[HN Gopher] CIA report into shoring up Afghan war support in Wes...
___________________________________________________________________
CIA report into shoring up Afghan war support in Western Europe, 11
Mar 2010
Author : salemh
Score : 29 points
Date : 2021-08-24 19:55 UTC (3 hours ago)
(HTM) web link (wikileaks.org)
(TXT) w3m dump (wikileaks.org)
| criticaltinker wrote:
| Summary:
|
| _> This classified CIA analysis from March outlines possible PR
| strategies to shore up public support in Germany and France for a
| continued war in Afghanistan. _
|
| _> The proposed PR strategies focus on pressure points that have
| been identified within these countries. _
|
| _> For France it is the sympathy of the public for Afghan
| refugees and women. _
|
| _> For Germany it is the fear of the consequences of defeat
| (drugs, more refugees, terrorism) as well as for Germany 's
| standing in NATO. _
|
| _> The memo is a recipe for the targeted manipulation of public
| opinion in two NATO ally countries, written by the CIA. It is
| classified as Confidential /No Foreign Nationals. _
| nickff wrote:
| Thanks! These do seem to be the most important points, though
| I'm not sure that tailoring one's message to the audience is
| really 'manipulation'.
| l332mn wrote:
| This is how American propaganda works, not only to support the
| Afghanistan war, but to support US imperialist foreign policy in
| general. It's extremely manipulative, but also effective at
| controlling the narrative, in a 1984-esque fashion. It has lead
| to the result that the "official narrative" as portrayed by
| mainstream media and (complicit) politicians stands in stark
| contrast with the general public perception on the matter. It's
| basically taboo to be critical of the widespread use of
| propaganda to support imperialist policy, and you're generally
| deemed a conspiratorial lunatic if you point at CIA's role in all
| this in a manner which is critical both of them and the state
| which support them.
|
| Where are all the journalists scouring wikileaks for real news?
| For real content, investigating the dark underbelly of foreign
| policy and war, etc.? Why are we only served with manufactured
| consent (i.e. bullshit) from BBC, CNN, etc.? When it comes to
| war, they eagerly repeat the manufactured lies about our
| "enemies", be it Saddam's WMD's, Assad's chemical missile
| attacks, Gaddafi's genocide - all exposed through wikileaks to be
| lies manufactured by "intelligence" agencies, in conflict with
| facts and evidence at hand at the time - which then serves to
| justify intervention on "humanitarian" grounds, but which is
| merely pretext for imperialist aggression. It's taboo, most of
| all for journalists, to take an interest in this. They are barred
| from mainstream media outlets, shunned even. Some are even killed
| (cf. the investigators of the Panama Papers). You will receive no
| financial support if you do, and you will be judged a foreign
| state actor if you're freelancing for non-western media outlets
| (e.g. RT).
___________________________________________________________________
(page generated 2021-08-24 23:02 UTC)