[HN Gopher] Many invasive plants are still being sold at garden ...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Many invasive plants are still being sold at garden centers
        
       Author : malingo
       Score  : 102 points
       Date   : 2021-08-22 16:55 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.smithsonianmag.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.smithsonianmag.com)
        
       | legohead wrote:
       | Russian Hogweed [1] [2], which the Russians actually bred and
       | initially controlled, is a huge problem over there. Interesting
       | plant, which burns you if you get the sap on your skin (reacts to
       | sunlight), so you can't just go chopping them down willy nilly.
       | And even if you do, it grows back. They have to be destroyed
       | methodically. They grow at an incredible rate and dominate
       | whatever is around them.
       | 
       | [1] https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/03/opinion/sunday/russia-
       | hog...
       | 
       | [2] http://www.russiaknowledge.com/2020/07/14/the-day-of-the-
       | gia...
        
         | flycaliguy wrote:
         | The seeds spread during floods and can last 15 years before
         | sprouting. What a nightmare. We've got it down river, not much
         | in my town. I'd actually love to see it in person.
        
         | quercusa wrote:
         | Giant Hogweed: https://www.dec.ny.gov/animals/39809.html
        
           | godelski wrote:
           | I didn't know this plant would burn you. I've seen a lot of
           | it around the Pacific Northwest. It grows like crazy and is
           | really tall.
        
         | zabzonk wrote:
         | More commonly (at least in the UK) known as "giant hogweed" -
         | they are very toxic and unpleasant.
        
       | bawolff wrote:
       | Finally, a plant i can keep alive!
        
       | ahnick wrote:
       | I'll see your cogongrass and raise you trumpet vine. I kid you
       | not, every 3 weeks during the summer I am out cutting back the
       | vine on top of my pergola that is a good 6 feet from my house and
       | it still feels like I'm losing the war. This thing drops seeds
       | all over the place and vines start sprouting from all the beds
       | and grass. If it reaches a tree it starts to climb it like crazy
       | and if it touches the house for long enough it will suction on to
       | the mortar/woodwork and you will have a devil of a time getting
       | it off. (https://www.botanicalamy.com/warning-about-invasive-
       | plants/)
        
       | Alex3917 wrote:
       | If you can't keep your property free of invasive plants, the
       | government should seize it and auction it off. Right now a big
       | part of the reason why real estate is overpriced is that the
       | costs of maintaining it are artificially low, because the
       | government allows people to push externalities like this onto
       | their neighbors. The government shouldn't be forcing the poor to
       | subsidize the rich.
        
         | kQq9oHeAz6wLLS wrote:
         | > If you can't keep your property free of invasive plants, the
         | government should seize it and auction it off
         | 
         | Don't take this the wrong way, but that's a little unhinged.
         | It's a terrible idea to give any governing body this much
         | power.
        
         | technothrasher wrote:
         | I have about seven acres of woodlands on my property that are
         | littered with invasive plants. If the government is auctioning
         | off my property because of them, they're either going to be
         | auctioning it off over and over, or somebody is going to have
         | to strip the entire forest bare.
        
           | Alex3917 wrote:
           | Or it'll get split up. The point is that people shouldn't be
           | allowed to own more property than they can steward
           | responsibly. That said, if _everyone_ in an area gets rid of
           | all their invasive plants, then it 'll be vastly easier to
           | keep them from coming back.
        
             | perl4ever wrote:
             | >if everyone in an area gets rid of all their invasive
             | plants, then it'll be vastly easier to keep them from
             | coming back.
             | 
             | I think this is a denial of what "invasive species" are,
             | and even evolution itself.
             | 
             | An invasive species is something that thrives in many
             | environments and outcompetes natives.
             | 
             | Since humans have become concerned about such things,
             | loopholes in human thinking, behavior and social
             | institutions are necessarily _part of_ the fitness function
             | that makes something invasive.
             | 
             | People can target something specific on a micro level, but
             | at a high level, "invasive" will itself evolve to whatever
             | works because people are psychologically or institutionally
             | blind to it.
             | 
             | Have you ever tried to mow thistles or vetch?
        
         | gruez wrote:
         | >Right now a big part of the reason why real estate is
         | overpriced is that the costs of maintaining it are artificially
         | low, because the government allows people to push externalities
         | like this onto their neighbors.
         | 
         | Sounds like a HOA would be prefect for you.
        
         | bavell wrote:
         | The horror of nature must be subdued! Down with our plant
         | overlords!
        
       | metabagel wrote:
       | Not only that, but in SoCal, it seems there are a dearth of
       | landscapers who are familiar with and can obtain native plants.
        
       | ourmandave wrote:
       | _...the study concludes that consumers need to be more aware of
       | what they are buying.
       | 
       | "...it's clear we as a public also lack awareness about which
       | plants are invasive and how they spread to new areas," Beaury
       | says.
       | 
       | One good thing: the study is generating interest by enforcement
       | agencies who want to crack down on illegal sales._
       | 
       | "Whoa, I just saw old widow Johnson down the street doing the
       | perp walk. What was her crime?"
       | 
       | "Opening planting cogongrass in her front yard."
       | 
       | Speaks directly up at US AG dept drone hovering nearby, "Uh, I
       | never did like her."
        
         | JadeNB wrote:
         | > One good thing: the study is generating interest by
         | enforcement agencies who want to crack down on illegal sales.
         | 
         | > "Whoa, I just saw old widow Johnson down the street doing the
         | perp walk. What was her crime?"
         | 
         | > "Opening planting cogongrass in her front yard."
         | 
         | Cracking down on illegal _sales_ is highly appropriate, and
         | very different from cracking down on people who (presumably
         | unaware of the risks) _plant_ it.
        
       | EGreg wrote:
       | By the way, I would like to make this linguistic comment:
       | 
       | While the headline is misleading, it is also technically correct
       | in an interesting way
       | 
       | The article says "ONE OF the world's most invasive weeds." Let's
       | suppose it was #22 on the list of all known invasive weeds ranked
       | by invasiveness
       | 
       | But as a MEMBER of that group, one can legitimately label it as
       | "A world's worst invasive weed" and then drop the "A"
       | 
       | Interesting techique to make hyperbolic claims that are
       | technically true due to the rules of English!
       | 
       | Do people do this elsewhere?
        
         | leephillips wrote:
         | Huh? Dropping the "A" changes the meaning.
        
           | EGreg wrote:
           | Yes it does but it is often acceptable
           | 
           | "The rockettes have done xyz"
           | 
           | "A rockette has done xyz"
           | 
           | "Rockette does xyz"
           | 
           | Rockette here is used as a category of people, a label. She
           | is a member of "The Rockettes"
           | 
           | Similarly, "most invasive weed" is a member of "THE MOST
           | INVASIVE WEEDS" group, and dropping the "a" is done in
           | newspaper headlines a lot, things are often contracted such
           | as Politico or Prez or POTUS etc.
        
             | kyralis wrote:
             | This is false. This would be true for "invasive weed", but
             | adding the "most" qualifier without another modifier
             | indicates a specific member, not any member of a set.
        
         | bavell wrote:
         | I don't think you can drop the "A" while preserving the
         | original meaning. Without it, an implicit "The" is assumed:
         | "World's worst invasive weed" => "(The) World's worst invasive
         | weed"
         | 
         | Or at least that's how I interpret it as a native speaker!
        
       | thebeardisred wrote:
       | They lost me at: > However, the study concludes that consumers
       | need to be more aware of what they are buying.
       | 
       | I can't "slow clap" enough for this statement.
        
       | susiecambria wrote:
       | My HOA recently approved an environmental stewardship policy and
       | plan. Among the requirements: plant natives first. You'd have
       | thought the people supporting the plan were proposing to kill
       | members' grandchildren. The rhetoric was unreal for such an issue
       | that no one had ever really thought about.
       | 
       | It doesn't help that local hardware stores and the biggies sell
       | fewer natives than non-natives.
       | 
       | Both the policy and the plant sales significantly matter here: we
       | are in Virginia a stone's throw from the Chesapeake Bay. Doing
       | right by the environment (plants, wildlife, water) is important
       | in its own right but the beauty of the environment is also why so
       | many people moved here to retire.
        
         | sokoloff wrote:
         | > My HOA recently approved an environmental stewardship policy
         | and plan. Among the requirements: plant natives first.
         | 
         | It's quite possible that people were objecting to the general
         | expansion of powers/policies of the HOA and the "environmental
         | stewardship policy" rather than this specific clause. (I'm not
         | the type to willingly buy in an HOA area, so I can sympathize,
         | even if I'm fine with this one clause.)
        
           | Alex3917 wrote:
           | > I'm not the type to willingly buy in an HOA area
           | 
           | The problem is that there's a hard trade-off between private
           | property ownership and walkability. If you want to live
           | somewhere where you can walk and bike to restaurants, houses
           | inherently need to be close together. And when houses are
           | closer together on smaller lots, there is more value to
           | having communal property, and to keeping private property
           | cohesively managed. In short, the more walkable a
           | neighborhood you want to live in, the more game theory pushes
           | you toward forming HOAs, co-ops, etc.
        
             | sokoloff wrote:
             | We're in a part of Cambridge, MA with relatively small
             | lots. I've supported every neighbor's application for a
             | permit or variance, even when I really didn't like the
             | aesthetics of what they were building.
             | 
             | I don't think it's my place to care what windows you have,
             | what color your door is painted, if your hedges are trimmed
             | to the regulation height, or whatever other ridiculous
             | policies HOAs can dream up.
             | 
             | There's a sidewalk out front. If you don't like the look of
             | my house, I invite you to look at something else while you
             | walk past; I'll do the same.
        
         | nerdponx wrote:
         | I recently visited Kennebunkport, Maine (yes, the fancy town
         | where the Bush family lives), and they apparently had some kind
         | of wildflower initiative that was incentivizing people to grow
         | native wildflowers instead of the typical manicured mulched
         | gardens I see in the northeast. Not only was it _more_
         | beautiful than the usual, but it seemed to enhance the
         | quaintness of the place (especially given how overrun by
         | tourists it was).
         | 
         | People are ridiculous. So afraid of change!
        
         | massysett wrote:
         | Does the plan apply to homeowners' private property or only to
         | HOA property?
        
           | kQq9oHeAz6wLLS wrote:
           | It's an HOA, their job is to tell people what they can do
           | with their private property.
           | 
           | HOAs basically allow you to pay a monthly fee for the right
           | to dictate what your neighbors can do on private land they
           | own, in the name of preserving property values.
           | 
           | Some love them; I think it goes without saying I'm not a fan.
        
             | massysett wrote:
             | It was just a question. I know that HOAs can tell people
             | what to do with their property. However, many HOAs own
             | substantial tracts of land in their own right. It could be
             | that this rule OP describes pertains only to the HOA
             | property and not to the private property of the homeowners.
        
         | Alex3917 wrote:
         | > You'd have thought the people supporting the plan were
         | proposing to kill members' grandchildren.
         | 
         | That's crazy, considering that policy is likely adding an
         | absolutely insane amount to everyone's property values. When
         | NYC re-landscaped The Highline to make it exclusively native
         | plants, property values in the area literally went up 10x.
         | 
         | I live in a HOA, and the first thing I did when I moved in was
         | to dig up all the forsythia along our driveway and replace them
         | with grafted pawpaws. Planting nice trees is the only home
         | improvement you can make where you can spend $50 and add
         | $100,000 to your property value. The returns are literally like
         | getting a chance to go back to 2011 and buy Bitcoin.
        
           | paulcole wrote:
           | > When NYC re-landscaped The Highline to make it exclusively
           | native plants, property values in the area literally went up
           | 10x.
           | 
           | Any source on this?Because it seems like Highline-adjacent
           | properties probably would've seen a pretty good ROI over the
           | past 10 years regardless of what plants were up there.
           | 
           | > Planting nice trees is the only home improvement you can
           | make where you can spend $50 and add $100,000 to your
           | property value. The returns are literally like getting a
           | chance to go back to 2011 and buy Bitcoin.
           | 
           | Any source on this one? I work with arborists and even
           | they're not quite so gung-ho on promoting this kind of
           | return. And $50 is getting you a sapling that's going to take
           | (maybe) decades to maximize any return.
        
             | Alex3917 wrote:
             | https://www.mansionglobal.com/articles/the-high-line-s-
             | halo-.... Talks about an apartment that went from $350,000
             | to 3.15M.
             | 
             | As a more general principle, try to buy any good pawpaw
             | cultivar. If you look peacefulheritage.org, which is
             | probably the top grower in the country, they go one sale 1
             | day a year and completely sell out in 20 minutes. You need
             | to license the same software that people use to scalp PS5s
             | to even have a chance to buy one. There literally isn't any
             | consumer product on the market that has this high of an
             | asymmetry between supply and demand.
             | 
             | If you go to the estates of any wealthy families, e.g. the
             | Rockefeller estates or the Getty estates or whatever, the
             | one thing they all have in common is really nice trees.
             | Picking out trees for the new Apple campus was the last
             | thing Steve Jobs did before he died. If it's an
             | exaggeration to say that being able to buy nice trees is
             | the entire point of having money, it's probably not by
             | much.
        
               | paulcole wrote:
               | > Talks about an apartment that went from $350,000 to
               | 3.15M.
               | 
               | $350K in 1997 to $3.15M in 2016. Probably hard to find a
               | property in lower Manhattan that didn't appreciate like
               | that.
               | 
               | > If you go to the estates of any wealthy families, e.g.
               | the Rockefeller estates or the Getty estates or whatever,
               | the one thing they all have in common is really nice
               | trees.
               | 
               | Post hoc ergo propter hoc.
        
           | qweqwweqwe-90i wrote:
           | Yeah, I'm sure it was the native plants and not the 100s of
           | millions spent in re-development.
        
       | MattGaiser wrote:
       | > Other invasive species being sold include Japanese barberry,
       | Chinese privet, whitetop, Norway maple, Brazilian peppertree,
       | Russian olive, garlic mustard, yellow star thistle, Canada
       | thistle
       | 
       | Who are these people who want to own a thistle, yet alone pay for
       | one?
        
       | onecommentman wrote:
       | "The researchers discovered that 61 percent of 1,285 invasive
       | plant species remain available through the plant trade, including
       | 50 percent of state-regulated species and 20 percent of federal
       | noxious weeds"
       | 
       | What is invasive in Georgia can be well-mannered in West Texas or
       | North Dakota. Barberry is not invasive in the high deserts, where
       | it continues to be a valued ornamental. Russian olives can raise
       | havoc in riparian areas, but be fine for areas where birds can't
       | spread the seeds to moister soils.
       | 
       | There is a "patchwork" of state regulations because there is a
       | patchwork of climatic zones and ecosystems in the US. There is no
       | mention in the article that, although nurseries sell invasives,
       | most nurseries have policies not to ship invasives to the
       | individual States where they are identified as such by local
       | authorities.
       | 
       | Saying that, non-invasive natives are generally better, but not
       | so much better that non-natives (that could be invasive in other
       | climates) don't have a role to play in landscaping and gardening.
       | Skip the giant hogweed....
        
       | ineedasername wrote:
       | I thought it would be Kudzu, but nope. Though Kudzu is still
       | mentioned.
       | 
       | It's kind of amazing that weeds are a real life example of where
       | "kill it with fire" is actually a realistic and appropriate
       | response, and less harmful than herbicides.
        
       | temp0826 wrote:
       | >> Other invasive species being sold include Japanese barberry,
       | Chinese privet, whitetop, Norway maple, Brazilian peppertree,
       | Russian olive, garlic mustard, yellow star thistle, Canada
       | thistle, kudzu and Johnsongrass, among others, the study states.
       | 
       | Part of me wants to plant a garden containing all of these to see
       | which one wins
        
         | jacobsievers wrote:
         | Add Oriental Bittersweet, Black Swallow-wort, English ivy and
         | Chinese Wisteria to this list and you've got my back yard. The
         | winner every year is the Wisteria. It cannot be killed.
        
           | technothrasher wrote:
           | I'm waging a constant war on my property with Oriental
           | Bittersweet. It can't be reasoned with, it can't be bargained
           | with... it doesn't feel pity or remorse or fear... and it
           | absolutely will not stop. Ever. Until you are dead.
           | 
           | My parents, on the other hand, thought it might be fun to
           | plant a little bamboo patch about twenty years ago. They now
           | have an entirely uncontrollable forest of the stuff.
        
         | maxerickson wrote:
         | My street is lined with Norway Maple and barely any seedlings
         | at all come up.
         | 
         | The Siberian elm next door and oak down the street end up with
         | many more seedlings in the yard than the maples.
         | 
         | I can see it being a different situation in a yard adjacent to
         | a stand of more natural trees though.
        
           | Alex3917 wrote:
           | Some Norway Maple cultivars are more invasive than others.
           | The main problem with them though is that they release
           | allelopathic chemicals from their roots which inhibit the
           | growth of other native plants, trees, and fungi.
        
             | cmrdporcupine wrote:
             | The previous owners planted a bunch of them on our acreage
             | here and they're also really annoyingly brittle vs the
             | native maples. They get damaged in storms easier. I'm
             | constantly cleaning up from them.
             | 
             | I'm currently resting my legs on a coffee table made from
             | the trunk of one that came down in a burst storm some years
             | ago. It's a soft maple but quite nice for wood working.
             | 
             | Just biding my time until the natives I planted next to
             | them grow up a bit more and then I will take them all down
             | and get them milled up.
        
             | quercusa wrote:
             | I lost a number of shrubs planted under one before I
             | thought to look that up. I am plotting its demise even now.
        
         | peanut_worm wrote:
         | My money is on Kudzu
        
         | abnry wrote:
         | Careful you don't get arrested for running a plant-fighting
         | ring.
        
         | e40 wrote:
         | Based on driving through lots of rural NC, SC.. kudzu will win.
         | Hands down.
        
         | EGreg wrote:
         | Underrated comment
         | 
         | (And that's saying a lot considering its upvotes lol)
        
         | sydd wrote:
         | Different weeds have different strategies. There is one that
         | specializes in wildfires (cheatgrass): it has a large root
         | system and burns very easily, so it "awaits" to be burned: no
         | one but their root system survives the fire, so it can grow out
         | quickly again after the fire.
        
         | mixmastamyk wrote:
         | Don't forget the gorse:
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulex
        
           | test1235 wrote:
           | This stuff is all over scotland where I am - it's like
           | nature's barbed wire
        
             | robaato wrote:
             | A favourite in the golf community (I grew up in Hopeman -
             | east of Inverness)
        
             | smcl wrote:
             | Where I grew up too (NE Scotland). It does smell very nice
             | every now and then then, like coconut
        
         | josh_today wrote:
         | Throw English ivy in there too
        
           | gbrown wrote:
           | Unkillable.
        
           | zabzonk wrote:
           | My (late) parents had all sorts of ivy in their garden for
           | about 40 years (that I know about) with few problems. Ivy is
           | great for birds - home for insects for them to eat, berries
           | to eat too, and places to nest.
        
             | chrismcb wrote:
             | Ivy may be great, but if it isn't native then it can be bad
             | for the local ecosystem. I've got some in my backyard and
             | it smothers everything else except the pine trees (and even
             | those three ivy would eventually take down) I just finished
             | removing the blackberries. The ivy is next and then maybe
             | the holly
        
         | Jgrubb wrote:
         | Whichever one wins, you and your neighbors lose.
        
       | taylorfinley wrote:
       | I'm particularly sensitive to this as a native plant nerd here in
       | Hawaii. Home Depot and Walmart are filled with (beautiful)
       | invasive plants like Medinilla magnifica, Kahili ginger, Lantana,
       | so many others. I've spoken to the managers about it from time to
       | time but nothing changes.
       | 
       | I used to work at a botanical garden here on Hawaii Island that
       | boasted of their 6 different species of Medinilla, even selling a
       | fridge magnet in the gift shop. I tried and tried to explain how
       | backwards this was and how these magnets would be viewed by
       | anyone who knew or cared about fragile native ecosystems. Their
       | response always came down to something like "but these ones are
       | prettier." They also sold little bagged starts of two horribly
       | invasive plants! (Bamboo orchid and Kahili ginger)
        
         | RosanaAnaDana wrote:
         | On oahu the two biggest issues I see are with field bind weed
         | and Acacia confusa, but I am dry side. Neither are horticulture
         | atrocities, but t hff they are problems nonetheless. There
         | really is no excuse for HD to continue to sell these high
         | invasibility plants. States and local governments should be
         | able to sue suppliers like HD for damages considering the
         | millions that it costs to control these plants once they
         | escape.
         | 
         | If I see Andean pampas grass at a home depot again, I might
         | have a problem.
        
         | quercus wrote:
         | Hawaii's "fragile native ecosystems" exist only in your
         | fantasies of the past, or way up in the mountains where nobody
         | lives or farms. If Medinilla wants to invade an Albizia grove,
         | who cares?
        
       | thrill wrote:
       | Kudzu enters the chat.
        
         | alexpw wrote:
         | Kudzu enters the chat.
         | 
         | Kudzu enters the chat.
         | 
         | Kudzu enters the chat.
         | 
         | ...
         | 
         | Uh oh
        
           | ineedasername wrote:
           | RM43 enters the chat.
           | 
           | RM43 has issued the KILL command; Kudzu has been
           | disconnected.
           | 
           | .... 20 years later:
           | 
           | Cancer has entered the chat.
        
       | tyingq wrote:
       | I didn't see bamboo mentioned. It grows crazy fast. I don't know
       | if it's technically "invasive", but I imagine it's fueled quite a
       | few neighbor feuds.
        
         | vlozko wrote:
         | I assume you mean Japanese Knotweed? That stuff is nearly
         | impossible to fully remove.
        
           | meepmorp wrote:
           | I assume they mean actual bamboo, some species of which grow
           | over a meter per day. It's also incredibly hard to remove and
           | spreads very fast.
        
             | hkt wrote:
             | Simple solution, get a pet panda. The circle of life!
        
           | MichaelGroves wrote:
           | I doubt many, if any, would confuse the two. Bamboo is
           | notorious for being hard to kill. It spreads underground
           | using shoots, and those shoots can reemerge again and again
           | every time you chop down the bamboo patch.
        
         | asquabventured wrote:
         | Can confirm, once rented a house with bamboo in the backyard,
         | it's awful awful stuff and will spread very easily
         | 
         | The only way to keep it from moving further into yards or
         | gardens is to pour concrete trenches it can't grow thru.
         | impossible to eradicate entirely and while it's shooting new
         | sprouts up from the ground after its first day or two of
         | softness starts to get more wood like and are wicked sharp
         | easily being able to pierce through skin/clothes/shoes and
         | cause some nasty cuts.
         | 
         | No one should ever plant that stuff voluntarily!
        
           | ourmandave wrote:
           | If you could borrow a couple giant pandas from the local zoo
           | for a few days, that would be a win-win.
        
           | throwaway09223 wrote:
           | Bamboo is fairly easy to contain- just surround the area with
           | a 60mil thick plastic barrier. I've been growing bamboo for
           | two decades in my yard without issue.
           | 
           | It also won't spread beyond wet areas, so a lot of people
           | control it simply by not watering the surrounding areas.
           | 
           | In terms of maintenance, bamboo only shoots for a few weeks
           | in the spring - it won't grow at all for the rest of the
           | year. The real scourge in my yard are the weeds that grow
           | year-round.
        
             | asquabventured wrote:
             | At least in northern Virginia it sprouted shoots all spring
             | and summer and it was not in a wet/non draining area or an
             | area we ever watered.
             | 
             | Maybe different species have different growing
             | characteristics but the one we had was awful and constantly
             | was trying to creep from the side of the back yard into the
             | main lawn area.
        
               | throwaway09223 wrote:
               | I could see it being a lot harder to contain in the
               | south. I'm in a dry area in California and it won't grow
               | where I don't water.
               | 
               | There are definitely different species of bamboo. The two
               | main categories are running and clumping. Running bamboo
               | is the hardest to contain, with rhizomes that travel long
               | distances. Clumping bamboo spreads slowly.
        
           | stickfigure wrote:
           | Here in California we have a solution: Stop watering it.
           | 
           | Yellow starthistle, on the other hand, should be a felony.
        
         | erikerikson wrote:
         | Some is, some isn't.
         | 
         | We chose to back out of a house offer due to invasive bamboo
         | when the owner was unwilling to reduce the price to cover
         | professional removal.
        
           | echelon wrote:
           | That's a _really specific_ ask.
           | 
           | I feel like a different species sometimes when dealing with
           | humans that negotiate this hard. I tend to overpay and be
           | done with it so I can think about other things, but I suppose
           | that's leaving money on the table.
           | 
           | The last place I bought had a giant crack in the concrete
           | floor. Inspector said it was fine, so I just let it slide.
        
             | erikerikson wrote:
             | I have certainly accepted some large inefficiencies in a
             | purchase including the house I live in now.
             | 
             | This was a case where the seller had mowed back the bamboo
             | and placed weed barrier and fresh soil to hide it. There
             | hadn't been _any_ visible bamboo during the viewing that
             | precipitated our offer. About 3 days later we inspected and
             | found pervasive multi-inch long shoots of bamboo throughout
             | the yard including big shoots going into a supporting
             | shared wall with the neighbor and into the neighbor 's yard
             | as well as into the house foundation and siding.
             | 
             | To completely remove the bamboo we would have had a large
             | excavation that included tearing out and rebuilding the
             | entry walkway disrupting our use of the home. To pay
             | someone to do the labor, guarantee removal (there are
             | specialist companies), and perform the geo-engineering work
             | was estimated to cost 25-30K here in Seattle.
             | 
             | To be clear, we did ask the seller to reduce their price to
             | accommodate that work because we felt we had offered a
             | generous (and competitive above many competing offers)
             | price for the house. That price did not include removing
             | the hidden-at-the-time-of-offer bamboo. The seller didn't
             | like that which was their right. They rejected our counter
             | and months later sold the house for less than our offer
             | minus the cost of the bamboo removal.
             | 
             | [edit: planting invasive bamboo in your yard literally
             | reduces the value of your home]
        
         | xkcd-sucks wrote:
         | Bamboo is pretty manageable, it stops sending out new shoots by
         | midsummer and if you really want to eradicate it you can chop
         | it down and paint the stumps with herbicide.
         | 
         | Bittersweet OTOH is horrible, it colonizes everything,
         | strangles 100 foot trees, grows roots in every direction, and
         | makes tons of berries that get distributed by critters (I.e.
         | crosses roads and rivers from adjacent land even if you manage
         | to eradicate it on your own property)
        
         | 11235813213455 wrote:
         | they need wet soils though
        
       | gregjor wrote:
       | Hand-wringing by members of the ultimate invasive species.
       | 
       | I went with my son's middle school class on a field trip to the
       | Audubon Society preserve in Portland, years ago. The guide gave
       | the kids a long lecture about evil English ivy, explaining the
       | concept of non-native invasive species. Portlanders organize
       | groups to tear down the ivy in parks, often trampling the native
       | ferns in their zeal.
       | 
       | Not ten minutes later the same guide showed the class a family of
       | ducks crossing the path. Everyone oohed and aahed -- ducklings,
       | so cute. My son pointed out that they were mandarin ducks, a non-
       | native species. The guide went quiet.
        
         | nerdponx wrote:
         | Non-native is not necessarily invasive. The latter is a subset
         | of the former. The ivy is invasive, the ducks are just non-
         | native.
        
         | _vertigo wrote:
         | Is it possible that English ivy is worse than Mandarin ducks?
        
         | yosito wrote:
         | > Portlanders organize groups to tear down the ivy in parks,
         | often trampling the native ferns in their zeal
         | 
         | Sounds typical of Portlanders. Zealous about tearing things
         | down with no regard for the consequences.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-08-22 23:01 UTC)