[HN Gopher] How to Paint 50k Miles of Lines
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       How to Paint 50k Miles of Lines
        
       Author : scott_s
       Score  : 75 points
       Date   : 2021-08-30 13:08 UTC (9 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.nytimes.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.nytimes.com)
        
       | petarb wrote:
       | I love the story format that this uses
        
       | aeharding wrote:
       | American traffic engineers' love for painted bicycle gutters is
       | infuriating.
       | 
       | https://twitter.com/tomflood1/status/990927016617807872
        
         | zwieback wrote:
         | better than no bike lane at all, though. Drivers don't really
         | respect the painted bike lanes when there are no bikes around
         | but I notice that it does raise awareness that a bike might
         | appear
        
           | acomjean wrote:
           | They tend to paint them solid green in some massachusetts
           | cities. (Especially at intersections.).
           | 
           | Thats a lot of paint.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | athenot wrote:
       | This was a neat set of slides.
       | 
       | Apparently here in the US they use beads of glass sprayed onto
       | the wet paint for reflection. It kinda works; but for the longest
       | time I wondered why the paint here is nowhere near as reflective
       | as the kind used in Europe which has little bumps for sound but
       | also better visibility with rain.
       | 
       | https://www.morenoconseil.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/SER...
        
         | sbarre wrote:
         | What you can use also depends on the weather in the area.
         | 
         | The profiled crew was in Michigan I think(?) where you get snow
         | and drastic changes in weather.
         | 
         | That affects the available materials. Can they survive salt and
         | freezing, and being scraped by snow plows etc...
        
       | poulsbohemian wrote:
       | A few years ago I had a team that worked on software for this -
       | it was far more complicated than expected. The hardware, IE:
       | trucks with paint equipment, are also far more complicated as
       | you've got to get the application of paint just right or else it
       | leads to too little (and thus repeat applications) or too much
       | (which over the miles becomes big $$$). Also, it's not always
       | just paint - it can have reflective material and binders with
       | various kinds of textures added as well.
       | 
       | edit: For what it's worth, my impression at the time is that this
       | is an industry ripe for disruption. Every city / state / county
       | has to deal with road striping. They do it through a combination
       | of their own rigging and/or various firms who specialize in this
       | stuff - both hardware and software - but where there isn't a
       | dominate provider. It's classic B-school stuff: take a cottage
       | industry and standardize the process, outperform your competitors
       | because of your standardization, and become the monopoly.
        
         | capableweb wrote:
         | > my impression at the time is that this is an industry ripe
         | for disruption
         | 
         | > outperform your competitors because of your standardization,
         | and become the monopoly
         | 
         | I'm not sure what your goal is here, either it's innovation or
         | creating a monopoly, but you can't really argue for both at the
         | same time.
        
           | sacred_numbers wrote:
           | Monopolies are often created through innovation, either
           | through lowering costs or increasing quality above
           | competitors. Carnegie Steel, for example, used the Bessemer
           | process to drastically lower the cost of steel and thus drive
           | competitors out of business. Google used innovation to make
           | searches much better and faster.
           | 
           | There are certainly other ways to create a monopoly, such as
           | regulatory capture, illegal activities, and price dumping,
           | but natural monopolies due to superior levels of innovation
           | do exist. The reason we generally want to avoid monopolies
           | isn't because of the way they are created, it's because of
           | the damage they can cause after they are firmly established.
        
         | Arrath wrote:
         | > it was far more complicated than expected
         | 
         | I ran into this myself being involved in a highway project
         | along the Oregon coast. There was a very fine balance of paint
         | reflectivity, traction, and wear resilience that had to be met
         | and it turned out it was very, very trick to hit the right
         | spot.
         | 
         | E.G., the paint itself has very poor traction characteristics
         | when wet, which it often is on the pacific coast. Adding
         | texture coatings to it then impacts the reflectivity, but
         | reflective additives within the texturizer cause it to wear
         | faster..
         | 
         | We were only paving 4 miles, but I saw several inspectors grow
         | a lot of gray hair over the course of a few months.
        
         | jabroni_salad wrote:
         | I spent some time in Germany and something that struck me was
         | the omnipresence of the Unimog. It seemed like for every
         | outdoor job that can exist, there is an attachment you can bolt
         | onto the front of a unimog to do it. Utility trucks are
         | relatively highly customized in the states compared to that.
        
           | MisterTea wrote:
           | Its a hybrid of a truck and farm tractor. The track width was
           | standardized to the width of two rows of planted potatos. It
           | was instrumental in the German rebuilding effort after WW2 so
           | it sort of became a national point of pride, the vehicle that
           | rebuilt Germany.
           | 
           | As to why the hybrid idea never made it to the USA is the USA
           | did not suffer continuous allied bombings and therefor had no
           | need to develop a multipurpose vehicle. The Unimog replaced
           | two vehicles thus being very convenient and cost effective in
           | post war Germany. A single vehicle could till fields, haul
           | crops, haul building materials, and plow snow. USA had all of
           | those things already. Why reinvent the wheel?
        
       | mauriciolange wrote:
       | Without the paywall:
       | https://web.archive.org/web/20210829143611/https://www.nytim...
        
       | grecy wrote:
       | While driving around Africa and the length of the Americas I
       | really did see guys lying on moving flat decks using paint
       | brushes to paint road lines. The 8 year old in me was pretty
       | excited!
        
       | mastax wrote:
       | One of the big changes happening in the industry is increasing
       | collection of road line quality data. Previously we'd use
       | handheld meters to spot check pavement markers. The new state of
       | the art is to use continuous laser scanners attached to vehicles
       | to measure all of the pavement markers on the road. This data is
       | used to identify what areas need to be re-striped, to see how
       | different materials fare in different conditions over time, and
       | to submit warranty claims when things aren't up to spec.
        
         | toomuchtodo wrote:
         | I'm surprised Tesla (or similar data collection fleets, like
         | Google Street View) isn't measuring this and offering it to
         | road authorities as a dataset. They have 1 million+ vehicles
         | traversing roads daily, and they're already collecting labeled
         | data (10 second video clips) for Dojo. Lane markings directly
         | impact quality of driving assistance experience, so vehicle
         | manufacturers have a vested interested in high quality
         | road/lane markings.
        
           | Dangeranger wrote:
           | Transit authorities care most about the quality of the data
           | and the chain of control over the data from collection to QA
           | and finally to delivery.
           | 
           | Most commercial LiDAR trucks are accurate down to millimeters
           | in relative terms and centimeters in absolute position terms.
           | The equipment has been certified by approved surveying
           | bodies, and there are official records as to that specific
           | piece of collection equipment's accuracy and precision.
           | 
           | If any autonomous car company could deliver data to that
           | standard then it would be valuable. But to my knowledge none
           | of them can, because the accuracy of measurement systems for
           | surveying roads at motion are so specialized and expensive.
        
             | toomuchtodo wrote:
             | Do you have any links on the topic you could share? Very
             | interested in learning more! I am a bit of a precision
             | positioning and fleet data collection wonk.
        
       | joshuaturner wrote:
       | Really not a fan of this slideshow style presentation - tons of
       | great media sure, but I don't see why that couldn't be inlined or
       | at least responsive to scrolling
        
         | TroisM wrote:
         | Me neither, and every other page is blank... maybe they were
         | ads?
        
           | sbarre wrote:
           | Yes there were ads mixed in (not ever other page but you're
           | probably just being hyperbolic) and if you have an ad blocker
           | they would have been blank.
        
         | athenot wrote:
         | Quite the opposite. I really enjoyed the format that shows one
         | whole slide at a time instead of seeing content progressively
         | reveal via scrolling.
         | 
         | Also keyboard arrows worked, which was a nice touch.
        
           | capableweb wrote:
           | > Quite the opposite. I really enjoyed the format that shows
           | one whole slide at a time instead of seeing content
           | progressively reveal via scrolling.
           | 
           | Sure, but what about content that is always visible that you
           | scroll manually to signal your intent to read something, and
           | then read where you stop yourself? You know, like a classic
           | web page.
        
       | kiliantics wrote:
       | > The painters aim for straightness. They relish the crispness.
       | They try to tune out impatient drivers who yell or honk or even
       | sometimes throw things at them.
       | 
       | What is it about driving a car that turns people who are probably
       | otherwise normal adults into literal babies. Who screams (honks)
       | as loud as they can, without a care for who it might bother?
       | Babies. Who throws things at people when they are upset? Babies.
       | 
       | I think the requirements to be licenced to drive should include a
       | basic understanding of traffic dynamics. When a person gets in
       | your way so you can't speed through the lights and you end up
       | waiting at a red, they didn't lengthen your trip at all and are
       | not worthy of any directed rage. You were just going to be
       | stopped by the next light and get to your destination at around
       | the same time. If there is roadwork or an accident, everyone is
       | in the same boat and no single person can speed you up or slow
       | you down.
       | 
       | We've all collectively just accepted to be subjected to an
       | enormous amount of noise pollution and sometimes deadly violence
       | on the road simply because people can't understand and/or accept
       | the realities of how driving infrastructure works. It's kind of
       | mind-blowing if you consider it.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | throwaway0a5e wrote:
         | >What is it about driving a car that turns people who are
         | probably otherwise normal adults into literal babies. Who
         | screams (honks) as loud as they can, without a care for who it
         | might bother? Babies. Who throws things at people when they are
         | upset? Babies.
         | 
         | They're not angry at the road crew. They're angry at the state
         | police, DOT bureaucrat or whoever that decided to block off way
         | more road than was strictly necessary and they're taking it out
         | on the road crew. They're angry at the state for making their
         | lives harder than strictly necessary and they're taking it out
         | on the messenger.
         | 
         | >When a person gets in your way so you can't speed through the
         | lights and you end up waiting at a red, they didn't lengthen
         | your trip at all and are not worthy of any directed rage
         | 
         | If it never has positive ROI people wouldn't do it. Just
         | because people don't share the same reading of the situation as
         | you doesn't make them stupid. During peak hours where I live
         | missing a light adds more than just that light to the time
         | because you now are behind more traffic that just got onto the
         | road. So instead of waiting two cycles to get through the next
         | light you might wait three, and so on and so on.
         | 
         | >We've all collectively just accepted to be subjected to an
         | enormous amount of noise pollution and sometimes deadly
         | violence on the road simply because people can't understand
         | and/or accept the realities of how driving infrastructure
         | works.
         | 
         | One man's "accept the inevitable" is another man's "needlessly
         | bend over and take the unnecessary". If people went when the
         | light turn green, didn't stop at cloverleafs(!!), etc there's
         | be a lot less honking.
        
         | D-Coder wrote:
         | > What is it about driving a car that turns people who are
         | probably otherwise normal adults into literal babies.
         | 
         | It's like Usenet, or FaceBook. Two layers of glass
         | (driver+worker) give people some anonymity and they stop
         | treating others with some respect.
        
           | jrwoodruff wrote:
           | I read a quote from one of the Sandy Hook parents: Anytime
           | you put a machine between people, the person at the other end
           | of the machine is dehumanized. I'm paraphrasing here, and
           | they were talking about a gun, but I think it holds true for
           | cars and computers as well.
        
         | soared wrote:
         | It would be nice, but in my opinion it's not caused by being in
         | a car. Some people will try to take advantage of any system
         | where they won't feel/see negative repercussions. You can call
         | it externalities causing global warming or you can call it my
         | dad reusing a coupon because the cashier didn't collect it.
        
           | acdha wrote:
           | We see it more in cars because of the isolation and
           | velocitization: someone running or on a bicycle _can_ be rude
           | too but it's far, far less common because they feel like part
           | of the community without the isolation of being in a sealed
           | metal box kept multiple body-lengths from other people and
           | there isn't billions of dollars of design and marketing
           | saying that it's all about going 70mph, anyone who doesn't go
           | fast is a fool, and everyone else should get out of your way.
           | 
           | I used to car commute & now use bike/transit exclusively. I
           | see more people being considerate, apologizing for confusion,
           | etc. in a given day than I used to see in a year of driving
           | in California. The reduced safety & quality of life isn't
           | just because cars are faster - a lot of people just seem to
           | do the same thing internet commenters do and let distance
           | bring out their worst sides, only they're doing it with
           | several tons of metal which can reach killing speed in less
           | time than it takes to think.
        
         | oogali wrote:
         | Why assume they are otherwise normal adults?
        
       | js2 wrote:
       | > The painters aim for straightness. They relish the crispness.
       | They try to tune out impatient drivers who yell or honk or even
       | sometimes throw things at them. But they know that unless they
       | mess up, few will consider their work.
       | 
       | Ah, I know that feeling...
       | 
       | (And what the hell is wrong with someone that gets angry at a
       | road crew?)
       | 
       | > When Garza presses a black button spraying white paint on the
       | road, it also triggers a second gun behind the paint gun to
       | sprinkle tiny salt-size glass beads. If the paint is too thin,
       | beads won't stick to it. That means the lines won't reflect
       | light.
       | 
       | I don't think they use these beads in the road paint universally.
       | The lines here in the piedmont region of NC are virtually
       | impossible to see at night, especially when they are wet.
        
         | FridayoLeary wrote:
         | >(And what the hell is wrong with someone that gets angry at a
         | road crew?)
         | 
         | Come to the UK then. A crew were actually caught working once.
         | It made national headlines.
        
         | gumby wrote:
         | > (And what the hell is wrong with someone that gets angry at a
         | road crew?)
         | 
         | Seems a lot of people feel this way. Haven't you seen those
         | "end construction" protest signs? People seem to post them
         | almost anywhere crews are working!
        
           | jrwoodruff wrote:
           | Contrast that with all the complaining about how bad the
           | roads are. Yea, the construction is a pain, but at least I
           | connect that with better roads in a few relatively short
           | months.
        
         | kevin_thibedeau wrote:
         | The beads get scraped off by plows after a couple winters and
         | are just as invisible in the wet.
        
         | throwaway0a5e wrote:
         | >(And what the hell is wrong with someone that gets angry at a
         | road crew?)
         | 
         | They're not angry at the road crew. They're angry at the state
         | police, DOT bureaucrat or whoever that decided to block off way
         | more road than was strictly necessary and they're taking it out
         | on the road crew.
        
       | raman162 wrote:
       | I never once considered the amount of engineering it goes into
       | painting the lines on the street. I feel it for them, good
       | (perfect) work goes un-noticed while bad work is obvious and
       | criticized. Also seems like the work requires a lot of focus and
       | constant attention. That in combination with physical labor
       | sounds really exhaustive.
        
         | jrwoodruff wrote:
         | I'm always amazed at the amount of engineering that goes into,
         | well, everything. Like how each transmission line tower is
         | designed by someone for that specific location, even though the
         | overall design looks the same from tower to tower. There's just
         | so much to modern life that we take for granted these days.
        
           | raman162 wrote:
           | That's true, I guess that is the beauty of an interdependent
           | society.
           | 
           | I have this longing thirst to become as independent as
           | possible but it just seems pointless considering how far
           | we've advanced as a society.
        
       | lights0123 wrote:
       | The company I work for has a robotic solution for road painting,
       | but we focus on things that would normally require stencils:
       | https://roadprintz.com/
        
       | dang wrote:
       | Stub comment for off-topic replies to
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28356187, which is now
       | pinned to the top.
        
         | bArray wrote:
         | Thank you.
         | 
         | They really wouldn't need to spend so much on hosting fees if
         | they were willing to do a text-only version - the main website
         | is heavy as hell. I'm sure many people would be willing to pay
         | for it.
         | 
         | Also these days I don't consume regular content from sources
         | that do not provide an RSS feed.
        
           | kiba wrote:
           | I doubt hosting fee are the bulk of expenses at NYT. More
           | likely human labor is the major cost.
        
             | capableweb wrote:
             | Knowing how wasteful IT is, especially in large
             | organizations, I think the hosting fees are probably higher
             | than you think.
             | 
             | I still think you're right though, human labor is likely
             | more costly.
        
         | rootusrootus wrote:
         | Also just turning off javascript with uBlock Origin makes it
         | work fine for me.
        
         | 3pt14159 wrote:
         | When this becomes common for non-techie forums, I worry about
         | what will happen to archive.org. I don't mind paying for news,
         | but there really aught to be something better than what we
         | have.
        
           | NortySpock wrote:
           | The truth is paywalled but lies are free...
        
         | eplanit wrote:
         | Thank you. That, plus reader mode, makes it actually readable.
        
           | unethical_ban wrote:
           | The presentation has a lot of video you're missing out on by
           | using reader mode.
        
       | gumby wrote:
       | Unreadable for me as reader mode doesn't work
        
         | kbenson wrote:
         | It's a slideshow presentation. Does reader mode usually work
         | for those? (honest question, I don't use reader mode often so
         | don't really know)
        
           | gumby wrote:
           | Most of the time, yes, it does.
           | 
           | Even in most slideshows, much less most articles, the text is
           | all I really am interested in anyway.
        
       | dekhn wrote:
       | There's a lot of roadwork on 101 in the Bay Area and so I see
       | many different lines being painted, scraped up and moved.
       | Recently I was curious how my new car, which has automated lane
       | keeping, handled various situations, like: 1) no lane markers.
       | Just lots of recently paved black asphalt across multiple lanes
       | (seen near SF recently). 2) conflicting lane markers. the
       | previous markers were "Scraped" physically off the road, leaving
       | a large high contrast mark. The new markers weren't painted on
       | well, so it was hard to tell which was the new road and the old
       | one. 3) various ambiguous areas where lines change from one type
       | (solid white to yellow)
       | 
       | The car didn't handle any of those situations well. I had a hard
       | enough time with the first two that I'm not surprised.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-08-30 23:01 UTC)