[HN Gopher] How the Pandemic Is Changing the Norms of Science
___________________________________________________________________
How the Pandemic Is Changing the Norms of Science
Author : phreeza
Score : 29 points
Date : 2021-09-11 18:46 UTC (1 days ago)
(HTM) web link (www.tabletmag.com)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.tabletmag.com)
| ivoras wrote:
| Sigh. Some day I hope I can get this project funded:
| https://github.com/WOTvision/wot1
|
| "This is a repository containing an implementation of a
| blockchain which supports an unique feature set: asserting trust
| of information organised in JSON documents.
|
| The goal is to have a global public notary service, for people
| and corporations to issue signed statements which are globally
| recognized and verifyable, which are identified by a QR code,
| which the media and news channels can reproduce and which can be
| verified by the consumers of information (i.e. ordinary people).
| The vision is to combat fake news by using a thing blockchains
| are very good at: distributing reliable data, and by providing a
| low-tech user-centric interface to it, which everyone can use to
| verify random junk they hear on the media."
| mrkramer wrote:
| For example you can already embed messages inside Bitcoin
| transactions and then crawl and index them all from Bitcoin's
| blockchain. Organizations can prove and verify their Bitcoin
| addresses using PGP.
| amelius wrote:
| But how can the public know which submission to the blockchain
| is the ground truth?
| yyyk wrote:
| What is the value in this project?
|
| If the purpose is to let X make statement Y and prove did X
| said Y and only Y, there are at least five more prevalent
| standards to do so ranging from other blockchains to web
| sites/archiving, DNS records, various archives across the
| world, etc. We can make the QR example work today with a URL.
|
| All these mechanisms are much more likely to survive longer
| than the suggested project, and are less subject to Proof-of-
| work energy waste.
|
| That leaves the voting mechanism, which isn't very useful
| either - truth isn't subject to majority vote.
| cblconfederate wrote:
| Maybe scientific debate shouldn't be conducted in public.
| Scientists quarelling inside a conference is bad enough, but when
| they feel they can weaponize their hordes of followers, things
| turn nuclear and nuance is lost. This might be the first
| scientific crisis in which chemical substances were being judged
| by their political affiliation (HCQ), and in which scientists
| need to declare their politics before engaging, it was pathetic
| jokethrowaway wrote:
| Not a crisis, but climate change was similar
| bobbytit wrote:
| The climate religion destroyed the credibility of science.
| ant6n wrote:
| Those with money and power have always sought to undermine
| scientists that uncover inconvenient truths. Example:
| Gallileo.
| bobbytit wrote:
| Which is why every scientist with the courage to speak
| out against the climate scam has been cancelled.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-09-12 23:01 UTC)