[HN Gopher] France Recalls Its Ambassadors to the U.S. and Austr...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       France Recalls Its Ambassadors to the U.S. and Australia over a
       Submarine Deal
        
       Author : rastafang
       Score  : 54 points
       Date   : 2021-09-17 21:50 UTC (1 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.npr.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.npr.org)
        
       | pm90 wrote:
       | This is getting pretty ridiculous. Almost like a child throwing a
       | tantrum. How does France expect to be taken seriously if it acts
       | like a petulant child?
        
         | blibble wrote:
         | France _always_ reacts like this
        
         | Dobbs wrote:
         | Well I mean Australia and the USA could not go behind Frances
         | back to strike a deal which apparently causes Australia to back
         | out of a deal it has with France?
        
         | briane80 wrote:
         | They are after all _French_
        
         | aphroz wrote:
         | The contracts were signed and it is perceived as a betrayal
         | from the US which French thought were their allies. The
         | ministry of defense of France called it a "stab in the back".
        
       | trynumber9 wrote:
       | It seems like a bit of an overreaction. Is shipbuilding that
       | important to France?
        
         | manacit wrote:
         | That's part of it, but it's mostly a larger political play
         | around France and Europe being less dependent on the USA as a
         | partner around the world. France has been pushing on 'strategic
         | autonomy' (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_autonomy)
         | for quite some time now, and this played right into their hands
         | as an opportunity of the USA not being reliable.
         | 
         | Whether or not it's true, or if this will work, will take a lot
         | more time to figure out.
        
         | elefanten wrote:
         | Also genuinely curious. With no judgment, I want to understand
         | the French perspective here.
         | 
         | And can anyone weigh in on whether these deals getting scuttled
         | is so rare. Esp for advanced military equipment, I'd think that
         | it's quite common.
        
         | conradfr wrote:
         | EUR50B over 50 years, dubbed "the contract of the century".
        
           | chrisseaton wrote:
           | The French were messing up the contract all on their own.
           | 
           | https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-01-20/australia-attack-
           | clas...
        
         | allemagne wrote:
         | It's always about domestic politics. Macron doesn't want to
         | look weak in the leadup to the 2022 election, and it's not hard
         | to see why France would be upset here.
        
           | ekabod wrote:
           | When Merkel decided to welcome one million refugees on german
           | soil, it was about domestic politics?
        
         | skissane wrote:
         | It isn't just that Australia cancelled the deal and made a new
         | one with someone else. It is they kept their plans secret from
         | France instead of letting them know about it and giving them a
         | chance to make a counter-offer or save some face.
         | 
         | France has nuclear submarines too, so maybe France could still
         | have played some role? Maybe AUKUS could have been AFUKUS? They
         | didn't allow France into the negotiation room, and they told
         | France "everything is fine, we are sticking with your
         | submarines" even while secretly negotiating with the US and UK.
         | 
         | I think being excluded and lied to upsets Macron far more than
         | the submarines themselves do.
        
       | xyk2 wrote:
       | Is it just me or are there more off-topic political posts on HN
       | lately?
        
         | cryptoz wrote:
         | This isn't off-topic for HN. We've always had 1) submarine
         | posts (aha, I mean both meanings here haha), 2) military
         | strategy posts, 3) $40B deal-falling-apart posts, and even 4)
         | war escalation posts. There's even a prized technical angle
         | about the development of high-tech nuclear submarines.
         | 
         | On-topic.
        
         | RobRivera wrote:
         | geopolitical topics != politics
         | 
         | impact of nation-state relations have a very real impact on the
         | world commerce
        
         | math wrote:
         | Disturbing observation: 5 years ago, the trends that seemed
         | most important to me were all technical - I really paid no
         | attention to politics. Today, they are mostly geo-political.
        
         | dougmwne wrote:
         | It seems that the user base here has been deteriorating and the
         | focus has been drifting away from the SV startup scene. I've
         | also been noticing a growing political atmosphere that is in
         | opposition to SV norms. A sign of the times probably, but I
         | also suspect that HN's usefulness to Ycombinator is fading.
        
           | chrisseaton wrote:
           | Massive technical military contracts seems extremely SV to
           | me? Isn't that where it all started?
        
             | AndrewBissell wrote:
             | Presumably "SV norms" here refers to the expectation that
             | one does not ever explicitly acknowledge this element in
             | Silicon Valley's history, lest it undermine the "plucky
             | dudes in a garage" mystique.
        
           | sergiomattei wrote:
           | > Please don't post comments saying that HN is turning into
           | Reddit. It's a semi-noob illusion, as old as the hills.
           | 
           | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
        
           | Zababa wrote:
           | > I've also been noticing a growing political atmosphere that
           | is in opposition to SV norms
           | 
           | Genuinly curious, what are "SV norms"? I think most of the
           | people here don't come from SV, and I think this has been the
           | case for a large part of HN existance, but I have nothing to
           | prove it.
        
           | Dobbs wrote:
           | Totally agree, if you want proof of the paradox of tolerance
           | look around HN. In the sake of being tolerant to
           | misogynistic, homophobic, racist, and transphobic posts and
           | comments it has chased away many people leaving more and more
           | the ugliness behind.
           | 
           | Most women, and trans people I know despise and avoid the
           | site at this point. All you have to do is look at the
           | comments any time something even tangentially related to
           | women's experiences in tech or when tech impacts women to see
           | it.
        
         | toomuchtodo wrote:
         | Politics is a human system. Systems analysis and nudging
         | systems is of interest to hackers, no?
         | 
         | Humans are the infrastructure on top of which technology runs.
        
         | tomc1985 wrote:
         | Hey now, lots of startup hackers are interested in geopolitics
        
         | jonshariat wrote:
         | No downvote on posts, I wish this were implemented but I also
         | know the implications are many
        
           | AnimalMuppet wrote:
           | You can flag posts, even if you can't downvote them.
        
         | Zababa wrote:
         | I think the COVID slowed down the open source development
         | scene. For example, we didn't see many JavaScript frameworks
         | these last two years.
        
         | olalonde wrote:
         | This trend started years ago. My opinion is that politics
         | should be off topic on HN but the "everything is political"
         | crowd doesn't seem to agree.
        
         | VictorPath wrote:
         | I've been busy today, didn't see if the daily yellow peril
         | story hit the front page (China's about to invade Taiwan, China
         | should respect British sovereignty in Hong Kong, China should
         | treat Uighur terrorists nice like the US did in Afghanistan
         | etc.)
        
       | rmk wrote:
       | It looks like the vaunted experience of Biden and his team has
       | _not_ translated into any sort of deft policymaking, particularly
       | in foreign policy. The messy pullout out of Afghanistan, followed
       | by this scuttling of the deal in progress between Australia and
       | France have reinforced the notion that Uncle Sam _can not_ be
       | relied upon, even by his closest allies. Pretty surefire way of
       | helping fence-sitters become client states of China.
        
         | torstenvl wrote:
         | Derna forever!
        
           | rmk wrote:
           | Huh? What does this mean?
        
         | Dobbs wrote:
         | You do know the messy pull out of Afghanistan was a peace deal
         | agreed to by prior governments (without the consent of the
         | Aphgani government no less) could they have done better,
         | absolutely but the way you are framing it is hardly unbiased.
         | 
         | As for countries deciding to not rely upon America, that has
         | long been a desire, but the previous administration drove it
         | home like a stake through the heart. Having lived outside of
         | the US for most of the last five years I can't fully express
         | how far the US has fallen in the eyes of the world, and just
         | how much of a joke we are these days.
        
         | tmilard wrote:
         | Because I am french I will not say anything too dark.
         | 
         | But yes, this SUB contract was big. Giant.And Naval Group is
         | partially a state company.
         | 
         | The Worth for french community is this : 1) French just hatted
         | Trump. Deeply. His sense of hatting his allies ( Germany...)
         | and loving his foes ( North Corea, ect).
         | 
         | 2) As opposed, French loved Biden. More rounded, multi
         | cultural, more social like in Europe. I would say french people
         | felt Biden was a friend.
         | 
         | So With this SUB commercial stab in the back, the feeling of a
         | friend that betrays us french is palpable.
         | 
         | It feels as if Biden just behaved like Trump.
        
         | Grimm1 wrote:
         | If they think the US is bad seems like an even worse idea to go
         | buddy up with China imo. You know, the country on a more
         | egregious economic imperialism kick for the last 15-25 years.
        
       | tkojames wrote:
       | It is super laughable because the nuclear powered version that
       | they are building for themselves was a fixed bid contract for
       | something like 10 billion for 8 subs.. and the Australian
       | contract keeps going up and up something like 35 billion for ten
       | subs. The diesel sub for Australia is based on the nuclear sub
       | that they signed the fixed bid contract for. Anybody with half
       | brain can tell they are making up the lost of fixed bid contract
       | by charging the Australia more.. and then they act surprised when
       | Australia pulls out when they can get nuclear subs for cheaper.
       | When nuclear subs usually cost 2.5* the cost. These people do
       | great reporting on all of this. https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-
       | zone
        
         | mahkeiro wrote:
         | French contract took 4 years to be negotiated, the US one less
         | than 6 months, in total secret with no public check... expect
         | big surprises at the end, US weapons program are not known to
         | never overrun their costs
        
           | tkojames wrote:
           | For sure all that is right as well. But if I was in the
           | Australian shoes this is just to good of deal from US and UK
           | to turn down.
        
       | gdy wrote:
       | I wonder what French think now about their cancelling of the
       | Mistral deal with Russia [0] under American pressure [1].
       | 
       | [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mistral-
       | class_amphibious_assau...
       | 
       | [1] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-france-russia-mistral-
       | idU...
        
       | ldargin wrote:
       | There's no question that nuclear subs are more appropriate for
       | Australia, especially against a sophisticated opponent like
       | China. Hopefully USA and Australia can compensate France in some
       | way to maintain their prestige.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-09-17 23:00 UTC)