[HN Gopher] No laughing matter? what the Romans found funny
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       No laughing matter? what the Romans found funny
        
       Author : diodorus
       Score  : 209 points
       Date   : 2021-09-08 05:02 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (antigonejournal.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (antigonejournal.com)
        
       | lqet wrote:
       | I googled around a bit to find some actual Roman jokes [0][1][2]:
       | 
       | One man complains to another: "The slave you sold me died!" "By
       | the gods!", the other replies. "During the time he was in my
       | service, he never did such a thing!"
       | 
       | A man is attending the burial of his wife, who has just died.
       | When a passerby asks, "Who is it who rests in peace here?", he
       | answers, "Me, now that I'm rid of her!
       | 
       | A provincial man has come to Rome, and walking on the streets was
       | drawing everyone's attention, as he was a real double of the
       | emperor Augustus. The emperor, having brought him to the palace,
       | looks at him and then asks: "Tell me, young man, did your mother
       | come to Rome anytime?" The reply was: "She never did. But my
       | father frequently was here."
       | 
       | An intellectual came to check in on a friend who was seriously
       | ill. When the man's wife said that he had 'departed', the
       | intellectual replied: "When he comes back, will you tell him that
       | I stopped by?"
       | 
       | A misogynist stood in the marketplace and announced: "I'm putting
       | my wife up for sale! Tax-free!" When people asked him why, he
       | said: "So the authorities will impound her."
       | 
       | A runner going to participate in a contest had a dream that he
       | was driving a quadriga. Early in the morning he goes to a dream
       | interpreter for an explanation. The reply is: "You will win, the
       | dream meant you have the speed and the strength of horses." But,
       | to be sure, the runner visits another dream interpreter. This one
       | replies: "You will lose. Don't you understand that four ones came
       | to me before you?"
       | 
       | An intellectual got a slave pregnant. At the birth, his father
       | suggested that the child be killed. The intellectual replied:
       | "First murder your own children and then tell me to kill mine!"
       | 
       | A intellectual checked in on the parents of a dead classmate. The
       | father was wailing: "O son, you have left me a cripple!" The
       | mother was crying: "O son, you have taken the light from my
       | eyes!" Later, the student says to his friends: "If he were guilty
       | of all that, he should have been killed while still alive."
       | 
       | An incompetent astrologer cast a man's horoscope and said: "You
       | are unable to father children." When the man objected that he had
       | seven kids, the astrologer replied: "Look after them well."
       | 
       | A young man said to his libido-driven wife: "What should we do,
       | darling? Eat or have sex?" She replied: "You can choose. But
       | there's not a crumb in the house."
       | 
       | An astrologer cast a sick boy's horoscope. After promising the
       | mother that the child had many years ahead of him, he demanded
       | payment. When she said, "Come tomorrow and I'll pay you," he
       | objected: "But what if the boy dies during the night and I lose
       | my fee?"
       | 
       | [0] https://imperiumromanum.pl/en/article/roman-sense-of-humor/
       | 
       | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_jokes
       | 
       | [2] https://aleteia.org/2017/05/23/want-to-hear-an-ancient-
       | roman...
        
         | jan_Inkepa wrote:
         | Slight nit-pick: Those at [0] that you cite here are Greek
         | rather than Roman. But still funny.
        
         | V-2 wrote:
         | I don't understand this one:
         | 
         |  _" An incompetent astrologer cast a man's horoscope and said:
         | "You are unable to father children." When the man objected that
         | he had seven kids, the astrologer replied: "Look after them
         | well.""_
        
           | SpeakMouthWords wrote:
           | I had a completely different interpretation to everyone else.
           | I read it as the astrologer doubling down on his assertion
           | despite the evidence staring him in the face. The guy can't
           | have kids, so he should look after the ones he has! (Even
           | though they prove that he CAN have kids)
        
           | OGWhales wrote:
           | Apparently I interpreted it differently from everyone else. I
           | thought it meant that he couldn't father them in the sense
           | that he was a shitty dad, not that he couldn't have kids.
        
             | george_ciobanu wrote:
             | Haha I also had a different interpretation, that his kids
             | are very likely to die in order to support the astrologer's
             | prediction. Too dark?
        
               | nautilius wrote:
               | I'm pretty sure that a people that watched people hack
               | each other to pieces for entertainment would not be
               | impressed by what we consider 'dark'.
        
           | gostsamo wrote:
           | Not very funny one. The astrologer says only that he won't be
           | able to produce any more children in the future. There is the
           | implication that the kids might die and he will be childless
           | as the initial prediction implies.
        
             | wincy wrote:
             | I took it to mean that the astrologer is bad at his job and
             | shifts the goalposts so he's "right", like "you won't have
             | any more kids AFTER THIS!" As psychics and astrologers have
             | been known to do for thousands of years apparently.
        
             | lqet wrote:
             | I think it can be understood in two ways: the other one is
             | that the astrologer hints that the children may not be his.
        
               | gostsamo wrote:
               | Yes, I agree. In those situations the usual punchline is
               | "I hope that you will take care of them as if they are
               | yours." and that's why I didn't think of that
               | interpretation.
        
           | cgio wrote:
           | I assume it's word play and look after them also stands for
           | look at them, as in to confirm resemblance.
        
           | querez wrote:
           | The Astrologer is pointing out that since the guy can't have
           | any (more) children, he should take good care of the ones he
           | has.
           | 
           | It's also possible that this is a bad translation from Latin,
           | and the original punchline was along the lines of "take a
           | good look at them" (i.e., implying that he's not the
           | biological father).
        
             | jraph wrote:
             | Or maybe the incompetent astrologer is also mean and going
             | to try to make their statement right by killing the
             | children, so the father should better look after them.
        
             | hn_go_brrrrr wrote:
             | This joke is actually in ancient Greek (it's in a book
             | called <<Philogelos>>), but the translation looks right to
             | me. I think your interpretation is spot on.
        
             | LudwigNagasena wrote:
             | > the original punchline was along the lines of "take a
             | good look at them" (i.e., implying that he's not the
             | biological father).
             | 
             | That's the punchline I expected when I was reading the
             | joke. It makes much more sense and it is more stinging.
        
               | Brakenshire wrote:
               | It's a joke at the expense of the astrologer. Rome had
               | Augurs with official responsibilities for predicting the
               | future, so maybe these kind of jokes were more subversive
               | at that time.
               | 
               | Although I could imagine a modern joke about an
               | astrologer making grand predictions that are whittled
               | down as the person corrects them.
        
               | thaumasiotes wrote:
               | > Although I could imagine a modern joke about an
               | astrologer making grand predictions that are whittled
               | down as the person corrects them.
               | 
               | https://www.newsfromme.com/pov/col054/
        
             | gverrilla wrote:
             | first possibility wouldn't be a joke imo
        
               | LanceH wrote:
               | The other astrologer one:
               | 
               | > An astrologer cast a sick boy's horoscope. After
               | promising the mother that the child had many years ahead
               | of him, he demanded payment. When she said, "Come
               | tomorrow and I'll pay you," he objected: "But what if the
               | boy dies during the night and I lose my fee?"
               | 
               | So if they look down on astrologers as being
               | opportunistic charlatans (at least the bad ones), they
               | are mocking that they will say one thing and when
               | confronted about how wrong they are slide right into
               | their next statement.
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | thaumasiotes wrote:
             | > It's also possible that this is a bad translation from
             | Latin, and the original punchline was along the lines of
             | "take a good look at them"
             | 
             | This is pretty unlikely as a mistranslation from Latin,
             | where those would be radically different verbs.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | bthrn wrote:
           | The astrologer says "you are unable to father children". It
           | is ambiguous whether the astrologer is implying that the man
           | cannot conceive children or whether he has no ability to be a
           | father. When the man reveals that he has seven kids, the
           | astrologer's reply of "look after them well" could be
           | interpreted as sarcasm. I think initially you're supposed to
           | think that the man cannot have kids, but the joke is that
           | he's implying he's a terrible father.
           | 
           | My $0.02.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | bserge wrote:
           | I understood that as in they're not his heh
        
           | jetrink wrote:
           | This one made me laugh out loud and I don't think any of the
           | other replies understood it correctly. The astrologer has
           | gone way out on a limb by telling the man that he is
           | infertile without first ascertaining whether he has children.
           | Then, when cornered, he desperately tries to cover his error
           | by implying that the man is _now_ infertile.  "Look after
           | them (because you won't be able to replace them.)"
        
           | bluGill wrote:
           | I understood this as a play on fatherhood - he is unable to
           | father children as in he is a bad father. Thus the look after
           | them well as in do better.
           | 
           | The other two explanations others have given [so far] are
           | very interesting: make sure you read them.
        
         | GravitasFailure wrote:
         | > A man is attending the burial of his wife, who has just died.
         | When a passerby asks, "Who is it who rests in peace here?", he
         | answers, "Me, now that I'm rid of her!
         | 
         | I had no idea Rodney Dangerfield was a Stand Up Philosopher[0].
         | 
         | [0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IF2RYhNhBdw
        
           | lqet wrote:
           | I honestly think Dangerfield would've had great success in
           | ancient Rome.
           | 
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MecU2keW54I
        
         | caf wrote:
         | _A young man said to his libido-driven wife: "What should we
         | do, darling? Eat or have sex?" She replied: "You can choose.
         | But there's not a crumb in the house."_
         | 
         | OK, that's quite good. I can easily imagine one along those
         | lines in a standup set today (probably more along the lines of
         | _" So, the other night my boyfriend asked..."_).
        
           | woko wrote:
           | It reminds me of this movie quote:
           | 
           | > _I 'm here to kick ass and chew bubblegum and I'm all out
           | of bubblegum._
           | 
           | Reference: https://scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/111729/
        
             | nkingsy wrote:
             | I thought it was an oral pleasure joke, not a pick one of
             | one joke.
        
               | caf wrote:
               | Yes - I assume there's a name for this kind of joke in
               | the industry, where you get a laugh, then a beat, then a
               | bigger laugh.
        
           | pehtis wrote:
           | In Cyprus, where i live, this is an actual joke still said
           | today! I've heard (and said) this joke many times in my life,
           | and it never crossed my mind that it's 2000 years old. Setup
           | is the same and the punchline goes "Oti nomizeis tziai en
           | kala tziai ustera trome!" (in Cypriot greek)
        
           | pessimizer wrote:
           | Or "I'm here to chew bubblegum and kick ass..."
        
         | glecedric wrote:
         | I don't see any jokes involving the Roman deities, maybe they
         | were that fervent, and nothing about the conquered territories
         | either.
        
         | zxcvbn4038 wrote:
         | Hysterical! Although my wife just banned me from telling her
         | jokes for a month.
         | 
         | Makes me think of Life of Brian - https://youtu.be/0lczHvB3Y9s
        
         | bcrosby95 wrote:
         | Looks like people didn't like "intellectuals".
        
           | wavefunction wrote:
           | The original article mentions that there were "tropes" in
           | Roman, recurring characters in different jokes playing the
           | same roles. In the examples it seems to be a character who
           | takes things quite literally either in a serious manner or in
           | a joking manner. I don't see anything particularly negative.
        
         | nononolaughs wrote:
         | Hey, hey, hey, watch it - this is HN not reditt. No jokes or
         | laughs allowed. Like they say, when in Rome, do as the romans
         | do.
        
           | belter wrote:
           | I think anti jokes are allowed:
           | 
           | - You don't need a parachute to go skydiving.
           | 
           | - You need a parachute to go skydiving twice.
        
             | BrandoElFollito wrote:
             | That's a good one. One of my kids is still thinking it out,
             | I expect an eureka moment any time
        
           | hutzlibu wrote:
           | Well, my by far highest karma scoring post, was a joke. But
           | it added to the conversation. So it was welcome. Like those
           | jokes here very much are.
           | 
           | But a lame OT joke about Trump, or Biden, or comparing US to
           | Rome in late stage etc. no thank you.
        
             | wvh wrote:
             | How Trojan of you.
        
           | ant6n wrote:
           | Careful, nononolaughs, you're making jokes and spelling
           | imstakes!
        
         | goto11 wrote:
         | What are the source?
        
           | lqet wrote:
           | Added them above.
        
         | HarHarVeryFunny wrote:
         | > A provincial man has come to Rome, and walking on the streets
         | was drawing everyone's attention, as he was a real double of
         | the emperor Augustus. The emperor, having brought him to the
         | palace, looks at him and then asks: "Tell me, young man, did
         | your mother come to Rome anytime?" The reply was: "She never
         | did. But my father frequently was here."
         | 
         | Solid burn. Being based on the emperor not only sets the joke
         | up (being someone well recognized), but make the comeback
         | sharper/funnier.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | quacked wrote:
           | Can you explain the joke? I do not understand it.
        
             | Digit-Al wrote:
             | The provincial man is basically saying that his father did
             | Augustus' mother.
        
             | naasking wrote:
             | The joke is that they probably have the same father and the
             | emperor's mother wasn't faithful, basically the reverse of
             | what the emperor was implying.
        
         | ZeroGravitas wrote:
         | I dont understand the one about the runner?
        
           | hanoz wrote:
           | The linked sources don't say the four "came _to me_ before
           | you ", as above, but rather "came before you". So it's a joke
           | about the fickleness of dream interpretations. That is, a
           | dream of driving a four horse chariot is taken by one
           | interpreter as bestowing the speed of horses on the dreamer,
           | while the next interpreter says oh no, it's a dream about
           | having four in front of you!
        
           | thehappypm wrote:
           | I think four other competitors came also, so the
           | fortuneteller realized that either a) he was going to lose
           | because of the competition or b) he already told someone they
           | were going to win so couldn't tell multiple
        
           | lqet wrote:
           | They had the same dream.
           | 
           | Edit: I think your interpretation below is the correct one!
        
             | mro_name wrote:
             | ... and were faster (in visiting their consultant).
        
             | ZeroGravitas wrote:
             | After looking up what a quadriga is, I think the joke is
             | that he's behind four horses. So the dream can be
             | interpreted in two opposite ways. So presumably the other
             | four dreamt of being a horse.
        
               | Talanes wrote:
               | There's the reinforcement of him being behind them on
               | making it to the fortune teller as well.
        
         | thaumasiotes wrote:
         | None of these involve wordplay, but it was common in Roman
         | humor.
         | 
         | Did you make the choice to leave it out (since it doesn't
         | translate well), or did your links?
        
         | rnoorda wrote:
         | Thanks for finding these! I'm often impressed by how often
         | jokes in other languages/cultures are funny, without much
         | cultural or linguistic context needed.
        
       | captainpiggies wrote:
       | I highly recommend anyone who's interested in funny stories of
       | Roman life to read the Satyricon from Gaius Petronius Arbiter
       | (eBook available on Project Gutenberg)
        
         | knodi123 wrote:
         | https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/5225
        
           | kook_throwaway wrote:
           | Thank you.
        
       | abruzzi wrote:
       | I'm surprised that the author doesn't see modern usage of coined
       | names, maybe we read different things. It is very common in
       | almost all of Pynchon's novels. Vonnegut used it often as
       | well."Benny Profane", "Oedipa Maas", "Pierce Inverarity",
       | "Malachi Constant", and half of the characters in Gravity's
       | Rainbow: https://www.coursehero.com/lit/Gravitys-
       | Rainbow/characters/
        
         | marton78 wrote:
         | The same is true for Bond Girls and for the Batman's romantic
         | interests.
        
         | robotresearcher wrote:
         | The author gives an example of modern use from Family Guy. It
         | works as a tic for Vonnegut because it's not common.
        
         | bitwize wrote:
         | A lot of anime characters have highly unusual but descriptive
         | names. Ex.: Katsuki Bakugo from _My Hero Academia_ is a
         | narcissist preoccupied with proving he 's the best, and has
         | explosion based powers. His name incorporates the kanji for
         | "self", "win", and "bomb". Many of the other MHA characters are
         | so named according to their traits, superpowers, and even
         | signature colors.
         | 
         | It's kind of a shame that you don't see a lot of this in
         | popular Western media.
        
           | SuoDuanDao wrote:
           | You might like Stephen Erikson's Malazan Books of the Fallen
           | series. It's a noteworthy feature there, albeit only in some
           | of the cultures he invented.
        
           | kook_throwaway wrote:
           | Hiro Protagonist
        
             | brazzy wrote:
             | Ahem.
             | 
             | Biggus Dickus.
        
       | malwarebytess wrote:
       | All of the apologies for the blue comedy are grating. We get it,
       | making fun of women isn't socially acceptable. You don't need to
       | preface every single description of an off-color joke.
        
       | bitwize wrote:
       | The bit about Romans dressing and acting like Greeks reminds me
       | of the Gilbert and Sullivan play _The Mikado_ , which satirized
       | British life but was set in a comical version of Japan. When the
       | Crown Prince of Japan visited Great Britain, all exhibitions of
       | the play in London were cancelled so as to avoid giving offense.
       | Unfortunately, His Highness had wanted to _see_ _The Mikado_
       | while he was in town...
        
       | OJFord wrote:
       | Baffling that this piece manages to mention so much modern
       | comedy, in discussing _Romans_ , without referencing the
       | centurion scene in _Monty Python 's Life of Brian_, with Caesar's
       | friend (he had a wife you know)!
       | 
       | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kx_G2a2hL6U&t=1m18s
        
         | belter wrote:
         | "And about you? Do you find it risible...when I say the
         | name...Biggus..."
        
           | HarHarVeryFunny wrote:
           | Orphelia Buttocks
        
           | fartingflamingo wrote:
           | wisible!
           | 
           | Sowwy, couldn't wesist!
        
         | BoxOfRain wrote:
         | Nice one, centurion!
         | 
         | That film has so many absolutely classic scenes with the
         | Romans. My personal favourite is the "romanes eunt domus"
         | scene!
        
           | ako wrote:
           | "You are all individuals!"
        
           | mbg721 wrote:
           | But apart from all that, what have the Romans ever done for
           | us??
           | 
           | There's definitely a lens of "the history of the world as
           | it's presented in high-school" that makes the Life of Brian
           | so funny.
        
             | marcosdumay wrote:
             | That joke is very complex. Let's not forget that it's about
             | people that lost a war not long before it, that had plenty
             | of them killed by the Romans, and are forced to support the
             | empire with taxes (that go mostly to Rome, not to local
             | improvements).
             | 
             | The way people represent the joke, as if they had no reason
             | to oppose the Romans is a joke by itself.
        
               | erehweb wrote:
               | It is a joke the filmmakers may not be fully in on - the
               | Romans in Python are analogues for the British, managing
               | an empire and bringing the "benefits of civilization" to
               | "quarrelsome and backwards natives".
        
               | marcosdumay wrote:
               | And the joke applies almost exactly to the British rule
               | of their colonies. Or do you think Monty Python wouldn't
               | make an anti-nationalist joke?
               | 
               | (The "let's interrupt our program because the Queen has
               | just started watching" is the best.)
        
               | [deleted]
        
               | mbg721 wrote:
               | Nah, the joke is more self-centered than that--it's the
               | answer to a British adolescent's exam question "Name x
               | benefits of Roman rule." No actual Romans would sit
               | around saying "Wait...this is the same word either way,
               | but is it dative or ablative??" either.
        
               | kuraudo wrote:
               | High school historian perspective: I don't know; compare
               | their conquest to the greek's. Greek civilians thought of
               | Rome as "the light of the world," even though their
               | wealth was used in much the same way.
        
               | marcosdumay wrote:
               | That's the complexity. The Roman invasion did enrich
               | their society (as did the Greek before), yet all none of
               | the dead people got any of it and many individual lives
               | were completely destroyed even if not literally
               | terminated.
        
           | mro_name wrote:
           | with the "Decline!" double meaning (refuse! vs. list the
           | grammatical cases of the noun!)
        
           | switch007 wrote:
           | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romani_ite_domum
           | 
           | "People called Romanes they go the house?!"
        
           | Radim wrote:
           | All of Life of Brian aged well. I rewatched the film last
           | year - still thoroughly enjoyable.
           | 
           | What I completely forgot were the scenes with Stan
           | transitioning into Loretta. What seemed like an eccentric
           | joke at the time (more than 40 years ago!) proved fairly
           | prescient. Funny yet handled with kindness.
        
             | mbg721 wrote:
             | Is it really that kind, or is the movie just too beloved to
             | try to cancel?
        
               | OJFord wrote:
               | Well, it does portray a very PC acceptance (fighting for
               | Stan/Loretta's right to have babies even if he/she can't
               | actually have them) even if it is a joke.
               | 
               | So I think it's at least difficult to object to? Yes that
               | behaviour is correct but it's not allowed in a comedy?
               | Stop laughing (so it can still be in the script, it's
               | just not a joke?)?
               | 
               | I think the whole film is far more thoughtful than it is
               | unkind, to any group. The main contemporary objection was
               | from religious groups of course, but just watch
               | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CeKWVuye1YE.
        
               | mbg721 wrote:
               | It portrays a serious extremist group being derailed by
               | the demands of the furthest, most boundary-obliterating,
               | most ludicrous social extremists imaginable at the time.
               | The fact that that group was later considered centrist
               | doesn't make the joke PC, it just means people don't get
               | the joke anymore.
        
               | [deleted]
        
               | stronglikedan wrote:
               | Nothing about Monty Python was unkind. They made no
               | comedy with ill intent.
        
               | emacsen wrote:
               | > Nothing about Monty Python was unkind
               | 
               | "Never Be Rude to an Arab" is Islamaphobic on its face,
               | as well as normalizing other racial slurs.
               | 
               | "I like Chinese" is full of pretty gross stereotypes as
               | well.
               | 
               | The troop claims they harbor no ill intent, and that may
               | be true, but it's easy to say "We're not here to offend"
               | about someone else but not acknowledging the power
               | differences here and why someone might be offended.
        
               | BoxOfRain wrote:
               | We can only behave according to what is acceptable in the
               | present moment we happen to exist in, it would be
               | unreasonable to ask people to attempt to predict future
               | morality when making ethical choices. We can try to make
               | a good guess about it and act accordingly but it'll never
               | be perfect, nobody can make a ruler with units that don't
               | exist yet let alone try to measure something with it. I
               | think intent counts in these situations too, like you say
               | Monty Python never set out to be unkind or bigoted to
               | anyone.
               | 
               | Would it be an acceptable sketch today? Probably not, and
               | that's not really a bad thing given that improvements to
               | the rights and recognition of transgender people is one
               | of the more positive things to come out of the last
               | couple of decades in my opinion. Should Monty Python be
               | cancelled over this sketch though? Not in a million
               | years.
        
           | dugmartin wrote:
           | I recently watched a great "explainer" video on why that
           | scene was even funnier at a deeper level if you had been
           | classically educated in Latin (as John Cleese was):
           | 
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfH6gjxTTgE
        
         | iantrt wrote:
         | Surely you mean "Life of Brian"?
        
           | OJFord wrote:
           | Yes, of course :facepalm:. (Or rather, 'Bwian'!)
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | bmn__ wrote:
         | versio originalis in lingua latina ;)
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxfDIV1f0R4
         | 
         | (subtitles available)
        
       | peter303 wrote:
       | Play Funny Thing Happened on Way to Forum used lots of these
       | jokes. Still funny.
        
       | antognini wrote:
       | I've been doing some research in the last couple of weeks about
       | the astronomer Thales of Miletus for an upcoming episode of a
       | podcast I host about the history of astronomy that I run [0]. I
       | had known that Thales was one of the Seven Sages of Greece, but I
       | didn't quite appreciate the extent to which the Seven Sages had
       | entered the popular consciousness.
       | 
       | It turns out that centuries later over in Rome there was a public
       | latrine in the town of Ostia Antica that has some graffiti that
       | reference a few of the sages, including Thales, and provide
       | advice for those using the facilities:
       | 
       | * "To shit well, Solon rubbed his belly {Ut bene cacaret, ventrum
       | palpavit Solon}."
       | 
       | * "Thales admonished those shitting to strain hard {Durum
       | cacantes monuit ut nitant Thales}."
       | 
       | * "Sly Chilon taught to fart silently {Vissire tacite Chilon
       | docuit subdolus}."
       | 
       | Below these there are some other pieces of advice, though not
       | from the sages:
       | 
       | * "shake yourself about so you'll go faster {agita te celerivs
       | pervenies}"
       | 
       | * "you're sitting on a mule-driver; I'm hurrying up {mvlione
       | sedes, propero}"
       | 
       | * "friend, the proverb escapes you: shit well and fuck the
       | doctors {amice fvgit te proverbivm: bene caca et irrima medicos}"
       | 
       | * "no one talks to you much, Priscianus, until you use the sponge
       | on a stick {verbose tibi nemo dicit dvm priscianvs utaris
       | xylosphongio}"
       | 
       | An interesting article with more details:
       | https://www.purplemotes.net/2014/01/19/seven-sages-ostia/
       | 
       | [0]: Shameless plug: https://songofurania.com/
        
         | bserge wrote:
         | Sponge on a stick. Reusable. Shared. Sometimes deadly.
        
           | antognini wrote:
           | There's even a Wikipedia page about the xylospongium:
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xylospongium
        
             | bserge wrote:
             | Oh dear God, they actually used sea sponges? Why did I need
             | to know that...
             | 
             | My ancestors might've been barbarians but they knew to use
             | leaves and water :D
        
               | loonster wrote:
               | Or that a gladiator committed suicide by choking on one.
        
           | zxcvbn4038 wrote:
           | Inspiration for the Plumbus on Rick and Morty?
           | 
           | https://rickandmorty.fandom.com/wiki/Plumbus
        
       | heikkilevanto wrote:
       | I don't have any reference, but I heard once that someone looked
       | at the jokes they told about Hitler, and was able trace more than
       | half of them back to the Romans.
        
         | thaumasiotes wrote:
         | There are a few Grimm's Fairy Tales involving the Lord taking
         | human form and asking a (real) human to host him. He might be
         | accompanied by St. Peter.
         | 
         | The stories are obvious, direct correspondences to Greek
         | stories about Zeus, perhaps accompanied by Hermes, doing the
         | same thing.
         | 
         | However, since the Brothers Grimm collected their stories from
         | aristocrats, it isn't clear whether the Greek stories passed
         | down naturally through time (while mutating into a slightly
         | more Christian theme), or whether the narrators learned the
         | stories in their original Greek as part of a classical
         | education and then rethemed them as "native German" stories for
         | the benefit of the Grimms.
        
         | GravitasFailure wrote:
         | I would be completely unsurprised if that were true. If you
         | look at the graffiti in Pompeii it's a parade of dick drawings,
         | boasts about virility, and generally would look quite at home
         | in the modern era.
         | 
         | https://kashgar.com.au/blogs/history/the-bawdy-graffiti-of-p...
        
         | ojnabieoot wrote:
         | Maybe a reference would help - I'm not sure how this is a
         | meaningful statement.
         | 
         | It seems that there could be many somewhat "generic" Western
         | European jokes about despots which date back to Roman times.
         | But without more information I can't think of any jokes at or
         | about Hitler specifically that could possibly date back to the
         | Romans.
        
         | ben_w wrote:
         | Part of me really wants to believe that ancient Rome's
         | plebeians sang "Ceaser unum testiculum habuit, Augustus duo sed
         | parvae sunt" (or whatever it would be: please excuse my use of
         | Google translate).
        
           | Y_Y wrote:
           | Suetonius records the following as being sung by the troops
           | at one of Caesar's triumphs:
           | 
           | > Urbani, servate uxores, moechum calvum adducimus.
           | 
           | > Aurum in gallia effutuisti, hic sumpsisti mutuum.
           | 
           | > Gallias caesar subegit, nicomedes caesarem, ecce caesar
           | nunc triumphat qui subegit gallias.
           | 
           | > Nicomedes non triumphat, qui subegit caesarem.
           | 
           | > Gallos caesar in triumphum ducit, idem in curiam, galli
           | bracas deposuerunt, latum clavum sumperunt.
           | 
           |  _hastily translated:_
           | 
           | > Hide your wives, we bring the bald adulterer to our city.
           | 
           | > You fucked away all our gold in Gaul, then you borrowed
           | more.
           | 
           | > Caesar is beneath the Gauls, Nicomedes is beneath Caesar,
           | behold Caesar who is beneath the Gauls now triumphs.
           | 
           | > Nicomedes does not triumph, who is beneath Caesar.
           | 
           | > Caesar leads the Gauls in triumph, the same in the senate,
           | the Gauls remove their trousers, they picked up his purple
           | toga to carry it.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-09-09 23:02 UTC)