[HN Gopher] Why the world still loves 1970s detective show Columbo
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Why the world still loves 1970s detective show Columbo
        
       Author : CaptainZapp
       Score  : 77 points
       Date   : 2021-09-10 11:43 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.bbc.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.bbc.com)
        
       | drfuchs wrote:
       | Fun fact: In the first few seasons, Colombo had continuing
       | problems with his car, which was always an excuse for being late
       | or showing up unexpectedly. But, like his wife, the car never
       | showed up on screen. By the later seasons, they wanted to do
       | scenes where you see him arrive at a golf course, or whatever,
       | and the prop department had to create a car that looked like an
       | old clunker, and they made it out of unidentifiable pieces of
       | various different real automobiles of different manufacturers,
       | all so that no car company would complain that their cars were
       | being maligned as unreliable.
        
         | yodon wrote:
         | This is a wonderful story but I'm sorry to have to report that
         | the car Columbo drove wasn't built by the props department, it
         | was a 1959 Peugeot 403[0].
         | 
         | [0]https://www.cartalk.com/blogs/jim-motavalli/columbos-car-
         | it-...
        
           | drfuchs wrote:
           | Huh. I thought I'd heard the story in an interview with Peter
           | Falk, or one of the producers. Oh, well.
        
           | goodJobWalrus wrote:
           | Was Peugeot ever sold in th US?
        
             | banana_giraffe wrote:
             | Yep
             | 
             | https://www.periodpaper.com/products/1959-ad-
             | peugeot-403-sta...
             | 
             | There were a few hundred Peugeot dealers in North America.
        
         | technothrasher wrote:
         | Huh? The car was a very recognizable Peugeot 403.
        
       | raffraffraff wrote:
       | From across the pond... Yes Minister and the follow up series Yes
       | Prime Minister are the most rewtchable TV shows I've ever seen.
       | When it was originally on air, it's said that the prime minister
       | at the time, Margaret Thatcher, loved it. And it's still
       | absolutely relevant and witty today.
        
         | JimTheMan wrote:
         | I second that. The Yes Minister series is brilliant.
        
         | throw0101a wrote:
         | > _When it was originally on air, it 's said that the prime
         | minister at the time, Margaret Thatcher, loved it. And it's
         | still absolutely relevant and witty today._
         | 
         | Thatcher loved because it suited her ideology:
         | 
         | > _Adam Curtis, in his three-part TV documentary The Trap,
         | criticised the series as "ideological propaganda for a
         | political movement",[16] and claimed that Yes Minister is
         | indicative of a larger movement of criticism of government and
         | bureaucracy, centred upon public choice economics. Jay himself
         | supported this:_
         | 
         | >> _The fallacy that public choice economics took on was the
         | fallacy that government is working entirely for the benefit of
         | the citizen; and this was reflected by showing that in any
         | [episode] in the programme, in Yes Minister, we showed that
         | almost everything that the government has to decide is a
         | conflict between two lots of private interest - that of the
         | politicians and that of the civil servants trying to advance
         | their own careers and improve their own lives. And that 's why
         | public choice economics, which explains why all this was going
         | on, was at the root of almost every episode of Yes Minister and
         | Yes, Prime Minister.[17]_
         | 
         | * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yes_Minister#Politics
         | 
         | > _There is a division of opinions by political scientists.
         | Some of them cite the series for their accurate and
         | sophisticated portrayal of the relationships between civil
         | servants and politicians,[40] and are quoted in some textbooks
         | on British politics.[6] However, other political scientists
         | considered it a reflection of the public choice model, which
         | encouraged a "conservative agenda of balanced budgets and
         | reduced government spending".[41] The Washington Post
         | considered its "ideas were at the center of the Thatcher and
         | Ronald Reagan administrations in Britain and the United States,
         | which favored cutting government and shifting its functions to
         | the private sector".[42]_
         | 
         | * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yes_Minister#Reception
        
           | linksnapzz wrote:
           | The critics of the Public Choice model, (who all seem to be
           | socialist academics, a cohort known for its puissance at both
           | government & industry...) would have done better to have
           | their own TV show, written by someone who could cleverly show
           | why the Heath/Wilson/Callaghan-style governments were the
           | best the UK was going to get, and why the viewer should
           | appreciate that.
        
           | nyokodo wrote:
           | > Thatcher loved because it suited her ideology
           | 
           | She liked it because she could laugh at herself. It might
           | have given a voice to her ideology sometimes, and rightly so
           | because it was prominent at the time, but none of the
           | characters giving voice to anything are sympathetic. They're
           | portrayed as tragically ridiculous players vying for power
           | and positive public image who'll drop their "principles" at
           | the drop of a hat if it suits them. If pundits are worried
           | about this or that argument given by a character on the show
           | they're just revealing their own insecurities about their
           | political opinions.
        
             | Barrin92 wrote:
             | >They're portrayed as tragically ridiculous players vying
             | for power and positive public image who'll drop their
             | "principles" at the drop of a hat if it suits them
             | 
             | And that cynical portrayal of politics is itself part of
             | the exact ideology that Thatcher tried to promote, so I
             | don't really see why you think that contradicts OPs point.
             | It's like the joke that Reagan used to repeat _" The nine
             | most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from
             | the Government, and I'm here to help"_. It wasn't an actual
             | self-demeaning joke, the intention was to demean governance
             | itself at every moment possible.
        
               | linksnapzz wrote:
               | What a tragedy. Lese-Majeste towards civil servants and
               | politicians. Of all the things to be less cynical about,
               | we must be less cynical about the motivations of those
               | that seek temporal power!
        
               | Barrin92 wrote:
               | >we must be less cynical about the motivations of those
               | that seek temporal power
               | 
               | is there anyone not seeking temporal power? Are private
               | sector shareholders on a quest for spiritual
               | enlightenment or something? Is the board of Facebook
               | filled with Zen Buddhists?
               | 
               | The notion that competing for petty status and power is
               | somehow unique to administration and government is one of
               | the consequences of shows like Yes, Minister. And
               | actually yes, we should be less cynical of civil servants
               | and politicians. A pathological disregard of them has,
               | for example, significantly worsened one of the worst
               | public health crisis in decades.
        
             | nsajko wrote:
             | You're entirely missing what the parent is talking about.
             | Your point that "none of the characters giving voice to
             | anything are sympathetic" is irrelevant. On the other hand:
             | 
             | > They're portrayed as tragically ridiculous players vying
             | for power and positive public image who'll drop their
             | "principles" at the drop of a hat if it suits them
             | 
             | This is exactly what the parent pointed out.
             | 
             | To make this even more clear, I made excerpts from the
             | quote by Jay (creator of Yes Minister):
             | 
             | > this was reflected by showing that in any [episode] in
             | the programme, in Yes Minister, we showed that almost
             | everything that the government has to decide is a conflict
             | between two lots of private interest [...]
             | 
             | > And that's why public choice economics, which explains
             | why all this was going on, was at the root of almost every
             | episode of Yes Minister and Yes, Prime Minister.
             | 
             | So both series ("almost every episode") were clearly
             | conceived and executed as propaganda, whether you like it
             | or not.
        
         | nyokodo wrote:
         | > Yes Minister and the follow up series Yes Prime Minister are
         | the most rewtchable TV shows I've ever seen.
         | 
         | It had a brilliant and ideologically diverse writing team
         | meaning no side was singled out. The principal actors were
         | comedy geniuses. Plus, the writers eventually revealed they had
         | political insiders feeding them material [1]. Apparently
         | similar things to the Arab embassy security room bar scene
         | actually happened!
         | 
         | [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yes_Minister
        
       | romwell wrote:
       | It was _massively_ popular in Ukraine and Russia in the 1990s.
       | 
       | I still remember the overcoat, the dog, and Culombo's wife, which
       | has always been mentioned, but never shown.
       | 
       | I guess that's all I have to say for now _starts to leave_.
       | 
       |  _Opens the door back again_
       | 
       | Now, just one more thing...
        
         | MikeDelta wrote:
         | I seem to remember that that one more thing often turned out to
         | be the thing that unravelled into solving the crime.
        
           | mbg721 wrote:
           | Just as often, he would already know how the crime happened,
           | and the "one more thing" was just to unnerve the suspect.
        
           | ChrisMarshallNY wrote:
           | That was his "schtick."
           | 
           | He'd come back and say "You see, I guess maybe I missed it,
           | but I just can't figure out how..."
           | 
           | Whoever he was talking to, was about to get new jewelry.
           | 
           | He'd also have a couple of uniforms handy, with stainless
           | steel bracelets.
           | 
           | He was doing it before Steve Jobs.
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | themadturk wrote:
         | I read recently that the "just one more thing" originated when
         | the writers discovered they'd forgotten to have Colombo ask a
         | question during the scene and tacked it onto the end to avoid
         | having the rewrite the scene.
        
         | dogma1138 wrote:
         | The wife got a spin-off series Mrs. Columbo.
        
           | mbg721 wrote:
           | In case you find yourself among Columbo corners of the
           | Internet, Mrs. Columbo is emphatically considered non-
           | canonical.
        
         | dasil003 wrote:
         | Oh my god, I never connected the through-line from Columbo
         | (which I often watched re-runs with my family as a kid) to
         | Steve Jobs keynotes.
        
       | loonster wrote:
       | Columbo, CHIPS, MASH, all old shows that still appealed to me as
       | a boy in the 90s.
        
         | romwell wrote:
         | Throw in Nash Bridges there too
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | 95014_refugee wrote:
       | That's a nice nod to Wings of Desire in there.
        
       | tyingq wrote:
       | I did like Columbo, but I liked "The Rockford Files" better.
        
       | muzster wrote:
       | Peter Falk really was a fallen angel. Wings of Desires
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2-26rb7S38
        
         | itronitron wrote:
         | Columbo!
        
       | dogma1138 wrote:
       | I kinda miss the older syndication friendly shows.
       | 
       | Everything today is trying too hard to have a season or a multi
       | season epic story arc and the shows today are often so damn grim.
        
         | gremloni wrote:
         | I completely agree. I've completely gravitated lately towards
         | irreverent, silly, almost B-movies. Yesterday I watched Men at
         | Work and it was amazing. That's something I would have never
         | watched a decade ago.
        
           | bwship wrote:
           | That is a great movie! Have you watched Tremors?
        
             | gremloni wrote:
             | I haven't. I'm going to watch it tonight, thanks for the
             | recommendation!
        
       | JohnFen wrote:
       | Ummm... because great shows stay great forever?
        
         | mbg721 wrote:
         | Columbo plots were oddly fixed on telephone technology in
         | particular, in a way that might not have aged well if the
         | acting weren't as good as it was.
        
           | chrisseaton wrote:
           | I don't understand why being set in a particular period would
           | cause a program to not age well?
           | 
           | Does Sherlock Holmes not age well because now we have DNA to
           | solve crimes more easily?
        
             | mbg721 wrote:
             | Just that things like answering machines or phone records
             | for long-distance but not local calls are less familiar and
             | relatable, so plot points that would have been obvious to
             | the audience at the time can't be taken for granted.
        
       | sn41 wrote:
       | There was a German detective series whose translation was called
       | "The Old Fox" - I used to like it in the 80s. I haven't been able
       | to find it online much.
        
         | Someone wrote:
         | I think that's "Der Alte". https://www.fernsehserien.de/der-
         | alte/episodenguide. Available on Amazon, iTunes, and magenta
         | tv.de (all possibly only in Germany and/or Austria)
        
       | yodon wrote:
       | Colombo always had a such hilarious proletariat vs bourgeois
       | "Marxist" class struggle element hidden just below the surface of
       | a major Hollywood series whose pilot was directed by a promising
       | new young kid named Steven Spielberg.
       | 
       | The criminals were always rich, powerful, famous. Columbo was an
       | unimpressive civil servant dressed in a shabby overcoat and
       | driving an equally unimpressive old Peugeot. Every episode
       | contained some bit of banter in which he or the villain called
       | out explicitly the huge gulf in class between them, generally
       | including some mention of Mrs. Columbo, who was never seen in the
       | real series but was always held up by Columbo as cultured,
       | intellectual, and wise in all the ways he professed to be
       | ignorant (yes, they did eventually spin off a series about her,
       | but it was terrible in as many ways as Columbo was great).
       | 
       | At the end of every episode, the honorable masses would triumph
       | over the evil bourgeois as Columbo caught and humiliated yet
       | another arrogant villain just before viewers were advised what
       | brand of products to buy to look better than their neighbors.
        
       | mbg721 wrote:
       | Some of the better episodes and their guest murderers:
       | 
       | "Swan Song" features Johnny Cash as a gospel singer with an
       | unconventional murder weapon,
       | 
       | "Any Old Port In A Storm" has Donald Pleasence as a wine
       | aficionado,
       | 
       | "Double Shock" has Martin Landau playing a pair of twins and
       | Columbo harassed by their uncle's fastidious housekeeper,
       | 
       | "Columbo Goes To College" is one of the best of the 90s-era
       | revival episodes, and features a couple of cocky frat-boys
       | murdering their criminology professor.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-09-11 23:02 UTC)