[HN Gopher] DNA-RNA: What Do Students Think the Arrow Means? (2014)
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       DNA-RNA: What Do Students Think the Arrow Means? (2014)
        
       Author : Tomte
       Score  : 53 points
       Date   : 2021-08-21 10:25 UTC (12 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (europepmc.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (europepmc.org)
        
       | chromatin wrote:
       | Wow. This is very nice work in which the authors find that about
       | a third of undergrad students completely misunderstand the
       | physical process underlying information flow from DNA to RNA.
       | 
       | I teach the central dogma of molecular biology to learners at
       | multiple postgraduate levels. With the curse of knowledge, it
       | never even occurred to me how wrongly people might get this.
        
         | icedchai wrote:
         | Don't AP Bio classes still cover some of this? I remember it
         | being covered, at least at a high level, in my AP Bio class
         | back when I was in 10th grade.
        
           | parsecs wrote:
           | They still do, as someone who completed AP Bio a few months
           | ago.
        
             | icedchai wrote:
             | Good to know! I took it almost 30 years ago. (Yeah. I'm
             | old.)
        
         | Mordisquitos wrote:
         | Having studied biology myself, I am also amazed by the level
         | and the frequency of the misunderstandings that the authors
         | found amongst students.
         | 
         | By the way, relevant XKCD: https://xkcd.com/2501/
        
         | AprilArcus wrote:
         | I used to TA undergraduates in Molecular Bio. It was
         | demoralizing to see how many answers to midterm and final exams
         | were just regurgitated babble-stage nonsense. A hidden Markov
         | model could have outscored half my students.
        
           | crazydoggers wrote:
           | Well this is kind of what undergraduate studies are about,
           | yeah? Not every student who wants to go into molecular
           | biology is cut out for it. Hopefully when they meet a topic
           | thats too hard and the grading is tough but fair they'll put
           | their efforts elsewhere.
           | 
           | Maybe we should be encouraged that half would really
           | understand a Markov chain in biology?
        
             | foobarbecue wrote:
             | Only in the USA. Undergrad in the US is what high school is
             | in most of the developed world -- a time for broad learning
             | and exploration. Outside of the USA, if you're going to
             | college, you're getting serious and fairly specific. In my
             | experience, Americans take an extra four years or so to
             | grow up, because they're allowed to. (I'm not saying this
             | is good or bad.)
        
             | andi999 wrote:
             | The comment before didn't mean half know what a Markov
             | chain is, instead that their knowledge is not better then
             | one.
        
       | abhisuri97 wrote:
       | https://kraulis.wordpress.com/2015/11/04/why-do-so-many-scie...
       | Also an interesting read about how the central dogma was never
       | really meant to be presented in teh way that it is currently
       | presented (really was meant to focus on "information" flow
       | starting at DNA rather than show a definitive guide to the
       | transformations between these molecules in a cell).
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | woliveirajr wrote:
       | (it's a PDF file)
        
         | Causality1 wrote:
         | HN could really use some kind of tag for when a submission goes
         | to a file instead of a web page.
        
           | CamperBob2 wrote:
           | Why?
        
             | wizzwizz4 wrote:
             | It would be useful for many. I have several computers that
             | can browse the web but can't render PDF files (or run
             | PDF.js).
             | 
             | Things don't have to be useful for everyone to be a good
             | idea.
        
             | Causality1 wrote:
             | So my phone does what I expect it to do. When I open a link
             | I might be opening it in another tab to read later, or
             | switching to a different app while it loads, or something
             | else. If it's a file I'm going to get a pop-up asking me
             | what I want to do with it. Depending on where my finger was
             | I might open the file with the wrong app or dismiss the
             | pop-up making me either download it again or go find the
             | file in a file manager. It also clutters up my Downloads
             | folder with things I'm going to read or skim once and never
             | look at again.
        
           | ajsfoux234 wrote:
           | There is: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix
           | =true&que...
           | 
           | It seems that the submitter hasn't applied it
        
       | aaaaaaaaaaab wrote:
       | I remember that it was a video like this that made it click for
       | me in high school: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8M198uHJd_8
        
       | kasperset wrote:
       | html link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4041510/
        
       | Hayarotle wrote:
       | I've always found those articles studying common student
       | misconceptions and their causes interesting . There's quite a lot
       | of physics publications dealing with phenomenological primitives
       | and concepts learned in other disciplines and how they influence
       | students' learning of physics and might be misapplied. For
       | example, this one describing common misconceptions about chemical
       | bonding [1]
       | 
       | Some misconceptions are so strong and common that you might even
       | get teachers that have and propagate them. I remember having a
       | thermodynamics teacher who would insist it's impossible to reduce
       | the entropy of a closed (rather than isolated) system, despite
       | making it clear in their classes that you can reduce the entropy
       | of such system by work and / or heat transfer.
       | 
       | [1]
       | https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225227224_Some_Stud...
        
         | codethief wrote:
         | > reduce the entropy of a closed (rather than isolated) system
         | 
         | How do you define "closed" and "isolated"? In fact, this is the
         | first time I'm hearing of a distinction between the two terms.
         | In my experience, they are used synonymously.
        
           | Hayarotle wrote:
           | In a closed system, matter cannot be exchanged between the
           | system and the surroundings, but energy can be exchanged (in
           | form of work or heat). In an isolated system, neither matter
           | nor energy can be exchanged [1].
           | 
           | Those are the definitions used in thermodynamics, but they
           | might be conflated into a single concept in other
           | contexts/disciplines
           | 
           | [1] http://www.projects.bucknell.edu/LearnThermo/pages/Other%
           | 20T...
        
       | Shmebulock wrote:
       | So how does it really work? What does the arrow actually mean?
       | 
       | Is the point that the information on the DNA gets copied onto RNA
       | while the DNA remains intact?
        
         | wtallis wrote:
         | > Is the point that the information on the DNA gets copied onto
         | RNA while the DNA remains intact?
         | 
         | Close, but I think it's more that the information gets used to
         | _assemble_ the RNA, and the resulting RNA also encodes
         | information. Saying  "copied onto RNA" can imply that the RNA
         | previously existed in some kind of blank slate form.
         | 
         | So the arrow denotes a transfer/flow of information, but does
         | not denote a chemistry 101 style reaction that changes a
         | physical piece of DNA into a piece of RNA and then into a
         | protein.
        
           | hirsin wrote:
           | As an analogy - DNA is source code. The first arrow is the
           | parser and creates RNA that is a reflection of the DNA. The
           | second arrow (RNA to protein) is the compiler, taking the
           | parsed code (RNA) and generating a program (protein) from it.
           | 
           | At no point is the source code consumed to create the
           | program, akin to DNA.
        
       | kace91 wrote:
       | Just semi related: I find it curious that 3 out of the 4
       | universities have the same percentage of minority students (12%).
       | Is this figure a coincidence, or is it the result of some
       | specific policy?
       | 
       | ( I'm not American so I lack the context).
        
         | DiggyJohnson wrote:
         | I don't have a direct answer to your question, but that's very
         | close to the representation of black Americans in the total
         | population. That number is cited colloquially as 15%.
        
         | ineedasername wrote:
         | Most regional schools, as they get larger and larger, will have
         | a student body that reflects the regional population fairly
         | well. Three of these schools were private though, and small
         | private schools especially can have idiosyncratic student
         | populations. Apart from that, it's hard to say more without
         | knowing which schools these were.
         | 
         | (A regional school is one that draws students mostly from the
         | surrounding region instead of nationally/globally)
        
       | labster wrote:
       | Apparently transcribe is a technical term too complicated for
       | undergrads. I guess a third of college students have never read a
       | transcript before leaving high school. Terrifying.
       | 
       | When I was a tutor at my community college, I learned pretty fast
       | to explain concepts in as many different ways as I could until
       | the concept "clicked". Vocabulary is the gateway to
       | understanding. From reading this paper, it seems like people
       | didn't know what transcribe means, so they miss that the name
       | itself is an analogy and not solely a technical term.
       | 
       | It's kind of frustrating that people are doing bad at biology
       | because their English classes failed them.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2021-08-21 23:00 UTC)