[HN Gopher] The predecessor to Google Earth was clumsy, yet powe...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The predecessor to Google Earth was clumsy, yet powerful
        
       Author : croes
       Score  : 60 points
       Date   : 2021-09-23 07:48 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.vice.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.vice.com)
        
       | hirundo wrote:
       | I thought this would be about Keyhole. I was a Keyhole user when
       | Google acquired it in 2004 and turned it into Google Earth.
       | 
       | https://archive.is/ynMIR
       | 
       | At the time I thought it was one of the most spectacular pieces
       | of software I'd ever seen. Google hasn't changed that.
        
         | myself248 wrote:
         | Here I thought it would be about NASA WorldWind, a 2003-era
         | project which was sort of like Keyhole but with all sorts of
         | layers for the GOES and Landsat and MODIS imagery.
         | 
         | Some of those layers were updated every 12 or 24 hours, so you
         | could get near-realtime views of stuff like forest fires and
         | crop growth, which are easily visible using specific spectral
         | bands which are imaged by the satellites.
         | 
         | And clouds, of course, updated every few minutes.
         | 
         | Then the project changed directions and it's more of an SDK
         | meant to be baked into other software; the old interface with
         | all its wonder and depth seems to be gone.
         | 
         | Here's what it was like:
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rfxy7mn7mw
        
         | pfrench42 wrote:
         | Same here (Keyhole)
         | 
         | Funny story: Back then I was running keyhole with my son who
         | was about five years old. Naturally you want to fly in over
         | your house, so we did that. He saw the house and said "Dad, go
         | run outside!"
        
           | panzagl wrote:
           | Is your son now a scriptwriter for 'NCIS'?
        
             | bitwize wrote:
             | There are systems deployed by the U.S. military because
             | some general or colonel saw _Enemy of the State_ and said
             | "I want that surveillance tech." Look up Gorgon Stare.
        
         | prox wrote:
         | The article mentions 2001 for Google Earth, but I am pretty
         | sure it must have been released later. Wikipedia collaborates
         | as much.
        
         | AndrewKemendo wrote:
         | That was my expectation as well. I used Keyhole in the Air
         | Force back in 2004 or so and it was revolutionary at the time.
         | 
         | I had to go to a special closet and print maps from there as it
         | was only installed on one machine.
        
       | whoknowswhat11 wrote:
       | Man - when you are claiming 10 year old tech was stolen...
       | 
       | I'm sure this will get the clickbait headlines and comments
       | around google "stealing" someone's idea.
       | 
       | To at least a bit ahead of things
       | 
       | They did "terravision" which never went that far in 1994?
       | 
       | They sued claiming their tech was stolen in 2014 (20 years
       | later).
       | 
       | Patent was re-issued twice, so they filed in 1996, then did a re-
       | issue in 2010, then had to do another re-issue in 2013.
       | 
       | The claims are things like
       | 
       | The method of pictorial representation in claim 2, further
       | including determining the coordinates of the data in a new
       | coordinate system
       | 
       | The claims they were accused of violating were found to be
       | invalid. This went to jury trial.
       | 
       | Patents are great, but the more I read software patents, maybe
       | they should be limited to something like 6 years.
       | 
       | To be clear - I think it IS possible that their stuff was
       | "stolen" - in the sense that a number of people probably have had
       | ideas of maps in computers, I know I had an old multi-cd
       | encyclopedia that I think actually had a cool spinning globe
       | which was cutting edge back in day. Their zoom in piece looks
       | like the most unique (sets of more detailed tiles).
       | 
       | I'm not sure when level of detail methods came out really, I know
       | in gaming they were around for a while and there was a terrain
       | generator as well that made great terrain that had some level of
       | detail stuff. Perhaps this was in fact novel?
        
         | khazhoux wrote:
         | > I'm not sure when level of detail methods came out really, I
         | know in gaming they were around for a while and there was a
         | terrain generator as well that made great terrain that had some
         | level of detail stuff. Perhaps this was in fact novel?
         | 
         | Mipmaps were invented in 1983.
         | 
         | Keyhole/Earth used "Clipmaps", invented mid-90s. Clipmaps
         | solved the problem of how to fit gigantic mipmapped textures
         | into memory. Basically, you can keep the lowest LODs in memory
         | always (the zoomed out views), and then Clipmaps show an
         | efficient way for storing the higher resolution as needed.
         | 
         | As an aside, RIP the wonderful people behind both these
         | techniques. Lance Williams passed a few years ago, and Michael
         | Jones just a few months ago. Both were kind, humble, and
         | generous geniuses.
        
           | whoknowswhat11 wrote:
           | Thanks for this context and history - very helpful.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | csteubs wrote:
       | "Never Lost Again" is an excellent read for anyone curious about
       | the origins of Keyhole-become-Google Earth.
        
       | s_gourichon wrote:
       | Video from 1994: https://youtu.be/fAsAWoency8
        
         | tdeck wrote:
         | That's a very impressive video. It's interesting that they used
         | ATM networking, which also showed promise but didn't really
         | take off:
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asynchronous_Transfer_Mode
        
           | why_only_15 wrote:
           | This[0] is one of my favorite articles ever, about the
           | competition between IP and ATM in the 90s and the different
           | mindsets they had.
           | 
           | [0] https://www.wired.com/1996/10/atm-3/
        
             | jeffbee wrote:
             | Netheads vs bellheads is an instance of the superiority of
             | the end-to-end principle. https://web.mit.edu/Saltzer/www/p
             | ublications/endtoend/endtoe...
        
       | crmd wrote:
       | The moral of this story is that, along with great execution, you
       | have to get the timing exactly right for disruptive technology.
        
       | asadlionpk wrote:
       | Watching the video, Google has a display in their visitor center
       | with a similar mouse/dial thingy for navigating Google Earth.
        
       | habibur wrote:
       | In between the 10 years of these two releases, there was also
       | Microsoft's TerraServer, more like google earth but wanted to
       | show MS SQL server's power of being able to store terrabytes of
       | data.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terraserver.com
        
         | mc32 wrote:
         | Yeah I think they had a deal with Compaq or something for some
         | aspect of (commodity) hardware.
        
           | NelsonMinar wrote:
           | DEC, which Compaq bought. http://jimgray.azurewebsites.net/pa
           | pers/msr_tr_98_17_terrase...
           | 
           | DEC Alpha was the first readily available 64 bit architecture
           | for micro/mini computer sizes. Terraserver was in part a demo
           | of how powerful that was. So was Altavista, the first really
           | successful Web search engine. It started as a DEC research
           | demo program.
        
       | Animats wrote:
       | I first saw that kind of technology in my aerospace days, around
       | 1983. One day I was shown into a classified area, and got to try
       | a rack of custom built special purpose hardware used for
       | analyzing aerial imagery. There was a screen, a trackball, a
       | knob, and a lever. Pan with the trackball, rotate the image with
       | the knob, and zoom it with the lever. It was nicely done; no
       | artifacts and no lag. One of the people in my department worked
       | on extending it to larger areas of imagery, and he said it got
       | much easier once they realized it could be viewed as a virtual
       | memory system.
       | 
       | I'm not sure who the customer was. I just saw the prototype and
       | wasn't involved with that project. At the time, imagery analysts
       | usually used big photographs and magnifying glasses, as they'd
       | been doing since WWII. This was the beginning of computerizing
       | that process.
       | 
       | So this was being done, expensively, decades before it became a
       | consumer product.
       | 
       | (DoD R&D was like that back then - very expensive one-off designs
       | to solve specific hard problems. This was before "commercial off
       | the shelf technology" overtook the DoD one-offs.)
        
         | mistrial9 wrote:
         | my colleague in the 90s worked in Huntsville, Alabama, and if
         | the story is true, had duties down deep in a bunker where
         | satellite imagery was stored. People whispered it was "the
         | whole Earth" but now we know that there are clouds :-)
         | 
         | interesting story however
        
           | Animats wrote:
           | If you're into that, NRO published a history of their early
           | years.[1] More on the collection side than the analysis side.
           | In the early years, it was more about collecting imagery of
           | specific areas of interest. Now, there's a flood of imagery
           | of the whole planet to be analyzed. NRO buys most of that
           | from commercial vendors.
           | 
           | Which resulted in NRO getting flak from Congress over the
           | rather large building complex they built out by Dulles
           | Airport.
           | 
           | [1] https://www.nro.gov/History-and-Studies/50th-Anniversary-
           | Arc...
        
       | twobitshifter wrote:
       | That globe is absolutely enormous. Was the expectation that
       | people were so familiar with a physical globe that it must be the
       | best interaction device? It doesn't make sense to me once you get
       | past 1x zoom.
       | 
       | As far as Google earth goes, I remember using nasa world wind
       | before I had ever heard of Google earth. At the time that earth
       | came out, nasa had the leg up.
        
       | tdeck wrote:
       | > But it never took off in the way Google Earth later would, in
       | 2001.
       | 
       | This makes it sound like there's some big mystery here. Is it
       | really surprising that a free tool you could download in the
       | 2000s took off where a commercial CD-ROM product from the mid 90s
       | did not? How many people in 1994 would even have machines that
       | could support such a visualization?
        
       | beamatronic wrote:
       | "The opening screen of T'Rain was a frank rip-off of what you saw
       | when you booted up Google Earth. Richard felt no guilt about
       | this, since he had heard that Google Earth, in turn, was based on
       | an idea from some old science-fiction novel."
        
         | slacka wrote:
         | I haven't read Reamde. What was the opening sequence? The zoom
         | In Effect when you pick a local address?
        
           | beamatronic wrote:
           | Many people don't realize that Neal Stephenson is referring
           | to _his own_ novel, Snow Crash
        
       | sigg3 wrote:
       | And it was stolen by Google, apparently.
        
         | Lammy wrote:
         | Not exactly: https://pando.com/2015/07/01/cia-foia-google-
         | keyhole/
         | 
         | One of my favorite coincidences is how the mapping startup has
         | the same name as NRO's series of orbital surveillance
         | platforms: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KH-11_Kennen
         | 
         | This is also where the "K" in "KML" comes from (Keyhole Markup
         | Language)
        
           | Rebelgecko wrote:
           | I believe it was an intentional reference
        
           | c0nsumer wrote:
           | Probably not a coincidence. The Keyhole name was in the
           | public realm prior to this. (It'd been used within the
           | intelligence community since the late 50s.)
        
         | khazhoux wrote:
         | Except a court decided they didn't.
         | 
         | This company didn't have a claim on the idea of 3D
         | visualization of the planet.
        
           | rhacker wrote:
           | By Jury. And at the time Google was a highly popular company.
           | I still think a lot of large companies get away with stealing
           | the candy from others.
        
             | khazhoux wrote:
             | But Keyhole did not steal anyone's candy. The origin for
             | the product (and I'm paraphrasing the story here,
             | secondhand) was actually SGI'ers had developed a method for
             | efficiently rendering gigantic textures at multiple levels
             | of detail. They looked for the largest texture they could
             | find for their demos, and that turned out to be high-res
             | terrestrial imagery. This demo app then turned into the
             | Keyhole product itself.
             | 
             | This technology was developed inside the world's leading
             | computer graphics company, where people spent 24/7 thinking
             | about how to render 3D graphics and textures better,
             | faster, at higher resolutions. And Keyhole was merely a 3d
             | app that happened to be showing the planet. The other
             | company did not have a valid claim against that.
        
       | INTPenis wrote:
       | I remember an earlier article on Terraserver [1] where they made
       | an interesting observation that each morning when the east coast
       | woke up the corresponding DC would get a rise in temperature.
       | 
       | And that their logs clearly showed that the first thing anyone
       | looked at was where they lived, where they shopped and other
       | things near them.
       | 
       | So my interpretation was that Microsoft back then were so focused
       | on showing off their SQL server that they didn't even understand
       | the treasure of personal data they had in their hand.
       | 
       | 1. https://www.vice.com/en/article/8q89q4/microsofts-
       | terraserve...
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-09-24 23:01 UTC)