[HN Gopher] MIT Mathlets
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       MIT Mathlets
        
       Author : huftis
       Score  : 171 points
       Date   : 2021-09-03 15:43 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (mathlets.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (mathlets.org)
        
       | woofie11 wrote:
       | What I find obnoxious, and typical of MIT, is how credit is
       | allocated.
       | 
       | "Copyright (c) 2009--2015 H. Miller"
       | 
       | Only hmm (H. Miller) didn't do the work. The "About" page,
       | fortunately, lists the authors, but doesn't really credit who did
       | what.
       | 
       | Nothing personal about hmm, but a lot personal about the MIT
       | culture of credit theft. MIT didn't have this culture 25 years
       | ago. If this was (c) MIT, it'd be okay. But it's the PI on the
       | project, who often doesn't do much of anything, who gets to pick-
       | and-choose what goes to whom, and more often than not, allocate
       | anything of value back to themselves.
        
         | mynameismon wrote:
         | This might explain the reason for the copyright:
         | https://mathlets.org/training/
         | 
         | Edit: More specifically:
         | 
         | > This self-paced short course by Professor Haynes R. Miller,
         | Ph.D. [ Biography ] focuses on the use of technology in
         | mathematics education at the university level. The course
         | begins with an introduction and then explores the MIT Mathlets
         | collection by providing examples of Mathlet use in three
         | different contexts.
        
         | realsimplesynd wrote:
         | > the MIT culture of credit theft
         | 
         | This makes me think about who we revere as scientists and who
         | we compare ourselves to.
         | 
         | A lot of success in life is out of our control. Conditions
         | produce outliers, not diligence and hard work (Outlier X
         | probably did work hard, but the conditions were so for their
         | nervous system to act as such).
        
           | queuebert wrote:
           | Besides this, the phenotype that academia reveres is a
           | particular type of low-level bureaucrat that works by
           | quantity, not quality.
           | 
           | For example, I'm in academia, but I prefer to solve
           | interesting problems and create new things of high quality. I
           | have never had to retract a paper, nor has anyone found a
           | mistake in my work. I don't supervise more than one or two
           | students at a time, because I want to be able to devote time
           | to them. People like me languish and do not get promoted to
           | tenure.
           | 
           | I have colleagues who pride themselves on how many e-mails
           | they answer a day and recruit large labs of grad students who
           | download neural net codes, tweak and publish. They talk of
           | "least publishable units, or LPUs" and are always submitting
           | and chairing ... submitting grants, submitting papers,
           | chairing committees, etc. They get tenure very quickly and
           | make a lot more money than I do. But they aren't scientists,
           | they are bureaucrats who send emails. They decide what
           | science is done, because they chair funding committees, so we
           | get boring, incremental science that is stuck in local
           | minima.
        
         | jonsen wrote:
         | How is copyright the same as credit?
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | pfortuny wrote:
         | Yep.It should be copyright MIT, especially if he is using his
         | post and other personnel to make this.
         | 
         | Nothing against him personally.
        
         | queuebert wrote:
         | Unfortunately, all of academia is like this now. The most
         | successful PIs are the best marketers of work produced by an
         | army of grad students recruited for their cheap labor costs
         | more than their future in the academic world.
        
       | unix_fan wrote:
       | Nun of these seem to be accessible for screen readers, unlike
       | what PHET has.
        
       | stevenpetryk wrote:
       | Shameless plug for my React library for creating interactive
       | visualizations on the web, in case anyone wants to make similar
       | things. Probably needs a little work to make things this
       | sophisticated though :)
       | 
       | https://mafs.dev/
        
         | throwaway6734 wrote:
         | This looks really interesting! Very nice work!
        
         | globuous wrote:
         | Really really cool !! The example section is sweeeet, real nice
         | work ;)
        
         | jonsen wrote:
         | On iPad your page shows for .2 seconds then blanks :-/
        
           | stevenpetryk wrote:
           | Dang! I did test on iPad at one point. Thanks for the heads
           | up.
        
         | mynameismon wrote:
         | Wow, this is stunning! I foresee this as a frontend
         | visualisation tool for a Brilliant.org competitor (something I
         | have been wanting to do for a while, but haven't been able to
         | find time for)
        
           | stevenpetryk wrote:
           | Funnily enough, I built it largely to impress them when I
           | applied last year. But they black holed me. Still happy I
           | made it!
        
             | mrtksn wrote:
             | You definitely impressed some random strangers on the
             | internet:) It's quite neat really.
        
       | Bostonian wrote:
       | Interesting, but in the first one I clicked on, "T distribution",
       | there should be more explanation. It says only "The t
       | distribution depends on one parameter.". I would say, "The shape
       | of the t distribution depends on one parameter, the degrees of
       | freedom, which controls the kurtosis. As df approaches infinity
       | the t distribution approaches the normal distribution."
        
         | martincmartin wrote:
         | It's designed to be used in a MOOC, so there should be lots of
         | text around them. edX math classes use them a lot.
        
       | qualudeheart wrote:
       | I would like a neurology site called brainlets.
       | 
       | I think it would appeal to young people. Brainlet is a popular
       | slang word these days.
       | 
       | What do you think my friends?
        
         | mixedCase wrote:
         | It's an insult akin to "stupid" or "dense". It worked for git,
         | but "git" at least wasn't in vogue.
        
       | euske wrote:
       | Slightly off-topic question: how would you call these playable
       | things embedded in HTML these days? I would like to use the word
       | "applet" but it can be still confusing to those who remember Java
       | Applets. Any idea?
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-09-03 23:01 UTC)