obtusifolia wrote:
           | I think they refer to terms like consoooom and soyware which
           | are not political, but can be connected to 4chan and
           | therefore to the alt-right. It's a bit of a strech if this is
           | the first time you heard of Luke Smith, but generally he's
           | not shy to express his political opinions on the far right of
           | the spectrum. Which is a shame, because otherwise there's a
           | lot I can agree with him on.
        
         | the_third_wave wrote:
         | I read the page and did not find anything worth labelling "
         | _disgusting alt-right vocabulary_ ". Either put up or shut up
         | with the " _disgusting alt-right vocabulary_ " nonsense. This
         | type of accusation without examples and explanations just why
         | it is " _disgusting_ " and " _alt-right_ " only serves to
         | poison the well from which ideas are drawn, it serves no good
         | purpose.
         | 
         | So, show us some examples of that disgusting vocabulary so we
         | can respond to it. If you can not just keep your fingers off
         | the keyboard until you have something constructive to add to
         | the discussion.
        
           | woodruffw wrote:
           | "unJewgled Chromium"[1] was the first one that came to mind.
           | He's normally a little bit more subtle, but I guess he was
           | feeling randy that time.
           | 
           | I'm not going to dig further through his blog posts (they're
           | insufficiently interesting from a technological perspective;
           | mostly longform versions of what someone with only opinions
           | from 4chan would write), but you're welcome to.
           | 
           | [1]: https://lukesmith.xyz/articles/every-web-browser-
           | absolutely-...
        
           | mkr-hn wrote:
           | I had a look at one of his Peertube feeds and I see that
           | "soy[noun]" is something he uses often enough that it's
           | probably not a typo. Example: "climate soyence," "OBS is
           | major soyware." All with the soyboy meme guy overlaid. The
           | "soy" thing is very much an alt-right dogwhistle, but those
           | have a way of leaking out, so it's not always a red flag in
           | isolation. I don't think such a charitable read is warranted
           | in this case: he's all in on the meme. Put it together with
           | all the pepes and whatnot, and it's clear he's at least well
           | into the pipeline.
           | 
           | This is why I'm usually against making such accusations
           | without extra context. There's _no_ way a casual reader could
           | have seen this. If you don 't have that context, it's clearly
           | just a typo! So Kaze404 looks like a goofball, unless you
           | have context.
           | 
           | edit: more context that removes all doubt
           | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28653868
        
             | mycoborea wrote:
             | It's 2021. Like it or not, what you're describing is common
             | slang of internet youth culture.
        
               | mkr-hn wrote:
               | Edgy antisemitic[0] language (like "unJewgled"), along
               | with transphobia, homophobia, and racism, was normal when
               | I was an internet youth, too. Then I grew up. I don't
               | think he's an internet youth unless I seriously misjudged
               | the photo on his website.
               | 
               | [0] https://www.adl.org/spelling
        
           | Kaze404 wrote:
           | I did so in another comment on this very thread. And
           | unfortunately for you, even if I didn't you don't have the
           | power to stop me from saying it. Maybe next time read the
           | rest of the thread before commenting.
        
         | qersist3nce wrote:
         | Well, at least most of the blogs on self-hosted freedom-of-
         | expression-respecting solutions I read over the net are written
         | by boogeyman "alt-rights" and "4channers", unlike the so called
         | "liberal" ilk that are bowing day and night to big media.
         | 
         | I have my criticisms on Luke Smith, but as a fellow man, I
         | respect him.
        
       | Zash wrote:
       | Forgotten OStatus have we? That was essentially RSS feeds +
       | optional extras like ActivityStreams and push, all gracefully
       | degrading into plain ol' RSS / Atom feeds.
        
         | cxr wrote:
         | Along with Atom, RSS is simple enough (it's in the name) that
         | you can add RSS support even for static sites. ActivityPub, the
         | most popular carrier for ActivityStreams, is "designed around
         | the concept of an inbox and outbox"
         | <https://lwn.net/Articles/741218/>, requiring that the server
         | itself provide support. If you know of a realistic
         | demonstration of ActivityStreams-without-ActivityPub that
         | establishes a pattern that can be appropriated for re-use
         | elsewhere (e.g. on static sites), then ActivityStreams is worth
         | discussing, but otherwise probably not.
         | 
         | It's my claim that for all the work that goes into Mastodon,
         | Solid, etc, none of them will truly succeed without the ability
         | for programmers themselves to effectively put them into
         | practice on static sites, especially those associated with
         | their GitHub profile using GitHub Pages. (I despise GitHub,
         | FWIW, and really hate that so much of the world of development
         | has settled there, but I can know what I know from seeing what
         | I see.) When it's simple enough to do that, that's the point
         | where non-niche productized services for non-programmers to do
         | the same will start popping up and off-Twitter chatter will
         | take off. Despite the inroads that Mastodon has made, I don't
         | consider in non-niche; it's being held back by the same factors
         | described here.
        
           | Zash wrote:
           | ActivityStreams was originally an XML extension for Atom
           | <https://activitystrea.ms/specs/atom/1.0/>. It worked just
           | fine with a static site.
           | 
           | https://www.w3.org/TR/websub/ formerly PubSubHubbub was used
           | to notify subscribers, but it was optional and subscribers
           | would fall back to polling. WebSub could be a separate
           | service.
           | 
           | The trickiest part is handling replies, which involves some
           | cryptography to prevent spoofing. But this too could be done
           | by polling, only then you only get replies from those you
           | subscribe to. ActivityPub does this with crypto too IIRC.
        
       | pacman2 wrote:
       | For Twitter I use this Bridge to get RSS
       | 
       | https://github.com/RSS-Bridge/rss-bridge
       | 
       | Just saw, it works also with other websites like youtube. But I
       | have never tried this.
        
       | HaloZero wrote:
       | Has anybody used rss-bridge to replace the Facebook newsfeed? It
       | seems like you have to point to individual people so I'm curious
       | if you'd get blocked if you tried to follow more than a few
       | friends.
        
       | chrismorgan wrote:
       | Technical correction: YouTube, GitHub and GitLab all produce Atom
       | feeds, not RSS. (Nitter has /rss in its URLs but I can't confirm
       | they're _actually_ RSS because the feeds seem to be broken,
       | producing HTML "user not found" error pages.)
       | 
       | (If you want to know more of my beef against RSS (both as a
       | technology and as a term for web feeds regardless of actual
       | format):
       | https://hn.algolia.com/?query=chrismorgan+atom+rss&type=comm....
       | RSS should have been killed off about fifteen years ago in favour
       | of Atom.)
        
         | ravenstine wrote:
         | I'm curious, why do you think it should have been killed off in
         | favor of Atom? Do you mean in the sense of the terminology, or
         | is there something inferior about RSS?
         | 
         | Perhaps both should be killed off in favor of a JSON-based
         | format.
        
           | chrismorgan wrote:
           | Refer to my earlier comments: Atom is technically superior
           | and more sound, and calling them all "RSS" is harmful by
           | encouraging the inferior.
           | 
           | JSON stuff? Eh, I feel that's largely a solution looking for
           | a problem. It's too late to get universal support in clients
           | (feeds aren't popular enough and too much of the software
           | basically on life support), so you're always going to need to
           | serve Atom or RSS as well, and once you're implementing one
           | of _them_ , why would you bother with the JSON format at all?
           | As for the one serious attempt, JSON Feed, I have one thing
           | that I really like about it and one thing that I don't. The
           | don't: it specifies that titles are plain text, which I think
           | is a shame; Atom lets you put HTML in your titles so you can
           | do things like <code>, <em>, <sup> and so forth (and I do, oh
           | yes! I do)--though I wish Atom had let you specify _both_
           | plain text and HTML ( _sometimes_ I want  <code></code> to
           | "degrade" to backticks; refer to the titles of my last few
           | blog posts for examples, with plain text in the <title> and
           | HTML in the body). And that's the thing I think JSON Feed got
           | right for the _content_ , that you can provide both HTML
           | _and_ text, whereas Atom forces you to choose.
        
             | ravenstine wrote:
             | > JSON stuff? Eh, I feel that's largely a solution looking
             | for a problem.
             | 
             | Before I say anything else, your viewpoint is totally
             | valid. :) I can't truly argue against it in an objective
             | sense, I think.
             | 
             | It's funny that you say that, however, because that's my
             | perspective on XML in general; it's a solution looking for
             | a problem. Sure, we have Atom, it's here, let's just use
             | it, and I kind of agree. Yet if Atom has already been in a
             | sort of decline, if you will, the complexity it adds only
             | detracts from any sort of resurgence in adoption. The
             | entire syntax is designed to support _types_ , which as far
             | as I've seen is something that has never really been used.
             | I mean, whose feed actually uses custom XML
             | namespaces/tags? Feeds are these verbose and overly-
             | abstract markup files for a purpose nobody really asked
             | for. If someone needs to stick more metadata into their
             | feed, they can already do it with JSON by just adding a
             | non-standard key to the object. Done. No need to have
             | anything beyond primitive types or declaring namespaces.
             | 
             | As far as the HTML thing goes, that's a fair point, but I
             | have to disagree. I _don 't_ want HTML to taint titles of
             | things in a feed reader. It's bad enough that people can
             | use emojis and different stylized unicode characters in
             | them, but HTML would just make things worse. I don't need
             | titles to have bold or italics or colors or whatnot. If
             | that's going to be in the actual content body, then so be
             | it, but what you are suggesting sounds like a horrible
             | idea. Granted, I didn't have that problem back when I used
             | to use a feed reader.
        
             | thaumasiotes wrote:
             | > calling them all "RSS" is harmful by encouraging the
             | inferior.
             | 
             | Where did this come from? You refer to an atom feed as RSS,
             | someone decides to add RSS to their site, and they
             | implement atom because that's how you do RSS. What's the
             | problem?
        
           | theshrike79 wrote:
           | > Perhaps both should be killed off in favor of a JSON-based
           | format.
           | 
           | As long as XML has DTD and Schema, it will be superior to
           | JSON
        
         | leephillips wrote:
         | RSS seems to have taken over as a generic term encompassing
         | both actual RSS and the superior Atom.
        
       | stiltzkin wrote:
       | > RSS-bridge is the ultimate RSS feed helper and will not just
       | give you RSS feeds for Facebook pages, but basically anything
       | else.
       | 
       | This has been my opposite experience, all RSS bridges i have
       | tried gets error with Facebook pages.
        
         | jsilence wrote:
         | I share this experience. Frustrating. But made me give up on FB
         | completely. For good.
        
       | spansoa wrote:
       | _Uses this for Miniflux_
       | 
       | https://miniflux.app/
        
       | poopsmithe wrote:
       | I've been enjoying using https://fraidyc.at/ for the past year or
       | so. It ingests RSS and is smart enough for everything else. I use
       | it to follow people on Twitter, know when a favorite youtuber
       | uploads a video, subscribe to a number of blogs, and know exactly
       | when a new post is added to the subreddits I frequent.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | hnaccy wrote:
       | I use social media because it's social.
       | 
       | A one way rss feed of content is the complete opposite.
        
         | the_third_wave wrote:
         | You could import the RSS feed into a tool which allows you to
         | comment to specific entries with your comments being served
         | through RSS to interested others...
         | 
         | ...upon which you'd have re-invented something resembling
         | Mastodon, GNU Social or XMPP, give or take few bits.
        
           | Ambolia wrote:
           | The bad thing about Mastodon is that you don't own your
           | handle and your data unless you run your own instance.
           | 
           | Maybe it could have a crytographic addon where you own handle
           | and data cryptographically and can move it to a new server as
           | long as you keep a backup locally and the private key.
        
             | the_third_wave wrote:
             | Maybe you could but there is something to be said for
             | running your own instance of whatever platform you use to
             | spread your thoughts. It is close to the last word in
             | avoiding censorship as long as the network operators remain
             | (or become in the case of AWS and probably some others)
             | neutral. As to whether this is scalable... remains to be
             | seen but for "normal" people with a few thousand
             | "followers" at best it should work fine even on a single
             | board computer like a Raspberry Pi. That same SBC could
             | host your mail - using a smart host (which could be run as
             | a service) to push mail to the world so as to avoid an
             | avalanche of spam. While it is doing its thing anyway you
             | may as well add whatever web-related thing you might want
             | to put out for the world to see, or maybe not for the world
             | but at least for family and friends. It can host media
             | services, a VPN service, etc. In short, it can be a
             | stepping stone towards a decentralised net - which I deem
             | to be a good thing.
        
       | yur3i__ wrote:
       | The issue with these solutions is that they're only really one
       | way, if I actually want to interact with anything posted to the
       | RSS feed I have to navigate to the main website anyway, which
       | renders the initial reading of them in a freer way pretty
       | pointless.
        
         | illegalmemory wrote:
         | I agree, but that is beautiful right? The choice is in user's
         | hand if they want to interact with content or not. If they
         | don't want to read the content from that publisher in future
         | they can simply do that, rather than getting three drip mails
         | in 2 week intervals on why I haven't read emails sent to me by
         | them.
        
           | piggybox wrote:
           | Since you mention choice, then this is just an option rather
           | than a replacement. If it's a replacement then it takes away
           | the option to interact with content (such as commenting).
        
         | 0xabe wrote:
         | If you want to interact, the way you do that is to own your own
         | blog where you post your "reply" and use a trackback[0] url.
         | Then the conversation is even freer and you're in control of
         | your content. Don't forget to create your own RSS feed for
         | others.
         | 
         | [0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trackback
        
           | karatinversion wrote:
           | This is another way of achieving the same end, yes. Like any
           | such solution, it requires both author and commenter to use
           | software supporting it, which Twitter does not.
        
       | torstenvl wrote:
       | I've thought about how RSS and social media relate to each other
       | _a lot_. Social media works off the  "feed" paradigm pretty
       | explicitly (News Feed, Twitter feed, etc.).
       | 
       | I've thought about how to implement an open-standards social
       | media site. Maybe with a feed server (FastCGI or otherwise) that
       | takes authentication tokens in the request header or URL (over
       | HTTPS only obviously), and - if the token is linked to a valid
       | "friend" or "following" relationship, returns an RSS feed of the
       | person's recent posts.
        
       | est wrote:
       | Twitter with an RSS feed is a waste of crawling traffic.
       | 
       | Suppose you follow 1k accounts, you have to subscribe 1k RSS.
       | What a waste. Twitter's core functionality was based on how to
       | aggregate all 1k updates into one feed.
        
       | streamofdigits wrote:
       | Replacing existing approaches to social media needs a two way
       | protocol like activitypub https://activitypub.rocks/
       | 
       | RSS plays well but is not sufficient
        
         | riffic wrote:
         | to add on top of this, we *really* need players like media,
         | institutions, and government to start adopting ActivityPub and
         | to have those groups start spinning up sites which pump out
         | communication onto this system.
         | 
         | This could look like a WordPress blog with the ActivityPub
         | plugin installed.
         | 
         | It could also look like the incumbent social media services
         | white-labeling their websites so orgs can be social from their
         | own domains.
         | 
         | Groups I'm talking about are your newspapers, cable news
         | channels, fire departments, colleges, heads of state, et
         | cetera.
        
       | kugutsumen wrote:
       | I use Reeder to follow the sites I enjoy reading e.g. slashdot,
       | ars technica, xkcd, swift and golang blogs, some sections of the
       | NY Times, etc.
       | 
       | I never read social media feed. For Twitter my Tweetbot client is
       | configured to filter out all retweets and I use a 'mustered' list
       | for the people whose tweets I don't want to miss.
        
       | Ambolia wrote:
       | The difficult part is replacing the comment section and the
       | network dynamics that make those sites grow.
       | 
       | I think all alternatives to youtube fail because of the dead
       | comment sections. Not sure if there would be some way of creating
       | distributed comment sections without them turning into pure spam
       | and . Maybe chains of trust where you only see messages by users
       | that have been "whitelisted" by someone you trust.
        
         | edoceo wrote:
         | Signed ActivityPub?
        
       | woodruffw wrote:
       | I'll post this every time someone tries to launder Luke Smith
       | through HN: he is a reactionary with a relatively popular YouTube
       | channel in which he openly espouses and trades in racist talking
       | points[1].
       | 
       | [1]: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2eYFnH61tmytImy1mTYvhA
        
         | tasuki wrote:
         | That's... bad, and also totally orthogonal to the linked blog
         | post?
         | 
         | Should we not be using RSS to replace social media because the
         | person saying so might be a racist? Should racists be silenced
         | when talking about other things?
        
           | woodruffw wrote:
           | > That's... bad, and also totally orthogonal to the linked
           | blog post?
           | 
           | The linked blog post is the kind of informational pablum that
           | anybody with a handful of years of programming or IT
           | experience could write.
           | 
           | That's what Luke Smith specializes in: milquetoast
           | technological advice wrapped in a veneer of alt-right
           | language designed to titillate his audience. I see no reason
           | why we should give him center stage in our attentions when
           | plenty of other, better, and more qualified people can talk
           | cogently about the same topics.
        
             | jsilence wrote:
             | > when plenty of other, better, and more qualified people
             | can talk cogently about the same topics
             | 
             | You mean Brodie?
        
               | woodruffw wrote:
               | I don't know who that is.
        
               | jsilence wrote:
               | Brodie Robertson is one of the Linux Protonerds on YT
               | worth watching.
        
         | jsilence wrote:
         | Yeah we know. Does not keep me from cloning his st config. But
         | yes, I liked watching his stuff much more when he was going
         | thru his Linux/Dektop setup or advocating useful but little
         | known command line tools.
         | 
         | Not unlike Scott Adams. I find Dilbert funny. Am I supposed not
         | to laugh because his political views do not align with mine (at
         | all)?
        
           | woodruffw wrote:
           | You can do whatever you please!
           | 
           | Not everybody knows, because he's a relative nobody who
           | occasionally gets laundered through HN. My only role in this
           | entire thing is making sure that the bits that I know are
           | available for consideration.
        
             | jsilence wrote:
             | He does not seem to be a complete mindless dummy. Ever
             | tried to contact and argue with him? I'd honestly watch
             | that.
             | 
             | Same thing with Jordan Peterson. I must not agree with his
             | stand points and positions, but his arguments are
             | compelling at times and it is fun watching and following
             | his stuff. I can only broaden my view if don't look into
             | the same direction all the time.
        
               | woodruffw wrote:
               | Both Peterson and Smith's content falls squarely into the
               | tarpit of bullshit asymmetry: anything that they chose to
               | mouth off on takes an asymmetrically large amount of
               | effort to rebut. That's not how I'd prefer to spend my
               | time, and it's not something I can reasonably ask any
               | person to do.
        
               | torstenvl wrote:
               | > _takes an asymmetrically large amount of effort to
               | rebut_
               | 
               | And so... you'd rather just badmouth him on HN instead?
               | This entire subthread is an ad hominem, and entirely
               | inappropriate.
        
             | piggybox wrote:
             | Thanks! I, for one, have never heard of this person.
        
         | _dain_ wrote:
         | get over it
        
         | olah_1 wrote:
         | Thank you for reporting this, comrade.
        
           | woodruffw wrote:
           | Accusing your critics of being communists is a famously
           | strong argument against being a reactionary, as all of modern
           | history has shown!
        
             | abnry wrote:
             | "This guy's racist"
             | 
             | "Ok commie"
             | 
             | About right for the level of discourse.
             | 
             | This is the comments section of a post about RSS.
        
             | olah_1 wrote:
             | There is no critique here other than "reported for wrong
             | think".
        
               | woodruffw wrote:
               | You do realize that this is an Internet forum and that
               | nobody has been reported, right?
               | 
               | It's incredible how we've descended from "someone pointed
               | out that the author of TFA is a reactionary" to
               | breathless analogies.
        
               | olah_1 wrote:
               | That guy knows exactly what he's doing. He's hoping that
               | more of the hivemind jumps on Luke and tries to further
               | punish him for his dissent from the global technocracy.
               | 
               | Comply or face the consequences. No doubt that guy
               | believes he's a true individual lol.
        
               | woodruffw wrote:
               | I'm the same guy.
               | 
               | I'm not particularly old, but I _am_ old enough to
               | remember when it was possible for someone to be Unpopular
               | On The Internet (for good or bad reasons) without it
               | being a matter of grave political importance (
               | "hivemind", "punish", "dissent").
               | 
               | In other words: you're overplaying your hand. If you like
               | what Luke has to say, just say that. Behaving as if my
               | _dislike_ somehow amounts to oppression is childish.
        
       | debarshri wrote:
       | Social media tells you what you should see based on some implicit
       | determination. Sure sometimes you can discover new things that
       | did not interest you. You can feel serendipitous. With RSS feed,
       | you can actually gain control, you could actually say when you
       | see items in the feed, alert me. With current social media, I am
       | constantly discovering things, which gives me a short high of
       | finding new things which lasts for few minutes and then I find
       | another new thing. I haven't been able to find what interests me
       | for eg. In YouTube, where I get bored quickly even though I keep
       | seeing new things, new domain I just discovered.
        
         | ravenstine wrote:
         | YouTube is far better if you can completely bypass their
         | algorithm.
         | 
         | Half the time I use YouTube through NewPipe, a FOSS Android
         | alternative to the YouTube app. If you import your
         | subscriptions, it shows you _exactly_ all the videos from your
         | subscribed channels in chronological order, not what it or
         | YouTube _thinks_ you want to see. The search is seemingly less
         | algorithmically influenced and there is no autoplay. There 's a
         | "trending" tab, but that's easy to ignore and you can just set
         | your subscription feed as the default tab. The very fact that I
         | don't feel like what I'm seeing is what corporations and
         | billionaires want me to see changes my usage into something
         | that is _active_ rather than _passive_. It feels different,
         | better, to participate in the power process to not only have
         | confidence in that I 'm seeing all the updates I specified to
         | see but that I have to seek out what I want to watch/listen to.
         | Psychologically, it's healthier, IMO.
        
           | atatatat wrote:
           | Peep the settings, you can remove the Trending tab
           | altogether.
        
           | crtasm wrote:
           | Newpipe is fantastic.
           | 
           | > there is no autoplay.
           | 
           | There is now, it got turned on when I installed a recent
           | update. The option is: settings->video and audio->auto-queue
           | next stream.
        
           | Quillbert182 wrote:
           | YouTube itself does have that same option under the
           | subscriptions tab, it will only show videos from your
           | subscriptions in chronological order.
        
             | ravenstine wrote:
             | That is true, except YouTube doesn't always show you all
             | your subscription content. In fact it frequently hides
             | subscribed content from me, including live streams, even
             | when I set the bell-icon to "All". The difference between
             | the subscriptions tab on YouTube and NewPipe is that the
             | latter literally scans every subscribed channel for
             | uploaded content, so I have yet to find out that I've ever
             | missed something through it. Whereas on YouTube I often
             | discover that I missed out on either a live stream or an
             | upload that did actually interest me but it never appeared
             | in either my notifications or in the Subscriptions tab. The
             | subscriptions tab _is_ better than anything that 's on the
             | home page, but I prefer to not have an algorithm lie to me
             | that I can see "All" new uploads.
             | 
             | EDIT: Also, random semi-related complaint; YouTube on web
             | _never_ honors when I click  "Set Reminder". It doesn't
             | matter if I permanently allow notifications in my browser
             | or what. I get no emails either. I have a hard time
             | believing the YT devs have written any tests for it. Then
             | again, I've never tried it in Chrome. !_!
        
           | kgwxd wrote:
           | YouTube has rss.
        
         | marginalia_nu wrote:
         | Serendipity is sadly an endangered experience with today's
         | popularity algorithms. If every suggestion you see is based on
         | what you and people with similar behavior as you are most
         | likely to click, then what you get is a rut. The things you
         | discover may be things you haven't seen before, but they can
         | hardly be called new.
         | 
         | The beautiful thing about flipping through a magazine, or
         | browsing a library, is that everyone gets the same options
         | regardless of who they are. It allows me, someone who isn't
         | into a particular thing, to discover that thing. To
         | accidentally read something I wouldn't have thought I agreed
         | with, and discover that they actually made a decent point.
         | 
         | I think these types of popularity algorithms are deeply
         | problematic.
        
       | grujicd wrote:
       | I'm doing it the other way, using social media instead of RSS!
       | Ok, only half joking.
       | 
       | Facebook is now what RSS was supposed to be, but for the non-tech
       | masses. Sure, I still use RSS for tech blogs, but how do I find
       | about local concerts and events, schedule changes for kid's
       | aikido, etc? All these small organizations, clubs, bands,
       | artists, venues use Facebook as a way to notify their
       | members/fans.
       | 
       | After some curating, I really like my Facebook. But I don't use
       | it as a social network, i.e. there's not much social stuff there.
       | "Loud" friends or relatives they are muted. But that's where I
       | find out about next concert of bands I follow, which I wouldn't
       | find elsewhere.
        
       | sys_64738 wrote:
       | Twitter is especially good for RSS as you can see almost all 140
       | chars in a single line and see all the recents tweets for the
       | twitter account. I've no interest in comments in twitter.
       | 
       | With Reddit you can subscribe to RSS feeds of subreddits and see
       | the new topics. Click through to reddit if you want to engage.
       | 
       | It has its uses and frankly it's my method for info consumption.
       | If something doesn't have an RSS interface then I don't use it.
       | Life is too short.
        
         | throw0101a wrote:
         | > _Twitter is especially good for RSS as you can see almost all
         | 140 chars in a single line and see all the recents tweets for
         | the twitter account._
         | 
         | Twitter used to have RSS (Atom?) until March 2013.
        
           | gaius_baltar wrote:
           | Any suggestion for a good HTML scraper that generates RSS
           | feeds from Twitter profiles without relying in the API or
           | third-party services?
        
           | sys_64738 wrote:
           | The RSS service I use has a Twitter gateway which does
           | translation. It works really nice.
        
             | dharmaturtle wrote:
             | What RSS service you're using? I'm in the market.
        
               | sys_64738 wrote:
               | INO Reader - think Google Reader. Good deals around
               | Thgiv.
        
       | navmed wrote:
       | Is there one for Instagram?
        
       | smsm42 wrote:
       | I hope RSS is finally old enough to be in fashion again, and
       | people are starting to wake up to the fact that it's much
       | superior to social media as a periodic content consumption venue.
       | Social media is for posting cat pictures, wedding invitations and
       | ancient jokes you heard for the first time yesterday. RSS is for
       | creating curated periodic content streams. I've been using it
       | since forever, and there's never been anything better. Well,
       | maybe better format - RSS, Atom, whatever - but the idea is the
       | same.
       | 
       | Hopefully people start to wake up to this finally? One can hope.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-09-25 23:01 UTC)