[HN Gopher] Gimp 2.10.28
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Gimp 2.10.28
        
       Author : marcodiego
       Score  : 107 points
       Date   : 2021-09-18 14:33 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.gimp.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.gimp.org)
        
       | h2odragon wrote:
       | > Very slow file dialogs: it used to happen when network devices
       | were slow or unavailable, or pluggable devices disconnected, or
       | even because of fake floppy drives configured in the BIOS. GLib
       | was using an inappropriate Windows API to get some information
       | about drives. This has been fixed!
       | 
       | Cool! I think that bug helped me get my wife to accept an Ubuntu
       | install instead of trying to stick with Win7 last year; it had
       | caused her enough pain to notice, apparently. She mentioned "it
       | doesn't grovel when I swap flash cards" specifically after the
       | switch.
        
         | willis936 wrote:
         | Windows hates slow disks in general. When I've had a dying HDD
         | just plugged in, even when that HDD is never accessed, Windows
         | comes to a crawl. The same system booted into Ubuntu is smooth.
        
           | marcodiego wrote:
           | I think SSD is now a requirement for smooth windows usage.
        
       | hall0ween wrote:
       | What a fantastic tool.
        
         | reginold wrote:
         | Post on funding for GIMP developers:
         | https://www.gimp.org/news/2021/07/27/support-gimp-developers...
        
           | hitekker wrote:
           | > What these donations through GNOME still cannot do is
           | funding paid development, so if that's what you want, please
           | fund the developers directly as explained above. GIMP project
           | obviously welcomes the 2 types of donation, for community
           | needs through GNOME and for paid development through the 2
           | crowdfundings listed.
           | 
           | Well, that's confusing. It's unfortunate they were unable to
           | work out an agreement with the GNOME foundation for
           | donations. https://krita.org/en/support-us/donations/ or
           | https://fund.krita.org/ looks way more straightforward.
        
       | Andrex wrote:
       | > You may have noticed that GIMP 2.10.24's macOS DMG was released
       | months late. Even this only happened because Jehan spent days to
       | fix the build on the remote build server, bit by bit, without any
       | local access to a macOS machine, nor any ways to run and test
       | himself.
       | 
       | Anyone here want to pool some money and send this guy a Mac Mini
       | off eBay or something?
        
       | reginold wrote:
       | For those more familiar with GIMP, can you share what you love
       | about it? I'm assuming most people think of it as a "open-source-
       | but-less-good photoshop". Would like to hear from fans.
       | 
       | edit: reading this thread
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25174686
       | 
       | Also curious about PhotoGIMP, focused on a better UI
        
         | chuckdotis wrote:
         | I haven't used Photoshop in about decade, but there isn't many
         | reasons why I use it over Photoshop other than it works on
         | Linux, I don't have to pay a subscription fee, it's not as
         | bloated and resource heavy, and it just works. In fact, I'm
         | much more familiar with GIMP than Photoshop. I'm not a
         | designer/illustrator by any means, but the times I've had to
         | edit photos for whatever reason or do bulk conversion, GIMP did
         | the job well and there's a community providing support.
        
         | scoopdewoop wrote:
         | I've been using GIMP since at least middle school. I learned
         | about color, layers, opacity, paths, etc all from GIMP. It has
         | always been free, available, and it doesn't change too fast. I
         | have used photoshop for advanced features (CMYK halftoning),
         | but that never comes up for me often enough to subscribe.
         | 
         | Having learned on GIMP, its super easy to me. I have a hard
         | time understanding what could be better just because I am so
         | used to it.
        
         | pvaldes wrote:
         | Everything and the pluggins
         | 
         | (but Imagemagick is also great).
        
         | ducktective wrote:
         | I only use its "auto white balance" feature...I don't know how
         | to do this with imagemagick as good as GIMP.
        
         | marcodiego wrote:
         | I simply don't know or care if it is better or not than
         | photoshop. I never used photoshop, I can't even compare. All I
         | can say is that it has always been good enough for whatever I
         | needed.
        
         | prox wrote:
         | It's good there is a Gimp, but it's idiosyncratic UI is a real
         | hindrance for me. So Affinity Photo is my go to tool these
         | days.
        
         | npteljes wrote:
         | I use it mainly because I love FOSS. Looking at what sets it
         | apart technologically, I really like two plugins: Liquid
         | Rescale and Resynthesizer (Heal Selection), the very wide
         | support of formats, including niches like the windows icon
         | format, and the fact that I can use it everywhere legally.
        
         | bloolizard wrote:
         | I don't have to pay $15/month.
        
           | paulryanrogers wrote:
           | This was the issue for me even before the subscription model.
           | I realized that any FOSS I learned could be taught and given
           | to friends and family at no cost. Photoshop Elements can fill
           | that niche too, though paying anything for software is
           | becoming an uphill battle with some demographics.
        
         | hitekker wrote:
         | I like that it inspired Krita. Those folks really seem to be
         | listening to users; working hard to build highly demanded
         | features without navel-gazing or bike-shedding.
         | 
         | For those who haven't seen it before, check
         | https://krita.org/en/ out!
        
           | Andrex wrote:
           | I checked it out and could not wrap my head around Krita tbh.
           | It feels very powerful but focused on solving many different
           | problems, of which photo-manipulation is only one of them.
           | 
           | I need to take another look and give it another try, I don't
           | think I'm done with Krita yet, but it's not a replacement for
           | Gimp yet (as far as I'm concerned.) There's some beauty in
           | having focus.
        
         | Rd6n6 wrote:
         | I tried gimp, and still use it sometimes, but switched to
         | affinity photo mostly because the smart select tool was so much
         | better, and the Ux was a lot smoother. Faster too. They are
         | basically the same program in a lot of ways and if I'm on Linux
         | (I dual boot) I do use gimp sometimes still. You will spend
         | some time on YouTube trying to figure out how to do things but
         | there are a lot of good short videos to get you moving
         | 
         | On a related note, I used kdenlive (video editing) the other
         | day and it was a really good experience, smoother and faster
         | than a paid editor I used to use
        
           | marcodiego wrote:
           | Kdenlive reached a good enough level of maturity in features
           | and stability. Very nice editor nowadays.
        
         | Andrex wrote:
         | After 15 years, I'm just used to it.
         | 
         | Gimp was _usable_ before the same-window toggle (introduced
         | about 2010?), but when they added that I stopped looking at
         | competitors tbh. I wish certain things in Gimp weren't so
         | kludgy (mainly basic stuff like dropdowns and dialogs), but
         | Photoshop isn't perfect underneath its slick-looking UI either.
         | 
         | That said, I use and kinda adore Premiere, so I'm losing the
         | Adobe "synergy" by not using Photoshop. I still can do
         | everything I want or need to do in Gimp, and I admittedly don't
         | do anything advanced.
         | 
         | Paint.NET sufficed for a little while but Gimp hits that great
         | middle ground for me personally between too-simple and too-
         | powerful.
         | 
         | Gimp moves so slowly that I personally can't wait for
         | downstream forks like PhotoGIMP to pick up updates, so I've
         | always tried to stick to the latest official stable release. I
         | love reading new updates hit the front of HN, usually means a
         | meaty release. :)
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | mistrial9 wrote:
         | a clever friend once said it this way, while I was complaining
         | about the GIMP interface. He said "Adobe spent years refining
         | the small details of Photoshop, and GIMP must not copy PS, so
         | therefore all the GIMP interface parts will feel terrible, by
         | default"
         | 
         | of course this is humorous oversimplification, but I can't help
         | but think of it every time I really, really need a general
         | editor, open GIMP and immediately start cursing over ordinary
         | thing.
         | 
         | source: I wrote the third color paint app for the Mac II thirty
         | years ago while a contractor at Apple Inc.
        
           | p0nce wrote:
           | Is it Stockhold syndrome? After years of GIMP I really
           | disliked the Affinity interface, also it is unusably slow on
           | a very recent computer here. I kinda like GIMP, the good
           | parts.
        
             | klondike_klive wrote:
             | Is that an egg-corn? ie an mishearing of a well-known
             | phrase in a way that makes total sense? Stockhold syndrome
             | - it's like Stockholm syndrome but you're cheerleading for
             | companies with crappy products only because you own stock.
        
           | mrj wrote:
           | There's no limit on copying from PS, but it wouldn't make
           | sense to trash the current user base to try to acquire those
           | used to PS. Then it would be the Gimp users who feel upset.
        
           | RubyRidgeRandy wrote:
           | Something that others might not be aware of - Gimp could be a
           | lot better by now, but Adobe actually has patents on features
           | that cannot be included into Gimp, including certain UI
           | elements. So there is a limit on what Gimp can do, not
           | because of competency, but because of legality.
        
             | luegen wrote:
             | Is there by any chance a list of software patents that
             | Adobe or other companies hold that GIMP cannot implement
             | for this reason?
        
           | ryantgtg wrote:
           | My clever take is that complaining about GIMP's UI is just a
           | meme at this point.
           | 
           | I could easily complain about Photoshop or Illustrator's UI
           | just as much as GIMP or Inkscape.
        
       | rastafang wrote:
       | v2.99+ is also pretty nice... aka Beta
        
       | stoicjumbotron wrote:
       | Really cool to see the development going strong. Even though more
       | time is focused on the 2.99 release versions it is nice to see a
       | stable version every couple of months or so.
        
       | MikusR wrote:
       | Interesting that Gimp website doesn't have a huge Code of Conduct
       | section, but still makes releases. While the fork that has is on
       | "hiatus"
        
       | alexandr1us wrote:
       | I used Gimp daily. I even liked it's UX better than photoshop.
       | Switched to Affinity Photo when they had macOS build problems :/
        
       | qalmakka wrote:
       | Is GIMP still on GTK+ 2.x? I think 3.x has been out for more then
       | 10 years now.
        
       | ancarda wrote:
       | >On macOS side, the activity is still slow, if not non-existent.
       | 
       | > So if you want this to change, please join us!
       | 
       | I'd like to help, though I feel like I don't know enough C, and
       | I've never used GTK. Is it possible to get a mentor, like you can
       | for Linux kernel development, who can help me write my first few
       | patches?
        
         | narraturgy wrote:
         | I've not heard of this. How does one go about finding a mentor
         | to help them learn Linux kernel development?
        
           | severine wrote:
           | https://kernelnewbies.org/KernelMentors
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-09-18 23:02 UTC)