[HN Gopher] The United States of Comedy: 2035 (2012)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       The United States of Comedy: 2035 (2012)
        
       Author : sand33pn
       Score  : 39 points
       Date   : 2021-09-10 12:05 UTC (10 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.vanityfair.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.vanityfair.com)
        
       | brodouevencode wrote:
       | > By 2022 the last vestiges of reality dissolve. The Onion
       | becomes the newspaper of record, only to be supplanted by an
       | "Onion" version of The Onion, which makes the original Onion look
       | "totally lame."
       | 
       | Soothsayer!
        
         | anm89 wrote:
         | There's something about this concept that seems so
         | realistically appealing to gen z to me.
         | 
         | I guess to some degree this is what clickhole already is.
        
         | dfxm12 wrote:
         | That consumers of news parody understand the what's going on in
         | the world better than people who consume what is ostensibly
         | straight news dates back at least to 2004.
         | 
         |  _On top of that, "Daily Show" viewers know more about election
         | issues than people who regularly read newspapers or watch
         | television news, according to the National Annenberg Election
         | Survey._
         | 
         | https://www.cnn.com/2004/SHOWBIZ/TV/09/28/comedy.politics/
        
       | dfxm12 wrote:
       | _New late-night talk shows appear so rapidly that the fight for
       | guests turns violent._
       | 
       | This was written a few years after Conan had his bad experience
       | with the Tonight Show. If you saw his live show around 2010,
       | you'll know how he grew jaded, at least with the business end of
       | things.
        
       | geon wrote:
       | What is the author even trying to say? I just get random
       | rambling. Could as well have been written by a Markov generator.
        
       | nickthemagicman wrote:
       | I always wondered what stew of genetics and upbringing makes
       | someone extremely funny. Its actually a pretty rare trait for
       | someone to be 'professional quality' funny as evidenced by going
       | to a few open mic nights.
       | 
       | I think a lot of people want to be funny and the hustle is
       | admirable, but I wonder if professional comedy is an inherent
       | talent not something you can just read a book about.
       | 
       | Still you don't know if you don't try.
        
         | kritiko wrote:
         | I'm married to a working comedian and know many. Everybody
         | sucks when they start, and open mics are kind of built for
         | people, even pros, to bomb at as they develop material.
         | 
         | The people who seem "effortlessly funny" often work the hardest
         | - although often that practice is developed in childhood.
        
           | ethbr0 wrote:
           | +1 I used to go to open mics weekly in undergrad (audience,
           | not performing). And hey, it was BYOB in an un-air
           | conditioned attic, for $5.
           | 
           | It was almost more fascinating watching the same person go up
           | week after week, with slight tweaks to their act.
           | 
           | It convinced me that the "talent" for comedy is probably just
           | "attention to detail."
           | 
           | And that the _actions_ required to be successful in comedy
           | were  "practice", "perseverance", and ability to use
           | constructive criticism.
        
           | brodouevencode wrote:
           | Exactly this. Bill Burr spent many, many years as an opener
           | for other people way less funny than him. Dave Chappelle was
           | in several bit parts and pilots before Half Baked. Richard
           | Pryor was a writer for several years before even starting
           | stand up. George Carlin in his early career is not the Carlin
           | you may have seen, in the ~mid-70s after about a decade he
           | completely changed his look and act. It may take a long time
           | to hone in on an act that works.
        
             | slg wrote:
             | Chappelle is an interesting example here. He was doing
             | standup on TV and staring in a Mel Brooks movie before he
             | turned 20. But he also wasn't an overnight success. He
             | supposedly started standup at 14 and spent years honing his
             | craft before most comedians even start their career.
             | 
             | Most comics I have heard talk about it say a person needs
             | to do standup for 5-10 years before even naturally funny
             | people actually become good at it. There is much more to it
             | than just being a funny person.
        
               | WalterBright wrote:
               | No wonder nobody laughs at my jokes!
        
           | WalterBright wrote:
           | I'm not the least bit surprised. I was involved in the dance
           | business long ago, and the top dancers danced in an
           | effortlessly elegant manner. Beginners danced like drunk
           | cows, and there was every level in between.
           | 
           | Some people learned faster than others.
           | 
           | But nobody was born elegant, and dancing smoothly and
           | elegantly required endless hours of practice, and relentless
           | attention to detail. You'll find even ballroom champions
           | still spending hours going over how to take a step forward,
           | again and again.
           | 
           | BTW, it isn't about making it _look_ easy. It _is_ easy when
           | you 've practiced it enough.
        
         | ericmcer wrote:
         | Growing up I had a group of 6ish close friends, and the goal
         | was 100% to laugh (it kinda still is). Even when we were 13 we
         | all knew who was funniest and who wasn't. There was no practice
         | or work put into it. Granted standup is a totally different
         | skillset from just riffing with friends, but some of us had the
         | confidence, presence and ability and others were more
         | precocious and less clever.
         | 
         | This new Podcast generation of comics is interesting because
         | some stand-ups can go on a show and just riff really well.
         | Others are not that great once they get outside their comfort
         | areas.
        
         | spaetzleesser wrote:
         | From what I have seen is that all the good comedians are very
         | good observers and think a lot about how society works and why
         | things are the way they are. It seems the funniness comes
         | second after that. Bad comedians try to be funny but have no
         | depth in their jokes.
        
           | WalterBright wrote:
           | Good comedy seems to stem from connecting one topic to
           | another in an unexpected way. It's why puns are funny.
        
         | jjj123 wrote:
         | I'm reading Tom Sharpling's memoir right now and he mentions
         | noticing as a teenager that his comedic skillset was better
         | than his peers. One thing that stuck out to me was that he's
         | able to string one thought to another easier than most.
         | 
         | I found it interesting because I hadn't thought about comedy
         | being about making connections in a funny way but that's what a
         | lot of it is, and some people are probably predisposed to make
         | those connections with less effort.
        
         | cortesoft wrote:
         | I think this can be said about a lot of professional level
         | skills. They are hard, and most people can't do them.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-09-10 23:02 UTC)