[HN Gopher] OpenBSD: Hibernate Time Reduced
___________________________________________________________________
OpenBSD: Hibernate Time Reduced
Author : rodrigo975
Score : 19 points
Date : 2021-09-01 06:09 UTC (3 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (www.undeadly.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (www.undeadly.org)
| kiwijamo wrote:
| Out of interest what does similar numbers look like on Windows,
| Linux, etc?
| ggm wrote:
| Not identical but related: do compilers tune with the OS to get
| code and data into L1 cache? I believe so, I want to believe you
| can compile to avoid mem fetch, let alone disc. E.g. if I know my
| AES needs a 20k table, does the compiler know how to make this
| apparent to the CPU farm so its never out of L1?
|
| I continue to believe a 2cpu 1mb L1 cache is faster than 2 cpu,
| 2HT, 512k L1 cache. 4x fake CPUs and less L1 doesn't beat true
| cpu and lots of cache on die. But, I might be wrong!
| adrianN wrote:
| Profile guided optimization can help compilers put data in the
| right place, but in general compilers are not very good at
| that.
| kristjank wrote:
| Great to hear that; Getting closer to running it as a bare-metal
| desktop OS by the day.
| nix23 wrote:
| Look being a great fan of BSD (especially FreeBSD), i have one
| big problem with all of them on my laptop....and it is
| Wireless! A max speed of ~650kb/s is just not a usable one
| today.
|
| Well and on the workstation that you cannot change fanspeed on
| a AMD-GPU, those are my 2 big-points.
| messe wrote:
| > A max speed of ~650kb/s is just not a usable one today
|
| What card model, how do you have it configured, and how far
| from the router are you? 650kb/s is not an inherent limit on
| any BSD, and much higher speeds are easily possible if you
| have supported hardware.
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-09-01 10:00 UTC)