[HN Gopher] The Case Against Naive Technocapitalist Optimism
___________________________________________________________________
The Case Against Naive Technocapitalist Optimism
Author : rapnie
Score : 43 points
Date : 2021-08-31 17:03 UTC (16 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (consilienceproject.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (consilienceproject.org)
| dannyobrien wrote:
| I wish we could get some critiques that weren't from a subgroups
| that so closely resembles the neargroup they're criticizing:
| https://consilienceproject.org/team/
|
| These essays often feel less like a novel analysis, and more just
| like different US elite factions arguing over whose turn it is to
| gain the Mandate of Heaven.
| [deleted]
| beaconstudios wrote:
| The consilience project is more rooted in systems theory than
| technocapitalism. Daniel's interests overlap strongly with the
| rationalist types (existential/civilisational risk, primarily)
| but his approach is not the economics-centric form that they
| take.
| [deleted]
| dtagames wrote:
| Fascinating and well-written. Informative and, in places,
| scathing.
|
| Thanks for the post!
| lawrenceyan wrote:
| > Notably, corporations themselves are also experiencing a
| reduction in internal science funding. The proportion of
| corporate funding allocated toward the research side of
| industrial R&D dropped from 28% in 1985 to 20% in 2015. The same
| review of scientific publications found that the rate of papers
| being published by corporations dropped significantly between
| 1980 and 2010, indicating that it is most cost-effective for
| companies to rely on existing data as opposed to producing new
| data.
|
| This is disingenuous, primarily because it applies data that is
| effectively outdated and no longer applicable. I'd say the exact
| opposite is true in fact. It's the companies investing the most
| in R&D that are also the most successful, both in terms of
| financial and overall societal contribution.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-09-01 10:02 UTC)